UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
4 Pag# 229• i Pag* 311. should be considered ram, and If the value of the land went down, that is, decreased In value, the value should be considered at some future time? Wehet Yes. Of course, I think you should give weight to the extent that the present value really represents the present value* If it decreases below the present value in a period of depression, when coats have fallen, the proper relationship should he maintained, in *sy opinion. Cannon: to Wshsi, The increased cost of the land at 1100 an acre, (up from a cost of 120.43 per sere) plus the rlght®-of-w®y at $400 an acre was also used in your computation of the original-cost and present-day-cost basis? • ;ehej those costs are reflected. Cannon: You say, ::r. Hah#, that there was no adjustment for the rights of way in the investment-cost basisj I think you figured 20 acres in rights of-way. Wehe: A small amount. Cannon: #2# an acre would fee £500 adjustment that would be required. ¥eh*s That is right. (Line 23),
