Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
a o p t STATE or NEVADA PUBLIC SERVICE M W Carson City, Nevada Sovenber 25, 1981 Mr* S. £. Bennett, Gt&ei^X Solicitor Union Pacific Railroad 433 w. Sixth Street Los Angeles 14, California Lear Ed; On November 31 there was sent to the Las Vegas Land and Water Company at Las Vegas,' a copy of Las Vegas Land and Water Company first Revised Sheet PStS so. 3, cancelling Original Sheet PSCH So. 2, to become effectl e Decen&er 1, 1981, copy of which is enclosed for your files* The only change in this sheet is for bung?aow court (motel) and provider for m rate for the first unit instead of all units being based open the same rate. This sheet was revised by the Commission. In the Comission *s original opinion and order, dated August 24, 1981, bungalow courts and motels were assigned a rate of 11.10 per month for each living tacit without toilet or bath, and 11.65 per month for each living unit with toilet or bath. These rates were based on 10£ increase over the old rates in effect at the time of the hearing. The Commission is of the opinion that it was in error at that time in that it did not take into consideration the stipulation entered Into at the time of the hearing between the water company and the motel operator’s association in that any rate prescribed for motels for the first unit should not b# in excess of that prescribed for a private residence, which in this ease is $1.65, plus 3<¥ for each tub or shower, plus 50|f for each toilet. Wo also believe that the 65£ rate for each unit without kitchen and $1.15 for each unit with kitchen, and a rate of 2$ per 140 sq.ft, for irrigation is in line with the abo e-referred to stipulation. You will also recall that in the crier the Commission r talned Jurisdiction in the premises for the purpose of amending any rate, rule or regulation as it deems proper. I trust in view of the above explanation that your company will have no objection to the revised sheet becoming effective December 1, m. / LS$tCA ccs Las Vegas Land & later Co. Very truly yours, PUBLIC SERVICE COUtSlSSlOH OF NEVADA By signed Lee S. Scott Secretary Las Vegas, lev. Tim Nollner - ffltehin* Post Hotel Las Vegas, Nevada