Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
SUB-DIVISION - Bonanza Village JOB TITLES—1946 Respectfully, LAS VEGAS — CLARK COUNTY JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION s/C. G. Petrie Planning Engineer Thereafter Commissioner Bates moved that the Board approve the recommendations of the Planning Commission and refer the matter to the City Manager for action. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clark, and carried by the following vote; Commissioners Bates, Clark and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Commissioners Baskin and Corradetti. The following letter of explanation as to the improvements of boundary streets of Bonanza Village was received from the Planning Commission: OFFICE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Honorable Mayor and Board of City Commissioners City Hall Las Vegas, Nevada Re: Subdivisions Bonanza Village Gentlemen: In accordance with your request for clarification of requirements for the installation of street improvements in the above tract, please be advised as follows. By action of the Joint Planning Commission at a meeting held September 5, 1946, it was held that it is not the intention of the Commission to obligate the developers of this tract to improve half streets on the North and East tract boundaries. The basis of this recommendation is supported on the fact that: 1. The State Highway Department anticipates the future improvement of the Right of Way on the North boundary (city limits) by inclusion on the State Primary System; and possible improvement of the Right of Way on the east by inclusion in the State Secondary Program. 2. Any improvements of these Right of Ways installed at this time may possibly be removed or reconstructed when the State designs and builds the anticipated routes. 3. Properties on the North and East boundaries have no access except to streets within the tract which are surfaced. Therefore, streets on the South and West boundaries should be and have been improved as the normal entrance and access streets to the tract and lots abutting thereon. It would appear that grading of the street on the north would suffice until other improvements are made, the street on the East already being open. Respectfully, LAS VEGAS -- CLARK COUNTY JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION s/ C. G. Petrie,_________ Planning Engineer Thereafter Commissioner Bates moved that the Board approve the recommendations of the Planning Commission as per the foregoing letter. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clark, and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bates, Clark and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Commissioners Baskin and Corradetti. The following recommendations of the City Manager relative to the creation of job titles for 1946 was presented to the Board for their consideration: August 30, 1946 In order to make some necessary adjustments in the organization setup to effect economics of operation and to establish positions for On-The-Job Training of Disabled Veterans, it is recommended that the following positions be created: having jurisdiction or ownership of the Kelso-Turner Project.