Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000091 103

Image

File
Download upr000091-103.tif (image/tiff; 23.68 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000091-103
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Los Angeles - August 7, 1952 8 0 -1 1 Mr. C.M. Batess cct Mr. dm, Reinhardt Mr. W.H. Hulsizer Mr. R.L. Adamson Referring to your letter of June 25th, your file 569# submitting copy of map and statement showing water-bearing lands to be acquired by the Water District and photostatlc copy of map entitled “Water-Bearing Lands owned by U.P.R,R.M, which shows certain sections lettered with the acreage and the value thereonj Z talked to Mr, Campbell in Las Vegas yesterday and he stated the district was considering the purchase of other lands and gave me the attached map. The map Indicates In red outline the 507 acres we have heretofore discussed. Apparently, the district Is now considering the purchase of the additional lands cross-hatched and shown in blue on the attached map, which would seem to be Indicated by the legend on the map, I think it would be advisable, therefore, prior to our meeting with the district, the week of the 18th, to have this map reproduced and have you indicate thereon, your opinion as to the values of the additional lands outside the 507 acres. I note that on the map they have these various parcels indicated by pare©! numbers although in your map you had them Indicated by letters. I also note that in some cases they have apparently tied two sections together and given them one parcel number. That is somewhat con­fusing in view of the lettering on yourearlier map and it seems- to me it would be better to give additional letter­ing to each of these sections or part-sections showing the acreage and the value. ^ 111; H |lf ?We should have sufficient copies to furnish /J«i Messrs. Reinhardt, Hulsizer and me copies and aiso^^f would appreciate return of the map handed you herewith. E. E. Bennett Ene EEBsAPK