Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000279 212

Image

File
Download upr000279-212.tif (image/tiff; 26.88 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000279-212
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

fop tli© Production Company# such as e le c tr ic power, which almost doubled in 1950, need a n a ly sis, and Mr* Johnson is going to look in to that as w ell as to submit what b asic fig u re s h® can on p a y ro ll and other costs that re la te to the operations o f the D istrib u tio n Company* Likew ise, Omaha has been asked fo r a breakdown* We have made our revenue estimate fo r 1951, so that is completed. S im ila rly , fix e d c a p ita l, rate base fig u res and depreciation estim ates have been completed* This means that the work yet to be done re la te s e ss e n tia lly to operating expenses, Including the management fee assignments. With these b asic fig u re s , i t w ill then be necessary to set them up in proper form and make the necessary computations, including Federal income tax* In reference to the la t t e r , i t may be pointed out that since the in it ia l report was prepared, there has been a change in the Federal income tax law. The present revenue Act is somewhat more favorable to the sm all corporation in that the surtax rate does not be com© e ffe ctiv e u n t il a fte r the f ir s t #25,000 of net taxable income. This means a le sse r Federal income tax because o f the #25,000 exemption, Inasmuch as the sum of both the normal and surtax at the present time is s t i l l the 45$ used in the in it i a l report as one o f the bases of computation, and, as stated, the 80$ surtax portion, which o rig in a lly applied on the to ta l taxable income, now does not apply u n t il a fte r the f ir s t #25,000* The tax adjustment is on© of the p rin c ip a l reasons why the gross revenue d e ficien cy as te n ta tiv e ly com-puted fo r 1951 is le s s than that computed fo r 1950 under the 45$ income tax level* I had planned to work up some m aterial that would be h e lp fu l in supporting the ef$ rate of retu rn requested. In doing t h is , I d id not have In mind attempting to make an extensive study. Such a study and/or presentation might take and be dependent upon two avenues of approach? (a) The settin g up o f a ty p ic a l fin a n c ia l structure that a water u t ilit y sueh as the LVL&WCo* might have i f i t were operated as an independent corporation w ith bonds and preferred and common stock outstanding. The cost in money from such a set-up would then be developed;