Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000149 79

Image

File
Download upr000149-079.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000149-079
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    l*as Vegan - October 1^, 19^9 e. * 2> ? e. b. OCT 17 194» f oo Hr, E. I. Bonnott ) Supplementing my letter September 15th regard- l«g reqaeet of the Hotel Owners Association that the hotel rate for water service be applied to motels and ante courts* set_t_l ed. aftIe wr& *o uurn cdoenrv etrhsea tiimopnr ewsistihon t hteh aPtu btlhieo maSetrtveirc veae Commission here October llthj however Oh&irman Allard phoned from Carson City this morning advising th&t considerable pressure was r i n g placed on the commission to have the hotel rate applied to motels. He requested tht t we file with the commission a rate for motels and auto courts differentiating from the bungalow court rate ehown in our present schedule, together with our definition regarding lawns and landscaping. He also requested that X contact the attorney for the Hotel Owners, Cleveland Schultz, with a view to compromising the matter to the satisfaction of the water company and the motel owners in order to avoid the necessity for a publio hearing on the subjeot. While \ it is true a rate for auto courts and motels is not sped- \ oleally provided for in our existing rate schedule* we have always considered them in the same category as a bungalow court. However 5 would like to get rid of the troublesome matter of adjusting vacancy allowances each month end if we could establish a flat rate perunnit that would have to ubse pIani cdo mrpergoamridslee,ss whether occupied or vacant it might nay Hy suggestion would be to offer them a flat rate of f 1.0 0 per unit without any additional charge for toilet f2a®c i. litfidesi ssuccoh nats irnesuteau rvaanctasn*c ys taolrleosw*a noseeer.v icAen yst aatdidointsi*ons! houses or trailers would of course be in addition to the motel rate, in accordance with our present practieo. 1 would rather do this than be forced to grant them the present hotel rate of about $0«h5 per unit* because of the importance of keeping our rate structure reasonably consistent. fhe charge of #1.0 0 per trailer hat been approved by the commission and if the |o.A5 rate were applied to motels it would result in tourists being penalized merely because they have wheel! under their abode, '