UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
52 V I 1 CONCLUSIONS It would accordingly appear that the 42.5$ over-all average increase in water rates that is required to yield the Las Vegas Land and Water Company a reasonable earning is fully warranted and not excessive, because: 1. Such increase will only return a modest earning on a reasonable capital base. 2. That with the high quality of water furnished and the high per-capita consumption, the proposed rates on the average are low when compared with most water rates elsewhere. 3. That the increase is considerably less than the ^ * decrease in the purchasing value of the dollar suffered by the company. 4. That the general increase in income of the water users is far in excess of the increase sought for water service charges. r ^ r v f csj / V I 3? 0
