Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000162 48

Image

File
Download upr000162-048.tif (image/tiff; 26.88 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000162-048
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    59 t attention is directed to Table I which shows that during the 4 years 1942 to 1945, inclusive, $160,482,97 was written off as an accounting transaction. However, during these same years, the Water Company not only failed to earn a fair return but, as a matter of fact, the net earnings were in the red to the extent of $54,628. Since this defense capital, so called, as a matter of fact, is represented by cast iron water mains that are presently used and useful in rendering water service to the regular customers of the Water Company, that capital, reduced by the regular depreciation accruals, is left in the rate base. For the Original Cost and Present-Day Cost rate base figures, as shown in Tables F and G, respectively, reserve requirements have been computed on somewhat shorter lives than currently employed. 1/ For the production facilities, the 4% depreciation rate as charged was not used, in its place lives corresponding to those em­ployed in the calculations on the Water Utility were followed. These on the Original Cost base yielded an average depreciation rate of ap­proximately 1.79$, or an equivalent average service life of about 56 years. For the Water Utility with a somewhat different composition of plant facilities, the average life is not greatly different, namely 51.6 years. This results in an average depreciation rate of about 1.94$. On the books, the composite life is about 64 years, and for a property that has had such extensive additions during the last few years, and with a dollar age of about 6 years, an expectancy of 45 years or more is viewed as sufficiently optimistic at this time in discounting the future. 1/ The 4$ depreciation rate was not looked upon as providing for depreciation alone, but for management expense costs that were not charged under the current method of billing.