Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000256 192

Image

File
Download upr000256-192.tif (image/tiff; 26.85 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000256-192
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    V Mr. Wm. R e ln h a r d t-4 - Overhead and Supervision 30.00 #327*93 We are able to collect under the Tariff" an amount of $4-0 only* Referring to the above estimate, where we include the cost of removing and replacing pavement, Mr. W. H. Johnson advised that we have an agreement with the city whereby the city will re-place pavement under situations such as the one at hand. However, I was advised by Mr. Doyle, our Superintendent, that# the agree­ment with the city with regard to replacing pavement refers to the replacement of pavement removed by us in connection with the re­pair of leaks only and does not cover situations where the Water Company cuts the entire width of street in connection with instal­lation of a new line. With reference to the above mentioned agreement with the city, I am advised by our forces here that this is not covered by a written agreement, but is merely an "understanding" with city authorities. I am also informed by Mr. Doyle, our Superintendent, that there are several other applicants for service lines who are familiar with Mr. Fong*s complaint in this matter and are Just waiting to see what the decision will be before making similar applications in their own behalf. It also seemed apparent that there are certain plumbers in the city who are putting the people up to making complaints of the nature made by Mr. Fong, and I believe the decision made in this case will be important^ from the standpoint of our future stand in connection with extension of