Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000101 197

Image

File
Download upr000101-197.tif (image/tiff; 23.77 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000101-197
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

He: Sale'Of Las Vegas water ays tent Los Angeles, June 8, 1954 80-11 Mr. V. l;. House % (cc - Mr, A. Stoddard Mr, Wm. Reinhardt fir. B. M. Sutton Mr. L. B. Maag Copies of enclosures to each I enclose copy of letter dated June A, 1954, from Mr. Franklin T. Hamilton, attorney for the las Vegas Valley Mater District, to which are attached two let­ters dated June 3, 1954, from Nelson Conway, one of the auditors for the District. I suggest that we enter into an agreement with the District assigning to the District for collection only any amounts unpaid as of the sal© date for water fur­nished under Bate Item 91 for air-conditioning,, refrig­eration, ice-malting and other similar equipment. 1 en­close suggested draft of .assignment contract, copy of which I have al$o furnished to Mr. Hamilton for his con sideration. If you and Mr. Hamilton approve this agree merit, I will prepare it for execution by Mr, Reinhardt, whose execution can be ratified by the Board of the Wa­ter Company at its next meeting. You will note that the other letter from the ac­countants for the District refers to a difference of 118,500 in-the purchase price as of April 30, 1954• I believe this difference relates entirely to donations received by the Water Company under Rule 9 contracts with respect to fire hydrant connections. As soon as Mr. Hamilton receives the final report of the auditors of the District with respect to the purchase.price, I will endeavor to have him agree that this Item should be added to the Basic Purchase Price under, the'provi­sions of the. contract of June 1, 1953'* ? iWjfe'JIf. H '£ . & M r'T. 3 MCTBMHEliBBal •' StS? H •' • * / T IpaBj > > B , . ' -. ?=, 5/' £. E, .Bennett i s M i l l