Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000036 159

Image

File
Download upr000036-159.tif (image/tiff; 23.62 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000036-159
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    1 CQPY -> P,S, As will appear from what is previously stated la this letter, the provisions ©f the hill which X consider parti­cularly obj eotionable are the provisions of Section J* there are other* provisions In the bill which 1 do not favor. I think the provision of Section 2 of the bill which would eliminate the right of a person to be registered to represent a qualified corporation owning property in the district at a district election is objectionable. Also the protion of Section 5 of the Mil which would permit the dlstiret to take possession of condemned property after judgment while an ap­peal is pending is objectionable even though the district is required to pay into Court the amount of the Judgment. It is easy to Imagine the difficulties which would be encountered if the district had token possession of an operating utility and the judipaent of condemnation was thereafter reversed so as to require the retrial of the case# The orderly procedure is for the owner to stay in possession until final Judgment# I am not concerned with the provisions of Section k of the billfc nor the provisions of Section 3 not heretofore al­luded to, nor the provisions of Sections 6, f and 8 of the bill. S, E. Bennett