Information
Digital ID
upr000329-132
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.M r.H.C.Uutt ( 2 ) 8/&9/L2 in cars, transfers or other causes, there is ground fo r believing that there has been loss in tran sit, it would not he I lle g a l to adjust such claims in the same manner as other ordinary loss and damage claims are adjusted, hut to admit that the difference between the weight at the mine and the weight at destination raises the presumption that there has • been loss In route, would have the effect of n u llify in g the t a r i f f provision in question, fo r the weights at designation would con trol. X, therefore, agree with your conclusion, i f , as I understand i t , the investigation disclosed that there was no ground fo r believing there was loss by p ilfe rin g or otherwise en rout©$ I return your f i l e herewith* Very truly yours, H-G