Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000319 4

Image

File
Download upr000319-004.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000319-004
    Details

    Member of

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    { con apta**is-*7~8«v ) i M »« p ia § m ust a l a nisi f M # S ** m $ p * smus # las Vegas, Kevada r/O July B, m 3 r Hr. i* 1. Bennett f css — Up * €>» KL Bates) With reference to the letter of fitf: 7i 1953i from Mr, Batee# concerning BID 2085# being an Extension R M « r of Audit Wo* 58126, KID 1031# covering g » f i ­nishing of water to Leonard K. Fayle, dba Quality Bakery* and requesting a termination of this agreement and tho preparation of a new agreement with lessees of Fayis, 1 am wondering about the terns of the proposed new agreement In view of Section t of the agreement between the Water Company and the Las Vegas Valley Water District, Section f of the aforesaid agreement provides# in part# as follows* **With respect to any water produced after the sale date free wells now or hereafter located in said shop grounds# the first forties* and each of them* agree that none of said water so produced shall he used except by First forties* or any of them* or corporations affiliated in ownership with first Forties or any of them." It is ay understanding that the Fallroad Company will he unable to furnish any so-called surplus water after said sale date, the proposed new agreement provides for a term of five years* Although our usual fora of agreement permits termination upon thirty days written notice, it seems to m that any new water contract should provide for a termination to be effective upon the so-called sale date* tUD 1031, Audit Wo. 58126# provides that it shall be automatically terminated without notice upon the termi­nation of the tenancy of the User, the tenancy User was terminated on Kay 2b* 1950 when Peed Audit 1911# conveying the property to the User# was executed. §gjj eequently, it would appear that we have been furnishing watts? under a contract which terminated three years ago and 1 am wondering if you do not think we should continue this practice without s new contract in view of the limi­tations imposed by the agreement with the Water District. I will appreciate your advising me how the proposed contract* as well ss future water contracts, should be handled. (sgd) CAX.VZN n. com