Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000331 64

Image

File
Download upr000331-064.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000331-064
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    C o lle c tio n o f dockage charges; Mr. T. P . C ullen, Superintendent, July 18, 1913. Dear S ir : I have your l e t t e r o f the 11th i n s t . j with f i l e , and w i l l take up the questions asked by Mr. B e ll in h is severa l le t t e r s . 1 s t . As to charging dockage fo r ve ss e ls docking at wharves fo r the purpose o f being fu e le d by the Standard O il Company; the vessels not coming to the wharf, however. This situ a tio n does not seem to be covered by the Ordinance, as i t provides that dockage s h a ll be charged " f o r the use o f any wharf” , the charge being " f o r the p r iv ile g e o f making fa s t to said wharves". X assume th at the barges o f the O il Company are anchored near our Wharves, and that the vossnla are fu e le d from these barges. I question Whether we can charge dockage in th is instance, and w ill in v e s tig a te the s itu a tio n and advise you fu r th e r , 2nd. With respect to charging dockage fo r lumber vessels WhVlKer they t i e up to discharge or take on passengers. In my judgment there is no question that we must charge dockage, and, as Mr, B e ll s ta te s , the Ordinance now provides that we may charge a prop ortion ate amount o f the charges provided f o r a 24 hour p erio d , w ith a minimum charge o f 20/, 3 rd , With respect to dockage against the Banning boats: I think we are e n t it le d to charge only one dockage where the same boat docks more than once w ithin the same 24 hoitrs; and we are only e n tit le d to make prop ortion ate charge o f tw en ty-fou r hour dockage fe e s fo r the actual amount of time the vessels are t ie d at the dock, but we are e n t it le d to a minimum charge o f 20/. I f d iffe r e n t vessels belonging to the same company dock w ithin the same 24 hour p erio d , I think dockage should be charged again st each v e s s e l. 4;th. The statement above with referen ce to Banning /‘boats would apply to the p a c if ic N avigation Company's b oats, were i t not fo y the fa c t that we keep .a berth open fo r these is s e ls a t a l l times , I w ish to discuss th is fea tu re o f the Ordinance with Z'