UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Mr.8*8, Bennett #3 ,4s stated toy you, It appears that tto® law in Mevada is similar ta that in California ami that a provision for liquidated d w m m s will not too enforced unless it is extremely difficult or impracticable to fix aotual damages, provided that the amount of damages so fixed is reasonable. However, because there is no prohibition in Nevada against liquidated damages, the defendant has the tourden of Showing that the provision for liquidated damages is a penally and therefore unesif oroitole • I understand the contrary is true in California Where the harden is e« the plaintiff to tooth plead and prove such faots as may to® necessary to validate his right to recover liquidated damages toy showing the is- practicability or extreme difficulty damages* of fixing aotual Sincerely, CHC/b C A LYU . M . H H
