UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Mr. Wm. Reinhardt (2) Page 2 January 16, 1952 I imagine that this may not be particularly satisfactory to the Chamber of Commerce of Las Vegas who have been making a lot of loose statements that as long as this application was on file the housing development of Las Vegas was being throttled. However, these statements are not borne out by the facts since we are continually receiving applications for new housing projects and such housing projects are being undertaken. Under the circumstances, I think we are in a better position to have this application remain on file subject to a hearing, if we deem it desirable, than to have had the hearing on January 22nd feeling as we do that our application would be denied.
