UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Los Angeles, December 28, 1953 Mr, %a. Reinhardt * Lea Angeles* Attached please find copy of letter free the Las Vegas Talley Water District, signed by Hr. Harry E. Hiller, dated December 23. 1953, relative to approval by the Hater District of installation of A?5 feet of 6-inch cast iron water sain to serve portion of Block 1, Boulder Dam Hcaesite Addition, las Vegas, Heir. In view of the fact that no decision has yet been made as to whether the Hater Company should secure three construction bids for every project in line with request of the Hater District, and in view of the position taken by the Hater District in the attached letter, I am advising the sub-divider in the ease at hand, as well as in all other oases where approval of the District is being held up by them, that approval of their project by the Hater Company A® being held up awaiting the approval of the Hater District® L. R. MAAO
