Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

geo000665 19

Image

File
Download geo000665-019.tif (image/tiff; 104.65 MB)

Information

Digital ID

geo000665-019
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    A new and possibly very sig­nificant archaeological find has been made at the wrath end of Honey Lake, which m cm the bor­der between California and Ne­vada. ; Dr. Charles Rosaire and Dr, Richard Shutter ©f the Nevada State Museum ate investigating the find. On June I, while they were digging m post hole on their j ranch, Bill Wta$ and Jlis son discovered whaf appeared to fee some Indian remains. They im­mediately feported their find to Dr, Warren d’Az$v«i&, l ^ologist at the University of Ne­vada. When he notified the mu­seum, Dr. d?A*evedo was asked to take charge ? .at the *site un­til the museum staff could take ewer,. , Tfie Wests had found a burial | which contained some bird-bone (beads, 11 points clustered at the abdomen of the skefion as if they had been in a pouch, sever­al scrapers and a grinding stone which apparently had been placed oh top of the chest after the boy was buried. Burials are rarely found in I this area. Unfortunately, even (more rarely does an archaelo- ; gist see them before they have been disturbed. Experts can learn a lot from the position in which objects are found. If disturbed, the re­maining pile of bones and arti­facts is rhuch less meaningful than the same material intact. Us# Wests are to be corn-mended for the very responsible way they reacted to their find, ? Dr. d’Azeved© was particularly; impressed by th t vtry expert work of ypyng. Billy .West, a teenager, whom lie says ‘would make a very good arch&eolo*i gist.” The Wests left the skele­ton in position. They kept tour­ists and vandals away. They nofifitB responsible experts at once. ” If everyone who made such discoveries*, acted as th#.fWe§tSj have, a g r e ^ boots to m im m ? ’ Dr. d'Azevedo said. At the sit# the earth was care­fully sifted as it w§i removed from the burial, the location of the articacts in relation to the bones was noted, and Dr. d’Aze-vedo photographed the material. | Later, Drs. Shutler and Rosaire! visited the site and began identi- j fying and interpreting the vari­ous things they found. t Dr. Rosaire says the grave1 appears to be quite old and pre­dates historical time in this; area. The projectile points of j basalt and obsidian appear to; belong to the Martis culture; { other items seem related to J Kings Beach culture. Absolute! dates have not been assigned; to these cultures, and they may | have overlapped in time. 'Arti-j. das resembling both cultures j appearing in this grave is a hint | that this may be the case. The Honey Lake find is also! interesting because it indicates} the cultures had a wider geo­graphical distribution than had been established previously. Unfortunately, there was no charcoal in the burial* and ra­dio carbon dating is not possible. Although bones can be dated, ! they are so easily contaminated that the dating is not considered reliable. Each find of this kind adds a! few more pieces to the puzzle of the cultures of prehistory. If jail such discoveries were imme-jdiatelv reported to the museum or the university and excavation left to experts, our knowledge of prehistory in Nevada would advance much more rapidly than it has so far. Tuesday, June 25, 1963 LAS VEGAS SUM