Information
Digital ID
upr000314-002
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.m September 6, 193^» Ur. H. L. Adamson: R e fe r rin g to your l e t t e r o f September 5» 193^» - ' .. .. • • . • . . , ? ' « regard in g water supply a t K e ls o ( C a lifo r n ia : 1 do not fin d any requirement o f tb e sta tu te law re q u irin g the owners o f springs on open range to prov id e f a c i l i t i e s where stock can secure drin king water. However, as you probably know, the water law o f the s ta te i s q u ite com plicated. In the s itu a tio n you mention, i t i s p o s s ib le th at b e fo re we acquired the land on which the sp rin g is lo c a te d some p a r tic u la r stock grower obtained prospect i v e r ig h ts in the sprin g. I b is can only be determined by tra c in g back the circumstances under which th e land was acquired by u s, and determine whether our r i $ i t to th e sprin g is encumbered in any way. 2 - E, E. Bennett. MD:FC ’ *