Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
V the character of the water production facilities and water-bearing lands of the Railroad Company and stated that the total Investment Cost as of December 31, 1950 of the total plant, excluding land, was $>773,554.20, that the Investment Cost of 679*42 acres of water-bearing land carried on the books of the Railroad Company was $>19,321,40, making a total Investment Cost for both plant and land of $792,375*60. Exhibit G introduced by Mr. Wehe showed the historical increase in the Investment Cost of such facilities and land at the end of each year between the year 1930 and the year 1950. Table B in Exhibit A showed the Investment Cost of these facilities as of December 31, 1949, broken down by classes of facilities. At the time .of the hearing the Commission did not question these Investment Cost figures nor did the City of Las Vegas. In fact Everett L. Clark, witness for the City of Las Vegas, based his testimony as to the proper rate base of the Railroad Company upon these basic figures and made certain deductions therefrom for depreciation, amortization, etc. (June Transcript 260). The Water Company also introduced evidence showing the estimated Investment Cost of such facilities and land of the Railroad Company as of December 31, 1951, but at the present time we will not refer to those figures. The fact is that no evidence other than that introduced bjr the Water Company as to Investment Cost or recorded book cost of the Railroad Company facilities was introduced in evidence. No issue was made with respect to the figures produced by the Water Company and the Water Company - 2 9 -