Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000008 125

Image

File
Download upr000008-125.tif (image/tiff; 100.39 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000008-125
    Details

    Member of

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    X X pfp L a s V e g a s La n d a n d W a t e r C o m p a n y OFFICES PACIFIC ELECTRIC BUILDING F1 A‘ WATERS' A<*T., LOS ANGELES, CAL. LOS ANGELES. CAL. AND W. R. BRACKEN, VICE-PRES. & AGT., LAS VEGAS, NEV. LAS VEGAS. NEV. Las Vegas, Nevada, June 18, 1919. Mr. J. Ross Clark, President, Las Vegas Land and Water Co., Los Angeles, Cal. Dear Sir: Acknowledging receipt of your letter under date of Jun 16th and referring to our conversation regarding the same subject when you were passing thru here yesterday in reference to the sale of Lot Seven in Block Five. I beg to advise that Miss Hickey’s statement to the effect thatr-! trad nfferedr^this^lot-for #2&0.00 is wrong. Miss Hickey, in trying to put over some smart deal, sent Mr. Waite here asking concerning the lot, and as Mr. Waite owns property abutting into this lot he stated to me that he wanted the same for a chicken house and pen, and could not pay $300.00. During the course of our conversation I told him to put up in writing the fact that he would pay $250.00 cash for this lot and I would submit his offer and approve same. Later on in the evening Miss Hickey inquired the price of the lot of me and as per our schedule fixed by the Board, I told her it was $300.00. She at that time said she had sent this man here and that I had offerred it for $250.00, but this was not a fact, and in this connection I would say that if a poor person was wanting to buy the same fot their own personal use, I would approve a price of $250.00, but in the case of one buying it for speculation as Miss Hickey is doing, I would most certainly not approve of any sale other than at our list price of $300.00. __ Hoping this explains the matter satisfactorily, I am Yours t.rnl v NUTT, LOS ANGELES. CAL. BARRY, AUDITOR, Los ANGELES. CAL. COMSTOCK, Secretary. Los Angeles, Cal. LEETE, Treas., Los Angeles, Cal. wrb/j Vice Pres. & Agt.