Information
Digital ID
upr000132-098
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.March 11,19^6 -»2- The Assessor, as previously stated, has the LVL&W water olant assessment in mind. He is not hound to accept the recommended Commission valuation, but may make ^ e ^ v a l u - ation. He stated he intends to inform himself thoroughly as to the methods pursued by the Commission in JJr***“f 1 valuation, and indicated that, being unsatisfied with that assessment he, as an accountant, could develop an independent valuation. These matters heretofore mentioned have been discussed with the Assessor, Mr. I. E. l I S S-nw. t r Allard* Chairman of the State public Utilities Commission and ex officio member of the Tax Commission who gen-exally c^txole the action of the Commission with respect to utility valuations. In vi*r"bf the fact the Assessor has stated he in-tend, in connection mentfi to increase t hwei tahs setshse ment of the Railroad. iaJnHa Jwrestv 1 rj&QsttSi sss ars tr^rsn xs&HSRHsrix property f | ^ the Railroad property. Charles