Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000192 49

Image

File
Download upr000192-049.tif (image/tiff; 26.55 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000192-049
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Mm. Reinhardt - Los Angel®® 90i Mr. b»o H»» Bennett Mr. 0. M. Cory Mr. 0* M. Sates Please refer to my letter to Volley I&terprtses, Inc., doted December 3, 1953# relative to construction of substitute water line In the northerly portion of Lot H Parle Place Addition, Lae Vegas, Nevada and Agreements *li*L.B. 2669 end *N*L.!3. 2669-1 covering Agreement between L*Y.L.&tt. Co., and Valley f2nterprla»a, Inc., and Easement by Valley Enterprises, Inc., to L.V.L.S&. Co., respeotlvsly across said Let K. I received a call this morning from Mr. Mac Peck, President of Valley Enterprises, Inc., and he stated that he Is now faced with a law suit covering the location of the northerly line of Lot M and while he expects to win the suit, he feels that the easement as prepared by as and submitted to him on the basis of survey furnished me by Engineer Bronken of Las Vegas would not be proper if It was decided in the suit that the northerly line of Lot M was in a different location than that location on which the easement was based. Mr. Mao Peck stated that he inteded to hold up any answers to my letters but that his attorney would write me within a few days stating his case and explaining reasons why Mr. Mao Peck was unwilling to comply with the Agreement furnished him on July 1?, 1953# mentioned in my letter of September 3# 1953* I will furnish you a copy of letter from Mr. Mac Peck’s attorney when received. Las Vegas - Beoeatoer 1?,. 1953 W 2>-h-4 LHMirr L* R. Ma&g