Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000284 78

Image

File
Download upr000284-078.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000284-078
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    July 6, 1951 Mr. Reinhardt Page 6 “However, a p p lic a tio n f o r an exten­sion o f se rv ic e to any su b d iv isio n o r pro­posed su b d iv isio n , may be made a f t e r A p r il 13, 1951, and such se rv ic e w i l l be rendered i f the land o f such su b d iv isio n received i r r i g a t i o n se rv ic e f o r a crop th at has been ir r ig a t e d w ith in the tw en ty -fo u r (2 4) months immediately precedin g the date o f a p p lic a tio n f o r an exten sion o f service. “Nothing contained In th is ru le s h a ll be in te rp re te d o r deemed to prevent the Com­pany from complying with any su bd ivisio n agreement where a p p lic a tio n f o r service o r an extension o f se rv ic e has been made to the company on o r p r io r to A p r il 13, 1951. “No a p p lic a tio n f o r se rv ic e w i l l be accepted o r granted nor se rv ic e rendered f o r the purpose o f i r r i g a t i n g lan d fo r commercial a g r ic u lt u r a l purposes u n le ss such lan d re ­ceived ir r ig a t io n se rv ic e w ith in twenty-four (2 4 ) months immediately p reced in g the date o f a p p lic a tio n fo r se rv ic e o r extension o f se rv ic e . “This emergency ru le s h a ll be construed and a p p lie d only in conjunction with Paragraph (B ) Extensions to Serve T racts Or S u bd iv isio n s, Rule and R egu lation No. 19, Main Extensions, and s h a ll not apply to Paragraph (A ) General E xtensions, under said Rule and R egulation No. 19. “This ru le s h a ll not lim it o r r e s t r i c t in any manner whatsoever the g ran tin g o f service to new a p p lic a n ts , oth er than fo r su bd ivisio n s and ir r ig a t io n service as hereinabove p ro v id e d .“ I t would seem, th e re fo re , that fundamentally we would be p e r fe c t ly J u s t ifie d in making a p p lic a tio n to the Nevada Commission fo r a u th o rity to re fu se fu rth e r connec­tio n s and in my op in io n , such an a p p lic a tio n would undoubt­edly m a te ria lly a id in the proposed bond is s u e . However, I think se rio u s con sid eration should be given to the re ac tio n which the Water Company might get to such an a p p lic a t io n .