Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000329 132

Image

File
Download upr000329-132.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000329-132
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

M r.H.C.Uutt ( 2 ) 8/&9/L2 in cars, transfers or other causes, there is ground fo r believing that there has been loss in tran sit, it would not he I lle g a l to adjust such claims in the same manner as other ordinary loss and damage claims are adjusted, hut to admit that the difference between the weight at the mine and the weight at destination raises the presumption that there has • been loss In route, would have the effect of n u llify in g the t a r i f f provision in question, fo r the weights at designation would con trol. X, therefore, agree with your conclusion, i f , as I understand i t , the investigation disclosed that there was no ground fo r believing there was loss by p ilfe rin g or other­wise en rout©$ I return your f i l e herewith* Very truly yours, H-G