University of Nevada, Las Vegas law school planning: reports, correspondence, and clippings

 

 

PRE-LAW AT UNLV

Interested In a law career? Your success In law

school — and whether you're able to gain

acceptance In the first place — will depend upon

the preparations you make today as an

undergraduate.

That's why this booklet has been prepared for you

by the UNLV Pre-Law Advisory Committee. It

contains Information on the selection of a pre-law

curriculum, advice on the Law School Admission

Test (LSAT) and facts on law school costs and

admission requirements.

ADVISEMENT

From the beginning, you'll have a pre-law advisor

at UNLV who knows the trends In legal education,

who knows what the LSAT Is testing and

admissions problems you might encounter later

on. Your pre-law advisor will work with you and

an advisor from the department of your major In

planning a curriculum and testing program

tailored to your own strengths and Interests.

A LAW CAREER

A law degree can take you to worlds far wider

than the traditional courtroom. Throughout

American history, lawyers have been among the

great political and social leaders. You may have a

parallel interest in engineering or science which,

with your law degree, can lead you to a career as

patent attorney or into the field of environmental

law. Consider also corporation or tax law,

investigative and other legal work for law

enforcement agencies at all levels, or the newer

areas of poverty and consumer law. Many staff

members of the diplomatic corps and the

American delegation to the UN are required to

have a background in international law. You

might, of course, be a teacher at a law school or a

judge on the bench. The possibilities are many.

And salaries? While the average beginning

compensations may be relatively low, increases

over the years bring them substantially above

national middle-income scales.

If you are planning to practice law in Nevada, you

should know that the Nevada Bar does not

acknowledge schools in California that are

accredited only by that state. Nevada Supreme

Court Rule #53 states that to sit for the Nevada

Bar one must have graduated from an ABAaccredited

law school. In addition, Nevada does

not grant reciprocity to other states, so practicing

law in Nevada requires passing the Nevada Bar

exam.

THE LAW SCHOOL

First thing for you to be aware of is that there has

been a dramatic increase in applications to law

schools in this country. Since 1948, the number of

persons taking the LSAT has increased twentyfold;

law school enrollment has doubled; and,

after first and second year exams, 72 per cent

were still enrolled — a very high retention rate. In

the past decade, the number of women enrolled

has increased sixfold, and the number of

admissions to the bar has grown 150 per cent.

Obviously, the competition is heavy.

However, new law schools are opening,

previously non-accredited schools are improving

and gaining their accreditation, and in many

cases the established law schools are welcoming

more first-year students than before. As a result,

it may be noted that the ratio of applicants to

available seats has improved.

THE COST

The cost of a legal education, of course, Is

affected by the economy as much as any other

living cost. So, we can't predict accurately. As a

general guideline, we looked at 1975 costs at

several schools In the West. Tuition at public law

schools was approximately $500-700 for state

residents: and $1,060-2,400 for non-residents.

Books and living expenses ran about $2,500-

3,500. A sampling of private law schools put

tuition at $1,680 or more per year with living

expenses and books nearly the same as above.

Variations are expected If you are comparing

unlverslty-owned and private housing or

considering areas where costs of living differ or If

you are looking for accommodations for a

married couple or family. Even the availability of

fellowships varies from school to school. But, In

general, stipends are difficult for entering

students to obtain.

CHOOSING YOUR COURSES

There Is no single path of study that you must

follow for your pre-law foundation. Most law

schools do not specify any particular

undergraduate major as an admission

requirement. Because the law grows and

changes, because law-related careers are so

varied, your choice of a major will be decided In

part by your own Interests. Looking at the

background of others who have done well In law

school, you'll find majors In philosophy, English,

engineering, history, sociology, political science

and several of the majors In the college of

business.

We might mention three general skills you'll need

for your study and practice of law. First, there are

the verbal skills: vocabulary, accuracy, clarity,

precise and sound argumentation, the ability to

comprehend and Interpret technical material,

and a sensitivity to the semantic and logical

variations of language. Second, you'll need

knowledge of the democratic Institutions,

foundations and systems of justice, ethical

standards, political and economic systems.

Finally creative and critical Intellectual abilities

are essential, the ability to think and construct

argument with Ingenuity and Imagination.

GETTING DOWN TO SPECIFICS

Some clearly-defined skills must be attained. The

concept of an argument, its reasoning and

validity, is gained from a study of logic. Courses

such as statistics, economics and mathematics

provide skills in quantitative derivation and

interpretation of data. Writing ability is acquired

from many English, government, foreign

language, history and philosophy classes — or, in

fact, from any class where the instructor requires

high-quality essays based on readings or

lectures. Other courses you might include in your

study are accounting, ethics, argumentation and

persuasion. Above all, think in terms of courses

that are intellectually demanding, particularly in

the areas of reading and writing.

Two other categories are included: those likely to

enhance your knowledge of man, history,

society, and the present highest level of our

intellectual heritage, and those likely to enhance

your reading comprehension and writing skills.

LSAT PREPARATION

The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) will

compare you with other students across the

country who are taking the test at the same time.

Admission to almost any law school - and to all

ABA-approved law schools - requires this test.

Each person is ranked by a raw score (based on a

maximum of 800) and a percentile score. In the

latter case, for example, if you score in the 89th

percentile, this means 11 per cent of those taking

the test did better than you did. Your writing

ability is scored separately, with a maximum of

100.

In general the LSAT will examine reading

comprehension, vocabulary, reasoning, English

grammar, and ability to read material such as

graphs and statistical tables.

SUGGESTIONS

Following are some suggestions for improving

yourself in test-taking:

Pre-Testing. UNLV's Counseling and

Evaluation Center offers a great variety of

vocabulary, reasoning and verbal skill tests

which prepare you for the LSAT's. These

pre-tests are similar in type and difficulty

and they can be graded to point out your

particular strengths and weaknesses. Your

advisor may recommend that you take

these tests several times during your

college years to evaluate your progress and

your changing needs.

LSAT "dry runs." You can take the LSAT

itself a number of times. However, because

scores usually improve with such practice,

many law schools count the first score

unless a second score is more than 60 or 70

points higher. Your pre-law advisor will

guide you on this matter.

The Law School Admission Pre-Test. This

is another exam similar to the LSAT. It is

administered nation-wide several times

each year and it parallels the LSAT in

length, difficulty and conditions of stress.

While your exact program will be worked

out with your advisor, you can still consider

the following list as a sampling of courses

typical of those that may be of value to you.

ENG 110 Introduction to Semantics

ENG 201 Advanced Composition

HIS 201 American Constitutional History

HIS 202 American Constitutional History

HIS 212 United States, Birth of the

Republic, 1763-1789

HIS 213 United States, National Period,

1789-1850

HIS 220 England and the British Empire

PHI 101 Introduction to Logic

PHI 220 Logical Theory

PCS 104 Principles of Political Science

PCS 108 Introduction to Political Science

PCS 202 Public Law

PCS 204 Political Theory

PSY 234 Theories of Personality

see 231 Crime and Criminal Behavior

see 236 Sociology of Law

CRJ 232 Criminal Justice Process

ACC 151 Elementary Accounting I

ACC 152 Elementary Accounting II

ACC 210 Federal Tax I

ECO 101 Principles of Economics I

ECO 102 Principles of Economics II

ECO 251 Public Finance

BUS 202 Legal Environment

BUS 273 Business Law I

LSAT score: is that all there Is? Although a

remarkably high LSAT score might get you

admitted regardless of all other

considerations, it's more likely the law

schools will look at other factors, such as

where you studied, what classes you did or

did not complete, your grades especially

during the junior and senior years, letters of

recommendation, your resume, and the law

school's own version of a law school index

(LSI). Each law school prepares its own LSI,

a figure used to rank the hundreds of

applicants they are considering. Usually,

the LSI is a composite of LSAT scores and

GPAs, often adjusted for differences

among schools.

Example of a perfect LSI score:

(a) LSAT maximum, raw, is 800 800

(b) Writing ability maximum is 80 (xlO) 800

(c) gpa maximum is 4.0 (x200)* 800

Highest possible LSI score 2,400

Example of a score recorded by a recent

UNLV graduate:

(a) LSAT, raw, 500 500

(b) Writing ability (LSAJ) 55 (xlO) 550

(c) UNLV gpa of 3.2 adjusted by LSDAS*

was 3.1 (x200) 620

Student's total LSI score 1,670

(This student was accepted by two southern

California law schools.)

*The gpa is factored by the LSDAS (Law

School Data Assembly Service) before being

multiplied by 200.

Classes not completed. Part of the

interpretation of your transcripts involves

the "N" and "I" grades. Two or three of these

need not cause alarm, but 10 or 15 will

appear to be indications of low academic

capacity. Rather than stack up a lot of "N" or

"I" grades, either ask for help or drop out

until you are better prepared to study.

Classes taken. As stated before, no set

program is your golden key to law school

admission. Your grade point average is

evaluated according to the degree of

difficulty of the courses you took. A high

GPA in some notoriously easy program

won't get nearly the respect of a moderate

GPA in something that's a challenge which

demands extensive reading and the writing

of cogent essays. Some law schools may

indicate which majors have usually been

admitted or which tend to do well. Others

will welcome applications regardless of the

major.

Junior and senior year grades. Though

grades throughout college are considered,

it is not uncommon to do better in the last

two years. These are more accurate

indicators of your current abilities. Top

scores in a difficult major would be best, of

course, but a 3.7 GPA in the last two years of

a difficult major would probably count more

favorably than four years of 4.0 in a less

demanding field. In addition, avoid taking

pass/no grade options, as they make your

transcript harder to compare to others, and

hence, weaker.

Letters of recomtnendation. These can be

particularly valuable, giving the admissions

officer a chance to discover something

personal and concrete about you - rather

than just a statistic or GPA. Your best bet is

to request letters from professors from

whom you've taken intellectuallydemanding

courses which involved

research and written term projects, and a

letter from someone who knows you and

your work well.

Your resume. You and those writing letters

of recommendation for you will be asked to

comment on your leadership capacity, your

emotional stability, maturity of purpose,

and interests outside of school. Activities

which could indicate achievement in these

areas include holding student office,

working on the college newspaper,

participating in local political campaigns,

and involvement with church or secular

youth groups. Also important would be

community service among the poor, the

elderly or others in need of help;

commitment to programs such as VISTA,

Peace Corps or University Year for Action;

and internships in legislative or

administrative offices at the state or federal

level. Activities such as these indicate

initiative and capacity for achievement

beyond the basic intellectual abilities.

Pre-Law Advisory Committee

Ralph Roske, Director of Legal Education and

coordinator for Pre-Law advisement at UNLV,

has current information on law schools, costs,

policies and financial aid. The pre-law advisors

are Dr. Brock Dixon, Dr. Ralph J. Roske, Ms.

Sharee Schrader, Dr. Lome H. Seidman, Dr. Jerry

L. Simich and Dr. Craig Walton. The UNLV Pre-

Law Association is a student organization

concerned with these matters as well as the

possibility of a Nevada Law School. You are

invited to inquire about meetings and activities.

Bibliography

1. Pre Law Handbook: Official Law Scfiooi Guide

(Published by the Association of American

Law Schools and the Law School Admission

Council).

2. Levi, E.H. introduction to Legal Reasoning.

3. Gruber and Willdorf, Law School Admission

Test (Published by Simon and Schuster).

4. O'Donnell, Law School Admission Test.

(Published by Regency and Cowles).

5. Strunk and White. The Elements of Logic.

6. Lambuth, The Golden Book of Writing.

7. Pickering, Harold. Preview of Law Study.

8. Report of the Task Force on Project Utilization.

ABA, 1973.

9. World Peace through World Law by Grenville

Clark and Louis 8. Sohn (3rd Edition)

Harvard, 1966.

August 1975

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Office of Information and Publications

 

AUG-24-95 THU 8:41 PROVOST FAX NO. 8954054 P. 01/01

LIBRARY

SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Nancy:

Here's the list of law school materials I found in the archives. The first

number is the Archive number; the second number is the box number in that

archive; and the third number is the item number in that box. I've included

just a brief description of the material, too.

12:11:45 - "Law School Planning" (correspondence, 1968-73)

12:34:38 - background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74

22:10:48 - law library donations, 1974

22:27:34 - law school proposal, 1968

23: 2:37 - background materials, law school (1966 and 1973)

62:11:5-6 - Law School Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2.cc printed;

2cc 8^5x11 spiral bound manuscript)

65: 2:108 - law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973

68: 8:295 - single letter, 1982

88: 4 - UNLV Law School survey of studies, 1976

92: 3:7-8 - law school development account balances; law school library account

balances (computer printouts), 1983

96: 3:15-16 - law school questionnaire, 4.9.73; law school committee, 1979

Post-It* Fax Note 7671 i?- ZTH if- |1p a0g' ssk' (t ~

From 1 \ r~- Co./Dept. ~ tvfhACY H iWv. Co.

Phone #

i-3X #

L_ SOSo U-DAU

• „ .. _

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA. LAS VEGAS 4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY/LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89154/(702] 739-3252

Nancy:

Here's the list of law school materials I found in the archives. The first

number is the Archive number; the second number is the box number in that

archive; and the third number is the item number in that box. I've included

just a brief description of the material, too.

12:11:45 - "Law School Planning" (correspondence, 1968-73)

12:34:38 - background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74

22:10:48 - law library donations, 1974

22:27:34 - law school proposal, 1968

23: 2:37 - background materials, law school (1966 and 1973)

62:11:5-6 - Law School Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2cc printed;

2cc 8^5x11 spiral bound manuscript)

65: 2:108 - law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973

68:^^/8:295 - single letter, 1982 '

88: /¥ ~ UNLV Law School survey of studies, 1976

92: 3:7-8 - law school development account balances; law school library account

balances (computer printouts), 1983

96: 3:15-16 - law school questionnaire, 4.9.73; law school committee, 1979

•% X-'DR fV* C*v^'6\lW»

Ti

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS 4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY/LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89-154/(702) 739-3252

LIBRARY

SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Hancy;

Here's the list of law school materials I found in the archives. The first

number is the Archive number; the second number is the box number in that

archive; and the third number is the item number in that box. I've included

just a brief description of the material, too.

12:11:45 - "Law School Planning" (correspondence, 1968-73)

12:34:38 - background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74

22:10:48 - law library donations, 1974

22:27:34 - law school proposal, 1968

23: 2:37 - background materials, law school (1966 and 1973)

52: ii:5-6 - Law School Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2cc printed;

2cc 8%xll spiral bound manuscript)

65; 2:108 - law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973

58: 8:295 - single letter, 1982

3S: 4 - UNLV Law School survey of studies, 1976

92: 3:7-8 - law school development account balances; law school library account

balances (computer printouts), 1983

96: 3:15-16 - law school questionnaire, 4.9.73; law school committee, 1979

VtRSir/ OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS 4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY/LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89154/(702) 739-3252

Law School Archives

1. "Pre-Law at UNLV" brocure (2 c.)-

2. 62:11:5-6

Pedrick, Dean Willard H. and Professor Lome Seidman. Law

School Study for the University of Nevada^ Las Veaas.

4 c.

3. Jansen, Judge William D. Memo re Drake University

blueprints of law school, etc. Other info attatched.

January 26, 1990.

4. 88:4

UNLV law packet. Survey of studies.

5. Consolidated Students reminder letter.

6. "Factor E: Education, Existence, Emergence: In Epilog".

Spring 1975.

7. List of contents for boxes 3, 4.

8. Copy of list to Nancy re archive materials.

9. 96:3:15

Law school questionnaire.

10. 96:3:16

Law school committee.

11. 92:3:7-8

Law school development account balances; law school lobrary

account balances (computer printouts), 1983 [2 files].

12. 68:8:295

Single letter, 1982.

13. 65:2:108

Law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973.

14. 23:2:37

Background materials, law school (1966, 1973).

15. 22:27:34

Law school proposal, 1968.

16. 22:10:48

Law library donations, 1974.

17. 12:11:45

Law School Planning (correspondence, 1968-73).

18. Law school proposal file.

12:34:38?

Background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74?

Law School Archives

1. "Pre-Law at UNLV" brocure (2 c.)-

2. 62:11:5-6

Pedrick, Dean Willard H. and Professor Lome Seidinan. Law

School Study for the University of Nevada. Las Veaas.

4 c.

3. Jansen, Judge William D. Memo re Drake University

blueprints of law school, etc. Other info attatched.

January 26, 1990.

4. 88:4

UNLV law packet. Survey of studies.

5. Consolidated Students reminder letter.

6. "Factor E: Education, Existence, Emergence: In Epilog".

Spring 1975.

7. List of contents for boxes 3, 4.

8. Copy of list to Nancy re archive materials.

9. 96:3:15

Law school questionnaire.

10. 96:3:16

Law school committee.

11. 92:3:7-8

Law school development account balances; law school lobrary

account balances (computer printouts), 1983 [2 files].

12. 68:8:295

Single letter, 1982.

13. 65:2:108

Law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973.

14. 23:2:37

Background materials, law school (1966, 1973).

15. 22:27:34

Law school proposal, 1968.

16. 22:10:48

Law library donations, 1974.

17. 12:11:45

Law School Planning (correspondence, 1968-73).

18. Law school proposal file.

12:34:38?

Background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74?

sk 4 M fg / !Q

LOLAAJ OLi/tXtf, y C 5

LIBRARY

SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT

ilancy;

Kere's the list of law school materials I found in the archives. The first

number is the Archive number; the second number is the box number in that

archive; and the third number is the item number in that box. I've included

Just a brief description of the material, too.

1/12111:45 - "Law School Planning" (correspondence, 1968-73)

-'r3-5-34^5-36-'- background, correspondence, and support materials, 1973-74

\/j^24-i:0r46-- law library donations, 1974

y/ ^2 T27T34~~-Hbaxr-9ehoal--pxapQsal, 1968

^2'.37~- background materials, law school (1966 and 1973)

J J /y • 62:11:5-6 - Law School Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (2cc printed;

2cc 8%xll spiral bound manuscript)

j/--Tr5T"'2': 108 - law school advisory committee meeting minutes, 1973

y 8:295 - single letter, 1982

>/ S8-^;~4 - UNLV Law School survey of studies, 1976

^9-2^3;7-8——law school development account balances; law school library account

balances (computer printouts), 1983

y-96; 3:15-16— law school questionnaire, 4.9.73; law school committee, 1979

JMIVERSir/ OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS 4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY/LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89154/(702) 739-3252

 

National Need

1. 19?^ Existing Law Schools: About 40,000 Admitted

130,000 L.S.A.T. Tests Taken

110,000 Applied

Of the 110,000 who apt)lied probably 20,000 were well qualified!

2. The National number of first-year law students has doubled

from 1960-1970.

3. It is projected that by 1978-79 there will be:

214,000 L.S.A.T. papers graded

48,000 First year students enrolled

4. Most State Universitys and strong private law schools received

10 to 15 applications per first-year class positions available.

5. Capacity of the approved law schools to receive first-year law

students is exhausted,

6. 1973-74 = Virtually no empty seats in approved law schools.

7. Factors contributing to capacity enrollment,

A. Population growth (continuing relationship between 22 year

olds to first year law students)

B. Larger number minority group law students.

Mid-60's = a few hundred

1969-70 =2,500

1973-74 = 7.601

C. Substantial increase in female law students.

1963 = 1,883

1973 = 16.760

D. Relative slowdown in other professional field placement

compared to continued relatively strong law graduate placement,

"

E. Dissatisfaction with society's organization (earlier

campus riots gave way to interest in change thru the system

via the channel of law),

8. College poll re: career objectivesjIaw

YEAR SENIORS FRESHMEN

/ Males / Females / Mal^/"Females /

1966-67 5.9 %

1971 7.1 ^ 1.2 %

1973 6.7 fo 2.5

9. 1973 Nearly 11 % B.A's registered with L.S.D.A.S. seeking

law school admissions for 1973-7^.

10. There could be a substantial number less (applicants) and

still have sizeable excess of truly qualified law school

candidates,

11. Immediate future 5 years will show continued absolute increase

in applicants and continued acute shortage of available student

positions (as much as 3 times positions available in approved

schools and 8 to 10 times as many for state universities).

National Need (Cent)

Past growth in number of our society's lawyers and ability

of our society to absorb.

1951 = 1 t 696 citizens

1970 = 1 ! 572 citizens (still strong demand for law grads)

There are now 156 ABA approved law schools. At present rate,

it would require nearly 50 new law schools with first year

classes of I50 each to handle qualified applicants and receive

the additional 8,000 new students predicted by 1978-79.

STATE NEED

State statistics beneficial to law school establishment

Population doubled since i960

Increasing percentage of native-born population (higher

birth rate - lower death rate than nat'l average).

Increasing population stability

Highly Urbanized = B0.9 ^ (9th nationally in 1970)

1972-73 Nevada L.S.A.T, Applicants

160 took LSAT and registered with LSDAS

968 applications were filed (average of 5 + per person)

91 accepted (a number accepted by more than one school)

32+ enrolled (number believed higher than reported)

50-60 enrolled is closer figure probable

National norm is substantially higher"than above figures

1970 First-year enrollment, nation-wide, of 22 year olds

was 1.1 % thus

1972-72 Nevada had approx. 8000 22 year olds which should

have yielded 90 enrolled in first year law school.

Effect J Fewer young Nevadans are trying to study law.

Fewer young Nevadans are securing admission,'

Fewer young Nevadans are actually enrolling in

law school than one would expect.

Contributing Factors

A. NO VISIBLE LAW SCHOOL or law student examples, thus lack of

stimulation to study law.

B.COST of going out-of-state to law school.

Exi Calif, (draws most Nev. Law Students) Tuition.

1973-7^ Low $1,500

2,200 U. of Calif. System

Hixrh ^'^oP WcGeorge (602LSAT, 3.O5 CPA)

High 3.184 Stanford

These tuitions make total cost from $^,000 to $7,000 per year

a barrier impossible for many Nevada students, even if thev '

are accepted.

STATE NEED (cont.)

Fragmentary Survey - UNLV

130 Responses

89 Interested in attending Law School and would attend one

in Nevada.

7^ Would NOT be able to attend Law School out-of-state.

CAUSES!

A ) Cost

B.) Quota's. Active discrimination by most schools against

non-resident applicants. Restriction from 0 to 25 ^

out-of-state student limit. (197^ poll indicated

only 9 or 10 schools didn't restrict non-resident

admission. 33 did (15^ mean))

RESULTS! Young Nevadan with precisely same entrance credentials

as resident applicant will be passed over in favor

of resident.

EFFECT: Channels more non-resident applications to privatelyfinanced

law^schools making task of winning admission

even more difficult because of shear numbers of total

applicants. Thus: If our qualified students can't find

admission - why apply? NO MOTIVATION.

Qualifications

iiTS study of Nevada LSAT scores shows Nevadans as a very fair

sample of National youth. Thus, by ability level, Nevada

students SHOULD win acceptance to law school at same rate as

young people generally but, in fact, have lower rate of success,

.hus, lack of opportunity for law study within own state by

Nevada residents of sufficient ability and character, is a loss

to the entire state as well as the student.

Caused among those who do win admission due to their

differing economic advantages resulting in less affluent more

likely to be unable to accept their admission because of

overall costs.

OTAT-C. 0.aiN£.J?' 1T

Center for legal studies and research.

Provide states own law-trained graduates.

Benefits and service of professional school.

State will receive a variety of capabilities

disinterested attentionthru study and evaluation of

the state legal system and its administration.

Due to states predicted rapid growth , benefits will be received

thru research regarding (just a few examples). . .

A. law of property

B. law of landlord & tenant

C. law of real estate finance

D. laws regarding environmental nrotection

Ei laws regarding land^use planning*

7.

8.

STATS BENEFIT (cont^

Due to Nevadas predicted rapid increase in economic activity

(ax. commercial ana industrial development) benefits will be

received thru research regarding, , ,

A. law of corporations

B. law of securities regulation

C. law of commercial transactions

Research of system of criminal justice and its administration.

sjstif oJ^Nevidf' ^ legal

6.

7.

8.

IT •W I

V .

COMMUNITY BENEFIT (Attorneys)

1. Most of the same benefits as would be received by the state.

2. Adequate library facilities (Clark Co. Law Library incomplete).

3. Public Service Projects

4. Community Attorneys

A. Improve legal system

B. Continuing education

C. Improved research capabilities

nairer^^^"^^ Characteristics (32^ responses to I974 question-

A. Legal profession concentrated in urban areas.

B. 1/3 practice as individuals.

n' with partners or professional corp.

D. 69.5% are members of ABA (5th highest in nation).

Legal practice is diverse

lo"c??Jo?a?rilw°^ = business orientation,

2.) Taxation

3«) Administrative Law

Benefit minorities!

28,000 Negroes in Nevada

2^1,000 Women in Nevada

Practicing Bar recognizes that some of the most effective

continuing ed. programs comes from professional

memSbrs of law faculties, and continuing ed. is an

•ciQ A profession to the community. Some State

Bar Assoc. require continuing ed. for lawyers as a

for renewal of their license to prac^iJe/^oluntSry SonUnuing

Ikius!/"""^ updating lawjer^ .

Practicing Bar recognizes that areas of practice are mov^n^

toward specialization, thus a further benefit in having a

with continuing ed. for maintenance of

certification in a special area.

9. Adequate Library Facilities, Clark CO. Law Library incomplete.

GENERAL BENEFITS

1. Law School serves needs of society by providing law-trained

persons to administer the justice system for all members of

society.

2. Professional ed. opportunity to citizens,particularly lower

income group.

3. Professional training for public leadership.

4. Provide additional legal services, especially to lower income

groups.

5. Provide legal training and study of important problems peculiar

to or with special character in Nevada,

6. Provides independent source of critical analysis of court work,

and legislature and administrative agencies.

7. Possible para-professional training.

8. Assistance of legislature, judiciary and public administration.

9. Education of police and civil authorities regarding laws they

administer and enforcej constitutional citizen's rights.

10. Educate undergraduates, high school students and general public

about workings of legal system in democratic society.

UNIVERSITY BENEFITS

1. Enrich university image.

2. Opportunity for interdisciplinary research.

3. Almost no segment of scholarship and learning is foreign to

some tie with the law. Thus Library, legal scholars, and

capable students provide endless resourses to entire University

system.

4. Law faculty and students contribute to policy formation

legislation drafting projects along with other disciplines.

5. Sensitizing University Community to "due process of law" in

University affairs.

FUTURE - GROWTH

1. Expect continued growth in numbers (some leveling off because

of even more needed to affect percentage change).

FUTURE - GROWTH (cont)

2. Projected population of Nevada

1980 - 777,000

1990 - 1,082,000 (16 yrs. will almost double todays size)

2000 - 1,319,000

2020 - 1,564,000 (46 yrs will more than triple todays size)

3. Population distribution - area rate variations

Most growth - Clark Co. 1970 = 55.9 %

1980 = 62.7 %

Fast growth - Washoe, Carson, Douglas

4. Growth in Casino-Resort industries.

A. increased gaming tax revenues

B. increased employment

C. incomes in "support" industries

5. I97O-73 Employment in Nevada increased 3 l/2 times national rate*

6. 1970-73 Employment in Las Vegas increased 2 3/4 times nat'l rate.

7. 1970-73 Employment in rest of Nev, increased 4 1/2 times nat'l

rate.

8. Clark Co. area rapid population growth (55^ states population)^

demanding expanding justice systems, courts, prosecutors,

legal aid programs aided by clinics and intern programs in the

school.

FUTURE - NEED and

EMPLOYMENT

1. Increased admissions due to , , .

A. Larger population of young people.

B. Interest in law of minority and women,

C. Interest in public service opportunities,

2." It is believed that the Bar can absorb additional graduates.

3. It is believed that allied careers can absorb additional grads.

from a school of law.

4. Employment prospects for 1970s & 1980s Law graduates.

1970 - Attorney total in U.S. = 355,242 ) ^ ^ ny 2i

1973 - Enrollment in ABA approved schools = 106,102 ) ^^ ^

1973 - Law Degrees awarded = 27,756

1973 - Persons admitted to the practicing Bar = 30,075

5. Below you will find the answers to the following questions.

? Under present system can they be gainfully employed?

? What will happen to the status of the Bar?

? Will public suffer from an oversupply of attorneys?

? Although demand for lawyers is increasing, is its rate

rapid enough to absorb the supply?

? Are all fields of practice adequately staffed.

? Are all areas (geographically) adequately staffed.

FUTURE - NEED and

EMPLOYMENT

ANSWERS i Consider the following in answer to the before

listed questions.

A. Most of the standard arguments do not apply to a state

that has NO law school.

B. There is evidence of a change in the system of law. It

is beginning to restructure to meet needs of those not now

adequately served.

C. . Many law school graduates can and do seek employment in

affiliated fields rather than pure practice of law. Ex.

corporation legal staffs, law clerks for judges etc.

D. Employment of lawyers expected to grow moderately thru 1980s.

E. ABA Task Force 1972 "There is no conclusive evidence to

indicate that there are now, or are likely to be in the

foreseeable future, more legally-trained men and women than

can be satisfactorily and productively employed."

F. 1973-7^ law graduate placement hard to deduce because of

lack of factual information! however, law school placement

officers indicate that, due to population growth in certain

areas, placement has slowed a bit but market is relatively

strong. Placement slower in areas which show greater concentration

of law schools (east coast and Calif.).

G. Demand for legally trained persons is expected to be

sufficient to absorb supply of law grads.

H. Demand for Capacity of law schools expected to be insufficient

to accommodate qualified applicants.

I. Unlikely to be a genuine oversupply in future of legally

ed. graduates.

J. Nevada difficult to predict using national standards since

it is not a cross-section of the national economy, ie

Recreation over agriculture, mining and industry.

LAWYER POPULATION RATIO

U.S.A. / NEVADA

1970 ... Is 572 1:633

1.) Of Nevada's 773 attorneys <739 were listed in directory.

617 of 739 were in Las Vegas & Reno showing' very low

numbers in outlying counties.

2.) Of the 739 listed.

583 = private practice

139 = government service (Exec., Legis., & Judicial)

32 = private corp.

K. Future needs in Nevada are directly related to population

growth.

L. Nev. experience of past suggests need for legal services will

support placement of substantial numbers of new attorneys

each year.

FUTURE - NEED and

EMPLOYMENT

M. Nevada positions will hinge on development of new methods

for providing legal services for very much larger segments

of society* (As across entire nation;

N. Factors that will increase demand for legal services.

1.) Demand will grow in direct relation to population and

economic activity.

2.) Urbanized society draws heavily on those with legal ed.

3») Rural areas also need law services to be increased.

0. Majority of 6o to 80 new law graduates per year will find

places in conventional legal profession (parallel

experience of fast-growing Mountain States Region).

1.) Large Urban Communities

2.) Rural and smaller communities

3.) Positions wnere law training is useful but not required.

P. Possible Placement Positions

1.) Private practice

2.) Trust Officers

3*) Law enforcement personnel

4.) Court administrators etc.

5.) Insurance Operationss claims, investigation, adjustment

6.) Executive posts

7.) Police affiliated legal staff.

S.) Corrections administrators legal staff

9.) Prosecutor's Office s

10.) Public Defenders Offices To name a few

Q. Areas of possible specialization and causes.

1.) Growing number of legal questions (increased population)

2.) Supreme Court decisions extending counsel for lesser crimes.

3.) Consumer protection

) Safety

5.) Increased legal service use by mid-income groups

6.) Replace retiring lawyers & other natural openings

7.) Increased governmental regulation & legislation

-.) Changing methods of property ownership

9.) Criminal justice

10.) Counsel for indigents in misdemeanor cases

11.) Expanded counsel in civil cases

12.) Increased complexity of society in general in litigation

_ . , . To name a few

Total overall predictions Nevada new lawyers will encounter

about same placement opportunities as likely thru rest of

nation despite different nature of the states economy. One

advantage Nevada has is the expected economic expansion.

NEVADA'S FUTURE FINANCTA7,. ,

STABILITY ^

Nevada is not now spending excessively on higher ed.compared

to other states (per-capita income).

Nevada appears to have adequate economic base - compared with

other small population states supporting law schools.

NEVADA'S FUTURE FINANCIAL STA3IT.TTY (cont)

S. Nevada's economic growth provides tax resources available for

law school support.

^"'1960^197?'^^''^^^'^ percentage personal income growth in Nation

5. 1960-1970 = Las Vegas is third (3rd) city in nation in personal

income growth.

AC KN 0W LEDGEME N T

This has been a very brief summary, compiled by the Citizens

Ad Hoc Law^^School for UNLV Committee, Jan Gould, Chairman, of

portions 01 the complete and detailed Law School Study for UNT,V

which was researched and put together by Willard H. Pedrick, Dean

of the Arizona State University College of Law and Prof. Lome

Seidman, chairman, Dapt of Finance, UNLV, who gave us "their

greatly aporeciated permission to do this paper.

This paper was made as brief as possible for the rapid use of the

Nevada Legislators and other concerned citizens, and by no means does

apologies for not includinHfl o?

he valuable factual information, and the methods for deriving the

statistics herein included. ci.xvxri^ tne

Following this page are actual pages taken from the study itself

regarding the capital costs and operating expenses necessary to

establish and run a first-class law school.

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PRO.JECTIONS

Budget Projections.

(a) Budget Projections for the Planning Year

(b) Budgeting for the First-Year Class

(c) Further General Budgetary Projections

(d) Physical Facilities — Temporary and Permanent

Basic Assumptions;

To project costs for the planning year and the first year of operation

for a Law School for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, requires

certain assumptions concerning the nature and quality of the Law School

to be initiated. These assumptions will be the subject of extended

comment and explanation in the full Law School Study being prepared

for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. For present purposes, the

assumptions will be shortly stated:

(1) It is assumed that the planning year might be the fiscal

year, 1975-76. To secure the Dean and get the planning

activity under way at the beginning of the fiscal year

will require six months or more of lead time. One must

take into account the likelihood that the Dean, upon selection,

would probably have present commitments limiting his

availability to a part-time or part-year basis. It is

probable that the planning period would occupy all of fiscal

1975-76. During 1974-75, provision should be made to cover

a salary for the new Dean, or consulting fees for his service,

during the portion of the year before he is fully

on board.' Some additional funds for travel, secretarial

services and the like may be required. In addition, some

Provision might be required in 1974—75 to begin to plan

for the permanent home to be built for the Law School.

Interim costs of the sort just described are not further

elaborated. As a rough estimate, $50,000 probably

will cover costs to be encountered in 1974-75,

apart from any law building planning costs.

t

(2) Although the ultimate size of the Law School, within

would not greatly affect the cost of the planning

year or the first year of academic operation, it may be

well to state that the Law School envisaged by the Consultants

for the University will be the smallish, mediumsized

Law School. In concrete terms, an entering class

in the 70-90-student range is contemplated as appropriate

for Nevada, with its population, economic base and probable

absorptive capacity for law graduates.

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

(3) A school offering full-tirae or day classes only is contemplated.

If evening classes were to be added, additional

costs would be encountered. Total student numbers would

not seem to justify an evening program. To begin the only

Law School in the State of Nevada with both a day and evening

division school would prejudice the quality of school in

absolute terms as respects total financial costs and in

terms of prestige, taking into account of the fact that

some evening division schools are not adequately financed

and, accordingly, do not stand high in the world of education

.

(4) Although the costs of the Planning Year and the first year

of academic operation would not be much affected, the Law

School envisaged for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas,

would be a school adequately financed to undertake what

has come to be described as "Law Center" function —

embracing, among other things, responsibility for development

of programs of Continuing Education for the Bar, responsibility

for organized legal research to assist the Legislature

and other branches of Government and further functions

characteristic of Law Centers. The cost of those added

functions, which extend beyond the central responsibility

of educating law students, will appear most significantly

in budgetary projections for the second and third years of

the Law School's operation.

(5) The capital costs for the Law School, notably capital costs

for the Law Library and for the Law Building, are separately

treated .

(6) The inflation factor as to all items of cost will require

adjustment of the figures here presented to take account

on lapse of time between the present projection and the

actual incurred expenditures.

(7) The budget figures offered in this Memorandum are intended

to proyide adequate financing, even if development should

be fully on schedule. That is quite unlikely. Even though

a Dean were fully on board at the start of fiscal 1975-76,

there surely would be an appreciable delay in recruitment

of other key personnel. Accordingly, it is likely that

there will be substantial underexpenditure in both the

Planning Year and the First Year of Operation. Those

apparent economies will fade, however, as personnel and

program catch up to the planned scope of activity.

APPENDIX PART VI. BUD'^ET PROJECTIONS

(a) Budget Projections for,the Planning Year :

The salary figures used are set substantially at the level of the

median salaries for law deans, librarians and law professors. The

national figures, as reported by the Section of Legal Education of

the American Bar Association, reveal that, in the Mountain States Region,

salaries at the better law schools — Utah, Colorado, Arizona and

Arizona State -- are at or above the national median figures. It is

not contemplated that the University of Nevada should endeavor to

lead the way on salary levels in legal education. The assumption,

rather, is that salaries for law faculty in Nevada should be competitive

with the good Law Schools of the Region.

(The figures are offered in terms of 1974-75 dollars.)

(1) Administration — Dean's Office

Salaries

Dean

Associate Dean

Secretary

$ 36,000 - $ 40,000

$ 27,000 - $ 30,000

$ 8,000

(Administrative

Assistant)

Clerical Assistant

(Wages) $ 6,500

Total $77,500 - $84,500

(2) Law Library — Salaries and Wages

Salaries

Librarian

Assistant Librarian

Cataloguer

Secretary

Part-time Help

$ 23,000 - $ 28,000

$ 14,000 - $ 17,000

$ 12,000

$ 6,000

(Wages) $ 5,000

Total $60,000 - $68,600

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

(3) Operations — Brochure, Bulletin, Application Forms,

Travel, etc.

Salaries

Brochure, bulletin, $ 7,000

application forms

Travel $

Office equipment and $

office supplies (typewriters,

dictating

machines, desks, photo

copy equipment)

Telephone £

Total

Planning Year

8,000

8,500

2,500

$26,000

Total Planning Activity

Law Library Capital

Total

$179,100

$100,000*

$279,100

(b) Budgeting for the First-Year Class;

(Figures used here are cast in terms of 1974-1975

dollars and an inflation factor will be required.)

(1) Administration — Dean's Office

Salaries

Dean

Associate Dean

Secretary

(Administrative

Assistant)

Secretary

Clerical Employee —

technical (course

materials, reproduction)

Office A.ssistant

(Secretary for

Admissions)

Outer-Office Receptionist

and typist

Travel

Total

$

$

$

40,000

30,000

9,000

6,500

7 ,500

$ 7,500

$

(2)

12,000

9,000

$121,500

*Plus $150,000 from private funds given for Law Library development

.1

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

(2) Instruction

Faculty (4)

Faculty Secretary (1)

Operations (xeroxing

and reproduction of

course materials, office

supplies, telephone,

student organizations,

financial assistance. Law

School Paper or Newsheet,

visiting lecturers' expenses

and honoraria and

annual Bulletin or Catalogue

of the Law School)

Capital equipment for instruction

(typewriters, desks,

equipment for reproduction

of course materials) $

Total

5,000

Salarigg

$100,000

$ 6,000

$ 35,000

$146,000

(3) Law Library — Operating Costs

Librarian

Assistant Librarian

Cataloguer

Reference Librarian

Secretary

Part-Time Personnel

Total

The total first-year operating budget

(excluding capital for Law Library and

Law Building).

Salaries

$

$

$

$

$

$

29,000

17,000

14,000

12,000

7,000

6,000

Law Library Capital

$85,000

$352,500

$100,000*

First-Year Operation Total Budget $452,500

*Plus $150,000 from private funds given for Law Library development

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

The Law Library Capital Requirements — Planning Year and Thereafter;

Although the standards of the two accrediting organizations, the

Section of Legal Education of the American Bar Association and the

Association of American Law Schools, both specify required minimal

library holdings, it is generally recognized that accreditation of

a new law school is not likely to be extended if the library holdings

simply meet the bare minimum. This position of requiring more from

newly-organized schools is formalized in the 'Policy Statement on

Accreditation of New Law Schools" issued by the Association of American

Law Schools. The same policy is, in fact, administered by the Section

of Legal Education of the American Bar Association. Accordingly, for

a newly-organizing school, a first goal for the law library of 50,000

volumes by the end of the third year of the school's operation (which

would coincide with the graduation of the first class) is an acceptable

and feasible goal, assuming adequate financing. The second goal would

be to achieve a collection of 100,000 volumes by the end of the sixth

year of the school's actual operation.

To meet the first goal, in terms of law library development, would

require, in the early years of the school's life, capital in the

range of $500,000 to $700,000. It is difficult to estimate, in

advance, the actual cost of the beginning collection. There may be

fortuitous and advantageous acquisitions. On the other hand, more

recently published material is becoming very expensive, indeed. There

is, as well, the matter of the extent to which a new law library may

wish to go for microfiche or other book substitutes.

In the year of planning and development before enrollment of the first

class, at least $250,000 should be available for library capital ex— •

penditure (including, in that term, a modest.amount for book binding

and, of course, for shelving). An additional $250,000-$300,000 should

be available for the second year, when the first entering class

actually arrives on the scene. Thereafter, in light of the inflated

condition of the dollar. Capital outlay of $150,000 per year for the

law library should continue, at least until the second goal is reached

and probably $125,000 thereafter, as the dollar will be subject to

continuing erosion in terms of real purchasing power.

Accordingly, to arrive at the overall budgetary requirements for the

projected new Law School during the Planning Year and during the First

Year of Actual Operation, there must be added to the direct operational

costs outlined the capital needs for the library. In addition, of

course, there is the matter of physical facilities.

Ill* Further General Budgetary Projections;

After the first full year of operation, the school will receive its

second entering class. The following year, the school would be in

full operation with three classes in residence. There will be a sharp

/

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

upward movement in the budget when the original entering class moves

into its third and final year. Teaching in small groups, small sections,

seminars and in clinical activities characteristic of the final year

will substantially enlarge the faculty and supporting staff. The Law

Review should then be in full operation. At that point, the school

will be fully operational and its costs will be those of other good

law schools for the Region.

In 1973-74 in the Mountain States Region, the better law schools

ran with budgets that reflected per-student costs (exclusive of

maintenance, depreciation and overhead) in the range

to $2700. A school in the 200-250 student range a bit more

expensive on a per-student basis than one in the 400-500 range.

A per-law-student operating budget cost of $3000 per student,

current dollars, is believed to be a fair price to enable quality

legal education under wise administration.

With a student body of 200 to 250, a good Mountain States Law

School in full operation at the current level of costs

costing from $500,000 to $800,000, in current dollars, depending

on the rate of Law Library growth and Law Center function activity.

Enlarged enrollment and enlarged function will require a larger

operating budget. Projecting that figure ahead five years will

provide an estimate for the then to be encountered operational

costs. By 1979-80, it is probably very optimistic to

per-student costs will be as low as $3500. A figure of $4000 for

the Mountain States Region would be more realistic, but the proD

lem basically is to gauge the pace of inflation. The Consultant

has no crystal ball on that front.

(d) Physical Facilities — Temporary and Permanent;

(1) Temporary Accommodations. In the first year or two of the life

of a new Law School, it is assumed that the school will be housed in

temporary quarters. The object here is to estimate roughly the requirements

for the temporary interim physical facilities needed fof

the beginning Law School. The space needs and the estimated requirements

for the first two years of operation are as follows:

Classroom (1) 1500 sq. ft.

Student lounge and

study area (1) 1500 sq. ft.

Offices (for Dean, ^ _

Associate Dean, four

Professors and two

Administrative

Assistants) 2800 sq. ft.

Secretarial Offices 450 sq. ft.

Reception 250 sq. ft.

Library (stack space,

- study space and

,• library staff work

space) 4000 sq. ft.

; T o t a l 1 0 5 0 0 s q . f t .

.1

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

The nature of temporary housing for the first year, or two of the law

school is not of critical importance. It may be possible to find

space in an existing building not committed to other uses. On the

other hand, a number of the recently established new law schools lived

satisfactory lives in temporary housing specially erected for the

purpose. Vvhat is important is that the functions enumerated have their

space and that the space be reasonably comfortable and usable. Of

prime importance, of course, is library stack space to accommodate

the rapidly-developing law library.

Should a Law School be initiated, it is assximed that provision would

be made for a permanent home for the school hopefully by the end of

the second year of its operation, as the temporary space outlined would

not be adequate for the third full year of operation with three classes.

(2) Permanent Physical Needs. For a student body in the 200-250

student range, with the satellite functions characteristic of a Law

Center — including responsibilities in the field of Continuing Education

and Legal Research — a building in the range of 60,000-80,000

gross square feet: will be required.

It should be borne in mind that legal education is presently in a

transition period — moving actively towards skill-type instruction.

The teaching of the skills of advocacy, of pleading, of interviewing,

counseling, drafting and negotiating require a much more intensive

use of teaching staff. This means a relatively larger teaching staff

with varied needs, both for office space and teaching facilities.

Accordingly, the Law School building of 20 or 30 (or even 10 years ago)

is not really adequate for the activities to be expected as a part of

a modern law school operation. Any law building for a Law School

built in Nevada should, as well, be built both with an eye for future

expansion to cover both increased numbers of students and additional

functions on the part of the Law Center.

APPENDIX PART VI. BUDGET PROJECTIONS

SUMI4ARY OF BUDGETARY PROJECTIONS FOR LAW SCHOOL

For Pre-planning Year (1974-75); $50/000.

Planning Year (1975-76):

Operations $179,100.

Library Capital 100,000.*

Planning Year $279,100.

First Year of Operation (1976-1977):

Operations $352,500.

Library Capital 100,000.*

First Operational Year $452,500.

*Plus $150,000 each for two years from private funds given for

Law Library development

Note: As explained in the text, the actual expenditures

are likely to be substantially below the

budgeted amounts, because recruitment of personnel and

expenditure of capital for the Law Library can be expected

to lag behind the projections. No allowance is

made in these projections for the total cost of physical

facilities or such costs as building maintenance and

depreciation, nor for any share of Central University

Administration overhead costs. No inflation factor has

been built into the figures.

Finally, actual expenditures will almost surely vary

from the categories described in these projections.

Projections by budget categories are simply designed

to give a measure of reality to the estimating process.

Experience always defines the gap between the expected

and the facts of life.

Spring, 1975 seventy-five cents

Factor E

EDUCATION, EXISTENCE, EMERGENCE: IN EPILOG

"The Law School Story"

This year UNLV won "What was happening in

more than Carson City this year anyway?"

"one for the gipper". MOST of the

A year's recap of the sports Law School story

begins on page 9. on page 2.

"Why a Campus Radio Station?"

Can Las Vegas Factor E proposes its necessity

really be exempt from , , , .

the depression? UNLVs p 3

top Economic„ Professors Pr,a ge 27.

say yes. Page 25.

STAFF BOX

Factor: E: Education, Existence, Emergence; In Epilog.

SPRING, 1975

Editor Mike Navarro

Associate Editor Norm CImon

Photograptiy Editor Bill Soard

Copy Editor Gary Cortez

Layout and Design Metamorptiosis

Contributing: Dr. Bernard Malamud, Dr. William T. White, Dr.

Lon Splght, Dominic Clark, Steven B. Howard, William Becker.

This magazine is published semesterly by the Consolidated

Students of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland

Pkwy., Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 and is operated by

CSUN Publications, Bob Stodal, Editor-in-Chief. Express permission

by CSUN before any of its contents may be reproduced.

INSIDE

I The University

A Politics

1. Val Buhecker: The Year Behind 1

2. The Law School Story 2

3. The Quality of Education Inside Back Cover

4. Joe Karaffa: The Future of Student Government.. 3

B Departments

1. Jerry Crawford: Close to the Top 4

C Activities

1. The Year of Everything 6

D Sports

1. The Men Behind the Sports 9

2. Women's First Year Success 12

3. "One Game at a Time" 13

4. Ingersol: Team Defensive Leader 14

5. Meyer Recruits 16 New Players 14

6. Meeker Pleased with First Year 17

7. 8-3-3 Ain't Just KIckIn' 17

8. Rebs Start Final WCAC Season 18

9. UNLV Track Records 19

10. 24-5: Best Season In 17 Year History 20

II The Community

A Money

1. The Las Vegas Economy 25

B Culture

1. The Question of the Campus Radio Station 27

III The Universe

A Aliens

1. Extraterrestrial Life: Does It Exist? 28

The

I am grateful for the opportunity to make

this report of the year's accomplishments and

failures within CSIJN.

One year ago I ran on an Eight Point Platform.

At this time, I wish to review that platform's

results as It definitely affected the

overall direclon of CSUN.

Removal of CSUN

From Its State of Chaos

Shortly after my Installation CSUN saw one

of Its most fluent operations In Its history. I

spent roughly 35 hours a week during the

summer and first semester working In the office

to clear up the chaos. The budgets were

approved, committees were appointed and

began working, and short term goals were

achieved all In record time.

I think the key was the openness of this

administration and the hardest working Senate

In CSUN history which existed during the

summer. Together, I feel we had eliminated

the chaos In student government.

However, I must concede that after eight

months the "honeymoon" was over. With the

elections four months away, the mood of the

Senate changed, the ability to listen disappeared,

and the state of chaos returned.

The traditional "President vs. Senate" fight

evolved as It has for the past five years just

before election time. When will CSUN ever

learn?

Financial Revue

A thorough review of traditional budgets

brought about a balanced budget with new

direction. Emphasis was placed on cutting

those areas that least affect students. Increasing

budgets where students benefited most,

and Insuring new programs by earmarking

money for them.

Our estimated Income was $103,000 from

student fees and $50,000 In revenues. We

had $11,000 left over from the Wade Administration.

The general expense budget which Is strictly

overhead was cut from $22,000 to $17,000.

I removed all presidential slush funds and

travel funds and had six of CSUN's fourteen

phones taken out to help make this cut.

The activities budget was Increased as

were the Day Care Center's (by nearly 60%)

and CSUN Publications (by 30% with 20%

more added to ball out the YELL). A special

publicity budget was also established for communication

purposes. We also boosted the

organizations matching funds for additional

programming.

Athletic Events Reform

I proposed a four point plan to make the

athletic program more fair to the students.

The spouse fee option was put In effect

immediately. Students were able to take their

spouse to the games at near student rates.

This option proved very successful.

I was successful In getting the "optional

athletic fee" which Included the other two

points, guaranteed seating and season tickets,

before the student body and the Board of

Regents. This ten month negotiated plan will

probably be my greatest accomplishment.

Activities Expansion

I set up the activities board and budget so

as to guarantee Its expansion and new pro-

Val Buhecker

grams.

An outdoor recreation program was established

with camping gear being purchased.

I regret that this program Is just barely getting

off the ground but I expect It will grow.

The dance program which basically failed

evolved Into the very successful "Smaug's

Coffee House." I sincerely hope this program

will expand In the future.

The budget called for more cultural events.

This Insured ethnic programming as well as

quality cultural happenings such as GREGOR

SOKLOV.

A special events program was boosted to

catch floating opportunities and to Insure additional

programming.

The traditional successful lecturers, concerts

and movies were kept with movies being

expanded to two nights Instead of one and

film festivals being added.

The major shortcoming of activities was

the lack of planning. Too many programs

were planned at the last minute.

Development of Student Services

Through cooperation with Dr. Black and

the Union Board under Eric Sprlngall we expanded

the Student Union Information Booth

to Include many new services. The check

cashing service and the postage service have

proved to be the most successful. The Board

also developed a ceramics workshop upstairs

where the old kitchen used to be and added

a music listening room In the Fireside Lounge.

I promised to Install a Bookdrop on campus.

The Library and Union Board cooperated

In placing three of them on campus.

A mimeograph and ditto service were added

In the GSIJN Office for students and organizations

to use.

I regret the failure of the academic council

to materialize. Only a couple of students

were really willing to work on this badly

needed service.

Establishment of a

Day Care Center Boartl

I established In the summer a Day Care

Center Board made up of parents which

proved most successful.

The Day Care Center Is In Its best shape

ever with a tremendous Director, Evelyn Ludeman,

and staff. The program has evolved

from babysitting to teaching.

This program Is my pride and joy and the

"Board" made the difference. We even got

the rent lowered.

One Man, One Office

There has been a great need to spread

out the responsibilities In government so that

more students can get Involved. I have tried

to avoid appointing people to more than one

position, especially key positions.

This standard has resulted In nearly 120

people being appointed to positions which

before were either left unappolnted or were

occupied by th 35 membr In-crowd. Hence,

more students did get Involved In the program

this year.

An Investigation Into

The Agency Account

Last summer CSUN was made "an arm of

the University" and had Its accounts placed

In the Business Office. Evaluating this move

I found It basically good.

We save from $5,000 to $10,000 In this account

and receive all the services the Business

Office has to offer. The Business Office

supplies accurate Information but In exchange

CSUN Is forced to think ahead In

financial matters.

CSUN only need fear Itself. If It makes

mistakes or mismanages Its money, then the

Business Office will be there to catch It. I

think this Is also good.

Things not promised, but . . .

I regret that two proposals were prevented

this year. The Legal Aid Program (hiring a

Lawyer), and the drafting of the Student Bill

of Rights both were bogged down In Senate

Committees. Both services are needed by the

Student Body.

Other accomplishments I have been Involved

In Include reevaluatlon of the student

insurance program which resulted In Increased

benefits to meet rising medical costs. I

also established a fraternity row search committee,

a lobbying committee for UNLV programs,

and revised the organizations council.

The latter two have proved a bit disappointing

but are a step In the right direction.

The major Issue still left undone In CSUN

Is the YELL. Although many solutions are

being hinted the real Issue will soon evolve:

"Who Is going to run the paper; the students

or the University?" I caution the Student

Body to weight carefully any proposal made

In the future concerning the YELL.

I wish to thank the many people who have

taken the time to work In CSUN. This has

been a most rewarding and meaningful experience.

I have met many great people and do feel

my education has been enhanced by this past

year's activities.

I wish to especially thank my wife (whom

I married while In office) for her support and

endurance.

Last I thank the Student Body for permitting

me this opportunity, and I wish you all

the best of success In the future.

The Law School Story

Amidst a slowly dissipating cloud of confusion

lies the controversy known as the

UNLV Law School Issue. $7,000,000 figures

for one blennlum were among the "hearsay"

costs that ran amuck In the legislature this

session. What actually did happen and how

did rumor take precedence over testimony In

the state capltol? The story can best be told

sequentially.

During the fall semester. Dean Wlllard H.

Pedrick of A.S.U.'s College of Law and Prof.

Lome Seldman, Chairman of the Finance

Dept. at UNLV published the fruits of a year's

labor In their Law School Study for the University

of Nevada, Las Vegas. This feasibility

study looked at Nevada's population, economy

and Universities, the need for a Nevada

Law School, what a new law school would do

for the state, and costs. The conclusions

were extremely favorable as to Its benefits

for all Nevada, and seemingly every possible

area of concern was analyzed. Including the

cost of a building. Dean Pedrick estimated

the facility, at present, would cost $5.2 mil-

Ion. Copies of this study were sent to all

members of the legislature.

At the start of the Spring semester, the

Consolidated Students opted to take an active

position on the Issue. CSUN formed a

Legislative Action Committee and appointed

student Mike Navarro (who was In Carson City

as a registered lobbyist as per his employment)

as advisor. Mention of the law school

confronted Navarro with the $7 million figure.

According to Navarro, refutation was

Impossible, and many legislators additionally

had qualms about entering Into any new continuing

programs with the economic status of

the nation. It seems that a few years back,

the Senate and Assembly had been sold on

the need of a medical school for Nevada and

been told that the cost to them would be

about $200,000. It Is currently requiring over

a million. Little progress was made but It

was discovered that Sen. Dick Bryan had a

UNLV Law School bill In the drafters, and

that Sen. Floyd Lamb supported the measure.

Optimism prevailed among the students for

a while, but It was short lived. LAC Chairman

Al KIngam and member Dave Elklns came to

the capltol to give testimony on another matter,

and lunched with Bryan, Assemblywoman

Jean Ford, and Assemblyman Bob Craddock.

Although all three legislators supported the

Idea, they felt that no favorable action would

be taken on the law school Issue this session.

But they did offer an alternative. They suggested

that for $200,000 Nevada could enter

the WICHE Law School program, which would

enable Nevada students entering an out-ofstate

law school to have a majority of their

tuition paid by the WICHE program. KIngam

stated that It was not Ideal, but the compromise

could serve as a stop-gap measure until

the next legislative session. KIngam and

Elklns left, taking the compromise back to

their constituents.

On March 23rd, Dr. Al Johns "State Legislature"

class journeyed to Carson City with

the Intent of seeing the legislative process

first hand, and doing a little lobbying for the

Law School. Using the name "Students Concerned

with Lawmakers", the students got the

same reaction as did the LAC: "Law School

NO. But what about WICHE?" Deciding that

this may be the only action taken to aid prospective

Nevada Law Students, the group

began Ic^bylng the compromise.

But Howard Needham, one of the students

In John's group and a future law student, did

not easily accept the compromise. Needham

reported that the Assembly Ways and Means

Commltee had been '.'turned off by the $5.2

million building figure". Approximately one

week before the students' trip north, the Las

Vegas lawyers had put out a news release

regarding the excessive amount of lawyers In

N'evada already. When confronted with this

by the lawyers, Needham responded "If this

Is really true, how do you explain the backlog

In civil liberties and Indigent law cases?"

Needham reports that his impression was that

they were really confronting a North/South

Issue. "Snowy Monroe, Tom Weiss and Don

Mello all want the law school In Reno."

During their stay In the capltol, the students

also had an audience with the Governor.

"O'Callaghan says they're In a need for

other things, specifically better prisons, retardation

facilities, and medical help. He says

we don't need a law school now."

On April 4th, UNLV President Donald Baepler

gave testimony on this Issue to the Senate

Finance Committee. Baepler's proposal

was this: The program can be started In '76

for an Initial $50,000. This money will allow

us to hire a dean, who will begin formation

of the school, and a librarian, who will start

coordinating a Law library. There will be a

three year program beginning In '77, and the

total cost to the state for the three years will

be $300,000, with the other $200,000 needed

coming from the students. There will be 70

•students In each going class, at a cost to

each of $5000. per semester. The library will

cost approximately $600,000, but we already

have Its cost pledged by a major strip hotel.

Jan Gould, of the Clark County Citizens

Law School Group, In an Interview with Factor

E, threw more "fat Into the fire". She

noted that "the Marquette Law School has

80,000 current, accredited law books for sale,

attainable at a very appetizing price. These •

books would make up 80% of our needed

law library." Gould also noted that the $5.2

million building continued to stifle support.

"The legislators should be Informed that a

building cost does not have to be taken care

of In one session, or this session. All that

needs to be done Is to show a financial commitment

to one by the third year In order to

attain accreditation, and Its cost can then be

stretched over a thirty year mortgage If necessary."

Both Gould and Baepler are against the

WICHE compromise, though. They feel that

with the money going to WICHE, and the

money from the students going out-of-state,

a law school program could be accomplished,

and the benefits of a continuing education for

our lawyers, an accessible law library In the

South, and a number of other factors make

this the logical choice. With this argument

In hand, the WICHE compromise has been

dropped, and all efforts are now back to

their original position.

During the week of April 7th through the

14th, the Assembly Ways and Means Committee

approved a Veterinary School for UNR.

The relevance of this occurrence Is that UNR

did not request it, and a feasibility study, up

to this point, has not even been undertaken.

The ."^ennfe Finance Committee appears not

to be In favor of this program at present, but

Is In favor of the Law School. Ways and

Means Is not In favor of the Law School. Now,

politics. Both committees must get together

to "thresh" out what budgets, that onlv one

side has approved, will be put Into effect,

and the name of the game becomes bargaining.

On April 14th, Baepler again gave testimony:

this time to Ways and Means. He made

the same proposal, and this time Vegas legislators

voiced the cry "I'm against It." The

two loudest southern lawmakers were Darrell

Dreyer and Bob Robinson. Dreyer proclaimed

"Two years ago we talked to Zorn about It

and he told us that two existing classrooms

would take care of It. This year Dr. Baepler

shows us a spot on the campus and tells us

this is where the law school will be built."

Robinson's comments were a bit stronger: "It

seems the University system Is more Intent

on getting a law school than meeting the

needs of the students." And added "We

could get them Into any school anywhere In

the country, If we could Include law In Nevada's

WICHE participation." But Supreme

Court Justice David Zenoff noted that young

people come to him with complaints they

can't find schools which will accept them.

2

The Future of Student Government

The time has come for the Consolidated

Students of UNLV to wake up, to realize

where we are, and where we are going. For

too long the Consolidated Students have

shown disinterest and apathy concerning the

University and the Student Body. We must

now realize the Importance of each Individual

growing as a person and as an Integral part

of the future In the free society. The college

student of today Is the leader of tomorrow.

If we can consider UNLV as a test tube for

each student, we can see the relevance of a

college education. The opinions, beliefs. Interests

and desires that each student obtains

In college life and In youth will be part of

him for his entire life. We see weaknesses

In today's society yet we seem willing to

allow gross Inadequacies to continue. Apathy,

In my opinion, will be the ruin of the "free

society". Apathy will also be the destruction

of the Consolidated Students.

Let us return now to the thought of UNLV

as a test tube. The grading process commits

each student to compete against his fellow

student, there Is competition throughout the

entire University system. We find competition

In grades. In sports. In theatre, Inter-fraternlty,

for elected office, for jobs, between members

of the faculty. In the administration. In fact,

everywhere one looks on this campus there

Is competition. The final outcome of this

competition Is the essence of an Individual's

future, be he a student, professor, or administrator.

Therefore, we see the University as

a test tube for each person Involved, if he

wins he achieves. If he loses — he Is lost.

The Consolidated Students have one

strength that no other group on campus possesses.

We will all be leaving — whether It

be for graduation or for work without graduating,

we shall all leave. The question then

becomes what shall we leave for those who

follow: Shall we leave the Incoming Freshman

an organized unified Student Body or

shall we leave him chaos, with ho organization

that wants to satisfy his needs? This

should be the purpose of the Consolidated

Students: An organized Student Body, responsive

to student needs, for the mutual

protection and growth of every member. This

shall be my objective as President of the

Consolidated Students.

I draw your attention to the name of the

organization — "The Consolidated Students".

It Is my belief that most college students have

very similar philosophical beliefs about the

future. It Is readily apparent that without

change, free society's future Is bleak. Shall

we destroy ourselves by pollution, over-population,

war. Ignorance, prejudice, crime or

what. Or shall we, as the leaders of tomorrow,

start thinking less about ourselves and

more about our fellow man? The hope for

tomorrow Is In Its leaders, will the leaders be

ready or is society doomed?

Across the UNLV campus we see fellow

students striving towards excellence. In the

sports arena, UNLV students are gaining national

recognition for abilities In football and

basketball. The Theatre Department, through

Its student casts, attained the top ten in Unl-

Joe Karaffa

verslty plays throughout the entire nation. The

Hotel Department and Its students are now

recognized as one of the best schools of Its

type In the nation. Although these are only

a few examples of the excellence members of

the Consolidated Students have attained, one

fact Is obvious — the students on this campus

can compete with students on any campus.

Now, If we can only unite, as the Consolidated

Students of UNLV, we will achieve

almost anything we desire. There Is definitely

safety and strength In numbers. If seven

thousand students want something they shall

have It.

As the University grows, so should student

government. CSUN must become more efficient

and more unified to meet the growing

student needs and demands. In an effort to

meet these challenges, I shall attempt to

write the various student factions on campus.

In so doing, the elected representatives of

the Consolidated Students must also unite

for the benefit of the entire student body and

the University. I call on the CSUN Senators

to forget past differences and remember student

government's purpose. If we work together

we shall achieve.

My past year of experience as Vice-President

of the Consolidated Students has given

me the experience necessary to lead the organization.

I am thankful for the chance to

learn how the CSUN operates. It has been

a pleasure to meet the many people, to learn

how government functions from the Inside,

and to see the Importance of communicating

with Individuals. I would like to congratulate

the past President, Val Buhecker, for the work

he has accomplished. I hope I have the ability

and strength that he has shown many

times.

In the next year, many changes shall be

enacted. Changes that hopefully will enable

CSUN to operate more efficiently. The YELL

newspaper must be given Its Independence.

This shall be accomplished by a Senate By-

Law establishing a Mass Communications

Board. There shall be a Student Bill of Rights

modeled after the National Student Bill of

Rights and presented to the Board of Regents.

More Investigation of a radio station on

campus shall be completed, programming for

a radio station, licenses and hopefully establishing

a campus station In the next year.

CSUN shall attempt to secure the long overdue

need of legal services on campus. We

shall expand activities to Include a more

varied lecture program, larger concerts, expanded

outdoor recreation programs, and a

film series to Include classics, experimental

and outdoor movies.

I believe CSUN should also establish a

poll of students' Interest on a yearly basis.

The elected officials of the Consolidated Students

shall make themselves more available

to their constituents by enacting office hours

for all executive and legislative representatives.

These hours shall be posted at the

CSUN Office so each student will know when

he may see his representatives.

My administration will be designed to promote

unity, motivation, and responsibility In

government and In the Student Body. As

%

President, I shall have weekly meetings with

key Student Government Officials to coordinate

our efforts and Initiate our plans. Our

objectives shall be student oriented and

group attained.

It Is my belief that student government

should now enter the area of academics. It

Is our education, therefore, we should have

something to say about It. For this reason,

CSUN shall begin student evaluations of the

faculty. Such evaluations should deal with

professor's lectures, reading materials. Interest

In the Individual student, and his desire

to teach. These evaluations shall be partially

derived from evaluations used at other Universities.

The evaluations shall be totally

student sponsored and the results shall be

published In booklet form for students' future

reference.

CSUN shall also attempt to establish a

book co-op, thereby giving students a break

on the price of books. Bring your book In,

set your price, and If another student Is willing

to buy your book you receive your price

minus a nominal handling charge.

In order to enact these and other programs

we shall need student support. Leaders cannot

lead without supporters. For your own

sake, I now call on the Student Body to become

more Involved. I realize that most students

work, that the average age Is over 22,

and that we only have so much time in a day.

However, just by voting you become Involved.

By your willingness to speak to your representatives

he can represent you — the student.

Again, apathy will destroy the Consolidated

Students, just as It will destroy the

American way of life.

The student's way of life Is similar to that

of his peers. His philosophical viewpoints are

similar to his peers. We are all attending the

same University together. Now after many

students are dead, such as those at Kent

State, can we not unite? Can we not think

positively? Can we not enjoy our college life

together? I think so, don't you?

In that this article will come out near the

beginning of summer and most of us will be

leaving for summer fun or work, I ask you to

consider this article as a message about the

future of the Consolidated Students.

We can enjoy our college life, we can learn

and grow together. We can also wither and

die like a plant without sunlight. Enjoy your

summer, enjoy your life, but when you're old

and death seems near, be able to say I lived

my life to the fullest and the world has gained

from my existence.

3

Factor E Interview

Jerry Crawford:

Close to the Top

Jerry Crawford is, in his own words, "An

Iowa farmboy who married his college sweetheart"

and is the father of three chiidren.

He had his PhD in playwriting and has been

teaching at the University of Nevada, Las

Vegas since 1962. This year under Crawford's

direction UNLV's "The House of Bernards

Alba" was chosen as one of the ten

teach, direct, act, write. So by then I'd reached

the rank of full professor in theatre, and

since that sabbatical leave and those administrative

days I have been doing just that:

Teaching, directing, writing, and acting. I'm

tenured, age 40, and will probably be here 'till

retirement.

F.E.: Then you're happy here? I mean, would

you rather be doing something else?

CRAWFORD: Yes, I'm very happy here, and

I'd rather be sportscasting with the Cleveland

Indians.

F.E.: What's your immediate goal for the theatre

department?

CRAWFORD: My goal is to see the theatrical

arts continue to grow as a cultural force in

this community. I need to see better and

better support than I've seen to date. It's

coming, and the responsibility is ours. I want

to see the people of Las Vegas embrace the

theatre department and the Judy Bayley program

and realize, as I came to realize years

ago, that not only does man not live by bread

alone, but he does not live by science alone,

or by the material things of this world, although

we need all those things . . . you

know "man cannot See his own eyes, but he

must see himself." And the best way to do

that is to see himself as he is represented on

the stage, that mirror of his life. I think we

need the theatre. I am very much an edu-

* -fa •

top productions in the United States. On the

basis of the latter (and most of the former

with the exception of the "farmboy" part).

Factor E has decided to spotlight the man

who has brought further acclaim to the University.

FACTOR E: How did you first come to

UNLV?

CRAWFORD: In 1962 I was in California interviewing

for a teaching position when Paul

Harris contacted me from a little school called

the Southern Regional Division of the University

of Nevada in Las Vegas. I laughed,

thinking there's nothing but a school there,

and there really wasn't: there were four

buildings, desert, and Maryland Pkwy. was a

blacktop road. I came here, they told me I

could teach Shakespeare and direct, so I

signed on and I've been here ever since.

F.E.: Didn't you take an administrative post

for a while?

CRAWFORD: Yes. From '65-68 I became

Dean of the University faculty, and I left

theatre. Don Moyer was here, and he was

the first President and 1 was the first Dean

of Faculty. Well, after Harold Hanlon ... he

only lasted two months . . . that's another

story. Then I had to make a decision in 1968,

when they decided to organize the theatre

department, to go on in higher administration

or come back home. I wanted to come back

home. So I came back as Chairman of the

department. Dr. Harris was then a Dean of

Fine Arts. Did that for two years, got a sabbatical

leave, wrote a play, took it to New

York, got a professional agent in New York,

made up my mind that I wanted nothing more

to do with administration. I just wanted to

we had the largest amount of entries yet in

our seven years: over 335, competing for a

final selection of the ten most outstanding in

America, which are brought, all expenses

paid, to perform in the Eisenhower Theatre in

the spring. Then there's no further competition:

when you go to Washington, you've already

won, and it's a festival of the best ten,

performing from 2-3 productions. In "Bernards

Alba's" instance we're going to perform

four; we're performing more than any

other college or university.

F.E.: Why did you choose "Alba" this year,

and how difficult was it to stage?

CRAWFORD: Lorca's "Bernards Alba" is a

very difficult piece of material. I selected It

Because of its wonderful acting roles. I had

good tryouts and put together eighteen outstanding

actresses. I did a lot of experimental

work with the production to open that

material up, to find humor in it. Did a couple

cationalist in that sense. But in no way does

that detract from my view that theatre is first

entertainment. Sure, escape, enjoy, laugh

and cry; that's wonderful. But to me it's also

a force, in society, that makes man see his

foibles. The poets often are the seers in society.

I think it's time they were restored to

that respected position in society. That's

what I'm about.

F.E.: Well, the National Collegiate Festival of

Theatre Arts has surely done some tremendous

work in that area. How exactly is a college

production chosen?

CRAWFORD: Well, each fall an American college

or university may enter a production in

the competition by paying a fee. This year

of daring things with set design with Fred

Olsen. Ellis Pryce-Jones did a beautiful job

with the costumes. Don Schmeidel assisted

from the Spanish department. It worked out

that I got a beautiful ensemble of acting from

those girls.

F.E.: Theatre Arts are one of the areas on

campus that the faculty chose to spotlight.

Can we assume then that you have an adequate

departmental budget?

CRAWFORD: Well, I must say that we've

never felt the administration totally supported

the faculty vote as much as they should have

for his type of special treatment. We've had

to struggle along the way we always have.

We're not supported enough; we're a little

understaffed, for the size program we put on.

I don't really offer a big complaint, but I

think we need more. And I think this award

will help us get more. The greatest thing we

have going for us, and we deeply appreciate

it, is the student government's support

through the performing arts fee. Of course

they get free tickets out of it, but it's a wonderful

two-way street and we hope it continues.

F.E.: Didn't you run Into some censorship

with your production of Vonnegut's "Happy

Birthday, Wanda June"?

CRAWFORD: I think that's stating it a little

too heavily. Dr. Zorn in no way censored us,

nor has any administration. However, there

was a good deal of community criticism of

the language in that piay. We made the mistake

of not advertising the play clearly

enough, and we've done that ever since:

"Recommended for the Whole Family", or

"Not Recommended for Children". But you

know, many modern plays, as do many modern

films, have a very liberal language usage.

We're a long way from "Gone with the Wind."

But, we had enough criticism that year that

the administration asked us to reexamine our

forthcoming season, which was the first season,

therefore a very important season, in the

Bayley theatre, if you look at the program

that fall, we had scheduled right in a row

"Marat Sade", and "Bernarda Alba", in rethinking

the thing, although there was a split

opinion among faculty and students, the majority

felt that the administration was wise to

admonish us to look at it. We just delayed

those plays: "Marat Sade", one year; "Bernarda

Alba", two. It turned out wise because

the first season turned out extremeiy well, so

did the "Marat Sade" season, so has the

"Bernarda Alba" season. If you want to look

at that as pressure from the administration,

you can. Certainly not censorship, and I do

not consider this in any way a pressure or

censorious academic or civic community.

F.E.: What can we expect next year?

CRAWFOFtD: Well, that's a little premature.

We're still working on it now. But I can tell

you the types of things we're working on.

For example, the American College theatre

festival has put out a mandate, in honor of

the bicentennial, that all entries be by American

playwrights. We're considering Robert

Sherwood's "Abe Lincoln in Illinois", "Pippin",

Mr. Burgan is discussing premiering a

play by the resident playwright here, me. It's

called "The Auction Tomorrow". Oh, there

must be twenty or thirty other plays under

discussion. But basically we'll probably have

a festival of American theatre here next year.

ii.-

if i.

Top ten in nation: Crawford (center) and the award-winning cast of "The House of Bernarda Alba".

CSUN Activities: The Year of Everything During the '75-76 school year, UNLV saw

a selection of movies, concerts, lectures, and

other areas previously unparalled by student

government. Working with a budget of $56,-

000, approximately $75,000 worth of programming

was put on by the Consolidated Students.

Mike Navarro chaired the CSUN Activities

Board during the summer and fall,

and was followed In that position by Rosalynn

Barney. President-elect Joe Karaffa has

again appointed Ms. Ramey to hold that position

next year, and the following are her reflections

on the year behind.

ON MOVIES: "I feel that It averaged out to

be a very good year for movies, mainly because

of the Wednesday and Thursday movie

nights. We had more general admissions this

year, but that was most likely due to our

movie selections. Our most successful movie

was "Jesus Christ, Superstar".

On the criticism of movies that have recently

or are soon to play on T.V., Ms. Ramey

stated that they still did well at the boxofflce.

"People like a 'theatre' atmosphere. There's

a total Immersion of sorts that Is unobtainable

at home."

ON LECTURES: "Our most successful lecturer

was Gene Roddenberry. We sold out a

day In advance, and still turned away approximately

300 people at the door. But we tried

to stay away from the usual circuit this year.

We thought the special Interest people would

hit a broader range of students than the

'newsmakers'. Speakers such as Roddenberry,

Stanton Friedman, NIkkl GlovanI, and

Stan Lee offered a little something for just

about everyone."

Istratlon supports the Idea. Val Buchecker

had chosen to stay away from using that facility

because he had received quite a bit of

negative feedback from the students on that

Issue. It's my feeling though that It was the

group (The Guess Who) and not the facility

that the students protested. Since that concert,

however, the County Commissioners

have set up some pretty stringent regulations

on promoting concerts at the Convention Center.

They want you to put up a bond of an

equal amount to what you expect In ticket

sales. That It totally ridiculous to ask us to

do that because we don't have that kind of

money. But we should be able to get that

munlty."

ON CULTURAL EVENTS: "Our most successful

cultural event was probably Russian pianist

Gregor Soklov. It was a very nice evening

and we had a good turnout from both the

community and the students. We also had El

Teatro Compesino, a free-style Chlcano repertory

group and Black poetess NIkki GlovanI."

ON THE ASSASSINATION WEEK: "Yes, It

was a real killer. No, but seriously. It was a

tremendous success and that pleased us. This

was our first stab at a theme week and we

hope to have more next year. People seem

to like the Idea of focusing on one Issue for

Folk singer James Lee Stanley

an entire week. There Is definitely a market

for more. During this week we had speaker

Rusty Rhodes and the films 'Day of the Jaeckel'

'Executive Action', and 'Z'. I guess It

would have been appropriate If the week

would have bombed, though."

ON CONCERTS: "The most successful, of

course, was George Carlln/Kenny Rankin.

We were sold out In advance on that one

also. But we didn't have too much luck during

the first semester. Part of the problem

was the facility we had to work with. We

have the ballrom, period. Any act we book

In there that costs over $1000 we lose money

on. And the big acts that would be automatic

sellouts cost over $10,000, some up to

$30,000 and beyond. Previous administrations

had had some trouble using the Convention

Center, and that sort of negated our using It

this year. But we have negotiations going with

the County right now and the Karaffa admln-

Black poetess Nikki Giovani

facility at no cost and have 90% of the requirements

waived because we are part of

the University and a non-profit organization."

ON THE BERGMAN FESTIVAL: "Well, with

a festival like this, we're back to appealing

to a certain group of people. We expected

about 150 to 200 people, and we got the

turnout we expected. Hopefully next year

we can expand Into a film festival series like

this: classics, things you can't get In the com- Russian pianist Gregor Soklov

George Carlin: Encore Comedy Concerts

ON THE POLITICAL AWARENESS SERIES:

"Definitely beneficial to the entire community

as well as the students. Although not too

successful In terms of student turnout. It was

a good program and needed to be offered to

the students; again. It's part of our responsibility."

ON THE MARIJUANA FORUM: "One thing

we wanted to happen this semester was the

Marijuana Forum. There was a lot of research

done on It and a lot of time put Into contacting

the people on It. But Interest seems to

have died down tremendously on It this semester,

not necessarily from the student body,

but from the law enforcement agencies to

come In and help support It. But we do plan

to do It next year and It should be a very

comprehensive source of Information for all

concerned. We'd planned to have a number

of people come In and speak on the pros and

cons of marijuana reform, but It Is difficult

to line up people against It because they are

not as vocal right now. We do feel that It Is

an Issue In which students can get Involved,

because whether you smoke or don't you do

have a stand on It."

ON PROMOTION: "The Consolidated Students

this year have built up an Identity with the

community and they are becoming aware that

we do put on quality programming at a nom-

Stanton Friedman:

"They do exist, / tell yon."

Inal cost to them. They are starting to take

advantage of this and that can only mean

more money for more programming for the

students."

ON THE CRITICISM OVER HIGH PUBLICITY

COSTS: "We are a commuter campus. We

have a little over two hundred students living

In the dorm. The rest of them live offcampus

and come out for their classes. If

you want to reach those students you have

to advertise off-campus. I think most of our

students have three classes In the education

building (or the equivalent), never hit the

Student Union and see a Yell about once a

month; you go to your classes, you work, you

go home and take care of your family. Getting

Into those costs, though, take Soklov, for

example. Instead of spending the $200 on

advertising, we could have brought In another

movie or lecturer. But It draws away from

the quality of that program. The only facilities

for publicity we have here are the marquee,

posters and the Yell. I think the outside

advertising Is extremely justified. That's

the way you reach your students and It's

building more P.R. for he Consolidated Students."

ON STUDENT INPUT: "If a student petition Is

received, we do bring In that lecturer. It happened

once this year with the art department,

Cold Blood: Cooked' without crowds

1

Fanny: On the charts AFTER

but some art students came in and complained

that their instructor passed it around and it

was sort of 'if you don't sign this it's not good

for the class'. You can't go on that. After

talking with some students in that department,

the amount of money that would have

been spent on that particular lecturer was not

warranted. But we do need more student input.

At the beginning of the semester we

had ten people working on spending $56,000

plus revenues of the students' money, and

now we have five, plus about ten unofficial

members of the board, if a student has a

suggestion, he can come in and talk to me

in my office, if I'm not here, he can write

a note and give it to the secretary; I'll get

it. Then it's readt o the board and referred

to the person in charge of that type of event.

That person has to take and investigate the

suggestion and report back to the board on

his findings."

ON FUTURE LECTURES: "We are talking

about bringing in more lecturers dealing with

the political atmosphere in our country right

now. i think the students are with the general

public in asking themselves how the two highest

officials in our country can bypass elections.

I think the students get involved in

that sort of thing."

Proxmire: Presidential Hopeful

UNLV Coaches UNLV Sports

The Men Behind the Sports

it has been said that behind every good

man, there's a good woman, too. Well, the

driving force behind the University of Nevada,

Las Vegas athletic program is a solid, hardworking

group of determined professionals.

Both in coaching positions, administrative

posts, and support areas, UNLV has what has

to be considered one of the finest intercollegiate

athletic staffs in the entire country.

The axle for the ever-forward-turning wheel

of athletic progress for UNLV is Director of

Intercollegiate Athletics, Bill Ireland.

After five years of creating a football program

for UNLV, Ireland Is completing his second

year as the head man in the Rebel program.

As head coach, the Rebels under Ireland

posted a 26-23-1 overall record with a nearperfect

8-1 mark in the first season of competition.

After leading the Rebels to four consecutive

winning seasons, Ireland has taken

giant steps toward building UNLV to a major

college team. He was very instrumental in

pushing for the Las Vegas Stadium which

opened in the fall of 1971 and no one has

worked any harder or more successfully in

Bill Ireland

putting the community behind the still young

football program.

Before coming to UNLV, Ireland had already

established himself as a firm part of

the Nevada sports scene as an athlete and

a coach. Born in McGill, on April 29, 1927,

he was an outstanding athlete in the White

Pine County schools. After graduating from

high school he served a stint in the U.S. Navy

during World War 11, and then entered the

University of Nevada, Reno, where he competed

in football and baseball.

During his seven years in Reno, the UNLV

athletic director also became an accomplished

sportscaster. He did play-by-piay of the

Wolf Pack basketball games and had his own

Jerry Tarkanian

sports show on both radio and TV. in his

position with UNLV, he is the color commentator

for Rebel football and the radio, has his

own radio sports show and a TV Rebel Report

as well.

Jerry Tarkanian and Ron Meyer are the

men of the hour in Rebel athletics, focal

points of the interest that has been nationwide

the past two seasons in Rebel basketball

and football.

The dynamic duo are a contrast of styles

and experience. Where the 44-year old Tarkanian

has been coaching on the collegiate

level for 13 years and has a total record of

364-44, Meyer's first job was here at UNLV

and his two year total is 19-3. Though their

programs are operated in nearly opposite

manners, both have proven their ability to win

and bring forth prominence and credibility to

the UNLV athletic system.

Of ail the superlatives, the most impressive

thing one can say about Tarkanian is — he

is the winningest active major college basketball

coach in the country. After seven

seasons of coaching major college basketball

(five at Cai State, Long Beach), Tarkanian

has a coaching record of 166-31 (.843 wining

percentage). His teams have won six conference

championships, gone to the NCAA

Regional tournaments five times, and no Tarkanian-

coached team has ever won less than

20 games.

The Pied Piper of college basketball is

establishing a tradition at UNLV that will be

hard to beat. He has now won 21 consecutive

ball games on the Las Vegas Convention

Center court, including all 15 in the 1974-75

season.

Tarkanian's major college teams have had

most impressive records — 23-3, 24-5, 24-5,

25-4, 26-3, 20-6, and this season's 24-5.

The Euclid, Chio, native spent seven seasons

in the junior college ranks before going

to Long Beach. At Riverside City College

(1962-66), he had a 131-9 overall record,

which Included three consecutive state championships

and four league championships in

five years. No other junior college coach in

the history of California basketball has

achieved those heights. At Pasadena City

College (1966-68), Tarkanian was 67-4 and

bagged a fourth state title while finishing In

the runner-up spot another time.

An astonishing feature of his wins is that

they were accomplished at schools which had

never previously won a basketball championship.

Riverside was last in its conference two

consecutive years before Tarkanian; Pasadena

was last in its conference the previous

year, and Long Beach had never won a

championship in basketball.

Jerry Tarkanian is a towel-chewing, nailbiting,

hardworking Armenian who came to

Las Vegas with a COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE

as his driving philosophy. He will

settle for nothing less than excellence from

his players, both on and off the court. In ad-

Ron Meyer

dition to a nationally-recognized basketball

power for UNLV, Tarkanian has developed a

tutorial program for his players that paid high

dividends. Last year all five Rebel seniors

graduated and are examples of how UNLV

emphasized equally the importance of academics

and basketball to all its student-athletics.

This year's only senior, Ricky Sobers,

will graduate after the first summer session.

Tarkanian's players have gone on to establish

themselves in the pros. They include:

Chuck Terry (San Antonio Spurs), Eric Mc-

Williams (Houston Rockets), George Trapp

(Detroit Pistons), Bob Rule (Cleveland Cavaliers),

Ed Ratleff (Houston Rockets), Leonard

Gray (Seattle Supersonics), and Glen Mc-

(Continued on Next Page)

Donald (Boston Celtics).

Ttie intense coacti easily won the hearts

of Las Vegas and the Los Angeles Times

calis him an "instant Las Vegas ceiebrity."

Tarkanian is the first to give credit to his

totaily invoived, totaliy devoted wife Lois,

who guides and directs the Rebels in their

academic pursuits.

The suave, debonair head football coach

for the UNLV Rebels, Ron Meyer is building

ever-so-quickly, a high powered, weii-organized,

progressive and productive product for

the department, university and entire state of

Nevada.

Football is an extensive, and expensive

sport, and the Meyer-men have responded

with back-to-back 8-3 and 11-0 seasons, two

Fred DaUimore

Ail-Americans, and money in the bank. Football

is definitely paying its way at UNLV.

The Rebels advanced to the Division II

semi-finals last season after the brilliant undefeated

regular season and next season

seems to promise more of the same. A total

of 49 returning lettermen, including 17 returning

regulars will attest to that.

Meyer himself is a well-educated gentleman.

He won the Noble Kinzer award for

athletic/academic prowess at Purdue University

in 1963, finishing college with a 5.2 grade

point average out of a possible 6.0. He earned

his master's degree there in West LaFayette.

Ind., as well and was on the Boilermaker

football coaching staff for six years, working

with every unit at one time or another.

His only head coaching job before UNLV,

he led Penn High School in Indiana to a 5-4-

1 record in 1964.

His six seasons on the Purdue staff followed,

then his overall personality rose to the

forefront. He went to the Dallas Cowboys of

the National Football League as one of their

four talent scouts and was part of the organization

that won Super Bowl VI.

With the deftness of a Minnesota Fats, and

the approach of a combination Henry Kissinger/

Charles Finley, he has dipiomaticaliyyet-

straightforwardiy, brought Las Vegas to

develop a keen and active devotion to Rebel

football.

The titanic .UNLV-Boise State football game

last October is a living example of the in-

Al McDaniels

voivement Meyer's Magic has brought to the

Rebel gridiron program. 18,631 people

crowded into the 16,100-seat Las Vegas Stadium

to see the Rebels defeat the Broncos,

37-35. It is the largest crowd ever to witness

a sporting event in the State of Nevada.

Meyer appears to have the makings of one

of the all-time great gridiron coaches, but

time and fate will dictate much of his future.

If ever there was a man who could change

fate, it may just be this one. His highly-organized,

well-disciplined, "equal opportunity for

ail, special privileges for none" LAS VEGAS

WAY program is an eloquent example of the

great accomplishments of athletics.

Coaches develop and cultivate Ail-Americans.

At Purdue, he guided several Supers in

Gordon Edwards

Bob Griese, Leroy Keyes and Mike Phipps.

At UNLV there has been Mike Thomas and

Joe Ingersoil.

Obtaining all the little qualities that go into

making him a complete, thoroughly prepared

coach, Meyer also has a demanding speaking

tour, clinic assignment schedule, and a

weekly half-hour television show in Las

Vegas.

He is the composer and director of the

UNLV football symphony and his music is

becoming increasingly popular.

It is true that basketball and football are

the real revenue sports at UNLV, a complete,

well-rounded athletic program consists of

many sports, each with qualified, capable

professionals guiding their destiny.

In his second season as the UNLV basebail

coach is youthful Fred Daliimore. The

former Ail-American pitcher for the University

of Nevada, Reno, has set his sights at the

highest level for the Rebel baseball program.

His schedule has included at least six of

the ten teams in the nation each year, and,

although his record has not yet reached the

Mike DrakuUch

winning side of the ledger, his Rebels did

knock off the defending national champion

use Trojans, 7-5, this year.

Daliimore spent four years as an assistant

coach in the Rebel program before taking

over the reins. A native Nevadan, he has

been associated witti collegiate baseball for

13 years, four as a player, seven as an assistant,

and two as a head coach.

Daliimore started in the UNLV program as

the handy-man, assistant to Robert Doering

in the baseball program, an assistant in the

football staff, and as the equipment manager

for the athletic program.

Following three years tenure as an assistant,

Al McDaniels is the head track and field

coach for UNLV. An unquestionable worker.

McDaniels is diligently striving for a successful

cinder program for the university.

Originally from Muskogee. Okia.. he is a

graduate of the University of Nevada, Reno,

where he won the highest honor given to a

Wolf Pack athlete — the 1965 Doc Martie

award.

Since coming to UNLV, he has conducted

summer track programs for the Las Vegas

10

Vic Hicker

community, and has done a lot to promote

the growth and development of the sport in

the area.

His Las Vegas Relays attracted over 700

athletes this year, including five world record

holders. .

Dr. Gordon Edwards, who assists McDaniels

in the track program, is the head cross

country coach for UNLV. He received his

doctorate from the University of New Mexico

and is a major in the U.S. Marines.

One of the most successful sports year-in

and year-out at UNLV is golf. The iinksters

are coached by the school's first basketball

coach and athletic director, Michael "Chub"

Drakulich, and constantly turns in superior

score cards to those of their opponents.

Drakulich even has a golf scholarship

tournament in his name each year to help

raise funds for his teams.

The newest sport in the UNLV athletic

wheel is swimming. Competing on a club

basis this year, coach Vic Hecker has already

aroused a strong desire in the area for a

strong aquatics program at UNLV.

His first year men's team was 8-2 in dual

competition and that's without even having

a home pool to practice and compete in.

The 6.5 million dollar UNLV Paul McDermott

Physical Education complex was not open in

time for his inaugural season, but next year

when the sport becomes "official", he will

have one of the finest facilities on the West

coast.

Tom Khamis

Another increasingly popular sport not only

in Las Vegas, but also in the UNLV athletic

program is tennis. Guided by UNLV Alumni

Director and former assistant basketball

coach Fred Albrecht, the Rebel netters

started the 1975 season with a 10-1 dual

match record. The Rebels compete on 12

new courts on the UNLV campus.

Soccer just completed its first year of regular-

sport existence on the UNLV horizon and

the result was a very credible 8-3-3 record.

Tom Khamis, an instructor at the Las Vegas

Variety School for children, has provided the

UNLV athletic family with an exciting new

program, one that promises an extremely

bright future and the definite capabilities of

becoming a revenue producing sport.

One of the essential ingredients to a successful

recipe for athletic prowess as an institution

is the capable work contributed to

the overall program by several distinct and

very-functioning "support groups"

Dominic Clark

Rodney Poindexter has a hard-working

training room, Dominic Clark runs the everpublicized

Sports Information Office, and

Sherman Bennett keeps his hands full handling

the UNLV ticket office.

UNLV is an institution that has set very

high goals for itself, both academically and

athletically. Success is in the cards for this

athletic program in the city of lights.

Appearances would say the Rebels certainly

have dealt themselves a full house.

Sherman Bennett -j

The '74-75 Women's Basketball Team: Emma Jean Majors, Sonja Madrane, Captain Tonya

Lytle, Linda Tellefson, Renne Brown, Head Coach Barbara Quinn, Gina Gonzales, Toni Affeidti,

Kay Lemay, Jill Adamson, Jackie Alford and Jane Anne Pete.

Women's First Year Success

At the University of Nevada, Las Vegas

something new has been happening . . . it's

women's intercollegiate athletics.

Since last July when the university hired

Barbara Quinn to be the women's athletic director,

the UNLV women's program has

grown into national prominence as the word

is getting around about the excellent opportunities

for both high school and junior college

women who want to compete in intercollegiate

competition against the best

women's teams in the country.

Women's Swimming Team: Head Coach Hicker,

Terry Wendell, Sue Powers, Chris Smith,

Kathy Buchanan, Lisa Foistad, Valerie Whitmore.

During last September and October Quinn

sent out over 24,000 letters to almost every

high school in the country so that people

would know about the new program that has

arrived in Las Vegas. Ever since then the

UNLV women's program has received letters

from different girls from practically every

state inquiring about UNLV and its women's

program.

The program consists of four intercollegiate

sports at the present time and will expand

to seven sports in the fall.

The women competed in basketball this

winter and recently finished its first year with

a winning record of 8-7. The gals traveled to

such cities as Santa Barbara, Salt Lake City

and Tuscon to participate against other universities

which have established women's

prog rams.

Probably the highlight of the women's basketball

season was when the Rebels played

host to the University of California, Los Angeles

Bruin team in the 6,257-seat Las Vegas

Convention Center. The contest was the first

time women's intercollegiate basketball had

been played in the Convention Center. The

game also marked the first time that UNLV

and UCLA had ever met in intercollegiate

sports, whether it be on the men's or

women's level. Governor Mike O'Callaghan

proclaimed the contest as the beginning of

"Athletic Week for Nevada Women." Even

Women's Tennis Team: Tina Kimzer, Tina

Teadors, Christian Chan, Maisie Gibson, Head

Coach Sue Kircher, Laurie McKauley, Sally

Pallitier, and Joyce Mitchell.

though the 1,000 people in attendance saw

the Rebels take their worst defeat ever, 99-

33, the game was considered a complete succss.

It made a lot of people aware of the

new and growing women's program at UNLV.

Besides basketball, the women have just

completed its first year of intercollegiate

swimming which saw two of its participants

qualify and compete in the national swimming

finals for women that were held in Tempe,

Arizona in March.

Swimming is not only new to the women's

athletic program, but this year also marks the

beginning of intercollegiate swwimming for

men at UNLV.

With the opening of the $6.3 million Paul

McDermott Physical Education Complex, not

only will swimming create a great deal of interest,

but the entire UNLV athletic program

will do so as well.

The complex houses enormous training

and practice areas, a 50-meter swimming

pool, attractively equipped locker rooms, athletic

training rooms and saunas. Spectator

seating capacity in each of two gymnasiums

is more than 2,000 and 1,000 at the pool. The

entire facility and all equipment is equally

accessible to both men and wwomen.

Two other sports, tennis and track and

field, competed in intercollegiate competition

UNLV's top woman track star Beatrice Emodi

who came to Las Vegas from Nigeria, Africa.

this year for UNLV. The Rebel women have

seen action against major colleges such as

Brigham Young University and Utah State

University.

Recently the tennis team took a three day

road trip to Utah v/here they picked up a

win and two losses against the toughest tennis

competition in the West.

In track, the women are fortunate to have

gotten an international track star in the services

of Beatrice Emodi from Nigeria, Africa.

The 5-7 freshman is currently the second

best long jumper in her native born Nigeria

and she plans to compete for the Nigerian

Olympic team in the 1976 Olympics in Montreal.

Emodi also competes in the 60 and 100

yard dashes. Also on the track team are two

of UNLV's women basketball players, Jackie

Alford and Emma Jean Major. Both Emodi

and Major competed in this year's national

track and field finals for women that were

held in Corvallis, Oregon in May.

With the opening of the new complex, the

women will expand its program to include

three more sports: cross country, gymnastics

and volleyball. All three sports will make

their debut at UNLV in September.

Sometning new has and is happening at

UNLV. Women's athletics will continue to

grow as they continue to receive the cooperatin

of the University's administration, the

Athletic Department, the student body and

lastly the Las Vegas community.

THE WINNINGEST

YEAR YET A recap of the '74-'75 Seasons

"One game

at a time"

Playing one-game-at-a-time, the University

of Nevada, Las Vegas has completed the

1974 Division II regular football season with

a perfect 11-0 record, 33 new school records,

and the host position of the Division II quarterfinal

game on Nov. 30 at 1 p.m. in the

16,100-seat Las Vegas Stadium.

The Running Rebels of second-year head

coach Ron Meyer gave the university its first

undefeated team in seven seasons of competition

and the two-year total under Meyer

is 19-3. The Rebels now hope to play for the

national Division II Championship on Dec. 14

by playing in the Camellia Bowl, but first

UNLV must host Alcorn State University, who

themselves had a very impressive 10-1 record.

If UNLV wins the quarterfinal game in

Las Vegas, they then would advance to the

regionally televised Grantland Rice Bowl in

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, before going to the

nationally-televised Camellia Bowl.

Before the season started, Meyer was confident

that his team was good, but did not

want to get into, the prediction game. His

only remark at th'e time was, "We don't want

to get involved in any numbers game, we are

just preparing for a 14-game season."

Well, his Rebels have marched off an impressive

list of victories that included powerful

Boise State University, Division I University

of Hawaii, and arch-rival University of

Nevada, Reno.

For the second consecutive year, All-America

running back Mike Thomas led the Rebels

in scoring and rushing. Despite missing two

and one-half games with a still troublesome

ankle, the super scatback still rushed for

1408 yards and scored 19 tds and had one

two-point conversion for 116 points. His twoyear

career total is 3,149 yards and 40 touchdowns.

Diminutive senior wide receiver Steve Haggerty

also led the Rebels in two categories

and will rank nationally along with Thomas.

Haggerty returned 20 punts for a record 324

net yards for an average of 16.2 yards per

return and one touchdown. He also ran back

15 kickoffs for 280 net yards for an average

of 18.7 yards each.

Sophomore quarterback Glenn Carano had

a commendable season passing the ball for

the running Rebels as he completed 49 of 106

passes for 839 yards and a school recordtieing

11 touchdowns. His favorite targets

were junior Mike Haverty (15 catches for 251

yards and three tds) and senior Craig Bryan

(11 for 186 and three tds).

As a team, UNLV rushed for 303.1 yards

per game, passed for 85.2 for a total offensive

average of 388.3 per game and scored

a record 36.2 points per game.

Mike Thomas ran (above) and Glenn Carano

passed UNLV to a 37-35 triumph over Boise

Stale University. It was a battle of the unbeatens

and the largest crowd in the history of the

state of Nevada (18,631) witnessed the game.

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS FOOTBALL FINAL 1974 DEFENSIVE STATISTICS

WON 11 LOST 0

1974 a year of firsts for UNLV, and a

super crowd turned out for a Pep Rally before

the Boise State victory.

Ingersol:

Team Defensive

Leader All-American candidate Joe Ingersoll, the

1974 University of Nevada, Las Vegas "Defensive

Player of the Year," is the Rebel team

leader in defensive production points according

to defensive statistics released recently

by UNLV defensive coordinator Steve Sidwell.

Ingersoll, a junior, led the unbeaten

(11-0) Rebels with 266 total production points

from his defensive tackle position.

Averaging over 24 points per contest, IngersoM's

final 1974 stats are 567 defensive

plays, 53 tackles, 52 assists, 61 rushed

passes, four quarterback sacks, nine tackles

for a loss, two batted passes, three hits causing

fumbles, and one fumble recovery. In addition

to leading the team in production

points. "Mighty Joe" is also the leader in

tackles, rushed passes, and tackles for a loss.

Another junior, linebacker Mike Otto, was

second on the Rebel squad with 231 points.

Otto placed his name in the Rebel record

book this season by pouncing on seven fumbles

to set a new school standard. His 63 assists

also gave him the team leadership in

that category.

Mike Whitemaine, also a junior, was the

only other Rebel to amass over 200 production

points. His 207 total came as a result of

his 41 tackles, 41 assists, eight qb sacks, and

four hits causing fumbles. He led the team

in qb sacks, hits causing fumbles, and total

plays (684).

Sophomore Marlon Beavers' five interceptions

tied a school record and gives him a

two-year total of nine interceptions. He led

the Rebel secondary with 179 points this

year.

UNLV's defense, in guiding the Rebels to

its first unbeaten season in the seven year

existence of UNLV football, only allowed an

PLAYER TP T A

(LINEMEN)

Joe Ingersoll 567 53 52

Greg Willis 413 36 31

Julius Rogers 292 29 30

Scott Orr 113 20 27

Randy Rizo 208 22 21

Earnest Dancer 140 9 8

Mike Davis 167 11 9

Karl Riley 140 8 11

(ENDS)

Mike Whitemaine 684 41 41

Tim Melcher 429 24 25

Lucien Hardy 257 16 14

Stuart Giles 100 8 4

Dave Beall 129 9 10

(LINEBACKERS)

Mike Otto 671 42 63

Tony Sandone 539 51 53

George Gaynor 288 25 26

Paul Jones 141 11 19

Sam Hontoya 187 16 13

Mike Savage 205 14 19

Jack Zaher 41 4 1

(SECONDARY)

Marlon Beavers 516 45 34

Gary Van Houten 469 36 33

Eddie George 475 34 29

Ronnie Bell 471 28 15

Donnis Watson 315 23 14

Jimmie .Andrews 189 13 13

Mike McLellan 119 10 12

Andre Jones 90 9 6

Sonny Brockman 64 6 4

Ysadore Martinez 91 6 2

(OTHERS)

Jim Thayer 3 1 2

Mike Haverty 2 1 1

Roy Callahan 3 2 1

Bruce Watkins 2 1 0

Clint Cator 7 1 0

Bob Braner 2 2 0

Craig Bray 2 2 0

Robert Starbird 1 1 0

Brad Hoffman 1 1 0

Leon Drummer 1 1 0

Mike Dye 1 1 0

Terryl Thomas 1 1 0

Mark Fikany 1 1 0

PT. VALUE KEY:

6-TD -Touchdown 3- I •

BK PR TFL BP CF RF TP TOTAL

61

43

42

60

0 36

18

14

12

24

14

5

1

1

3-BK -Blocked Kick 3-RF -

3-BP -Blocked Pass 3- S -

3-CF -Caused Fumble 3-TFL

Interceptions

Recovered Fumble

Sacks

-Tackle For Loss

0 266

0 188

0 179

0 156

0 108

0 59

0 54

0 49

0 207

0 114

0 69

0 32

0 32

231

189

85

56

54

48

12

179

133

111

92

91

63

41

35

22

20

2- T -Tackles

1- A -Assists

1-PR -Pass Rush

0-TP -Total Plays

average of 138.9 yards per game rushing and

only 318.6 total offensive yards per contest

for Rebel foes. In addition, they set a new

school standard with 23 pass interceptions

and held the 11 opponents to a total of 180

points or just 16.4 points per ballgame.

14

THE RECORD (11-0) (1-1)

UNLV OPP. ATT.

28 Weber State College 10 11,013

31 Northern Arizona University 14 7,800

20 University of Montana 17 11,524

51 University of Santa Clara 19 11,112

63 Prairie View A & M 28 8,915

37 Boise State University 35 18,631

33 University of Hawaii 8 15,418

52 New Mexico Highlands 14 5,587

24 South Dakota State 21 9,662

28 University of Nevada, Reno 7 17,119

31 Idaho State University 7 8,654

35 Alcorn State University • 22 12,689

11 Delaware University 49 10,000

MEYER RECRUITS

16 NEW PLAYERS

Hoping to bolster his team in needed

areas. University of Nevada, Las Vegas football

coach Ron Meyer recently announced

the names of 16 new recruits who have inked

national letters-of-intent to play for the Rebels

starting this fall.

Meyer reported, "We feel we have done a

commendable recruiting job and the addition

of these out-of-state recruits, combined with

the already-released instate recruits gives us

a good selection of talent for our 1975 Rebel

team."

The Rebels, undefeated in 11 games during

the 1974 regular season and 12-1 overall,

have 46 returning lettermen and 18 starters

returning to join with the new prospects to

give UNLV a balanced and talented team, on

paper, at least.

Linemen head the list of new talent for the

Rebels with seven, followed by three running

backs, two wide receivers, a pair of quarterbacks,

one fullback, and one linebacker.

Defensive secondary coach Chris Ault landed

five recruits during the recruiting season,

led by GIF 4-A Player-of-the-Year, Brian Bethke,

from South Hills High School in West

Covina, California. Bethke, 5-10, 182, guided

his team to the 4-A Southern Section championship

with a 13-1 overall record. Not only

did he run for over 1,000 yards, he also passed

for 600 more and proved to be a triple

threat as he was his squad's place-kicker as

well. His longest field goal was 37 yards. He

was an All-America selection as a prep.

The Rebels also landed, through Ault's

efforts, two of Bethke's talented teammates,

Mike Vargas and Doug Smith, Vargas is a

6-2, 225 pound middle guard, who was selected

as the AII-CIF-4-A Defensive Player-ofthe-

Year. Current Rebel defensive whiz,

Randy Rizo, was also the GIF 4-A Defensive

Player-of-the-Year in 1973.

Smith, 6-3, 200, will play at defensive end

for the Rebels after a two-way prep career at

fullback and linebacker. He was also an All-

San Gabriel Valley pick, like his teammates,

and like Bethke, was a high school wrestler,

earning all-league honors in that sport as

well.

Alphonso Williams, 6-1, 215, is an all-city

fullback from Banning High School in Wilmongton,

California. He is considered as an

excellent blocker and did run for 650 yards

last season for his 7-2 team.

A very strong prospect for the offensive

line will be 6-4, 225, Jeff Dill, from Redlands

Mike Thomas and the Rebels ran over Hawaii, 33-8

(California) High School. Dill also plays tight

end and for three years earned all-CIF 4-A

honors. He also competes in track as a 50-

feet plus shot putter.

Another five talenfed newcomers have been

recruited by offensive co-ordinator Larry Kennan

and receiver coach John Chura. A tall

quarterback is 6-2, 185 Tom Miller, from Burrough's

High School in Burbank, California.

He led his team to a 12-1 season record, running

for 500 yards and passing for 1,500

more. His team was a GIF 3-A semifinalist

and he will share the quarterbacking with

Bethke for the North team in the prep Shrine

game this summer.

A pair of running back hopefuls signed by

Kennan are Willie Russell, 5-11, 205, and

Jeff Caldwell, 6-0, 195. Russell ran for 1,300

yards at Redwood High School in Visala, California

and Caldwell is an all-conference player

from Capital High School in Boise, Idaho.

Both have been clocked in 9.9 in the 100

yard dash.

Wesley Austin is a very talented player

from Compton High School in Compton, California.

He was all-league twice and has played

split end, defensive safety, and linebacker.

Split end will probably be his position for the

Rebels.

Assistant head Rebel coach Doug Carder

has brought in four future Rebels, all considered

very good prospects for college football.

Gerald Scott is an all-league tackle from

(Continued on Next Page)

Delaware brought the Rebel season to a

screeching halt in the Grantland Rice Bowl in

famed Tiger Stadium in Baton Rouge, Loidsiana

. . . but it was a great season . . . and next

year is fust around the corner.

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS 1975 FOOTBALL SCHEDULE

Date Opponent (Series History) Location Time

Sept. 13 — Northern Iowa University (0-0-0) — Las Vegas —8:15 p.m. PDT

Sept. 20 — Idaho State University (2-1-0) — Pocatello, Idaho 8:00 p.m. MDT

Sept. 27 — University of Montana (1-0-0) — Missoula, Montana 1:30 p.m. MDT

Oct. 4 — Jackson State College (0-0-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PDT

Oct. 11 — University of Nebraska, Omaha (0-0-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PDT

Oct. 18 — Boise State University (2-1-0) — Boise, Idaho 7:30 p.m. MDT

Oct. 25 — University of Idaho (0-0-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PDT

Nov. 1 — Northern Arizona University (2-1-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PST

Nov. 8 — South Dakota State University (1-0-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PST

Nov. 15 — Weber State College (1-2-0) — Las Vegas 8:15 p.m. PST

Nov. 22 — University of Nevada, Reno (3-3-0) — Reno, Nevada 1:00 p.m. PST

' Home Games Played in the 16,106-Seat Las Vegas Stadium

1

Berkeley High In Berkeley, California. Scott

is 6-6, 250 and is the largest of all the Rebel

recruits this season.

A 9.7 running back from Ells High School

in Richmond, California, is prep Ail-American

Eddie Miller. All-Northern California and All-

East Bay, Miller, 5-9, 180 ran for 1,250 yards

his senior season. It is very possible he will

be a wide-receiver for the Rebels.

Mike Duckworth is a 5-11, 185 running

back from Oakland High School in that California

city and has been clocked in 9.8 seconds

for the 100. He was also all East Bay,

honorable mention Prep-All-America as he

toted the pigskin 150 times for 1,175 net

yards his final high school year.

A candidate for the center of the offensive

line is 6-3, 225, Jack Concannon. From Hayward

(California) High, he was a definite allleague

pick and was also honored as team

captain his senior season. He should help

the Rebel offensive line as a freshman this

fall.

UNLV defensive co-ordinator Steve Sidwell

has brought in three more Colorado players.

The new Colorado Rebels, who will join 13

others on the UNLV roster, are all from the

Denver area and were each selected as allleague

and all-Metro selections.

Randy Ramsey, 6-2, 215, is a lineman with

excellent 4.8 speed in the 40 and appears to

be a scholar-athlete as he is carrying a 3.4

grade point average at present. He also plays

basketball and was fourth in Colorado in the

shotput as a junior. He is from Westminster

High School.

A new linebacker for the Rebels is 6-0,

218, Greg Spencer. Spencer was injured in

the first game of his senior season but has

recovered according to his doctors and

coaches. He is a league-champion wrestler

(two years) and was second in the same state

track meet in the shot put that Ramsey was

in as a junior. He is from Lincoln High.

Russ Strecker, 6-3, 210, is a 4.7 defensive

tackle also from Lincoln. He was all-league

and all-metro in football and could possibly

play several defensive positions for the

Rebels.

The Rebels now have 27 recruits for 1975,

and Meyer is confident that the Rebels will

ink the allowabie three more for a total of 30

between seasons. Heading the iist of 11 instate

recruits are Ail-Staters Henry Vereen

from Clark High, Manny Rodriguez from

Bishop Gorman and Darrell Beavers from

Rancho High School. Vereen is a speedy

running back, Rodriguez is a fullback-linebacker

and Beavers is a linebacker.

The new recruits will report for the fall

practice, which begins August 20, but the returning

Rebeis will have Spring practice,

March 31 through May 2.

The Rebels will open the 1975 season at

home on September 13 when Northern Iowa

University visits.

BEST IN THE WEST

1974 UNLV RUNNIN' REBELS

W 11 L 0

1974 UNLV RUNNIN' REBELS — Front row (left to right): assistant

coach Chris Auit, assistant head coach Doug Carder, Ronnie Bell,

Jim Thayer, Mike Davis, Scott Orr, Craig Bray, Steve Haggerty, Mike

Dye, Cliff Conedy, Boh Braner, Julius Rogers, head coach Ron

Meyer, and assistant coach Jim Anderson. Second row: coach John

Chura, coach Bill Drake, coach Larry Kennan, coach Marty McGuffey.

Brad Hoffman, Mike McLellan, Clint Cator, Tony Grantz, Ysadore

Martinez, Kurt Schnahel, Shannon Russell, Courtney Bossert,

Mike Pry, Roy Callahan, Hugh Cunnigham, Mike Otto, Stuart Giles,

Tony Sandone, coach Clayton Bywaters, coach Doug Johnson, coach

Steve Sidwell, and coach Ron Smeltzer. Third row: Bucky Core,

George Gaynor, Jack Zaher, Earnest Dancer, Mark Eikany, Mark

Richardson, Robert Starbird, Joe Ingersoll, Rick BehrCndsen, Boh

Chess, Kevin Gray, Terry Mastey, Lee Levy, and Karl Riley. Fourth

row: Marlon Beavers. Dave Beall, Glenn Carano. Mike Whitemaine,

Tim Melcher, Ricci Prock, Mike O'Callaghan, Donnis Watson, Dusty

Satterfield, Doug Darlington, Bruce Watkins, Cliff Conedy, Randy

Rizo, Chris Davis, Mike Kelly, and Blanchard Carter. Top row: head

trainer Rodney Poindexter, trainer Ronnie Nold, trainer Frank Zazoni.

trainer Tom Pugh, manager Greg Payne, manager Rick Christopher.

manager Larry Chin, equipment manager Floyd Browning.

UNLV Swimming

HECKER PLEASED

WITH FIRST YEAR

"I am extremely pleased with our team's

performance throughout the entire year. For

a bunch of walkons, the University of Nevada,

Las Vegas swim team will have to go down

in history as one of the better groups of

young collegiate swimmers." Speaking: Vic

Hecker, UNLV's swim coach after the first

year of collegiate competition in swimming

at UNLV.

The Rebeis, who swam as a "club" sport

this year but will have full intercollegiate

status next year, were 8-2 in dual competition.

Even though the dual season is over for

the Rebeis, Hecker is still extremely busy

preparing six UNLV swimmers for the 26th

Annual Southern California Invitational AAU

meet on March 14-16 in Los Angeles.

Comprised almost totally of walkons, or

people who were not recruited and often have

very little competitive experience, the UNLV

swim season would have to be classed as

successful. "Although this is not the route

we like to take, it is nice to know that with

some dedication and work the students attending

UNLV have the ability to produce on

a collegiate level," Hecker stated.

He was very pleased with the men's performance

all year long and said, "the men

just about had to win every event because of

a lack of depth in order to win the meet."

"I was surprised," he added, "that we were

able to accomplish what we did without a

regulation facility." The team was unable to

•Vs.**-

Larry Miller: his breaststroke helped UNLV's swimming program get off the ground and into

the water.

8-3-3 Ain't Just KIckin' Things are never easy for a first-year team,

no matter what the sport. Soccer at the University

of Nevada, Las Vegas has definitely

been no exception to this rule.

Under the direction of Head coach Tom

Khamis and assistant coach Mitch Preus, the

first-year UNLV soccer Rebeis (8-3-3) fared

better than most first-year programs.

Comprised almost totally of former Las

Vegas area high school soccer players, with

a dozen of the 17 man roster being freshmen,

neither the Rebeis nor the head coach had

any collegiate soccer experience prior to the

opening of the 1974 campaign.

Forced to learn the hard way, the Rebels

learned very quickly. Although failing to win

in the first three outings, ail on the road,

UNLV came home and proceeded to win four

straight contests and six of the seven game

homestand. Highlighting the homestand were

a shutout victory over Brigham Young University

and a 4-2 win over previously unbeaten

Woodbury College.

After a road trip to Arizona resulted in two

ties, the Rebels came home and blanked

' .

.•'•V Ir-.t

Utah State 4-0. The Rebels finished the season

with an 8-3-3 mark after drubbing East

Los Angeles 2-1.

Co-captain Roy Sparks led the Rebels with

eight points on five goals and three penalty

kicks. Also tallying five goals were Louis

Lavietes and Dave Kennedy. Both Sparks and

Lavietes led the team in assists with three

apiece.

Goalie Bob Singer, in his first year as a

goalkeeper in college, recorded two shutouts

and only allowed 25 goals in the 14 contests.

The Rebels scored 32 goals against the

opponents' 25.

The road to success has never been an

easy one to travel. For the UNLV Rebels,

the journey has just begun. In a season designed

to determine the competitive ability

of the Rebeis, the team fared exceptionally

well against some very tough competition. Not

only did the Rebels prove that they can compete

on the collegiate level in soccer, they

proved that a first-year team does not necessarily

have to be a "patsy" on its opponents'

schedules.

Mike Rohm: on three UNLV relay teams

which placed in the top four in the Southern

California Invitational AAU in March.

use UNLV's new olympic-sized pool this year,

as they had planned, due to construction delays.

Another interesting sidelight to the program

was that two Rebel women swimmers,

Chris Smith and Cathy Buchanan, qualified

for the women's championships.

Hecker is now, in addition to preparing for

the Southern California Invitational, busy recruiting

and formulating the schedule for next

year. "I am looking forward to everyone returning

next year and am anxiously awaiting

the chance to combine our talent with some

new people," Hecker stated. He also added,

"We are upgrading the program next year by

scheduling such tough opponents as Arizona,

Arizona State, and Brigham Young University."

In addition to swimming next year, UNLV

will also have a water polo team. The Rebels

will start spring water polo practice in April

and Hecker is anticipating a good turnout for

this new sport. UNLV will host a 16 team

water polo tournament in October.

1974 UNLV Soccer Team: Varut Komalarajan.

Cliff Tabor, Bob Singer, Pat Clark, Wayne

Pederson, Mike Thompson, Bill Briare, Roy

Sparks, Louis Lavietes, Tom Khamis, Chuck

Martin, Bob Boehmer, Rick Ingram, Dave

K e n n e d y , M i t c h P r e u s . - j y

The '75 UNLV Baseball Team: Fred Dallimore, Rick Weber, Mike Slavinski, Terry Smith,

Gerry Okuda, Mike Whitemaine, Tom Tellmann, Bob Yount, Jerry Goeneche, John Schilling,

Brian Bills, Mike Cochran, Tom Ciilligan, Ralph Ulivarri, Pat Tiedeman, Glenn Page, Mike

McLellen, Mike Vaughn, John Wolfe, Clint Cator, Joe Vargas, Manny Abeyata, Monte Mendenhall,

Ed Draper, Dennis Deck, Pete Twyman, Bob Braner, and Glen Willard.

18

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS BASEBALL 1975 STATISTICS

RECORD: WON 12 LOST 10

PLATEtt G F B 2» IB SC 8? -4

Pat TladaMuiit ii H 2^ 5 0 I i i li

16

11 11 .sis 80 i? 9 >9M

Garry Okuda 22 76 16 24 0 4 1 1 2 0

15 13 .314 27 77 16 .867

John Schilling 21 81 15 25 2 1 0 3 2 0 12 14 12 .309 32 2 2 .944

Tla Culligan 20 79 U 24 6 1 2 1 0 1 12 11 16 .304 19 1 6 .769

Bob Tount 20 67 12 18 3 0 0 2 1 0 14 15 9 .269 34 1 4 .897

Mlka Cochran 22 86 12 23 4 0 1 1 1 2 6 a 9 .267 68 86 3 .981

BrUn Bills 22 83 12 22 6 0 0 1 4 1 9 8 13 .265 175 5 4 .978

Tatty Sfldth 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.000 0 1 0 1.000

Rick Wabar 14 48 7 15 5 0 1 1 2 1 8 12 13 .313 17 28 8 .849

Mlk« Slavenakl 16 43 12 12 1 0 1 3 1 1 8 10 3 .279 21 1 3 .880

Joa Vargas 17 40 6 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 8 11 12 .275 58 8 3 .956

John Wolfe 11 26 3 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 3 .269 27 2 0 1.000

Hike McLellan 12 24 6 5 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 7 2 .208 8 2 0 1.000

Ralph Ulivarri 5 11 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 .182 16 3 1 .950

Ed Draper 4 13 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 .077 0 0 0 .000

(PITCHERS) FIELDXHG. • • • 9 47 6 .903

mv 22 754 132 217 3ti 7 y 15 18 7 120 136 119 .288 591 291 65 .931

OPPONEHTS 22 776 150 206 37 15 5 31 23 10 92 108 120 .265 568 251 32 .962

PITCHING

PLATER G GS CG SV IP -H BB so HP WP R ER ERA W-L

Glenn Willard "1 0 0 0 2/3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 6-0

Hcmty Mandenhall 3 2 2 0 18 2/3 11 4 16 0 2 7 4 1.93 2-1

Manny 7 3 1 1 26 1/3 21 5 13 1 2 16 12 4.10 1-1

Dennis i/ccn. 9 5 3 0 51 1/3 56 29 23 1 3 33 24 4.21 4-0

Mike Whitemaine 5 4 2 0 38 45 9 23 3 1 28 20 4.74 1-2

Tom Tellmann 5 4 1 0 30 34 7 8 3 2 23 16 4.80 1-3

Clint Cator 4 0 0 0 11 2/3 14 11 9 0 1 16 9 6.94 1-0

Joe Vargas 4 3 1 0 15 17 15 13 1 5 19 15 9.00 2-2

Pete Tvyman 3 0 0 0 3 3 5 2 0 0 4 3 9.00 0-1

Mike McLellan 2 1 0 0 2 1/3 4 7 1 1 0 4 4 15.45 0-0

UMLV 22 "22 10 1 197 204 92 l68 10 16 ISO 107 4.89 12-10

OPPONEMTS 22 22 9 1 189 1/3 217 129 136 7 14 132 115 5.47 10-12

RESULTS:

UHLV OPPONENT OPP UNLV OPPONENT OPP

4 Northern Arlsona 3 11 Southern 7

3 Nerthem Arisooa 6 4 Brlgham Toung Unlv* 15

4 iNortbam Arlsona 9 18 Brlgfaam Young Univ. 15

8 #U.C. Irvine 6 7 use 5

3 #U.C. Irvine 4 6 LaVeme College 9

2 U. of Oklahoma 7 0 U c. Santa Barbara 16

4 #U. of Oklahoma 7 4 fOregon State 3

9 U« of Oklahoma 4 5 Air Force Academy 3

1 Southern Utah 0 9 0 .c. Berkeley 4

5 Arlsona State 9 5 fOonsaga Unlv» 4

7 Southern Utah 1 11 Lavish-dark State CaXit 13

#EZTRA INNINGS

Rebs Start

Final WCAC

Season

Playing 22 tough preliminary games, the

University of Nevada, Las Vegas baseball

team began its final season in the West Coast

Athletic Conference by traveling to Malibu,

Calif., recently for a three-game series against

defending conference champion Pepperdine

University.

Coach Fred Dallimore's Rebels will carry

a 12-10 record, including four victories in

their last five games, against the Wayne

Wright-coached Waves, who are rated in the

top 20 in the nation with their healthy 18-6

record.

UNLV will also be out to improve on its

disappointing 5-13 record in the WCAC in

1974. Pepperdine won the league title with

a 15-3 record after losing the first game in

conference play to the Rebels, 8-7 in extra

innings. The last time the Rebels went to

Mallbu, UNLV defeated Pepperdine three

straight times, 4-2, 3-1, 3-1.

While Pepperdine has outstanding defense

this year, UNLV has commited 65 errors in

22 games, and this certainly will be a key

factor in the series.

At the plate, the Rebels have four players

hitting over .300 and a very solid .288 team

batting average. Junior catcher-third baseman

Pat Tiedemann, from Vacaville, Calif.,

leads the Rebel bat parade with a .355 average.

He leads the squad in runs scored (19),

base hits (27), homeruns (2), and base-onballs

(21).

Shortstop Jerry Okuda, who is another junior

college transfer in the UNLV lineup, is

hitting .316, while leftflelder John Schilling is

hitting for a .309 average, and designated hitter

Tim Culligan leads the team in RBI with

16 and carries a 3.04 average at the plate.

Another area of improvement for the Rebels

this season has been on the mound,

where the Rebel pitchers have hurled 10

complete games so far, three more than the

team had all of last season.

The Rebels will open league play with junior

Dennis Deck (4-0, 4.21 ERA) on the

mound. In Saturday's doubleheader lettermen

Mike Whitemaine (1-2, 4.74) and Manny

Abeyta (1-1, 4.10) wili start. Pepperdine will

throw Mike Scott (5-2) on Friday, and Mark

Lee (9-1) and Tony Cameron (1-0) in Saturday's

twinbill.

The '75 UNLV Tennis Team: Fred Albrecht,

Dan Knight, Eric Dondlich, Doug Johnson,

Craig Crell, Paul luoring, Bruce Stubbs, Jim

Scott, and Frank Kosic.

Loaded with talent, depth and maturity, the '75 Track and Field Team at UNLV could well be the best in Rebel history. The Rebels are expected

to be very strong in the sprints, middle distances and relays by head coach AI McDaniels, who also expects many school records to

fall and many team members to make a name for themselves and the University. Pictured are Bradley Cruz, Roger Kersh, John Osborne,

Levant Carey, Eric Schlacks, Bob Weaver, Warren Hill, Beatrice Emodi, Craig Falk, Dale Campbell, Jerry Gates, Andre Jone, Fred Tredup,

Joerg Herbrechtsmeier, Luis Livingstone, Gene Hardaway, Mike Whiting, Gordon Edwards, Jimmie Chapman, Mike Newton, Mark Metcalf,

Lloyd Mitchell, Jeff Baird, Mel Turner, Marv Turner, James Moa and Al McDaniels.

UNLV Track Records

100 — Derek Cardwell, 9;6 (1974)

220 — Dan Coppola, 21.6 (1973)

Derek Cardwell, 21.6 (1974)

440 — Mel Turner, 49.0 (1973)

880 — Gary Elam, 1:55.2 (1969)

1 Mile — Dale Campbell, 4:18.0 (1974)

2 Mile — Blaine Clarke, 9:54.3 (1971)

3 Mile — Bob Weaver, 14:57.7 (1974)

6 Mile — Doug Clarke, 34:45.2 (1971)

120 HH — Lloyd Mitchell, 14.4 (1973)

440 LH — Bill Jones, 53.5 (1969-70)

Steeplechase — Bob Weaver, 9:30.0 (1974)

440 Relay — Joel Porter, Lloyd Mitchell,

Mel Turner, Luis Livingston, 42.2 (1973)

880 Relay — Luis Livingston, Charles

Cooper, Lloyd Mitchell, Mel Turner, 1:29.8

(1973)

Mile Relay — Bill Jones, Bill Spencer,

Gene Kendricks, Gary Elam, 3:20.8 (1969)

2 Mile Relay — Blaine Clarke, Rick Miller,

Doug Clarke, Ed Brown, 8:05.5 (1971)

Sprint Medley — Mel Turner, Lloyd

Mitchell, Luis Livingston, Ed Cantu,

3:30.5 (1973)

Distance Medley — Jeff Baird, Terry

Downey, Bob Weaver, Dale Campbell,

10:30.4 (1974)

Cross Country — Richard Milan, 25:15

(1972), Home Course - 5 Mile

UNLV Basketball 24-5: Best Season

in 17 Year HIstor Helping Jerry Tarkanlan maintain his pace

as the winningest coach in major college

basketball, the Runnin' Rebels of the University

of Nevada, Las Vegas ended the 1974-75

season as the finest in the 17-year history at

the university with a 24-5 overall record.

The West Coast Athletic Conference Champions

were 2-1 in the NCAA playoffs, defeating

San Diego State, 90-80, losing to Arizona

State, 84-81, and bouncing back to topple

the University of Montana, 75-67 for third

place in the Western Regional tournament

recently in Portland, Ore.

Coach Tarkanlan, who now has a sevenyear

major college coaching record of ISOSI

for a .843 winning percentage, commented,

"This year's Rebel team has played closer

to its potential than any other team that I

have coached, and, I am very proud that we

accomplished what we did with a sophomore

team."

Looking forward to becoming an independent

Division I team next year after withdrawing

from the WCAC as conference champion,

the Rebels were led by five sophomores, a

junior and one senior to the most victories

in the school's cage history.

Senior team captain Ail-America Ricky

Sobers set three UNLV records and three

Conference records, but the remainder of the

squad is expected back for the 1975-76 season.

The 6-3 WCAC Piayer-of-the-Year has been

invited to, and has accepted, to play in the

fourth annual Pizza Hut Classic in Las Vegas

on April 15. He leaves UNLV as the all-time

record-holder in assists as he compiled 166

this season for an average of 5.7 per game.

He also set a new Rebel mark from the freethrow

line, converting on 105 of 127 attempts

for a superb .828 percentage. He finished his

two-year Rebel career with 855 points, good

Bouncin' Boyd Batts came from Hawaii, wasn't eliaible until January, but he definitely made

his mark and was the Rebels' most improved player in 1974-75.

REBEL ROUSERS — The 1974-75 spirit-rousing

cheerleaders were front: Nancy Oesterle;

middle: Marrie Archuleta, Heidi Neal, and

Cathy Seggerson. On top: head cheerleader

Chris Martinez and Pat Washington.

enough for 11th on the ail-time UNLV scoring

charts.

Heading the list of returning stars for UNLV

is 6-7 sophomore Eddie Owens who led

UNLV in scoring this past season. Scoring

534 points for an average of 18.4 per game.

Easy Eddie has already moved up to 16th on

Ail-time UNLV scoring charts with 797 points.

He still has another two years with the Rebels,

too.

Center Lewis Brown, another sophomore

this year, ended the season with 20 points

and 13 rebounds against Montana to finish

third in scoring for UNLV and first in rebounding.

For the year, he averaged 13.1

points per game and ripped off 11.7 rebounds

per contest. He is 24th on the UNLV scoring

parade with 557 points after his first two

years with the Rebels.

Two more sophomores. Glen Gondrezick

and Jackie Robinson, also contributed greatly

to the Rebel success story. Gondrezick, who

was hampered at the end of the season with

a thigh injury, finished with 11.8 points per

game and 5.9 rebounds while Robinson completed

his second year with 11.6 ppg and 9.6

rpg, both promising greater futures.

The best Rebel performance in the NCAA

regionals in Portland was by 5-10 sophomore

Robert Smith, who started both games for

UNLV after being the sixth man ail during

the previous 27 games. Smith, who was

named to the Aii-Regional tournament team

for his play, scored 25 points in the two

games, had 10 assists, four steals, and nearly

single-handedly broke the Arizona State

press as he brought the bail up-the-court

nearly all of the time during his completegame,

40-minute display of ball-handling.

Smith finished the year with 9.5 points per

game and 93 assists and was the Rebels'

leading field goal shooter as he sunk 110 of

213 for a .516 percentage. He also shot a

very accurate .818 (54-66) from the charity

stripe.

Junior Boyd Batts, who did not become

eligible until conference season play started,

ended a solid season with 16 points against

Montana and a very healthy 9.2 scoring average.

Batts was a key factor off the bench

for UNLV several times during the season

and will return next season as the team's

only regular senior.

The Runnin' Rebels were also the bestshooting

team in the school's history, hitting

.479 from the field (1087) of 2270) and .733

from the charity stripe (467 of 637).

20 21

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS BASKETBALL 1974-75 FINAL STATISTICS

(Compiled by Dominic Clark)

PLAYER G FGM-FGA PCT FT>t-FTA PCT REB AVE PF-FO TP AVE A

EDDIE OVrtlNS 29 211-427 .494 112-148 .757 140 4.8 77- 4 534 18.4 53

V/CAC 14 102-210 .486 57- 72 .792 57 4.1 37- 3 261 18.6 28

RICKY SOBERS 29 209-421 .496 105-127 .828 108 3.7 101- 9 523 18.0 166

WCAC 14 102-198 .515 48- 57 .842 52 3.7 46- 4 252 18.0 88

LEWIS BROWN 28 170-370 .460 27- 50 .540 328 11.7 95- 3 367 13.1 24

WCAC 13 81-177 .458 7- 17 .412 156 12.0 47- 0 169 13.0 14

GLEN GONDREZICK 29 135-207 .470 71- 92 .772 172 5.9 115-11 341 11.8 76

WCAC 14 76-151 .503 30- 35 .857 99 7.1 53- 5 182 13.0 39

JACKIE ROBINSON 27 131-264 .496 50- 83 .602 260 9.6 67- 1 312 11.6 38

WCAC 12 58-110 .527 16- 24 .667 115 9.6 35- 1 132 11.0 17

ROBERT SMITH 29 110-213 .516 54- 66 .618 36 1.2 53- 1 274 9.5 93

WCAC 14 55- 94 .585 23- 28 .821 18 1.3 26- 0 133 9.5 41

BOYD BATTS 18 71-155 .458 24- 33 .727 74 4.1 59- 3 166 9.2 22

WCAC 14 52-120 .433 20- 27 .741 57 4.1 43- 2 124 8.9 16

DON IrtlMER 20 15- 43 .349 8- 15 .533 53 2.7 48- 5 38 1.9 4

WCAC 9 3- 12 .250 3- 8 .375 20 2.2 18- 2 9 1.0 3

MIKE MILKE 15 11- 31 .355 10- 12 .833 12 .8 9- 0 32 2.1 16

WCAC 9 9- 20 .450 10- 12 .833 5 .6 8- 0 28 3.1 10

JOHN FREEMAN 12 9- 17 .529 2- 3 667 4 .3 8- 0 20 1.7 0

WCAC 7 8- 12 .667 2- 3 667 1 .1 6- 0 18 2.6 0

MATT PORTER 9 6- 13 .462 3- 4 750 4 .4 0- 0 15 1.7 3

WCAC 6 6- 10 .600 3- 3 1 000 3 .5 0- 0 15 2.5 3

DON SILCOX 7 1- 3 .333 0- 2 000 17 2.4 2- 0 2 .3 2

WCAC 5 1- 3 .333 0- 000 11 2.2 0- 0 2 .4 2

JEEP KELLEY 7 8- 26 .308 1- 2 500 9 1.3 7- 0 17 2.4 4

(TEAM REBOUNDS) 147-58

UNLV 29 1087-2270 .479 467-637 733 1364 47.0 641-37 2641 91.5 501

WCAC 14 553-1117 .495 219-287 763 649 46.4 315-17 1325 94.6 261

OPPONENTS 29 927-2012 .447 464-673 689 1343 46.3 640-28 2318 79.9 442

WCAC 14 431- 959 .449 266-354 751 599 42.8 294-10 1128 80.6 217

MINUTES PLAYED;

TEAM (5,800)--Sobers (1002), Gondrezick (861), Robinson (855), Owens (854),

Brown (796), Smith (659), Batts (370), Uelmer (182), Kelley (75), Milke (62),

Porter (32), Freeman (28), Silcox (24).

TEAM (483)—Sobers (120), Brown (70), Owens (71), Smith (64), Robinson (51),

Gondrezick (48), Weimer (26), Milke (14), Batts (13), Kelley (4), Silcox (1),

Freeman (1), Porter (0).

Tricky Ricky Sobers (No. 40) passed and shot (see previous page) his wny into the UNLV record book ... He wai the Rnnnin' Rebels' first

All-American . . . MVP of the West Coast Athletic Conference and the UNLV team ... He was the Rebel team captain ... He played in

the Coaches All-Star Game in Tiil.sa, Oklahoma in April and the Pizza Hut Cla.s.sic in Las Vegas in April . . . He was the Man of the Hour

for UNLV basketball.

22

RECORD: OVERALL W 24 L 5; WCAC W 13 LI (HOME: 15-0; AWAY: 6-3; NEUTRAL: 3-2)

RESULTS; 126 *UNIV. OF NEVADA, RENO 87 Owens- 22 Robinson- 13 6,257 SELLOUT

84 *SEATTLE UNIVERSITY 62 Owens- 21 Brown- 20 6,257 SELLOUT

UNLV OPPONENT OPP LEADING SCORER TOP REBOUNDER ATTENDANCE 106 *SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE 94 Sobers- 23 Brown- 12 6,257 SELLOUT

75 CAL STATE, FULLERTON 56 Sobers- 16 Brown- 17 5,228 77 *Seattle University 63 Sobers- 20 Robinson- 14 3,000

80 U. of Arizona 85 Gondrezick- 21 Brovm- 8 11,123 81 *Saint Mary's College 75 Gondrezick- 19 Robinson- 13 1,800 SELLOUT

77 Univ. of Oregon 94 Robinson- 17 Robinson- 9 10,000 SELLOUT 103 *Univ. of San Francisco 113 Owens- 26 Brown- 23 5,488

84 U.C, SANTA BARBARA 81 O^^ens- 26 Owens- 12 3,859 81 *Univ. of Santa Clara 74 Sobers- 31 Brown- 9 2,335 SELLOUT

94 UNIV. OF RHODE ISLAND 80 Rcbinson,0\yens-20 Bro^m- 12 3,592 123 *PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY 86 0wens,Robin8on-16 Robinson- 15 6,257 SELLOUT

101 BUFFALO STATE COLLEGE 74 Robinson— 20 Robinson,Brown- 9 3,624 93 *LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIV. 81 Gondrezick- 26 Brown- 15 6,218

99 ILLINOIS STATE UNIV. 88 Broi-m, Sobers-22 Brown- 22 5,981 98 *Univ. of Nevada, Reno 88 Sobers- 30 Gondrezick- 12 3,500

99 tfUNIV. OF SOUTH ALABAMA 80 Owens- 30 Rob inson, Broim-15 6,257 SELLOUT 114 PORTLAND STATE UNIV. 100 Sobers- 32 Robinson- 16 6,237

80 //FRESNO STATE UNIVERSITY 64 Sobers- 23 Brown- 14 6,227 90 +San Diego State 80 Sobers,Owens- 21 Brown- 12 14,733 SELLOUT

78 (®Texas A&M University 80 Owens— 20 Pobinson- 17 5,673 81 •Arizona State 84 Sobers- 20 Brown- 9 9,797

89 0Univ. of Hawaii 77 Brown,Sobers-22 Brown- 11 8,825 75 +Univ. of Montana 67 Brown- 20 Brown- 13 8,534

82 *Loyola Marytnount Univ. 69 Owens,Sobers- 20 Brown- 15 2,123 SELLOUT

94 *Pepperdine University 82 Sobers- 24 Brotm- 11 2,950 HOME GAMES IN ALL CAPS

77 *UNIV. OF SAN FRANCISCO 75 Owens- 20 Brown- 11 6,257 SELLOUT //Las Vegas Holiday Classic OHouston Blueljonnet Classic *"csc Coast Athletic Conference

100 *UNIV. OF SANTA CLARA 79 Owens- 23 Brown,Gond rezic k- 9 6,257 SELLOUT -NCAA riaycffs ATTENDANCE: 46; HOME: 84,765; Home Averases 5,651.

REBEL BASKETBALL SQUAD — The University of Nevada, Las Vegas Rebels' 1974-75 basketball team is pictured here. They are, from

left to right (front row). Assistant Coach Gil Castillo, Mike Milke, John Freeman, Jackie Robinson, Matt Porter, Ricky Sobers, Robert

Smith, and Assistant Coach Dan Ayala. Back row: Head Coach Jerry Tarkanian, Don Silcox, Boyd Batts, Don Weimer, Lewis Brown, Phil

Parainore, Eddie Owens, Glen Gondrezick, and Assistant Coaches Lynn Archibald and Ralph Readout. 23

Jumpin' Jackie Robinson was always around the basket this year.

Big Lew Brown was the Jans' delight and the opponents' nightmare

as he rebounded better than anyone the Rebels played and led the

team during the season.

24

Easy Eddie Owens led the Rebels in scoring for the year and in

league play, and, he was only a sophomore.

r

Robert "Slick" Smith was the Rebel Super Star . . . He made the

Western Regional All-Tournament Team with superb play against

Arizona State and the University of Montana.

The Las Vegas Economy

by Dr. Bernard Malamud and Dr. William T. White

For economists, Las Vegas is one of a kind

—an especially interesting kind. Witfi its

focus on recreation in a world of ever-increasing

affluence, Las Vegas presents a

glimpse at the world of the future, sometimes

in a usefully exaggerated form. Economists

at the University of Nevada, Las Veaas. of

course, have special interests in the Las

Vegas economy and in recreational economics

generally. Yet local economies have been

sparsely treated in national economic literature,

and in the author's belief, too sparsely

treated at our university as well. To correct

this, the authors will offer a seminar on the

Las Vegas economy during the second 1975

summer session. This article presents a preview

of some facts and issues to be treated

in that seminar, with particular attention paid

to the challenging questions posed for economics

by events in Las Vegas.

We shall first examine the Las Vegas economy

as a whole, In terms of Its overall growth

thus far and as projected into the future.

There will be some surprises in these projections.

The remarkable resistance of many

aspects the Las Vegas economy to recession

receives attention next. Then, just to keep

from being too pleasant about prospects, we

shall discuss Las Vegas's remarkable ability

to have an unemployment rate persistently

higher than the national average.

In treating specific industries, our study

separates "export" industries, which bring

income from outside areas, from supporting

industries, which serve local residents.

The export resort industry receives the

special treatment it deserves, with particular

attention given to its behavior during national

recessions. We also give some idea of future

resort industry growth in the world economy.

The non-resort exporting industries deserve

and receive some brief comment, particularly

as they involve rather recession resistant governmental

activity; the Test Site and Nellis

AFB.

As in every community, "exporting" industry

employees are served by a very large induced

support industry involving everything

from barber shops to housing to food stores.

This supporting industry, while certainly characteristic

of any city, has unique features

here. Housing construction for a rapidly increasing

population is of particular interest.

We shall discuss some of these features as

best we can in the space available to us. We

promise much more for the seminar, of

course, including participation by persons expert

in each of the fields covered.

GROWTH AND FORECAST GROWTH

IN LAS VEGAS

In the period between 1960 and 1970, Nevada

grew more rapidly than any other state

in the Union — a 71.3% rate, which was almost

double that of its nearest followers,

Florideu and Arizona. Nevada's 70-F%

growth compares with an overall United

States population of growth of a little over

13.3%. Employment in Nevada has increased

3y2 times more rapidly than overall U. 8.

employment from the beginning of 1970 to

1974. The strong overall growth trend clearly

continues in the 1970's.

A recent study of automobile licenses exchanged

for Nevada plates Indicates that Nevada's

immigrants are coming overwhelmingly

from California, but other states are strong

sources of Nevada immigrants as well. Significant

numbers are coming from all states,

particularly the richer states.

In explaining Nevada's growth, and the

growth of Las Vegas which largely accounts

for it, most Las 'i/egans would cite job and

business opportunities and the high "quality

of life" enjoyed here as the primary reasons

new residents have been attracted.

Most economists, while impressed with the

quality of life reasons for growth in an increasingly

affluent world, still would place

primary emphasis in explaining growth on the

business and job opportunities available.

These in turn are primarily influenced by

changes in the export industries — the resort

business, Nellis AFB, and the Test Site. Of

the three export industries, increases In the

resort industry activity not only Is of first rank,

but in more recent years has compensated

for declines in the Test Site and little change

in Nellis activity. Over the period from 1953

to 1973, the average annual percentage rate

of growth in resort employment has been almost

8% (7.88%). Essentially, that which is

to be explained in accounting for Las Vegas'

rates much over five percent lead to strains,

distortions, and capacity constraints which

alter those situations to bring about some

lower rate of growth. Among such factors

one can already perceive In Las Vegas is

the end of the days when a tourist could

move from his hotel to any other without considering

traffic problems and travel times. As

another example, the increase in stoplights

on one two-mile stretch on Maryland Parkway

from one to five within the past three years

shows the effects of growth on the very

things which helped to permit growth — easy

movement from home to job for Las Vegas

residents.

Our retreat from high growth prediction

does not mean that we do not foresee very

strong growth in the future. Even with a gradual

reduction of annual resort growth from

8% to a more realistic 5.4%, resort employment

can be reasonably expected to reach

more than 105,000 by 1990, a 133% over

present levels. The expected growth in resort

employment and the multiplied effects this

employment would have on overall employmm

i i l l l l l l ' i f ' i " • i

From sin to savior: the gambling and resort industry may exempt Las Vegas from the surrounding

recession.

growth is the growth in tourism.

The 20-year persistence of growth of nearly

8% in resort employment and the high resulting

rate of growth in Las Vegas population

over the past two decades tempts an expectation

that something like an 8% growth rate

should be expected for the forseeable future.

We do not believe such an expectation is

warranted, however. In the main, we are dissuaded

from expecting such growth to continue

by the consequences anywhere at anytime

of such fantastic growth rates as Las

Vegas has had in the recent past. When it is

realized that 8% growth leads to the doubling

of size every nine years and a quadrupling

of size every 18 years, something of the consequences

of sustained growth at 8% can be

seen. By 1991, we would expect that there

be four times as many cars on the roads of

Las Vegas, four times as many houses, perhaps

three times as many school children,

four times as many hotei rooms, etc. Experience

in similar situations conform that growth

ment is very strong, indeed.

There is a second temptation in observing

Las Vegas growth to consider that future

growth will vary considerably depending upon

decisions not yet made and not predictable.

Thus, it might be argued that MGM's decision

to build the Grand Hotel, and Hilton's decision

to expand its hotel could conceivably

have been reversed, with a consequent radical

impact on resort employment. The data

suggests, however, that expansions in hotel

capacity which appear at first to be the result

of decisions by particular persons or

firms which might have decided otherwise,

probably would have occurred in any case,

other entrepreneurs moving in to meet a

valid demand. This fact, coupled with the

realization that some building which at first

appears to be overbuilding Is more correctly

perceived as "early" building, supports rather

smooth curves of expansion as the proper

basis for predicting long term growth.

(Continued on Next Page^^

RECESSIONS AND LAS VEGAS

EXPORT INDUSTRIES

The behavior of the Las Vegas economy as

general business conditions change, and

especially in recessions, is at least as important

as long term growth. Considering the

recessions of 1958, 1960-61, 1970-71 and the

current recession insofar as data are available,

Las Vegas resort business has only

slowed in growth rather than actually turned

downward. Only in 1960 did gaming revenues

adjusted for inflation actually decline from

the previous year and this decline was less

than two-tenths of one percent. In the current

economic downturn, which is considerably

more serious than the others, gaming

revenues in money terms have grown more

than enough to match inflation.

There is considerable difference in recession

impacts on Casino Center gaming as

compared with Strip gaming, with the former

thus far seemingly escaping any effects of

recession. Further analysis of impact patterns

of recessions will be required before definite

conclusions in this regard can be made, particularly

with respect to cause. There is limited

statistical support for a conclusion that

Strip business was significantly affected by

stock market changes, whereas Casino Center

business did not, and this might in part

reduce recession responsiveness of the latter.

A second reasonable speculation, still

to be checked, is that Casino Center business

is largely from Los Angeles, with a low

"ticket" price (minimum price of the trip),

whereas Strip business involves patrons from

more distant locations and a resulting higher

ticket cost. These facts, if they are confirmed,

coupled with the recently noticed high

sensitivity of high "ticket" items to recession,

would be a useful explanation of the apparent

greater recession sensitivity of Strip gaming

compared to that of Casino Center gaming.

Further research into the reasons that

recession impacts less on hotels than on the

less expensive and smaller motels also is

needed.

Within the limits of current information and

the analysis which has been made of it, the

non-resort export industry appears largely to

follow the recession pattern of government

employment elsewhere, i.e., limited impact.

There is some prospect that in a recession

considerably deeper than the current recession,

programs of defense spending such as

those envisaged by the Department of Defense

in its anti-recession budgeting last year

could make Nellis AFB and/or the Test Site

counter-recessionary, but nothing of this nature

has occurred thus far. Naturally, any

new employment associated with the proposed

nuclear waste storage facility, if it

should be located in Nevada, would add to

Las Vegas employment. There will also be

some multiplied effects of such employment

in terms of supporting employment. Caution

is called for in estimating the impacts of both

Test Site and Neilis expenditures on the local

economy. Many of the Site and Neilis expenditures

involve very little purchase of local

materials; highly sophisticated equipment

(e.g., aircraft) are brought in from outside

sources and constitutes major fractions of

total expenditures. Appropriate treatment of

Neilis and Test Site expenditures in terms of

impacts on the Las Vegas economy must be

based on employment and materials purchases

made locally. It is expected that estimates

of local materials purchases can be

obtained for the summer seminar and combined

with already available local employment

expenditures to refine estimates of Test Site

and Neilis impacts on the local economy.

SUPPORTING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

Workers in the support sectors of the Las

Vegas economy serve export industry employees

and each other. Most supporting activity,

such as derived numbers of children

in the public schools, retail store business,

and other service businesses are reasonably

predictable, not only from stable relationships

with the export industries, but from the relatively

smooth growth curves presented by

their histories. A typical case is that of tele-

•phone demand, which has increased at an

essentially constant growth rate. The fact

that this smooth growth has occurred despite

such seemingly radical discrete events as the

construction of the MGM and the Hilton addition

reinforces the conclusion previously

stated that Las Vegas growth can be expected

to be relatively independent of decisions

on individual expansion projects.

The relatively light impact of recessions

on Las Vegas' primary export industry, the

resort industry, normally would be expected

to be accomplished by a lower level of recessionary

unemployment in Las Vegas. In

fact, the opposite seems to be the case. Las

Vegas unemployment figures are higher than

the national average both in recession and

in upswings, and further rise more rapidly

than national unemployment rates when the

latter rise. Information from the Nevada

Employment Security Department suggests

that Las Vegas unemployed are augmented

by persons becoming unemployed elsewhere

who move to Las Vegas hoping to find work

or at least to collect unemployment compensation

in a recreational surrounding. In a resulting

carburetor-like effect, the reservoir of

unemployed would be quickly filled to a high

level even if almost every person now unemployed

were hired. Very recently, however,

there are indications that a larger than usual

fraction of the newly unemployed in Las

Vegas were locally generated.

One of the most important of the support

sector industries, housing, has not been

stable. For the most part, the problems of

this supporting industry are reflections of

national problems as housing starts declined

from a level above 2.4 million per year in

1972 to less than 900,000 per year at the present

time. However, in the hot distant past,

there have been some housing industry problems

essentially of local origin, particularly

in overbuilding and in housing finance practices.

Currently, the consequences of these

past practices are mixed. Las Vegas housing

is far less overbuilt than many other communities,

with such overbuilding as does exist

being concentrated in condominium projects,

which also are badly overbuilt on a national

basis. Housing finance practices have been

conservative in reaction to the earlier problems,

which led local savings associations

into negative net worth and placed them

under lending restrictions.

The financial institutions sector of the Las

Vegas economy has not yet shown any known

signs of difficulty from the current recession

or other causes, despite the problems in

housing. There were some minor difficulties

associated with the gold, silver, and other

commodities options purchases, with firms

involved proliferating in 1972 throuah 1974,

and with several major firm bankruptcies

eventually occurring. The total level ot these

activities and loss of actually invested funds

(as distinct from reinvested paper profits) has

not been sufficient to create a significant disturbance

in the Las Vegas economy.

THE CHALLENGE OF RELEVANT

WORLD TRENDS

As indicated at the outset, all of the foregoing

concerning the Las Vegas economy

constitutes a segment of a widespread international

movement into levels of affluence

which have brought not only Nevada but

also other recreational areas into the highest

levels of growth in modern society. There is

little effective literature on the long run consequences

of this increased demand for recreation

and the form in which recreational

demand ultimately best will be met. The long

run potentialities of automation and information

systems show clearly that product manufacturing

as well as most routine paper work

will increasingly occupy smaller shares of the

work force. Additionally, these most important

technological improvements, particularly

in communications and transportation, can

be expected to free many types of economic

activity from locational constraints, to the further

benefit of communities providing recreaion

and other aspects of a high quality of

life. The meaning of these trends for the Las

Vegas economy can be perceived only dimly

now. It is clear, however, that its better perception

will require not only the work of economists,

but the work of all of the disciplines

concerned with the nature of human society

and specifically with the nature of self satisfying

activity in a world increasingly able to

afford leisure time.

' • - • p i ' x f . V . - , „ —

I ' m .

U XltxYXjiik-

Ml'.'KOW TiUNS«tS»tt!N- K!^TRSII>f:. C-^LiF. _

Business Bulletin '

A Bcckip'oun'*

On Trenila Ir

Warnings oj impending disaster: will an economic crunch hit the United States?

The Question of the

Campus Radio Station A Factor E White Paper

In 1940, Las Vegas was a desert community

of eight thousand or so people. Even as

late as 1960, the city was still of a relatively

modest size.

Now it's 1975, and the metropolitan Las

Vegas area has, by recent census figures, a

popuiation of 300,000. A good size city, and

it's still growing.

Naturally, the number of goods and services

needed to support a city of this many Is

vastly greater than what was needed in 1940.

So, along with the increase in size, there has

been a corresponding increase in the logistics.

Now, social aggregations, once they

achieve a certain level of material well-being,

tend to look beyond physical needs and to

concentrate on the aesthetic and spiritual

side of their collective personality. In short,

they develop a more elaborate culture which

goes beyond economic needs.

So it is with Las Vegas. People from diverse

backgrounds, looking for a way to live,

for a way to understand themselves through

that which they have built and will build

around themselves.

There are theatres, a library system, and

cuitural centers. There are clubs and organizations;

groups that bring in dance and

theatre troupes; groups that put on rock concerts

and classical music concerts. There

are ail the wonderful jazz artists who spread

themselves around the town. There's the

Strip with its glitter and glamour. And, of

course, there's the University. All symbols of

the culture which is Las Vegas.

Finaliy, there are the media. Sometimes

overlooked, they nevertheless have a vital

role in the acculturation of us, the inhabitants.

They are a sort of external nervous

system which keeps the city linked to itself

and to the country and the world around it.

As such they are the eyes and ears of the

community.

The aim of this paper is to present a challenge

to the student body of the school, and

the community at large. As a member of the

Mass Communications board, I would like to

see interest in an on-campus radio station

revived. There have been efforts made in the

past to start stations, various proposals made,

ideas put forth about how a station might be

financed, operated, programmed and so on.

All met with failure. But perhaps the time is

right to try again.

Why the University? As the purveyors of a

goodly share of the Las Vegas cultural environment,

it certainly makes sense. U.N.L.V.'s

Judy Bayley theatre has, since its inception,

proved to be a smashing success. From its

dramatic presentations, to the impromptu

jazz ensembles on lazy fall days, to the multitude

of art and music festivals, it has attracted

patrons by the hundreds. Witness the

rush for tickets with the announcement of

each new play.

The sports teams have, of course, provided

a focai point for community interest. With

the fine seasons they enjoyed, they brought

national acclaim to themselves, and, consequently,

recognition to our school, and city.

Also, the university, as a whole, has some

fine educators, many of whom are deeply involved

at the local level in making Las Vegas

a better place. Some have attained high professional

standing and national reputation

and, as such, are rightly to be considered as

resources of the community.

What does all this have to do with a radio

station? Simply this; we have all the talent

needed to successfully run and program a

quality station. The concerts, sports activities,

lectures, etc. . . . ; the important social

and economic issues, both national and local,

as perceived through the eyes of the university;

the latest scientific developments and

technical innovations; these would surely provide

a solid base for at least a small part of

the programming schedule.

In addition, I count myself among those in

the city who feel that much of local radio

programming has failed miserably to cater to

the listening needs of a large portion of the

area population. And, while I understand that

the economics of the matter tend to severely

limit what is commercially feasible, I don't

think this adequately explains the fact that

there has been little innovative music programming,

be it classical (literally non-existent in

any form), rock, jazz or c&w. In addition, the

trend towards total package programming is

a bad one and can only lead to greater mechanization

of the listening environment.

Could we do any better? I don't know. I

do think that it deserves a try, though.

Now, if I've left the impression that it would

be "easy", let me dispel it right now. Just

finding a viable means of financing a station

on a continuing basis is a monumental task,

especially when the limited financial resources

of any student government, ours no

exception, are taken into consideration.

It follows that any proposal put forth and

acted upon would have to be perfectly timed,

weli co-ordinated, and would have to suffer

no major setbacks from its inception to

its finaiization.

But given that this levei of pianning couid

be achieved, what wouid the odds be? I'd

say very good. In fact, by all rights, U.N.L.V.

should have a station on the air right now.

Two years ago a proposal was drawn up

by members of the then current student government.

It was relatively complete, in that

it fulfilled most of the government requirements.

Let me expiain. The government has provisions

on the books (and as far as I have

been able to find out, stiil does) for threequarter

funding of the initiai set-up costs of

any station which it judges to be educational

in nature. While these costs are by no means

staggering, they would create a large drain

on the cash reserves of an organization as

small as 0.S.U.N. So if the applicant is able

to provide sufficient assurances that the station

has been properly organized, the government

is willing to help start it up.

And therein lies the problem with the proposal

of two years ago. For, while it was

complete in most respects, it was lacking in

some vital areas:

1) It was judged that the programming

schedule might perhaps be lacking in

educational material, and that It was too

tenuous In nature.

2) the feasibility study, a pre-requisite to

any proposal, was not sent along.

3) adequate means of funding a staff

were not provided for e.g. funding on a

continuing basis.

The last two of these were the real sticking

points, if my reading is correct. It is my

understanding that a feasibility study had

been contracted, but that, for some reason,

the proposal was sent along without it. Also,

the Federal Communications Commission requires

that any station of comparable power

output (the proposal called for 10,000 watts,

f.m.) have a permanent engineering staff of

three, including a full-time station manager.

While the regulations clearly state this, it

does not seem to have been given the proper

weight by those who drew up the proposal.

Perhaps it was their inexperience in handling

the technical details of such a situation. At

any rate, the proposal was rejected. And

though the letter of rejection seemed to imply

that a better planned effort would be welcome,

none was forthcoming.

I'm not arrogant enough to think that under

the same set of circumstances, we would do

any better. But this is not the same set. We

now have a very good idea of what is needed;

naturally, since they told us. And there

is no reason to believe that the kind of effort

described earlier wouldn't work.

Before any such plan can be put forth,

however, there will have to be some very

serious discussions between the executive

officers and the student senate, especially

in the matter of funding any such effort. Anyone

who can add two and two has probably

already decided that it is no small matter to

have a full time radio engineer or two at your

service.

Of course even such objections can be

overcome if we realize that, ideally, such a

crew would be supplemented entirely by a

student part-time staff. And while I haven't

talked to the Engineering department, I don't

think it would be unreasonable to expect

them to be enthusiastic about the prospect.

Practical experience is much to be desired.

Indeed, the chairman of the Communications

department has expressed an interest

in having the programming aspects handled

by his students.

It is my intention to formulate, with the

help of the other members of the Mass Communications

board, the student government

leaders, and the student senate, another proposal,

to be ready for presentation to the students

by the time the fall semester starts.

New student body president, Joe Karaffa,

has expressed a strong interest in doing just

this. In fact it was part of his platform to try

to get a radio station on campus.

So while I admit to a definite bias, I think

the prospects are good that with a sound

proposal, including an adequate funding

mechanism, we might expect a good shot at

getting a station started before the holidays

next winter. The most important element is

student support.

As I stated in the beginning of the paper,

the media form a vital part of any community.

I think U.N.L.V. could be part of the Las

Vegas nervous system. And the change

would be a healthy one.

27

EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE:

Does it exist? Nestled In the green hills of Puerto Rico

Is a 1000 foot radio-telescope capable of

sending and receiving signals from its equal

anywhere in our Galaxy. Its existence testifies

to our having arrived at the beginning of

a new stage in the development of civilization

on this planet. For the first time in its history

mankind is now capable of communicating

with the stars. But is there anybody out

there with whom to communicate? Do extraterrestrials

exist?

Few ideas are as exciting in their implications

for the future of mankind as the possibility

of extraterrestrial life, is man alone in

the Universe, or are the stars scattered liberally

with life? Are there planets on which

dwell intelligent civilizations equal or superior

to our own? Obviously no definitive answer

can be given at the present time. Nonetheless,

most people who have thought much

about it have a ready opinion, which in a

surprisingly large number of casts they are

eager to share. However, must we be content

with merely stating a prejudice pro or

con in the matter? Or are there some criteria

by which we might logicaliy establish some

reasonable estimate of how many intelligent,

communicating civilizations there might be

in the Galaxy? We might ask ourselves what

factors have led to the emergence of our own

species' civilization and culture, the only single

race of intelligent beings we know of for

certain that is capable of and at least somewhat

interested in communicating with others.

We should include only general factors, however,

since it is apparent that if we consider

too specific factors responsible for our own

particular emergence we shall only too easily

eliminate ail but our own detailed, inimitable

existence.

Several years ago Frank Drake of Cornell

University did just this. He suggested that

one could reasonably estimate the total number

of intelligent civilizations in the Galaxy

capable of and interested in communicating

with each other by considering ail the necessary

evolutionary steps, astronomical, chemical,

biological, and social, that are requisite

for the appearance of such a civilization, e.g.,

our own. These factors he summarized in the

formula

N = R.fpn,fifif,L

where R. is the rate of star formation averaged

over the lifetime of the Galaxy; fp is the

fraction of stars which have planetary systems;

nj is the mean number of planets within

such planetary systems which are ecoiogicaliy

suitable for life; fj is the fraction of such

planets on which the origin of life actually

occurs; fj is the fraction of such planets on

which, after the origin of life, intelligence in

some form arises; fp is the fraction of such

planets in which the intelligent beings develop

to a communicative phase; and L is the

mean lifetime of such technical civilizations.

It is strikingly evident that the problem is

in the truest sense an interdisciplinary one.

Note how the parameters of N cut across traditional

disciplinary lines. The first two factors,

R»and fp , are the exclusive domain of

astrophysics, while np involves astronomy,

chemistry, and to a degree biology. The

fourth factor involves both chemistry and biology,

as well as a bit of geology. The fifth

factor, f| , seems to be the domain of biology

alone, while the sixth involves perhaps

some biology but is probably more the domain

of sociology and anthropology. Obviously

the seventh factor, L, is exclusively

the domain of anthropology and sociology.

In the space available to us here we cannot

systematically, logically evaluate the factors

in Drake's formula. However, for those

interested in the carefully reasoned scientific

arguments leading to possible evaluations I

would recommnd several books on the matter.

For those with little technical background

Carl Sagan's Cosmic Connection, available

now in paperback, provides a mind-expanding

evening's reading, though it does not get into

Drake's formula itself. Equally readable but

much more extensive in its coverage of material

pertinent to the problem is a "fat"

paperback. Intelligent Life In the Universe, by

I. S. Shklovski and Carl Sagan. For those

readers with more technical background,

Interstellar Communication: Scientific Perspectives,

edited by Cyril Ponnamperuma and

A. G. W. Cameron, would be appropriate; it

consists of a set of essays by various scientists

addressing themselves to specific factors

in the Drake formula. For readers interested

speoifically in the biological and chemical

aspects of the problem, Stanley Miller and

Leslie Orgei have written an outstanding

though somewhat technical book entitled

The Origins of Life on the Earth. Finally, for

those who would really like to get their feet

wet and sample the flavour of scientific debate

in its unpolished, most excitingly human

form, I strongly recommend the published proceedings

of the First International Conference

on Extraterrestrial Life, held in Soviet Armenia;

this book, Communication with Extraterrestrial

Intelligence, edited by Sagan, is

available only from the MIT Press in Cambridge,

Massachusetts.

So what is the final result of all this learned

debate? How many intelligent, communicative

civilizations are likely to exist in our Galaxy?

Without acceding anything to the "flying

saucer" fanatics, our Milky Way Galaxy

alone, containing as it does somewhat more

than a hundred billion stars, probably is home

to somewhere between 100 and 5,000,000

civilizations at or beyond our own level of

development. The range of numbers reflects

the difference between basically conservative

and liberal approaches to the scientific information

available. I emphasize, however, that

it does not reflect just wishful thinking on

the part of estimators but instead is the result

of a carefully reasoned, rational approach to

the subject, one based on critical evaluation

of the best substantiated scientific information

available to us at our own present stage of

development.

If the actual number of communicative civiiiizations

is somewhere near five million, then

the chances are that the nearest one is located

within some fifty light years of us. In

astronomical terms that means essentially in

our own backyard. If one hundred is closer

to the mark, then the nearest is probably

some ten to fifteen thousand light years away

at least. In either case, the distances are vast

beyond any terrestrial experience, clearly precluding

any extensive direct physical contact

between us. Such distances would make even

radio contacts between civilizations lengthy,

drawn-out affairs, even though radio waves,

travelling at the speed of light, are the fastest

way of communicating information known to

us today. It would take at least a century to

send a message and receive an answer to

even the nearest civilization under the best

statistical circumstances.

The underlying question in all these considerations,

whether intelligence Is a normal

and expected result of natural biochemical

evolution, persists; at our present level of

understanding of these phenomena we again

have only one example to work from, the

human race. Even presupposing it is, does

intelligence alone always lead to an interest

in interstellar communication? Probably not,

since even on Earth we have what seem to

be exceptions; dolphins and perhaps whales

seem to have highly developed intelligence

but are not as obviously interested in extraterrestrial

communication as are humans. Apparently

judgments in this must remain for

the time being the sheerest speculation. It

certainly is possible that biological evolution

leading to intelligence need not necessarily

imply the development of the capability or

even desire to develop an interest in interstellar

communication. There is some suggestion

that even within the family of man

the aggressive Western variation of technocracy

is just one type of cultural activity rather

than a generally achieved stage of biological

evolution itself. How much less certain the

developmtnt of technological cultures might

be in the course of social development on

other planets is totally unknown and unknowable

to us presently. Indeed, even if

intelligence and an interest in communication

does deveiop, it might even then be only a

passing phase of short duration in the total

history of a civilization. On the other hand,

if a civilization were far beyond our own present

level of technical development, it seems

quite plausible that they might not have any

interest at all in communicating with such

primitive beings as ourselves. Consider how

much effort we ourselves expend in trying to

communicate with, let us say, ants, except in

a few specific and special cases.

Contact with other civilizations seems a

more realistic possibility with each passing

day. it is no longer just a science-fiction

theme. Even though extraterrestrials may be

wildly different from ourselves, they will likely

have experienced many of the same physical

and social problems with which we have and

will be confronted. We all live in the same

Universe, after all. If and when we finally do

make contact, it may be one of the most significant

events in the history of mankind. Even

if we receive a signal and consciously choose

not to respond, perhaps to minimize the possible

cultural shock we might experience, it

will precipitate a traumatic realization of our

place in the Universe at least as significant

as the Copernican revolution. Certainly the

commonality of all Earthlings would become

more apparent, if nothing else. If we were to

choose to communicate, or even just to

eavesdrop passively, what might we gain or

lose? Despite ail the science-fiction stories to

the contrary, the economics of interstellar

space travel preclude the realistic possibility

of physical "invasion". That is not to say we

should not proceed with caution, though; the

history of human impetuosity and guiiibiiity

would certainly suggest, on the contrary, that

we should proceed very cautiously. We might

gain simply advanced technological information,

which might or might not stultify or stimulate

our own efforts in that direction. Certainly

we would stand to gain new and significant

insights in the arts and humanities,

different aesthetics and realizations that must

become increasingly important and desirable

as our own civilization on this planet becomes

The Quality of Education

by Norm Cimon

Thanks to the sports program, U.N.L.V. is

starting to get a name for itseif around the

country. A recent visitor from back East mentioned

to me upon his arrival, that he was

looking forward to seeing the Rebels in action.

He was sincerely disappointed to learn

that the basketball team had finished out

their home season. (They were at that time

preparing for the playoffs.)

And last year, while back home (Massachusetts),

I noted that many of the people

who asked me where I was going to school

were familiar with the University of Nevada

at Las Vegas either from their reading of the

basketball polls or the college division football

standings.

i imagine there are still those who envision

slot machines next to the whirlpool in the

training room, and keno runners in the dining

hails of the "Las Vegas" team. But all

in ail, it's a good feeling to make a dent in

the national consciousness.

So what does ail of this mean? Weil, a

better all-around sports program for one thing.

It's long been common knowledge in university

athletic departments that in order to develop

a complete program, it was first of ail

necessary to establish interest in the major

team sports, such as basketball and football.

This has been accomplished here.

it's not surprising, then, that lately we've

been hearing more and more of the good

swimming team the university can expect to

field (or float), of the track and baseball

teams, and of the good season enjoyed by

the women cagers. The opening of the new

gym will, of course, aid immensely in the effort

to legitimatize the entire sports picture.

Aside from this, however, it also means

that we've drawn the national eye towards us

and that we are in an excellent position to

use the exposure as a way of attracting people

interested in getting an education to this

school. So in the end, it will be the quality

of the learning experience that determines

what type of school we are and will become.

What I would like to do in this paper, then,

is to consider some of the possible implications

of this new found public image, is there

any way to determine what type of students

the university will attract, or how many? Can

we expect unlimited growth? What do we

have to offer prospective students? All of

these subjects could, admittedly, fill pages

and pages all on their own. And I won't

even pretend that I can cover most of these

matters at anything but a superficial level.

Yet I do feel that it's important that they be

discussed openly. Obviously, there are going

to be quite a few decisions made in the next

few years which will determine the kind of

institution which U.N.L.V. will be. And once

these decisions are made, the choices will

be gone and we'll have to live with what

we've got.

Now Las Vegas is different from other cities,

both in its economic structure, and in

the way this structure shapes the lives of a

large number of the people who live here.

It's no secret that many cities have been hit

pretty hard by the recent economic woes.

Unemployment in Detroit is supposed to have

gone well over twenty percent.

And yet, while we have not been totally

immune from these problems ourselves, the

fact is that we had a good year, and the

gambling industry had a great one, at least

if gambling receipts are any criteria. So the

city thrives, and the state thrives, and there is

money for financing state projects including

the state universities and this means U.N.L.V.

When this fact is combined with the downturn

in the financial picture of most other

universities, one thing becomes clear; now is

the time for the school to build what is a

good faculty into a better one, and to increase

the scope of its curricula to include solid

graduate programs.

The latter is especially important. For, in

the world of higher education, a world which

is at least as high powered as any other top

echelon activity, the measure of a school is

the kind of graduate it produces. A school

moves into the "big time" when it can, for

example, produce a few psychologists who

are at least as good a grade of mathematician

as what might be turned out by the mathematics

department of the average school.

Or when it can produce graduates in the

entire range of specialties associated with

any given discipline.

The opportunity is wide open to produce

these types of programs here, at this university.

An interest in these matters by a large

enough segment of the local populace is ail

that is needed to insure that the proper consideration

will be given to funding for increased

faculty and improved programs when

these matters come up before the legislature.

Logically, the next question is "Granted

that we can afford more teachers and better

programs; do we need them?"

Enrollment has been steadily increasing

every year that I've been here, i walked into

the bookstore at the beginning of the current

semester and was confronted by wall to wall

books and counter to counter chaos. (In fact.

Dean Black recently made mention of this

situation, saying that serious consideration

would immediately have to be given to expanding

the facility.) This really brought home

the point to me.

If anything, the current economic situation

is only going to add impetus to the movement

of bodies onto the U.N.L.V. campus. People

tend to migrate where the money is. And

there's money here, money so that they can

put themselves through school. So the increase

will probably continue. And there'll

be a consequent amount of strain on the facilities,

and the staff.

The kind of student that is and will be attracted

to here will, in large part be determined

also by the types of programs offered.

So we move from questions of quantity to

questions of quality.

U.N.L.V. offers, of course, the complete

range of courses needed to complete requirements

in forty separate majors leading towards

bachelor's degrees, and in twenty-three

majors leading to master's. Naturally, some

of these have better reputations than others.

The hotel school, for example, offers one

of the most complete programs in the country,

including some eight hundred hours of

practical experience. As such it has attained

nationwide recognition.

The College of Allied Health Professions

offers both two and four year nursing programs.

It also trains for degrees (again both

two and four years) in radiologic technology,

and offers the associate's degree in medical

records. In other words, it has developed all

of the programs necessary to provide the

technical help needed to staff local hospitals.

The biology department has one of the better

graduate programs and, with the addition

of the life-sciences building to the campus,

should now have the facilities to match.

The theatre arts department has been attracting

much attention locally and on a national

level with the high quality of its productions.

And the music department, drawing

from a iarge pooi of iocal talent, has produced

some fine musicians.

It could have been argued a few years ago

that it was not logical to expect high enrollment

in the more technical disciplines such

as mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology

and engineering. Yet even this now seems

questionable.

The mathematics department recently received

authorization to hire two more full

time staff members, the geology department

two more, and the physics department added

two members iast year.

in passing, let me make one more remark,

i still haven't answered the question of how

much growth we can expect. I believe that

one depends on the rest of the questions in

the paper. Because we will, of course, end

up with exactly the kind of students we deserve;

and we'll deserve exactly what we've

planned for.

even more homogeneous.

All of this will be moot, however, unless we

find some way to avoid destroying ourselves

in either our own refuse or our recurring

wars, before contact is made.

it is ironic that the most critical factor in

evaluating N, the number of intelligent, comtnunicative

civilizations in the Galaxy, turns

out to be L, the mean lifetime of a technical

civilization. The values for the other parameters

are ail reasonably evaluatable, but

when it comes to deciding on the value of L,

everybody is really in the dark. The best educated

guesses reduce Drake's formula to

N = 0.1 L

that is, the number of technical civilizations

is roughly equal to 10 percent of the mean

lifetime in years of such civilizations. What

value should be used for L, then? if advanced

civilizations manage to survive on the

average a few million years, then the number

still around at this particular time in the history

of our Galaxy must be roughly a million

or so. If, on the other hand, civilizations tend

to have short duration, then we ourselves

might be one of only a handful of such civilizations

in the Galaxy at the present time.

How sobering it is to find that the greatest

uncertainty in the caiculaion of Drake's formula

arises not from the study of nature itself

but instead from the uncertainty of our

knowledge about social systems. Do technological

civilizations tend to destroy themselves

almost as quickly as they arise? Again

we have only one example on which to base

our estimate, and that is our own civilization.

The daily newspapers and our nearly suicidal

history over the last thirty years do not give

us grounds for optimism. We seem to exhibit

an absolute genius in developing weapons of

mass destruction and conditions for ecological

and population disasters. On the other

hand, as a civilization we have had the capability

of sending and receiving radio signals

from other stars in our Galaxy for only about

ten years. Curiously, that puts a lowest bound

on N of one, ourselves. It is also interesting

to note in passing that, like it or not, we on

Earth have already been inadvertently sending

signals out to the stars for the last several

decades through leakage from our TV,

radio, and radar signals.

Lon D. Spight

• Free Parking (with validation) In Nevada's

Largest Enclosed Garage

• Free Behind the Scenes Tour

• Free Gambling Instruction

• Free Gifts for Slot Players

• Gourmet Dining at the Top O'the Mint

• Entertainment Nightly in Two Great Lounges

• Ride Glass Elevator 250-Feet to

Top O'the Mint

• 90-Foot Grand Buffet

• Las Vegas' Most Complete Casino

• Spacious New KENO Lounge

• $2.00 Minimum Baccarat

DEL WEBB'S

KING OF CASINO CENTER

DIAL

^ TOLL FREE

(800)

634-6811

from California. i

Idatio.'Utah, Arizona i

and Oregon. §

(800) 634-6691 ^ Sfrom all other states

except Nevada,

Alaska and

L Hawaii. >

HOME OF THE $100,000 MINT 400 DESERT RACE

;;Fr^ 1B -f Z. WbWe not committing to ; a Public Works Board members

• might he persuaded to cn^ge_u i* ^ Raggio said construction of a promised

;!he can be shown sufficient funds J Neva^llrja . a de

,a law school ai uini-iv .

^ aijlaw school, in Neva

•,are available. v 7', J gosirable.

• :, : But Assembly leaders vlf^re' note^

.ifti

i .

1 to do a chemical study,

and decision location

esirable. will«be^ mhde in^cbii^

, are one, of two stater fhat by the LegislatU|rg'&i|ntenm rii'optimistic.

, .yd i y doesn't have aUaw school^®^ nance Committee.

: "-The House of I^rds has prob- ^ university system," heSSAd., Arbertr alsor dispelled persis-

•jlenw with said ,^8epWrCo-r~ Southern N;eYada l?^ak- ^tent,,su&ota

' '"Q. .Ray Raw8o)if;;ftf as V , . ^.ISZn .9.

. 6„»,, ' dn th^yj^j^y because in 1969 th^^gis-- gifloe opens. Hd pointed out

••building expansion may be B7«;; lature decided to put a statS nied' ^2,1 million wantie spent to

". last matter resolved before Legis- , ^t the University oP gj^gnd the East Sahftpa office.

N.vada.Ren„. the k.y. co^tnac,

In*another matter, legislators

committed $5.3 million to bhild a.

• Among key • construction

projects for Southern Nevada are

a juvehilO mental health facility

i.nJ , Las'.V.-C'el g• a-1s c/o• st• i.n• g $8.^ 8ad 1m« •< rivl lion,

' the weekend of June 24-25.

: The building expansion plan

I'could become a bargaining chip^ full-service Department of'Motor

•to induce Assembly members to yghkles office in Hendersoh.;But 7n7'-;vn«ndinB the

; .„pp„r, favored pro.aot. of 4 eoncern

•'""luring the hearing, lepslatorf;, fe «*

. of both houses won Support of nd|, D-Las Vegas, s^d the, a WLV hbraiy ^ & il>4.y mii

merous small building , p^opoged site ' may be ch^icallyi hbfi cosfc . fr

: that tacked $3 million onto the J' ^ '5: j'

vtotalconstructionptbgram. - -

• Ways and Meahs Chairmarv

' Morse Arberry,' D-Nofth Las W"

• gas, sought the laW school study '

• to carry out a commitment he

' once made to the late Sen. Nick

• Horn, D-Las Vegas. Horn wanted

— ' ' r .f' V . .

L^#V«gas Revi«i\i«r«Joumal

• Assembly m^ttlbers Willf

h a v e t o m a k e c j B ' . f b r n b w :

with smaller quarters than •

their Senate counterparts.

By Ed Vogel

Donrey Capital Bureau

CARSON CITY — A joint Senate

and Assembly panel on Thursday rejected

a $16 million expansion ot the

Legislative Building but approved an

•'pii^gl?^'for 1995-97. ^

• ' A'rbe"'''1>uilding pro^m includes a,„

$500,000 appropriation to study the

feasibility of establish

ing a law school,

probably at the

University of Ne- j .iir,. . «ni . r i

vada,'La8 Vegas.

Also'included in

the statewide prograr

is $60 million for pn^''ex- ^

pansions and $78 nd|^[ioii' in

on new

of the University and Commumty College

System of Nevada.

The construction program was

adopted by members of the Senate Finance

Committee and the Assembly

Ways and Means Committee. About

half of the construction will be financed

by bond sales, while the remainder

will be paid out of surplus

state funds.

But Senate Majority Leader Bill

Raggio, R-Reno, told his Assembly

rMn nrmpur. f= rnmouses

now support a plan to add an 84,0^-

square-tbot' addition to the Legislative..

Building in Carson City.

That $16 million expansion project

would have given the 42 Assembly

members offices of comparable size to

those of the 21 senators. Senators now

have offices about twice as large as

those of most Assembly members.

Assembly Ways and Means Committee

members reluctantly went along

with Raggio's wishes after he said he

Please see BU1LDINQ/2B

Sprmg, 1975 seventy-five cents

/ •

3U3A:i j.

"The Law Schoo! Story"

The Law School Story

Amidst a slowly dissipating cloud of confusion

lies the controversy known as the

UNLV Law School issue. $7,000,000 figures

for one biennium were among the "hearsay"

costs that ran amuck in the legislature this

session. What actually did happen and how

did rumor take precedence over testimony in

the slate capitol? The story can best be told

sequentially.

During the fall semester, Dean Willard H.

Pedrick of A.S.U.'s College of Law and Prof.

Lome Seidman, Chairman of the Finance

Dept. at UNLV published the fruits of a year's

labor in their Law School Study for the University

of Nevada, Las Vegas. This feasibility

study looked at Nevada's population, economy

and Universities, the need for a Nevada

Law School, what a new law school would do

for the state, and costs. The conclusions

were extremely favorable as to its benefits

for all Nevada, and seemingly every possible

area of concern was analyzed, including the

cost of a building. Dean Pedrick estimated

the facility, at present, would cost $5.2 miiion.

Copies of this study were sent to all

members of the legislature.

At the start of the Spring semester, the

Consolidated Students opted to take an active

position on the issue. CSUN formed a

Legislative Action Committee and appointed

•Student Mike Navarro (who was in Carson City

as a registered lobbyist as per his employment)

as advisor. Mention of the law school

confronted Navarro with the $7 million figure.

According to Navarro, refutation was

impossible, and many legislators additionally

had qualms about entering into any new continuing

programs with the economic status of

the nation. It seems that a few years back,

the Senate and Assembly had been sold on

the need of a medical school for Nevada and

been told that the cost to them would be

about $200,000. It is currently requiring over

a million. Little progress was made but it

was discovered that Sen. Dick Bryan had a

UNLV Law School bill in the drafters, and

that Sen. Floyd Lamb supported the measure.

Optirnism prevailed among the students for

a while, but it was short lived. LAC Chairman

Al Kingam and member Dave Elkins came to

the capitol to give testimony on another matter,

and lunched with Bryan, Assemblywoman

Jean Ford, and Assemblyman Bob Craddock.

Although all three legislators supported the

idea, they felt that no favorable action would

be taken on the law school issue this session.

But they did offer an alternative. They suggested

that for $200,000 Nevada could enter

the WICHE Lav/ School program, which would

enable Nevada students entering an out-ofstate

law school to have a majority of their

tuition paid by the WICHE program. Kingam

stated that it was not ideal, but the compromise

could serve as a stop-gap measure until

the next legislative session. Kingam and

Elkins left, taking the compromise back to

their constituents.

On March 23rd, Dr. Al Johns "State Legislature"

class journeyed to Carson City with

the intent of seeing the legislative process

first hand, and doing a little lobbying for the

Law School. Using the name "Students Concerned

with Lawmakers", the students got the

same reaction as did the LAC: "Law School

NO. But what about WICHE?" Deciding that

this may be the only action taken to aid prospective

Nevada Law Students, the group

began Iqfbying the compromise.

But Howard Needham, one of the students

in John's group and a future law student, did

not easily accept the compromise. Needharn

reported that the Assembly Ways and Means

Cornmitee had been ''turned off by the $5.2

million building figure". Approximately one

week before the students' trip north, the Las

Vegas lawyers had put out a news release

regarding the excessive amount of lawyers in

Ntevada already. When confronted with this

by the lawyers, Needham responded "if this

is really true, how do you explain the backlog

in civil liberties and indigent law cases?"

Needham reports that his impression was that

they were really confronting a North/South

issue. "Snowy Monroe, Tom Weiss and Don

Melio all want the law school in Reno."

During their stay in the capitol, the students

also had an audience with the Governor.

"O'Callaghan says they're in a need for

other things, specifically better prisons, retardation

facilities, and medical help. He says

we don't need a law school now."

On April 4th, UNLV President Donald Baepler

gave testimony on- this issue to the Senate

Finance Committee. Baepler's proposal

was this: The program can be started in '76

for an initial $50,000. This money will allow

us to hire a dean, who will begin formation

of the school, and a librarian, who will start

coordinating a Law library. There will be a

three year program beginning in '77, and the

total cost to the state for the three years will

be $300,000, with the other $200,000 needed

coming from the students. There will be 70

•students in each going class, at a cost to

each of $5000. per semester. The library will

cost approximately $600,000, but we already

have its cost pledged by a major strip hotel.

Jan Gould, of the Clark County Citizens

Law School Group, in an interview with Factor

E, threw more "fat into the fire". She

noted that "the Marquette Law School has

80,000 current, accredited law books for sale,

attainable at a very appetizing price. These

books would make up 80% of our needed

law library." Gould also noted that the $5.2

million building continued to stifle support.

"The legislators should be informed that a

building cost does not have to be taken care

of in one session, or this session. All that

needs to be done is to show a financial commitment

to one by the third year in order to

attain accreditation, and its cost can then be

stretched over a thirty year mortgage if necessary."

Both Gould and Baepler are against the

WICHE compromise, though. They feel that

with the money going to WICHE, and the

money from the students going out-of-state,

a law school program could be accomplished,

and the benefits of a continuing education for

our lawyers, an accessible law library in the

South, and a number of other factors make

this the logical choice. With this argument

in hand, the WICHE compromise has been

dropped, and all efforts are now back to

their original position.

During the week of April 7th through the

14th, the Assembly Ways and Means Committee

approved a Veterinary School for UNR.

The relevance of this occurrance is that UNR

did not request it, and a feasibility study, up

to this point, has not even been undertaken.

The "Senate Finance Committee appears not

to be in favor of this program at present, but

is in favor of the Law School. Ways and

Means is not in favor of the Law School. Now,

politics. Both committees must get together

to "thresh" out what budgets, that only one

side has approved, will be put into effect,

and the name of the game becomes bargaining.

On April 14th, Baepler again gave testimony:

this time to Ways and Means. He made

the same proposal, and this time Vegas legislators

voiced the cry "I'm against it." The

two loudest southern lawmakers were Darrell

Dreyer and Bob Robinson. Dreyer proclaimed

"Two years ago we talked to Zorn about it

and he told us that two existing classrooms

would take care of it. This year Dr. Baepler

shows us a spot on the campus and tells us

this is where the law school will be built."

Robinson's comments were a bit stronger: "It

seems the University system is more intent

on getting a law school than meeting the

needs of the students." And added "We

could get them into any school anywhere in

the country, if we could include law in Nevada's

WICHE participation." But Supreme

Court Justice David Zenoff noted that young

people come to him with complaints they

can't find schools which will accept them.

UNLV regents make law

building third priority

(Continued from Page 1)

McCullough, who said he was pleased with the

priority ranking of the library addition.

The library addition was added as the

number 12 request on the $23.9 million building

proposal for 1975-79. The regents suggested

that $10 million of the needed money

could come from the federal slot machine tax

rebate, $1.8 million could come from capital

improvement fees paid by students and $12.1

million could come from the state treasury.

At the top of the priority list is the acquisition

of 48.4 acres of land from the Nevada

Southern University I^and Foundation in 1975

at a price of $590,000.

The second of the 12 priorities is a $3.7

million expenditure for 29 campus improvements

at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Moved into the third priority spot, replacing

the law building, is $1.5 million for campus

improvements at UNLV.

Other priorities set by the regents include

$300,000 for improvements at the Clark County

Community College, $250,000 for site improvements

at a proposed Desert Research

Institute laboratory in Boulder City and an

$8.7 million addition to the Western Nevada

Community College in Reno.

The long range planning portion of the fouryear

capital improvements program includes

16 possible future projects, such as a professional

schools complex at UNLV and a new

Claik County Community College facility on

West Charleston Boulevard.

The program adopted by the regents also

seeks legislative funding to insure the total

completion of current projects which have

been hampered by inflationary increases in

the construction industry.

Proposed law school

held back by regent

ByMaryHausch

R-J Staff Writer

The construction of a law school at the

University of Nevada, Las Vegas was

dropped from immediate university building

plans Saturday.

The regents adopted a capital improvements

program request for the 1975-77 biennium

which removed plans for a $5.8 imllion

law building as the number three building

priority in the university system and placed

die facility on a long-range planning list for

later funding.

The request will be submitted to the 1975

Legislature, which could decide to make the

law building a higher priority and provide the

necessary funds for its construction in the

next two-year spending period.

The Legislature will also be receiving a

feasibility study from the regents calling for

the creation of a law school along with a

recommendation that the program itsetf be

considered for funding in the next biennium.

That proposal was approved by the regents

Friday at their meeting at UNLV.

UnivCTSity Chancellor Dr. Neil Humphrey

said lowering the building priority for the law

school makes sense because the proposed

facility should be designed by the law school

dean and faculty who will have to u^ it.

If a law school staff is funded in the next

biennium the faculty members will be kept

busy planning their academic program, the

chancellor said.

Regent James Buchanan II of Las Vegas

cast the only dissenting vote to removing the

law building as a top priority. Suggesting that

tha-e might be a state budget surplus of $50

million for this biennium, Buchanan said the

regents should request that the building be

funded if there is adequate money in the State

General Fund.

UNLV Preadent Dr. Donald Baepler sai

the placement of the law building at the top o

the long-range planning list would serve as a

signal to the Legislature that it would be a top

priority item during the 1977 legislative session.

While the law building was removed from

the priority list for the next Legislature a $7.6

million addition to the UNLV Dickinson

Library was added to the list.

Baepler said the request for a library

addition dates back to 1968. "To substitute a

law school building for the library would be to

disrupt the priority process," he stated.

Baepler also told the regents that the law

school could generate ill will on campus if it

lopped off a project like the library addition.

That prediction was supported by UNLV

University Senate President Dr. Joseph

(See UNLV, Page 8)

March 22, 1974

TO THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA:

The Chairman of the Liaison Committee with

Nevada Legislative Commission on the Nevada Law School

suhm.its the following report.

This committee was established as a liaison

committee by the Board of Governors with that committee

appointed by the Governor to carry out the intent and

effect of Nevada Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 48.

Since there is widespread misunderstanding as to what

was done in Assembly Concurrent Resolution No, 48 it was

the feeling of the chairman of your committee that this

resolution should be set out in full and it herewith

follows:

Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 48 — Messrs.

Schofield, Lowman, McNeel, Bremner, Rickey,

May, Dini, Barengo, Glover, Smalley, Crawford,

Howard, Demers, Hayes, Ullom, Craddock, Broadbent,

Mrs. Gojack, Messrs. Huff, Jacobsen,

Banner, Bickerstaff, Prince, Bennett and

Mrs. Brookm.an

WHEREAS, The legislature finds that a law

school is needed in the University of Nevada System;

and

WHEREAS, The legislature finds that it is for th

best interests of the state and of the university

that a law school be located at University of Nevada,

Las Vegas; and

WHEREAS, The legislature at this time desires

to have more information in regard to the cost of a

law school at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas;

now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED BY THE ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

THE SENATE CONCURRING:

1. That a law school be established in the

future in the State of Nevada at the University of

Nevada, Las Vegas.

2. That the board of regents of the University

of Nevada are authorized to employ a person v/ho

would be qualified to serve as a dean of a lav; school

from funds not appropriated by the state legislature

to develop plans for the physical facilities of a

law school, including a law library, and for the

faculty and staff of the law school to be located

at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

3. That the information developed be submitted

to the board of regents of the University of Nevada,

the governor and 58th session of the legislature.

Pursuant to this resolution the Governor appointed

a committee referred to as the Law School Advisory Board

whose members are as follows:

Dr. Ralph Roske, UNLV, Chairman

Dr. Bruck Dixon, UNLV

Dr. Lome Seidman, UNLV

John W. Diehl

Don W. Driggs

Hon. John P. Foley, State Senator

Robert M. Galli

Clark J. Guild, Jr.

Dr. Laurance M. Hyde, Jr. (Resigned)

Jerome Mack

Hon. John Mendoza, District Judge

Mrs. Herb Nail

Hon. William Raggio, State Senator

Hon. Jack Schofield, Assemblyman

E. Parry Ihomas

Mrs. Mary Woitichek

Hon. David Zenoff, Justice of the Supreme Court

On June 29, 1973, your chairman and the liaison committee

was appointed.

As soon as the undersigned was appointed I felt

it was necessary to decide two fundamental questions, to

wit; (1) what were we as a committee to do, and, (2) what

was to be our relationship with the committee appointed

by the governor to implement the concurrent resolution.

It was agreed by Mr. Dickerson, as the representative

of the Board of Governors, and our committee

that the Bar committee should formulate an answer to the

following three questions:

1, Should we have a law school in Nevada?

2, If we do, what will be the estimated capital

cost thereof and what will be the annual

cost for support?

3, How will the money be raised for the capital

costs and for the annual support?

The question as to what our relationship to the

committee appointed by the governor has been answered as

a result of a conference between myself and Dr. Ralph

Roske of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who serves

as chairman of that committee. Dr. Roske has been

extremely cooperative and has indicated that all members

of the committee appointed by the Bar were welcome at the

meetings of the committee established by the governor as

well as all subcommittee meetings. Further, he has extended

to us the courtesy of sending to us all material which has

been made available to the legislative comraittee. In

making this report I cannot overstate the cooperation that

I have received from Dr. Roske and the other members of

the committee appointed by the governor. They have been

fully cooperative in seeing that our membership has the

opportunity to attend their meetings and participate fully

in their discussions.

The committee appointed by the governor has

resolved itself into three subcommittees, to wit; a subcommittee

on facilities, 3 subcommittee on staff and

programs and a subcommittee on development.

There have been several meetings of the main

committee appointed by the legislature and at least one

meeting of the subcommittee concerning facilities. I

think it is a fair statement to make that there is no

facility presently available at the University of Nevada,

Las Vegas which will meet the beginning needs of a law

school on other than a very temporary basis.

Both the primary legislative committee and the

liaison"boiTimittee have been furnished with the feasibility

studies vhich have been done at the various universities

that have been considering law schools over the last seven

years. These reports are voluminous and each member of

our liaision committee has been furnished with these

reports.

As a result of these reports, the material sent

to us by the President of the State Bar, and that made

available to the legislative committee it was deemed

advisable by all concerned that a feasibility study be

prepared. In reaching this decision and in establishing

a panel from which to select a properly qualified person

the legislative coimnittee and the liaison conunittee were

advised by Professor Millard H. Ruud, Legal Education

Consultant for the American Bar Association and the

Association of American Law Schools. Professor Ruud

serves on the accreditation committees of both the

American Bar Association and the Association of American

Law Schools. Caesars World, Inc., the parent corporation

of the Caesars Palace Hotel in Las Vegas, has made available

for that study, and for the uses and purposes of the

legislative committee, the svim of $200,000.00, payable

$50,000.00 quarterly commencing January 1, 1974. In

addition, Caesars World has pledged the svim of $300,000.00

towards the creation of a law school library providing a

law school is to be established. Several other persons and

organizations have contributed substantial sums of money

or pledged substantial sums of money towards the creation

of a law school contingent upon a feasibility study.

Early in 1974 after an extensive review of the

qualifications of the candidates was completed, upon

recommendation of the legislative committee and Acting

President Donald Baepler of UNLV, William H,. Pedrick, Dean

of the College of Law at the Arizona State University at

Tempe, Arizona, was selected by the Board of Regents to

conduct a feasibility survey. Dean Pedrick had also

prepared the survey at the University of Delaware which

led to the establishment of the University of Delaware

Law School. That survey was an exemplar in establishing

a factual basis for projected costs. The undersigned,

as well as several of the members of the Bar liaison

committee have met Dean Pedrick. We have also been in

contact with him since his appointment in connection with

the various factual data which he is gathering for the

survey. We feel encouraged that the survey will be done

on a professional and thorough basis.

The next meeting of the legislative committee

is to be on March 22, 1974, at which time Dean Pedrick will

present a progress report on the factual material that he

has been able to develop. It is contemplated that at the

• meeting of the Board of Regents of the University on May

10, 1974, a full budget analysis of a proposed law school

will be submitted by Dean Pedrick. Some time in the middle

of June, 1974, Dean Pedrick will submit his full report to

the legislative committee for discussion and action, which

action will then be submitted to President Baepler of UNLV

for submission to the Board of Regents at their July, 1974,

meeting. Presumably their action, if any, will be submitted

to the governor and the legislature.

In addition to evaluating the various materials

which the Board of Regents committee has developed, your

committee has also submitted a questionnaire to the admittees

for the Nevada State Bar in 1972 and 1973. There were

-7-

151 admittees pursuant to information received from the

Executive Secretary of the State Bar. We have received

90 responses from the questionnaires. The questions asked

and the number of responses to that questionnaire are as

follows:

Yes No,

1. If there had been a law school

established at the University of Nevada

at Las Vegas at the time you were ready

to enter law school would you have

attended that institution? 15 68

2. If there had been a law school

established at the University of Nevada

at Reno at the time you were ready to

enter law school would you have attended

that institution? 28 54

3. At the time you entered law school

were either your parents or your wife

Nevada residents? . 43 42

4. At the time you entered law school

were you a resident of the State of

Nevada? 45 41

5. Since you entered law school have

your parents become Nevada residents

or have you married a Nevada resident? 13 62

6. Would your answer to Question #1

be different if that law school had

charged fees and tuition comparable to

those charged by a private rather than

a state-supported law school: 8 73

7. Would your answer to Question #2

be different if that law school had

charged fees and tuition comparable

to those charged by a private rather

than a state-supported law school? 12 71

since the questions are not necessarily mutually exclusive

the numbers of answers do not necessarily coincide. There

were many individual comments too numerous to mention.

The members of the Liaison Committee are deeply concerned

over this entire question. The creation of a law

school in Nevada will be an expensive problem initially

and it will be a continuing expense to the University of

Nevada system. The problem of gaining entrance to a law

school at this time for a non-resident applicant is a

considerable problem. Many state law schools have closed

their doors to non-residents and therefore the principal

opportunity for Nevada residents is to enter private and/or

sectarian law schools. The McGeorge Law School in California

has openly sought an affiliation with Nevada. McGeorge Law

School is a private school.

I think the central issue which concerns the members

of the Bar committee is that if Nevada is going to have a

law school that it not have a law school which is established

as a "second rate" law school so that Nevada residents

who cannot meet requirements elsewhere can go to law school.

I think it is becoming increasingly evident that the

quality of the Nevada Bar is distinctly above the quality

of the Bar in many adjacent states. For Nevada to establish

a law school solely and only for the purpose of "substandard"

law school applicants from Nevada or elsewhere

to gain admission to law school would be a mistake in the

opinion of the undersigned. At the same time we feel

that the legislative committee must demonstrate that

there are substantial numbers of fully qualified Nevada

residents who cannot gain admission to law school

because of other states adoption of restrictive nonresident

policies before the legislature should agree

to the expense of substantial sums of moneys which will

be necessary for the establishment of a Nevada law

school.

Unfortunately, the feasibility study of Dean

Pedrick has not been completed. I seriously doubt

if enough of it will be completed by the meeting of

the State Bar for either the Bar or the Board of Governors

to take any kind of intelligent action. As soon as that

study is completed, together with whatever other information

the Board of Governors requests of its committee,

it is the undersigned's opinion that the Board of

Governors should state their recommendations to the

State Legislature at the earliest possible time.

It is my understanding that early consideration will be

given to this matter by the office of the Governor and

other interested parties. If the opinion of the organized

-10-

Bar is to have an effect it should be enunciated to

all concerned individuals promptly upon receiving final

and definitive reports.

Respectfully submitted.

ALVIN N. WARTMAN, Chairman

Vo DeVoe Heaton

Paul H. Schofield

Jack G. Perry

Richard W. Horton

Rex A. Jemison

Thomas A. Foley

Loyal Robert Hibbs

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS

4505 Maryland Parkway Lae Ve^as, Nevada 89154

•adleoaomiM Dapartawnt of Fiaanc*

(703) 730-3650

TO:

FROM:

RE:

Dr. Gentile November 13, 1974

Vice President for Academic Affairs

Lome Seidman

Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)

THE WICHE PROGRAM

As a Nevada resident considers the pursuit of legal education, he

is discouraged by several factors, one of which is the high cost

of law school tuition. State schools charge out-of-state (nonresident)

students an additional fee and private schools, not

receiving state support, impose what, to many Nevadans, is an

impossible financial burden. The purpose of a WICHE program is

to mitigate the impact of high tuition charges.

A WICHE Law Program would create a system by which the State of

Nevada channels allocated state funds to participating law schools

attended by Nevada residents. In exchange, the participating

schools reduce the tuition which they would otJieirwise charge the

properly certified Nevada resident. In the case of participating

state schools, Nevadans are charged "resident tuition" and in the

case of participating private schools, tuition is lowered, perhaps

by crediting the amount received through WICHE against the normal

tuition charge. In either case, money is distributed to out-ofstate

law schools. WICHE is not a program that provides direct

financial aid to students. ,

The current "support level" provided by WICHE for legal education

is $2,500 per student per yectr. This "support level" is not an

arbitrary figure—it is designed to approximately equal tJhe

"operating cost" of a law school in this region on a per student

per year basis. "Operating costs" typically include the following:

1. Instructional costs—primarily the salaries of instructors

and secretaries but supplies are also included.

2. Administrative costs.

3. Library support.

The $2,500 "support level" provided by WICHE has been maintained

for two years and I have been told that, in the face of increasing

TOSts, it will be "reviewed" in the near future. By comparison the

$2,500 is now slightly less than the "operating costs" on a per

student per year basis at Arizona State University's College of

Law and is $500 less than the projected per student cost of a law

school here.

Unjywrtty of ?(«»• -«{« fiyntean

The WICHE Prograan

Page 2 - Continued

Success of the WICHE Law Program is difficult to measure. At this

time 24 accredited law schools, located in 9 states, participate

in the WICHE Law Program. Alaska is the sole contributing state

and now indirectly supports 43 students in 12 of the partiexpatxng

schools. The annual cost to Alaska is presently $105,000 which is

in addition to the $28,000 charged by WICHE for state participauion

in their programs generally.

j^ithouc^ a thorough study on the establishment of a law school in

Alaska is now only in the olanning stage, it aopears to me that

with only 43 WICHE exchange students able to take advantage of

the WICHE orogram many able Alaskans remain unable to attend an

out-of-state law school. It should be noted, however, that this

is Alaska's second year of participation and that while only 11

Alaskans entered the WICHE program as first year law students in

the first year the number increased by over 100% to 25 in the

second year of oarticipation. Seven students were apparently

already enrolled in oarticipating schools and were "picked up"

when the WICHE orogram commenced operation.

IMPACT OF WICHE IN NEVADA

In addition to lower tuition charges for Nevada residents attending

WICHE law schools, oarticipation in the WICHE law program would

provide some advantages to both Nevada residents seeking law school

admission and to Nevada taxpayers generally.

Taxpayers would only be called upon to pay the approximate operating

cost incurred by a law school while educating Nevadans. They would

be spared the expense of constructing a law school building and

contributing to the initial cost of assembling a law library.

a

Some financial incentive would be provided to induce out-of-state

law schools to accept Nevada residents, primarily for those private

schools that have held their operating costs on a per student basis

below the WICHE support level. The direct benefit, if any, to a

public law school would depend on the budgeting policies of the

individual states. Impact of any incentive, however, should be

viewed with caution. A good quality school is not likely to operate

for much less then the WICHE support level and because most state

law schools enforce restrictive quotas on the number of nonresidents

accepted for admission. In fact, assuming that ^izona State Univer

sitv's College of Law is typical of WICHE participants, the preference

for'resident students is openly stated.

While the qualified advantages discussed above are inherent in WICHE

participation, several other factors should be considered, specifi-

From a taxpayer's point of view, it may appear unwise to

pay the salaries of Californians and support libraries in

Arizona, If Nevadans are to pay the operating costs of a

Center for Legal Education they may prefer to take the full

step—construet a law school building, stock a library, and

The WICHE Program

Page 3 - Continued

create a Center for Legal Education in Nevada for the

benefxt of Nevadans. The advantages for a Center for

Legal Education in Nevada are discussed in Chapter III

of the Law School Study for the University of Nevada,

^s Vegas and it should be noted that over $300,000 in

private money" is already available for law libraacv

purposes. ^

2. The presence of a NICHE program still would not permit

]^y qualified Nevada students to attend out-of-state

law schools. Many students will be married to spouses

with secure emoloyraent in Nevada or have part-time

employment available to them here. The cost of movina

may in itself be prohibitive. The hardships involved

in relocating are real and perhaps are reflected by the

fact that only 43 Alaskans are currently able to participate

in their WICHE program.

3. Participation in the WICHE Law Program would not provide

a Center for Legal Education in the State of Nevada. As

mentioned above and discussed thoroughly in Chapter III

of the Law School Study for the University of Nevada

Las Vegas, a Center for Legal Education does more than

merely tram students—it can enrich the State of Nevada.

The functions of a Center for Legal Education, can, in "

part, include; - r - ' ±ii

a. A center for legal scholarships designed to study and

improve Nevada's institutions;

b. The maintenance of a law library in the State of Nevada

with research capabilities;

c. Enrichment of a variety of educational research and

instructional programs in Nevada;

d. Continuing education of the Nevada Bar;

e. Provisions of legal services to the citizens of Nevada,

especially the lower income groups;

f. Programs to educate law enforcement personnel amd

other civil authorities.

CONCLUSION

WICHE progr^ results in Neyadans paying the

operating cost of other states s law schools, but not enjoying the

Center for Legal Education or providing an opportunity

to all Nevadans who are qualified and eager to attain a legal

education.

The WXCHE Proqreun

Page 4 ~ Continued

Considering the fact that hundreds of thousands of dollars are

now available to create what would be Nevada's first and much

needed law library with in-depth research capabilities and considering

the fact that the construction of a*law school building

will cost more every year we delay, I must reaffirm my confidence

in the validity of conclusion 9, found on page 2 of the Law School

Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas which states;

"To provide opportunity for legal eduaticn for young Nevadans

to provide a Center for legal studies and research for Nevada

to provide Nevada with its own law-trained graduates to serve

in public and orivate assignments, to enrich the University

and to provide the State of Nevada with a professional school

of great promise of public service and benefit to the State

of Nevada, we recommend that the University of Nevada,. Las

Vegas, establish a Law School now."

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA SYSTEM

NEIL D. HUMPHREY

Chancellor

Suite 340, Arlington Towers

100 N. Arlington Avenue

Reno, Nevada 89501

(702) 784-6801

October 6, 1969

I .

Mr. Thomas Cooke

PresIdent

Nevada State Bar Association

One East First Street

Reno, Nevada

Dear Mr. Cooke:

PRESIDENT'S OFFICE

OCT'? 1969':

Univerb.iy or Neva, a, Las Vegas

From newspaper coverage of the recent Nevada Bar Association

meeting In Las Vegas, I understand that you will soon appoint

a committee to "evaluate the feasibility (of a law school In

Nevada) and recommend a site." As I am sure you know, both

the University of Nevada, Reno and the University of Nevada,

Las Vegas have proposed the establishment of law schools In

their ten year plans. These plans have been "accepted" by the

Board of Regents but not "approved." We are In the process of

reviewing proposed new academic programs and had anticipated

that a preliminary proposal concerning a law school would be

presented to the Board of Regents by each campus early in 1970,

The Board of Regents would then decide whether to authorize

UNR or UNLV (or neither or both) to proceed to the second

phase In our process for review of proposed new academic programs.

Please be assured that the administration of the University of

Nevada System welcomes the interest of the Nevada Bar Association

In this matter and we will be pleased to cooperate with

your conmilttee In every way.

Cordially.

Nell

Chancel lor

NDH/pr

cc: Mr. Procter Hug, Jr.

President N. Edd Miller

- President R. J. Zorn

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS

jssg

University of Nevada, Reno University of Nevada, Las Vegas

• , •

, Desert Research Institute Community College Division

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS

Office of the President

DATE:

Your In^rmation ______ ^5 Requested Your Signature

For Review Note and Return Other

Your Comment —Necessary Action ••• •••

y«Mj

j ' /.tiNb A.U HOC COmiTTEE FOR A LAW SCKCOL

1515 Westwood Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada

LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION; LAW SCHOOL POTENTIALITIES

J A 2 9 19 7 3

University of Nevnda. Las *fn,„

0-

:3

Law schools are usual components of a state university. For instance,

this is true of all Big Ten Universities—with the single exception of Purdue

University, which began as an agricultural and technical school. The state

universities of the Pacific coast also have established law schools, and in

the Rocky Mountain area the Universities of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Idaho,

Montana and Wyoming all include them. In Arizona both the University of

Arizona and Arizona State University each have a law school.

s. 'CL"""

Role and Importance

In most jnature universities, the law school is a major unit in professional

education. Not only does the law school provide access to professional

careers for young adults, but it also is an important aid to practitioners in

the field as it brings them seminars and short courses to up-date them concerning

new developments in the field of law.

Moreover, it is important to all members of the community who engage

the services of an attorney. The University law library as a nearby resource

center for attorneys can allow them more efficiently and cheaply to research

difficult or unusual points of law for their clients. Since knowingly or

unknowingly all who engage the services of attorneys must pay their counsels'

research expenses, many members of the general community directly benefit

from the presence of a law school.

Furthermore, a law school is useful to the total campus and community.

A modern law school like that of the University of Utah does not exclusively

teach law courses to law students. Instead its professors, as part of their

regular teaching assignments, teach the business law, environmental or consumer

law, and some law enforcement classes to students of various colleges

2

of the University.

General Statement of Need

There are two factors of outstanding •importance causing the current

unprecedented awakening of interest in legal training throughout the United

States. First, despite the recently falling birth rate, the rapid growth

of population into the university student category (age 18-22) will continue

into the twenty-first century. Second, there is a great rise in the demand

for legal services because of the growing complexity of governmental,

business, and particularly social affairs, and a moi'^it-ing concern that

Americans of all elements of the population should have opportunity to

obtain needed legal assistance.

The 149 law schools approved by the American Bar Association have

recently increased their total enrollment, but have cut the size of their

freshmen classes by 2.9 percent, that is from 36,171 students last year to

35,129 this year. This decrease in freshmen occurred because most law

schools have overadmitted new students in the recent past, and their enrollment

had swelled beyond their capacity. In addition, flunkouts and dropouts

have declined.^ This situation reflects full capacity at existing law schools

and inability to accommodate increasing volume of applicants.

There is now an unmet need for opportunity to attend law school for

Nevada students. In 1972, a committee of interested citizens made inquiries

with the purpose of determining the need in the state for such a facility.

They sent letters from a P.O. Box (for anonymity) to each high school in

Nevada inquiring about the number in each class that indicated to counselors

1 "Higher Education and National Affairs," January 19, 1973

an interest in law school.

The total response was:

Sophomores - 100

Juniors - 113

Seniors - 118

331

Distribution by areas polled:

Clark County 47.43%

Reno 25.37%

Remainder of state - 27.20% ^

A Department of Education study of data, concerning 9th to 11th graders in

Nevada reported that 447 listed law as their first career choice and 315

O

indicated law as their second choice.-^ The number of pre-law students at

UNLV who can be identified as such totals 100 at present. UNR may have

approximately as many. Therefore, the need for a law school to serve the

aspirations of Nevada's youth is clearly demonstrated.

Difficulties of Access

Formerly if a Nevada college graduate had the financial means he could

gain admission to some accredited law school. Now many schools have 8 to 10

applicants for each opening and 20 or more applicants for each opening may

4

soon become the norm. At present a B or B+ grade average and an L.S.A.T.

(pre-law) score in the top 20% is required. Unless law school capacities

are expanded, eligibility standards may soon demand a straight A or A- average,

coupled with an L.S.A.T. score in the top fifth or tenth percentile.^ The

present outlook for prospective law students is hopeful for only a relative

2 Citizens Ad Hoc Law School for Nevada Committee study

3 Department of Education Study

4 59 American Bar Association Journal 62, January 1973

5 Ibid

few; only those at the top of their college classes can qualify. Meanwhile,

other good applicants are being denied access.

Added to these conditions Nevada residents must bear an additional and

almost insurmountable burden. Typically, state schools give admission

preference to their own residents. For example, the University of Montana

Law School now admits no non-Montana residents. A state statute enacted in

1971 does not allow admission of a non-resident when his admittance would

6

exclude a qualified resident student. Other western law schools have notgone

so far as to codify their non-resident exclusion policies, but a study

of their enrollments reveals few Nevadans. The University of Oregon has one

Nevadan, a third-year student.^ No Nevadans have been admitted during the

g

last two years. The University of Idaho has no Nevadans enrolled, and the

University of New Mexico has no Nevada law students.9 The University of

Arizona at Tucson has one second-year and one third-year Nevada student

enrolled,and no Nevadan has been admitted since 1971. U.C.L.A. admitted

its last Nevadan in 1970. Until last year Utah recruited Nevadans. The

University of Utah does have 14 Nevadans but there is no breakdown by year.^^

If their admissions follow the same pattern as the other schools surveyed,

in all probability only one or two or perhaps none was admitted in 1972.

In view of this bleak situation, last year four desperate Nevadans applied

to the University of Mississippi Law School but none was admitted.

6 Revised Codes of Montana 75-8601 (2)

7 Letter of 18 December, 1972. Admissions Officer

8 Letter of 5 December, 1972. Dean

9 Letter of 6 December, 1972. Assistant Dean

10 Letter of 1 December, 1972. Admissions Officer

1973^^^ ^ February, 1972, and personal inquiry. Admissions Officer 11 January

12 Letter of 28 November, 1972, Academic Secretary; and Letter of 11 December 1972

Assistant Dean '

13 Letter of 20 September, 1972. Dean

In brief, the foregoing indicates that even the best Nevada students are

being precluded from obtaining a legal education. Those students are being

denied the opportunity to become members of the legal profession. This has

serious consequences to them and their parents. Additionally, Nevada as a

state will suffer for in the future the Bar will be composed of virtually all

non-Nevadans. Many citizens feel that the present Bar is even how too remote

from the people. If no law school is opened Nevada's legal system will be dom

inated by non-natives only vaguely in touch,with the needs of Nevadans.

Costs

In general, of all types of professional schools a law school is the

least costly—much less than medical or dental sch- ls, and only modestly

more than most doctoral programs in the arts and letters.

First, in reference to physical plant, a building to house classrooms,

faculty offices and a law library would probably cost a million dollars in

terms of 1973 construction.^^ However, since law schools do not require

laboratories and special equipment, already existing campus buildings could

temporarily house law school operations. During biennium 1975-77, the UNLV

campus plans replacement of its overcrowded library, enabling reassignment of

a modern structure needing only minor adaptation as a law school facility.

Second, the only specialized instructional resource-that a law school

needs is a library having an initial collection of 40,000 volumes costing

approximately $500,000 in 1966-67 prices. Probably ten per cent should be

added to this figure for inflation of prices to date.^^ Library acquisitions

would be phased over a three year term.

14 "Guideline Statement on the Establishment of New Law Schools" (Association

of American Law Schools, Washington, D. C. 1972) pp 15-16

15 "Guideline Statement on the Establishment of New Law Schools." p. 18

6

Sf

Third, operating costs for the first year can be realistically estimated.

Probably the smallest practical basis for the opening class would be 40

students.

Based on this first year enrollment, the initial year's operating cost

would be:

6 faculty salaries (inc. a Dean) $150,000

3 classified employees 18,000

Equipment, supplies, and travel 20,000

First 1/3 of basic library ' 150,OOO

Scholarships 5 oOO

$343,000

By the third year, with 110 students as a result of attrition in the

first two classes, operating costs would be:

11 faculty (inc. Dean) $275,000

5 classified employees , . 30,000

Equipment, supplies and travel ' " 40,000 '

Last 1/3 of basic Library 150,000

Scholarships 10,000

$505^000

The fourth year (at full scale) and thereafter:

11 faculty (inc. Dean) $285,000

5 classified employees 31,000

Equipment, supplies and travel 40,000

Annual increment for Library 60,000

Scholarships 10,000

$426^000

If it were desired to enlarge the student body, the faculty to students

ratio of 1:15 would be the best guide to expanded costs.

* * * * * * * * * *

Thus from the standpoint of both need and cost it appears to the Citizens

Ad Hoc Committee to obtain a Law School for Nevada that the establishment of

this facility in the near future is a wise investment of state resources.

A law school deserves the serious consideration and study of all state

officials.

16 Above figures are given or derived from information in "Guideline Statement

on the Establishment of New Law Schools."

Clamor For U

By COLLEEN BENTLEY

SUN Staff Writer

Vowing that "I'll fight for it to the end," Lise Wyman, UNLV student body vice

president, has outlined plans for the UNLV law school presentation before Friday's

Board' of Regents meeting.

Meeting at 10 a.m. at Clark County Community College, the regents are expected

to appoint a committee of up to 15 persons to raise funds for the school.

Some funding already has been pledged, said Wyman.

Claude Howard, a local businessman who has donated millions to the medical

school at University of Nevada, Reno, has promised more than $500,000 if construction

begins by Jan. 1. Caesars Palace has pledged a similar sum.

Nevada and Alaska are the only two states without law schools,'

Private funding must be sought because the Legislature has refused to allocate

any state funds, Wyman said.

UNLV has tried to get a law school since the early 1970s. A 1974 feasibility study

conducted by university officials pointed to the need for its establishment.

However, the 1975 legislature defeated a measure in support of the school.

In 1976, the pre-law association became actively involved in the issue, and has since

pushed the Legislature and the regents for support.

The study was updated last December at the request of the regents. They wanted

later figures on the number of students interested and construction costs.

With the updated study in hand, UNLV students spoke before the 1979 legislature

in support of SCR-24, a bill sponsored by Sen. Jean Ford and Sen. Floyd Lamb

supporting the law school. The bill was defeated by two votes, Wyman said.

5 The students turned to private donors. Wyman said they've received pledges of

close to $2 million.

Wyman said more money has been promised if regents establish the committee

because "many persons won't give money until sometlring firm is'established."

The law school would be privately funded and not assisted by state money. Wyman

Las Vegas Sun

9/20/79

P. 13

said it may be more expensive for students to attend, but, "It still will be less than

going out of state." '

The prelaw association did a survey in 1978 of out-of-state schools and found that

the average cost at a private institution is between $3,000 and $5,000 per year. Public

universities, it found, add additional out-of-state fees of $1,200 to $1,600 per semester,

he survey also confinped that many out-of-state universities have quotas as on

e number of out-of-state students. Thus, Nevada students wishing to go to law school

are restricted in where they can attend. •

Nevada students, having an in-state school, are in effect discriminated against both

in terms of economic and attendance factors, Wyman said.

Costs of operating a Nevada law school would vary, depending on whether a new

building must be constructed at UNLV or if the student union can be reconstructed

The updated study suggests its placement in the student union at a cost between

$3.5 and $4 million.

Cost of a new building approximates $7 to .$8 milUon, according to the study.

" : • ; i ' - •

A consideration is when a new student union could be built. University officials

say that's being studied.

Wyman said many persons have expressed an interest on serving on the law school

committee.

Some of those who are willing to serve include Fred Lewis, Summa Corp

executive; Judge John Mowbray, chief justice of the Nevada Supreme Court; Gerald

Moffitt, local architect who would draw the plans should a new building be required'

John Foley and A1 Marquis, local attorneys; Irwin Molasky, Paradise Development

Corp.; and Leo Puccinelli, an Ellm attorney.

Wyman said building the law school in Las Vegas once was debated because many

thought it should be in the north, near the seat of state government

Northern students now have "banded together" with southern students, she said

because both groups realize they can accomplish more if "they stick together."

^ The United Students of the University of Nevada System (USUNS) will assist in

the presentation to the regents.

naWS oUir«d<iU

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

12-5-79

Contact: Mark Hughes 739-3101

#248

Law School

^Baskets & Carapus Mail

• Locals (Red) ^

• Events (Eluc) /f/l , , . , ,

^Statewide (Green)

• Nationals (List attached)

• Special-interest pubs: _Uia_

• Exclusive to:

Prooicd by:

The board of directors of the University of Nevada,

Las Vegas Alumni Association has passed a resolution calling

for the establishment of a law school at UNLV.

The resolution, approved at the most recent regular

meeting of the group, asks for a school which would offer

legal programs for both full- and part-time students.

The vote was taken after the association members

reviewed a feasibility study which was carried out five

years ago at the directive of the Board of Regents.

A UNLV law school, according to the alumni resolution,

would serve not only to provide basic legal education, but

would enable practicing attorneys the opportunity of conntinuing

their educational development.

The resolution cites the fact that by 1980, Clark

County is expected to have 63 percent of the state's total

population. It also points to the university's growth of

faculty, physical facilities and enrollment as additional

factors in support of a law school.

-30-

co msoiii' Jaied StuKileiiiis

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS

4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY 89109

TEL. 739-3477

LAW SCHOOL RESOLUTION

WHEREAS WE THE SENATE BEING DULY ELECTED AS

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CONSOLIDATED STUDENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-LAS VEGAS DO OFFICIALLY ENDORSE

IN THE FORM OF THIS RESOLUTION THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A

LAW SCHOOL ON THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-LAS VEGAS

CAMPUS AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME.

•/:

r-l/'

Val S. Buhecker

CSUN President

Ubs'-eph J€. Karraffa

C-SUN Vice-President &

Presiding Officer

The above resolution passed unanimously by the CSUN

Senate on July l6, ISfh. CSUN Senate members present

Curtis Haggard

Raymond Carrillo

Susan Deems

Gary Abbott

Rafael Lara

Rosalynn Ramey

Gale Geer

tJohn Tofano

Eugene Belin

John Goris

Shirley Lindsey

Lynn Squires

Carlton Collins

v^ick Cuellar

v.^avid Elkins

Howard Needham

Carol Stapleton

Craig Ball

Kevyn DuMay

Ron Arnoldsen

John Rice

7/17/74

; Lei's Sfeii to •

Hevacia Law School Now

I It appears that the Legislature, serve as examples, many young Ne-

Iwhen it meets in January, will be vadans who might otherwise be stim-

' confronted with the question of wheth- ulated into thinking about law as a

er our university system should include possible career simply do not give it

a law school. serious consideration.

This newspaper has supported the Obviously, many students who do

creation of a law school here since 1974 consider law are discouraged by the

when a university-sponsored study high cost of going out of state to a law

showed it to be both feasible and school.

desirable TO HAVE YOUNG Nevadans of

WE ABE EVEN more supportive of character and ability excluded in -

i the concept today, and for that reason substantial numbers because of a lack

: are pleased to note that the Board of of,opportunity for law study within our

^ Regents has just voted to endorse the own borders means a genuine' loss to

f l L C

5 < r H o o L

[ A law school for Nevada?

i It's not a new issue, but certainly one

^that deserves to be examined again.

by the state.

But, with no law school in existence

here, with no law students visible to

The Valley Times

December 11, 1978

p. 4, Sec. A

Lel^s Start to Build

i^evada Law School Now

f i L i . :

V • A law school for Nevada?

^ It's not a new issue, but certainly one

^that deserves to be examined again.

' It appears that the Legislature,

'when it meets in January, will be

' confronted with the question of whether

our university system should include

a law school.

This newspaper has supported the

creation of a law school here since 1974

when a university-sponsored study

showed it to be both feasible and

desirable

WE ARE EVEN more supportive of

the concept today, and for that reason

are pleased to note that the Board of

Regents has just voted to endorse the

, creation of a law school.

The seed work for a law school can

' and should be started now — so that in

five or 10 years Nevada law students

and the people of this state are

benefiting from it.

: The arguments against it are, we

; believe, harrow and unthinking. It will

cost too much. There are too many

lawyers in Nevada. Nevada students

. can easily attend other, out of state law

schools. Nevada is too small a state for

; a law school. There aren't enough

Nevada students to justify it.

1 "We have plenty of attorneys in

Nevada and do not need to go into the

business of training more." That was

the simplistic, fifth-grade level thinking

that marked the Review-Journal's

opposition to the law school the other

• day.

• The number of attorneys in Nevada

[ is not determined by whether or not we

• have a law school. It is determined by

• the number of lawyers who apply for

•admission to the Nevada State Bar and

'successfully pass its test.

THERE CONTINUES to be across

the nation, and here in Nevada, a

steady increase in the numbers of

students seeking admission to law

schools.

But the capacity of the better law

schools to receive first year students is

exhausted. One estimate is that there

annually are upwards of 25,000 well

qualified applicants nationally who

want to go to law school but are not

I accepted by a single law school to

[which they apply.

Recent figures aren't available, but

I in 1973 about 160 Nevada students

I sought admission to law schools across

I the nation. They submitted more than

joOO applications to law schools, some

lapplying to more than five separate

Ischools. It is estimated that only 60

[actually started law school.

Project these figures on the basis

[that Nevada's population is expected to

jtop one million persons by 1990 and the

[clear need to start building the law

I school now is evident.

NOW, IT MAY BE contended that on

[a practical basis today the interest of

I only a few hundred Nevadans annually

in entering law school is not sufficient

to warrant such a major commitment

by the state.

But, with no law school in existence

here, with no law students visible to

serve as examples, many young Nevadans

who might otherwise be stimulated

into thinking about law as a

possible career simply do not gjive it

serious consideration.

Obviously, many students who do

consider law are discouraged by the

high cost of going out of state to a law

school.

TO HAVE YOUNG Nevadans of

character and ability excluded in

substantial numbers because of a lack

of,opportunity for law study within our

own borders means a genuine loss to

them, and to the fabric of this state.

Now, we fuUy recognize that it is not

reasonable to expect a small state to

provide every professional course and

every advanced educational opportunity

for all segments of its population.

But law education seems to us to

be one area where Nevada can easily

meet the need.

Beyond that, there are added dimensions

to what a law school, or more

properly a law center, can mean to

Nevada.

It will go beyond the training of

Nevadans for the legal profession. It

will be a tremendous resoiu-ce to the

university and to the state. It will bring

together a group of dedicated law

teachers, legal scholars, and a law

library — all of which will result in

focusing more attention on the legal

system and administration of the

courts in Nevada. It will be a resource

for the continuing education of Nevada's

lawyers.

DO WE HAVE too many lawyers in

Nevada? That's a ridiculous question

on the face of it — particularly if we

believe in the freedom of every

individual to pursue the career of

profession of his or her choice.

But, just for the record, Nevada has

had in the past a lower ratio of lawyers

to population than the national average.

Nevada is one of the two or three

states in the nation that docs not have

its own law school.

Somehow we are able to afford to

build athletic departments for gpreat

basketball and football teams, but are

told that a law school would cost too

much.

The fact is that other states, with

fewer financial resources than we have,

have built small but exceptionally fine

law schools for 200 to 5O0 students.

A UNrVEESITY of Nevada law

school can be launched at a relatively

modest cost. One estimate is about

$850,000, much of which pre bably can

be raised from private sources.

Let us make a commitment to build a

university system of substance and

depth. Let's expand our horizons for

the Nevada of tomorrow. A law school

will help do that. It's timff* to start

hiiilHintr now. - it

The first signs of competition

between the two campuses of

the University of Nevada over

a projected law school are expected

today as the regents

hear a ten-year plan for development

at Nevada Southern

University.

The Las Vegas school's plan,

which will be presented by

Chancellor Donald Moyers, will

include a law school proposal

that will rival one outlined Friday

for the'Reno campus. •

Details of the NSU plan were

unavailable to the press Friday.

Chancellor N. Edd Miller of

the Reno campus outlined a

proposal for a Reno law school

which would do more than just

train lawyers.

"There are two present thrusts

in our society which a program

of legal education should deal

with — social interpretation and

attitudes toward the law

brought about by civil rights

and Supreme Court decisions

and the increasing complexity

of governmental administration.

No law school now has this

major focus."

Regent Procter Hug noted that

some schools offering this type

of education were turning out

lawyers unable to practice law.

Miller replied, "I'm not saying

the standard law degree

should be eliminated. Law students

should still study torts

and contracts."

Miller said the law school

seemed "the most likely professional

school to be developed

within the next ten years on

the Reno campus."

As a selling point for locating

the legal school in

Reno, Miller cited the existence

of the National College

of Trial Judges at Reno and

its law library of 22,000 volumes.

In keeping with the broad

scope of the school proposal in

the plan, he said the existenca

of strong graduate programs in

psychology, sociology, political

science, and business would help

in the development of this type

of law program.

He said such a program could

produce specialists with more

than just conventional law degrees.

The university should

seek- to establish a distinctive

program rather than competing

with existing schools on traditional

grounds, he said.

I Miller said although the law

school would require assistance

from the state, it would

cost less than most professional

schools which might be proposed.

The law school could

open in 1970, he said.

Other features of the tenyear

plan included the estab-.

lishment of an honors college

which would include individualized

instruction for exceptional

students. The college,

which would include

.about 200 to 300 students, had

a projected opening date for

1978..

Nevada IState Journal

January 13, 1968

Miller; said conservative projections

indicate an enrOliment

of 9,240 at the Reno campus in

1978. He said the university

should strive to have a graduate

enrollment of 35 per cent of the

entire student body at that time.

To that end the plan also included

development of 30 new

graduate degrees.

The Reno campus ten-year

plan also included a physics

building, a television and com-

I munication arts building, an art

building, museum, gymnasium

and a library addition as well as

other construction projects.

Miller said the plan is not

final and will "probably require

changes in priority and modification

in the future."

Neither of the plans is the

final document for ten-year development

at the university.

That final plan will be developed

by the regents for presentation

to the legislature. It

will then be amended every

two years.

Las Vegas Review-Journal, January 13, 1968

RENO (AP) — Chancellor N.

Edd Miller of the University

o f N e v a d a p r o p o s e d F r i d a y

the establishment of a law edu

c a t i o n c e n t e r o n t h e R e n o

campus within the next ten

years.

Miller told the regents the increasing

number of students in

pre-law programs, the presence

of^e National College of Trial'

Judges and its library and the

proximity of the state capital

are reasons for establishing the

legal facility in Reno.

"THE PROPOSAL is to develop

a center on legal, educat

i o n a t • t h e u n i v e r s i y t h a t

would capitalize on the national

college's present programs,

t h a t w o u l d i n v o l v e a m a j o r

cross-disciplinary approach to

'the teaching of law and research

Into law, and, finally,

to develop a law school with

a major emphasis on governm.

ental legal practice and gove

r n m e n t a l s e r v i c e , " M i l l e r

said.

RENO (UPI) — The University

of Nevada board of regents

opened a two-day meeting Friday

to act on a site for the

proposed medical school, financing

of new buildings and a 10

year program projection for

development of the university

The recommended site for the

two-year medical school was a

42-acre site on the northeast

section of the Reno campus.

ACTING dean Dr. George

Smith and Chancellor N. Edd

Miller said a site feasibility

survey team which included

deans of medical schools in

other states unanimously cho.se

the campus site. Earlier, a site

adjacent to Washoe Medical

Center had been proposed as a

possible location..

The school was a bitterly contested

issue during the 1967

legislature. It caused a northsouth

split among lawmakers

and raised some opposition

among the regents. The Legislature

approved a conditioned

go-head after industrialist Howard

Hughes said he would contribute

$6 million over 20 years.

The board also was to act

on revised financing for a physical

science building at Renoj

and a chemistry building at '

Nevada Southern.

"The programs of the college

for trial judges and, m.ore recently,

for appellate judges has

called national attention to the

^pjversity as a center for this

kind of specialized legal education."

Miller said the National College

of State Trial Judges re-

I tains a library of m.ore than

; 22,000 volumes, providing one

' of the most expensive features

of a law center.

"THE COMPONENTS of this

! center would be a law school,

a-nd research engaged in by

lawyers, judges, psychologists,

social workers, sociologists,

journalist, historians, teacher.

. .", Miller said.

01-Lli Reno Evening Ga^'

I 5. 1 3T r - * *R(W }n B

LJillR/CISlif :

By MIMI LaPLANTE

, A proposal to establish a

;Iaw school on the University

of Nevada Reno campus

by 1971 was to be

presented to the board of

regents today.

The proposal is included

in a 16-page report outlining

the needs of the university

dui-ing the next ten

years..

Prepared by Dr. N. Edd Miller,

Reno campus chancellor,

with the help of administrators,

i faculty members and students,

the report also calls for:

: The establishment of sfac new

bachelor degree programs, 15

master degree programs, 15

programs leading to a Ph.D.,

and a gradual increase in associate

degree, technical

^counses;

i An honors college for 2a3 to

300 top students at the university;

An increase in the present

305 faculty members to 584 to

meet the needs of approximate-

|ly 9,240 students expected to

'enroll by 1978;

And a number of new buildings

including a high rise parking

lot, a new dhiing commons,

a television and communications

arts building, additional

housing for married students

and an art and museum center.

A faculty-composed educational

planning committee report

on the law school says it "is

the most likely professional

school to be developed during

the next 10 years.

"The need for the school is

attested by the growing enrollment

of undergraduates in prelaw

programs."

The committee report says

the Reno campus is specially

qualified to start a law projgram

because:

-The National College of

State Trial Judges is already

established at the university

and has the support of the

American Bar Association:

—The college has a 22,000

volume law library — 2,000 vol-

(Turn to Page 2, Col. 3)

(Continued from Page 1)

umes over the 20,000 minimum

needed for a school.

"Thus, one of the most expensive

features in the development

of a law school — an

adequate library — is already

present through the support of

the Max C. Fleischmann Foundation

of Nevada;"

—Strong graduate programs

in areas which could' supplement

the school (psychology, sociology,

political science, business)

would allow the school

to attempt new and broader approaches

to legal training.

The. committee suggests the

university establish a distinctive

program rather than competing

with established schools

on the same grounds.

"Unhampered by vested interests

or by conventional restrictions,

a Nevada law school

could consider such proposals

as combining a master of arts

degree in a related discipline

with law training in order to

provide some of the specialists

s o c i e t y i s d e m a n d i n g . . . A

program which would prepare

the lawyer for government service

might be of special ernphasis.

"The proximity of Reno to

both Carson City and Sacramento

(governmental centers)

would be helpful in such a program."

Financial support of the state

would be required, the committee

acknowledges.

"But becau-se of existing facilities

and the possibilities of

some outside funding, it would

be less expensive than most

professional schools which

might be proposed for the university."

Miller says the revolution of

law and its interpretation and

the increasingly complex nature

of governmental and public administration

should be considered

in developing a law program.'

Miller says a center for the

study of law should include a

law school, research facilities

for lawyers, judges, psychologists,

social workers, sociologists,

journalists, historians and

teachers.

A teaching program should

be developed for trial attorneys,

penal workers, juvenile

authorities, police officers and

others. A library and resource

center should be developed for

teachers and researchers, he

adds. V

It is also proposed that the

center develop programs leading

to the traditional degree

programs ranging from associate

degree in law enforcement

to masters and Ph.D. degrees

in associated areas.

"In-service training of judges,

attorneys,. police and juvenile

authorities would be an important

part of the program," Miller

says. '

"Special short courses and

seminars for practitioners in

these areas should be developed

. .!. public meetings and

c o m m u n i c a t i o n s p r o g r a m s

should be developed."

The cpst of the law school

and the other programs is not;

included in the report. ,

Neil D. Humphrey, acting

university president, says the

financial' report will be given

to regents later when the 10-

year budget is completed and,;

as a result, he will recommend

that the board not act on the

proposals today.

Carson City Appeal

January 12, 1968

Reno (AP) . Chancellor N.

Edd Miller of the University

of Nevada proposed Friday

the establishment of a law

education center on the Reno

campus within the next ten

years.

Miller told the regents the

Increasing number of students

in pre-law programs,

the presence of the national

college of trial judges and its

library and the proximity of

the state capital are reasons

for establishing the legal

facility in Reno.

"The proposal Is to dev.

elop a center on legal educa.

tion at the university that

would capitalize on the nat.

tonal college's present programs,

that would involve a

major cross . disciplinary

approach to the teaching of

law a^d research into law,

and, finally, to develop a law

school with a major emphasis

on governmental

legal practice and governmental

service," Miller

said.

"The programs of the college

for trial judges and,

more recently, for appellate

judges has called national attention

to the university as

a center for this kind of

specialize legal education."

Miller said the National

College of State Trial Judges

retains alibrary of more

than 22,000 volumes, providing

one of the most expensive

features of a law centei

"The components of this

center would be alaw school,

and research engaged ir

by lawyers, judges, psychologists,

social workers, sociologists,

journalists, historlians,

teachers.,.," Miller

said.

Miller said the number of

both faculty members and

students could be expected

to double within the next

ten years.

RRNO (UPl) — The Board of Regents

yesterday received a 10-year projection

of University of Nevada growlh which

the drafting committee called "both

. frightening and gratifying."

It said enrollment would double present

size as would the faculty. There

should be a law school as well as the

medical school which is in the formative

stage. Many other buildings should ^as Vegas Sun

be built to serve the students and the January 13, 1968

state. There should be a wider curriculum,

and more selective entrance requirements.

"The university should develop the

necessary graduate and professional

progi'ams without weakening undergraduate

instruction," said the Educational

Planning Committee, composed of faculty

members. "The depersonalization

which afflicts most large universities

should be avoided."

Reseai'ch activity should be encouraged,

and, the Reno campus for the

foreseeable future will continue to be

the logical place in the state for the

location of carefuUy screened graduate

and professional programs," it said.

It said a School of Law seems the

most likely professional school to be

developed here during the next 10 years.

. It said it could cooperate with the National

College of, Trial Judges ali-eady •

e.stablished on campu,?, which has developed

a law library of 22,000 volumes.

. Anticipated construction included highrise

parking, dining commons, physics

building, auditorium and music building,

ait and museum building, business

a^dministration building, gymnasium, nuc

Gar GngincGring building, HGVV dormitory

facilities, administration building

humanities building, and television and

. communications arts buildings.

It did not speculate on financing of

the projected program, but said "significant

increases in operating and equipment

budgets can be expected."

_ "These projections are both frightening

and gi-atifying: frightening because

of the necessary financial support increases

they will call for, and gratifying

because they represent a continuing

endeavor on the part of the university

to meet the needs of the state and its

young people," the committee, said.

Regents took no specific action on the

report. .v-

Regents aLso were asked to 'approve

a recommendation that the medical

The school caused a bitter debate in

JheMsW LegislaUire but got a conditional

go-ahead when billionaire Howai'd

Hughes promised $5 million over 20

years.

school be built on a .22-acre site on the

Reno campus. The site was favored by a

committee which included deans of

medical schools in other states.

Regents discus.sed financing of a physical

science building here and ch.emistry

building at NSU. Federal economy

cuts will delay grants to build the projects.

Regents have authorized the administration

to a.sk Gov. Paul LaxaJt to place

the sale of revenue bonds for them on

the special Legislative session agenda.

o g. g ^ _

2.&ar-S

IB »(l

U i i i v / d t j a i I

mf

Unappropriated surplus funds

of the University of Nevada

have dropped to "a dangerous

point," according to a firm of

certified public accountants.

Leroy G. Bergstrom, of Kafoury,

Armstrong, Bernard and

Berg.strom, advised regents Friday

that the surplus should be

at the half-million dollar level

each year.

Neil D. Humphrey, acting university

president, said today the

yearly balance is usually about

$100,000.

"Wfr are concerned with this

because we realize that certain

revenues don't always materialize,"

Bergstrom said. "We feel

the need for a reasonable resei-

ve against unrealized revenues

is a desirable and necessary

thing.

"Try to build this up. These

unexpected occurrences do happen.

The only thing you can do

is to try and look ahead.

"We recognize the nature of

the beast — that you can't

put it all back at once. But try

to put it back gradually so you

will have more of a cushion."

The accountant also recommended

implementation of a

strong internal adult procedure.

"Presently, satisfactory implementation

awaits adequate funding

for the position required.

... Only when substantial internal

auditing is done and

proper working paper documentation

is maintained, will it become

possible for independent

auditors to rely on such work,

thereby materially reducing the

extent of the tests of the university's

records, which are presently

necessary."

He also urged regents to have

a strong systems analysis program

and team to keep up with

the growing necessity of data

processing.

His firm also recommended:

—A coordination of student

fee audit procedures on both the

Las Vegas and Reno campuses;

•

—A perpetual inventory of

university property and equipment;

: —And the employment of a

deputy controller to provide for

more accurate financial statements.

iaei

University of Nevada regents,

told Friday that the Reno campus

wants a law school, were

to hear the same thing today

— about Las Vegas.

Regents were also to find

out late this afternoon that Nevada

Southern University

wants a school of dentistry and

other, assorted new academic

programs by 1978.

And they were to be informed

that an outside, educational consulting

firm thinks it is "at

least reasonable" that Las Vegas

have a medical school —

the present, pet project of the

Reno campus.

The report, prepared by Davis-

MacConnell-Ralston, Inc. of

Palo Alto, Calif., indicates that

Nevada Southern, once considered

the university's stepchild,

will have 17,500 students by

1978.

That's just under three times

the number of youngsters expected

, to enroll on the Reno

campus 10 years from now and

it is sLx times the number of

students Las Vegas had in fall

1957.

The report says approximately

950 faculty members will be

needed for teaching and research

at NSU in 1973 and faculty

salary costs will rise from

the present $2.8 million to $19

million in 10 years.

Regents were told Friday that

the Reno campus v/ould need

about 584 faculty members for

a projected 9,240 students in

1978.

The consultants predict that

Nevada Southern will need a

yearly operating budget of $30

million in 1978 and that between

now and then the combined

yearly operating costs

and capital expenditures will be

over $33 million.

Nevada Southern's budget

this year is $4 million. The

1967-68 budget for the entire

university system, including

both campuses, was $16.3 million.

• The report proposes 22 new

bachelor degree programs, 35

masters programs, 10 new

Ph.D.'s, and 17 associate degree

programs by 1978. It calls

for the establishment of a law,

school by 1974 — three years

later than the one proposed for

the Reno campus. It proposes

that the school of dentistry

open in 1976-77.

The consultants also say Nevada

Southern's long range

planning should include programs

in international transportation,

and research activities

into urban development, environmental

conditioning, arid

land studies, transportation, nuclear

research, creative ap-

(Turn to Page 2, Col. 6)

s i

Takes Post

On Campus'

Raymond L. Finehout has

been appointed director of development

for the Reno campus

of the University of Nevada by

the board of regents.

Finehout, who has been university

director of alumni relations

for both campuses since

July, will report to the office o!

the Reno campus chancellor

rather than to the university

president.

Last summer, the regents announced

that Finehout would

succed former Nevada Gov.

Charles Russell as development

director.

But Finehout said Friday the

regents decided he, should confine

his activities to the Reno

campus. A similar position is

expected to be established at

Nevada Southern University in

Las Vegas.

1

Confirmed . /

For il

A lO-acre site, in the northeast

corner of the University of

Nevada's Reno campus, was

approved Friday by regents as

the site of a proposed, two-year

medical school.

The site was recom.mended in

December by a team of medical

consultants who were in

Reno to confer with Dr. George

Smith, acting dean of the proposed

school.

Earlier plans called for building

the school adjacent to

Washoe Medical Center but Dr.

Smith said Friday that consultants

feel the medical student

should feel he is a part of the

campus community.

Reno Evening

Gazette

January 13,

1968

i (Continued from Page 1)

proaches to public and higher

education and data ;-etrieval.

The report specifically points

out that Nevada should plan for

a law school.

"Further," the report says,

"based upon an analysis of legal

activity in all of the counties

in Nevada, it seems evident

that tlie Las Vegas area

should become tire geographic

. locale for such a school.

"Not only is this area now

more active in legal concerns

than all other counties in the

state, it seems reasonable to

expect that in the years to

come Clark County will continue

to outstrip other areas in

its need for legally-trained men

and women and its continually

expanding urban mass will increasingly

provide the necessary

milieu of. attorneys' office,

courts and cases."

And the firm turns to billiona

i r e i n d u s t r i a l i s t H o w a r d

Hughes, who has pledged $300,-

000 a year for 20 years for the

Reno-based medical school, as

a reason for a school in Las

Vegas.

Although the consultants say

it might be reasonable to have

the medical school in Reno and

the dental school in Las Vegas,

1 , >

.d

Ml

i

lo

d

they caution that iTughe's provides

"an unknown factor" in

the medical school situation.

The report says that if

Hughes decides to build a major

medical center in Las Vegas

"it would then seem at

least reasonable for the univer-'

sity to consider placement of

a medical school as well as a

dental school in Las Vegas.

"The consultants are not recommending

that a medical

school, already • built on one

campus, be suddenly uprooted

and moved simply because of

the decision of one man.

"They are simply suggesting

that the university keep the

greatest degree of flexibility in

its planning up to the point at

which funds are actually committed

and spent for a particular

enterprise on a given

campus."

The firm, which emphasiEes

the need for continual planning

in its 85-page report, also took

a look at administrative organization

and the relationship between

the two campuses.

"In this regard," the report

continues, "t h e consultants

wish to stress as strongly as

possible the combined concepts

of autonomy and coordination.

"To define the precise line

between autonomy on the one!

hand and control from a high-i

er board on the other is diffi- -

cult at best . . . however it is

possible and indeed important

to point cut that while tlie

board of regents has the ultimate

responsibility for the University

of Nevada system, and

while it'also possesses the ultimate

authority in this area,

it is, by definition, a board .. .

and must be concerned with

policy rather than operating decisions.

"In a like manner, the chief!

executive officer at each campus

must, under the policy

guidelines established, by the

board, have sufficient autonomy

to carry out the program

of the institution under his own

leadership so that the institution

may move forward, as it

should, on its own steam." !

The consultants say the re-'

gents may expect the chief executive

of each campus to re-'

spect their ultimate authority.

But it says the board "must!

nevertheless have enough con-i

fidence in these chief executive

officers so that the occasions!

upon which it will have to ex-^

ercise constraint of higher au-'

thority will be rare."

?Memo

F ROM THE DESK OF

JUDGE WILLIAM D. JANSEN

January 26/ 1990

Larry:

As per your telephone conversation with my

secretary/ Donna/ this date/ please find

attached the information I received from

Drake University pertaining to blueprints

of the Law School/ Law Library and Legal

Clinic .

Also attached is an article setting forth

construction costs regarding law schools/

law libraries/ in 1989 within the United

States.

Sincerely

 

 

!.) rai; .'..• Un i vc i i: y

TO; DirccCor o f . tnCif^iival

;:K,C;'-:f oivacXcv o f . the Physical PL^ut

Slf?}JJ;C'C; Updacc of -euaxe roo^fi^e of nropeTrties -33 pari o£ Va:'

t;a>.versJ.ly cainpny

Ti, .•oor.^T'U.i.c:: wj-vh the DcpsTUwant of xRati'oitioaaJ. Uooeorch ''hyr.xc-ii^

?;cr:- >.r-3d;3>-iri?. its records oti al-. properties !7,el;3te:Luea a part ot '.aa

i;i:sikc- U-ivwrsity cefcpes.. Thiri baisic forsi letter viii. be iorvardca to

'••'cicb pro.;r c••'" it rw 3 evfsd. i' tca.sc- chccX t.b<i flcto of each aC~'.-?.-. -'-t

ref.'.'ec updetv •

1.. Atcochcd j.r c irosAio:;: oT yroyerty located at;

iiAS-blE.G-.l.E.-J- AW:-.L.iB,E^Ry:.

„A:4l.e..-Sti.aEEHXeB.„.-AyE;^

2. The gross-tquare fooropa of UaU property ii?; .n^,-sr- *-to ft 6 ^ -cr

:jL%uUj& acinzre ic«t. c/(^f3

3, The tovol assl&irebla square foot.ry.e of this property I.".;. A

assiyvoaoir? eqaare feei:,

ca'^J.gra-foi.,-: spA'.-.e,

... .. 4, The >.coM .-cceo at thi.'i property is:

' '*) S>.Z.4r._ . acres.

rs^rie: '';.iT^ tot.oi aqcare feet o£ the real prcperty divxccd

be dj.ioO square rcct ii equal to the acres,)

Th- 'iosi ••scovic vevislo-s roiuodciieg;, or re£salgTtT.3crt vt spoc-e i%

vOi.lch f/ao done, or, or .coOrc _

>'io'>;-e discsrd ycnir previooa inforoiatioa o£!n .jso '..aso ietcer re v-pdcte yots,

re-..ocdO: '0:0 cbitc of the letter shonld lieicrcino nhen the oats ivaa Autecncloolod.

^ '

>; s-e :;:•>• c-ucct xoi.a, please ccsttscv.-' -.o-

'.i.. b. been; rA

nirertcv nf ire hnyo'-'rc;

 

 

 

- ' , • Ci^&us co^ai^J>ucA'i:^o^•:

Dr/ik:; 'Jaivcr.'.'.ily

a!' Ins;?.: ?l<;;?^.arch

FROM; Divri'.r.r-or c.f th/i 'AbVoic-fti Vlaut.

SUajtCT: Updaca. of. q-.sare iooisii^Q uC properMos maintaitie-. as part of: the Drake

University catapup

In c-C'C-perafjcD «i th thi; Depr. rs:;-neu?.'oC iitacitntio'irul lU^search thr I'hyrjical

Plonf. is updating It.s on «ii. properties maintained as -3 port n.f tlio

Drake University eaajpus,. Tnj.s basic form letter will be fon/axded to you aa

each property is reviewitdc I'lcasc ciieck the date of each iGf-ter fo" the uiost

recent update=

Attached is a drawing of prop-ert}/ iocaved at:

•21'^^5T.4 CAR-P-ENrER.

riAgTWRl&HT LAW_,S,.G.H.C20L-

2, TJie K7.0S;:-'square footage -or thi> p-ioperty- is:

gross scjuare i'eet.

-/l ocf' f 6 OOC^ .

i, "lie to oi a:-.tienable suuore. footage of this prc.-pervy is: V

_ assignable sqi.iarc leet-.

'At'carhed ir 6 roori; by rcfcstt bxeak.dovnj of tiie asc-Jigr.fibie sgacii-;

4= "^'fhc land area e;c this property is:

Cncresr.

^livriuraT'square feat" ol the-: real prcperf.'/ divided

by 43,!)60 square font -i r equal rc the acretr )

5, The aost. rec>arit. r-;n/ j..s.'.oes rva;oc<ei .r-jg^ or rea sa'; grraeni: si space ii-;

t h i s a t r n c t . e r e L a a s f r s l l o w s -

vhich vas done on ov: obou

(Dctcl

Pierre c'i.>Ci','rd vO'':t v"--evi.oiis i.n£ovf<-i.at.ioj?. aiio 'et-e rhia ie;'---;. '-a v-j^,J.tv..e

records. The dace of bhe. H.e.tt.e:c should detertuf.iKV when -bne data vtns -r.uthewt

i c ft r 0 'h

Vf ore rsny oocatlcrw;., please coutacf: Ray 'Ja^oshanker, iinteno;vPr^ y-'-y:

>v .'SCnl'-.C

P.'xectcr a.f '.d;c- davs:-

•' -C d-'

 

 

 

Two months of catastrophe in a year

of magnificent construction

RUINS AMONG

THE SPLENDOR

LIBRARY BUILDINGS 1989

•

By Betle-Lee Fox with

Michael Rogers, Ann Burns, & Reginald E. Pruitt

THE UNBRIDLED enthusiasm

we usually display in

L7's annual Architecture Issue

must be tempered this year with

thoughts of ei that can destroy a

beautiful, functional building in the

blink of an eye. As we compiled the

statistics for the 1989 feature it became

evident that some of the finished

projects might actueiy lie in ruins

in the Carolinas and on the West

coast. Indeed, some of this year's

newly completed buildings may reapp>

ear in 1990 as renovation projects.

Our coverage of the devastation

from Hugo and the earthquake that has

befallen numerous libraries this past

autumn (News, LJ, November 15, p.

15,16; this issue, p. 20) has taught us a

lesson. To blithely ignore the vagaries

of nature and the en vironment that can

turn million-dollar buildings to rubble

is, to say the least, foolhardy.

But there is still a great deal to be

enthusiastic about in 1989. One hundred

eleven new public libraries were

completed between July 1, 1988 and

June 30, 1989, the greatest number

since 1979. Over $347 million was'

used to fund 235 building projects (including

134 additions and renovations)

in 44 states.

Forty academic projects are

highlighted here. The largest is the

Medgar Evers College Library of the

Bette-Lec Fox is Managing Editor;

Michael Rogers is Assistant News Editor;

Ann Bums is Staff Editor; and Reginald E.

Pruitt is Production Editor, U

Oliver Wendell Holmes Library, Phillips

Academy at Andover, Mass.

City University of New York in

Brooklyn, a $17 million building that

encompasses 34,(XK) square feet. The

largest academic addition and renovation

project is the Cornell University

School of Law Library, which

cost over $15 million dollars.

There wasn't the usual rush for

energy efficiency this year. Indeed,

not a single library mentioned specifically

energy-eflficient apparatus. Perhaps

energy efficiency has become so

accepted that it is,no longer considered

an unusual or unique aspect of

building design.

Two divergent considerations

for construction were at the core of

many buildings in 1989. Several projects

sought to provide access to

physically challenged patrons and

staff. Others confronted the challeifge

of remodeling old buildings to

blend with their surroundings while

maintaining old-style charm and architectural

features.

We are pleased to note that this

year the usually small contribution

made by state government increased

to $55 million—due mainly to the new

State Library of Michigan in Lansing,

which cost S43 million.

Local funding was up 28 percent

in 1989, accounting for 71 percent of

total funding. But funding was up in

all categories over 1988 figures.

And lastly, our Library Projects

in Progress section (p. 65) lists 949

new buildings in some stage of proposal

or construction. That is an increase

of 19 percent over the 796

buildings in progress in 1988, and it

promises some exciting architectural

issues in years to come.

Academic Library Buildings

The largest academic

project in 1989

is the new Medgar

Evers College

Library, CUNY,

Brooklyn: $17,000,000

Harry C. Trexler Library, Muhlenberg College,

AUentoum, Pa.

McGraw-Page Library, Randolph-Macon

College, Ashland, Va.

New Libraries

lUmt of liutltirtkiii Project

Cost

truss

Aru

Sq.FL

Cast

Crxistrvctioit

Cost

Equipment

Cost

Book

Capacity

Seating

Capacl^ Architect

Medgjf Evers College, City University of New Yort;, BrooUyn

Eastman School of Music. Unrversity of Rochester, N,Y.'

Muhlenberg College, Allentown, Pa.

Indiana University at South Bend

$17,000,000

12,195,755

11,B00,000

8,000,000

34,000

45,261

71,468

86,500

$114.70

195.00

127.64

83.25

$3,900,000

11,226,200

9,122,310

7,200,000

$%6,000

969,555

1,536,723

800,000

125,000

500,000

300,000

750,000

125

199

486

1,012

Harry Simmtjns jr.

Macon & Chaintreuil Assocs.

Geddes Brecher...

Edward Larrabee Barnes

Mercer University, Macon, Ga.

Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville

Mary Washington College, Fredericksburg, Va.

South Rorida Community College, Avon Park

7,600,000

7,600,000

5,375,972

3,000,000

94,750

122,000

70,081

23,864

64.38

57.38

59.41

92.19

6,100,000

7,000,000

4,163,346

2,200,000

1,500,000

1,073,000

1,212,626

800,000

500,000

n/a

550,000

40,000

750

n/a

385

238

Dunwody, Beeland & Henderson

Swenson Assocs/ScaH Assocs.

Vickery, Moje...

Cal Peck & Steve Clark

Engineering Library, Michigan State. East Lansing

Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University

Part College, Parkviile, Mo.

Pinu Community College, Tucson, Aril

1,867,779

1,530,000

1,500,000

821,215

12,593

9,137

45,000

7,600

137.00

120.39

41.24

100.00

1,725,241

1,100,000

1,855,934

760,000

142,538

55,000

215,309

61,215

100,000

31,000

2oaooo

25,000

184

42

288

140

Albert Kahn Assocs.

Esherick Homsey...

none

Rex Willoughby

' Project cost includes 17,MO sduart feet assigned to mall on first ftoor; 62,701 is gross square feet for computing square foot cost.

South Florida Community College, Avon Park

Franklin D. Schurc Library, Indiana University at South Bend

Additions and Renovations

lUau of Iftstitirtioi

^ "

Project trass St.Fl Censtrvctian Equipment Book Seating ifchftwct

Cost Area Cest Cost Ccst Capacity Capact^ Al WiMivVA

Cornell University Lew School, Total n/a 192,000 980.73 915,500,000 n/a 500,000 490 Shepley Bulfinch...

Ithace, N.Y. new 67,000 n/a 14925 10,000,000 n/a 320,000 104

Renovated n/a 125,000 44.00 5,500,000 n/a 180,000 386

Wichita State University, Kans. Total 10,775,000 192,973 49.09 9,473,000 400,000 965,500 800 Schaefer, Johnson...

New n/a 80,985 n/a n/a n/a 115,500 n/a

Renovated n/a 111,988 n/a n/a n/a 850,000 n/a

Canlsius CoUege, Buffalo, N,Y, Total 6,554,289 %,000 5626 5,410,709 1,143,580 750,000 724 Theodore J. Wofford

New n/a 62,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 34,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Phillips Academy at Andover, Mass. Total n/a 55,500 108.11 6,000,000 n/a 200,000 450 Shepley Bulfinch..,

fncetw-— n/a 30,000 n/a ' n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 25,500 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

University of Richmond, Va, Total 5,000,000 55,500 n/a n/a 540,000 365,000 216 Marcellus Wright...

New n/a 48,000 n/a n/a n/a 350,000 288

Renovated ^n/a 7,500 n/a n/a n/a 15,000 28

Coe CoUege, Cedar Rapids, la. Total 4,252,099 57,969 59.50 3,448,854 803245 300,000 619 Ben Weese

New n/a 38,110 n/a n/a n/a 290,000 371

Renovated n/a 19,859 n/a n/a n/a 10,000 248

Additions and Renovations (cont.)

Kami of Institirtioi

Project tms SK-FL Canstniction Iqulpment look Saattftg ircJittscf Cost Arta Cast Cost C^ Capacity Capacity tm IwWkWi

Randolpb-iyiacoci College, Ashland, ¥a. Total ;4,ooo,ooo 52,108 567,17 53,500,000 5500,000 260,000 532 Shepley, Butfmch...

New n/a 27,929 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 24,179 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Embiy-Riddle Aeronautical University, Total 2,350,000 48,000 35.91 1,723,590 230,030 90,000 800 Kenneth McGee

Daytona Beach, Fla. New n/i^' 28,000 61.56 1,723,590 200,000 30,000 530

Renovated n/a 20,000 0 0 30,030 60,000 270

Francis hlarion College, Florence, S.C. Total 2,300,000 75,135 24.48 1,824,000 356,000 294,500 596 McNair, lohnson

ILCMM 2,150,000 24,448 71.54 1,749,000 276,000 125,600 229

Renovated 150,000 50,687 1.48 75,000 - 80,000 168,900 367

George Fox College, Newfrert Oreg. Total 2,203,311 35,310 50.09 1,768,623 222,529 175,000 302 We Group Architects

New n/a 17,748 n/a n/a n/a 129,000 189

Renovated , n/a 17,552 n/a n/a n/a 46,000 113

Conservatory of Music, Total 2,133,319 "18,606 86.62 1,611,670 177,097 150,000 152 Gunnar Birkerts

Oberiin College, Ohio New 1,736,078 11,745 115,87 1,360,898 71,758 70,000 77

Renovated 397,241 6,861 36.55 250,772 105,339 80,000 75 -

Hartvrick College, Oneonta, K.Y. Total 2,050,000 84,100 24.38 2,050,000 0 275,000 520 Remick Architects

New n/a 33,575 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 50,525 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Huntington College, Montgomery, Ala. Total 2,000,000 19,752 89.47 1,767,266 17,000 103,000 126 Parsons, Wible.,.

New n/a 18,190 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 1,562 n/a n/a n/a Uy n/a

Houston Baptist University Total 1,080,000 44,560 880,000 120,000 205,000 440 Farrell 8 Assocs.

New 697,000 07,200 35.87 617,000 80,000 150,000 240

Renovated 383,000 27,360 9.61 263,000 40,000 55,000 200

College of Applied Sdetrce, Total 930,000 14,000 n/a n/a 110,000 65,500 131 Glaser Assocs.

University of Cincinnati loCT* 690,000 9,200 n/a n/a 72,000 54,000 96

Renovated 240,000 4,800 n/a n/a 38,000 11,500 35

University of Mairse at Machias Total 760,000 "^000 80.00 640,000 50,000 100,000 65 Rea Design Assocs.

New a/i 6,400 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Renovated n/a 1,600 n/a n/a A/a n/a n/a

Clearwater Christian College, Fla. Total 177,000 10,000 15.00 150,000 27,000 125,000 88 Ralph Sherer

New 167,000 3,000 46.66 140,000 27,000 67,000 0

Renovated 10,000 7,000 1,43 10,000 0 58,000 88

Colorado Mountain College IFIC, Leadville ~ —ToUl 75,153 4,569 15.41 70,423 4,729 18,360 45 ' , Crowe Architects

New n/a 486 n/a n/a 3,104 4,248 5

Renovated n/a 4,083 n/a n/a 1,625 14,112 40

There were 47

academic projects

in 1988; there are

40 in 1989

Andrew L. Bouwhuis Library, Canisius College, Buffalo, N.Y.

;r. -

' I I . . I ;

Burrow Library, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tenn.

Stewart Memoi-ial Library, Coe College, Cedar Raptds, la.

Additions Only

Name of Institution

Project

Cost

Cross

Area

SiiJl

Cost

Constniction

Cost

Equipment

Cost

Book

Capadtj

$satin(

Capacity Architect

Niajara University, N.Y. $794,000 7,000 $31.43 $220,000 $574,000 100,000 100 Keith Ait, Canon Design

Renovations Only

Name of institution

Project Cress Sq.FL Construction Equipment Book Seating

Cost Area Cost Cost Cost Capacity Capacity

Schlesinger Lib. on the History of Women in America, $3,400,000 23,038 $118.41 $2,728,000 $40,000 30,000 90 Shepiey BulfLnch ...

Radciifie College, Cambndge, Wass.

Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 2,450,000 28,686 58.63 1,682,000 768,000 110,000 334 Kam Charuhas.,.

Rhodes College, Memphis. Tenn. n/a 40,200 33.66 1,352,971 347,029 50,000 60 Crump Rrm

Bohr Bldg., University of Michigan 1,200,000 9,539 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a not reported

Ursinus College, Collegeville, Pa. 1,000,000 57,000 13,16 750,000 n/a n/a n/a none

Krrksville College of Osteopathic Medidne, Mo. 600,000 11,390 36.73 418,400 97,000 90,000 119 Garett Warner

federal Mogul Library Annex, 250,000 17,000 8.82 150,000 100,000 500,000 0 none

Wayne State University, Detroit

loom College Law Center, Huntington, N.Y. 19,000 1,800 1.66 3,000 16,000 9,000 36 Newman AssocsTPhillips

Hartford Graduate Center, CL 7,920 2732 3.54 7,920 0 0 34 none

Public Library Buildings

The largest new

public project is the

State Library of

Michigan in Lansing:

$43,000,000; the

smallest is the

Pioneer Memorial

Library, Harman,

$44,126

SBytattdMqu aCroUAret:; fMin^^uMicaiAn LLiibbrraarryy;; BMSS^—SrMoMaicnh AA SSyjstUUmm Btad^grun; S—SysUm HtadqusrUn; nla-^-nat a*ailabU

Elizabeth Jones Library,

Grenada, Miss.

Pleasanton Library, Calif.

New Buildings

P»p.

lnM

1

10

Code

M

R

Project

Cott

S4S7^

752,770

Const

Cost

S410,250

494,282

tms

Sa-R

7,090

7,168

Se-Fi

c^

J57.86

68.96

Equip.

Cost

845,079

57,000

Sits

Cost

Owned

140,000

Other

Cests

832,000

61,488

Volumes

28,000

35,000

Reader

Seats

45

60

Federal

Funds

0

0

Stita

Funds

S118200

154,400

Lacal

Funds

S369,129

401,370

cm

Funds

0

197,000

Archltact

Carieton G. McCuny

PHI Architects

BjdtiaiM C*t

7

3

M

M

250,000

235,520

n/a

n/a

3,800

4,161

n/a

n/a

n/a

2,220

Owned

Owned

n/a

n/a

20,000

n/a

22

n/a

126,500

177,760

0

n/a

126,500

n/a

43,000

n/a'

Cleave-Lundiren

Georje Myets

r«it R 196.498 152,984 3,500 43.71 27,381 Owned 16.133 15,000 22 81,812 0 0 114,686 Chllders Anderson

Miniwi*-

fWMOl ' •

Ll Jol»t:,T. -

lasAntdej

UJAnjelc'

Locan* ViBey

.FVISMAX..

Saowwb"

Sill L»is Obupo

S«R|W»'

WWitj'

170

*3

16

20

N/a

5

50

64

40

37

16

MS

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

MS

B

B

12,393,929

3,304,870

642,658

1,507,139

n/a

326,756

5,200,000

2,104,136

4,061,844

3,179,000

815,000

10,000,620

917,250

540,000

1,080,532

n/a

218,357

3,780,000

1,539,194

3,406,609

1,951,000

650,000

97,000

10,000

6,081

5,900

2,500

3,000

30,000

12,211

31,455

18238

7,500

laio

91.73

88.80

183.14

n/a

7279

126.W

126.05

10820

106.97

86.67

1,393,100

300,000

62,658

2,500

40,000

39,399

670,000

286,749

313.301

200,000

95,000

Owned

1,500,000

Owned

320,517

leased

50,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

850,000

Leased

1,000,209

587,620

40,000

103,590

n/a

19,000

750,000

278,193

341,934

178,000

70,000

300,000.

35,000

30,000

32,000

6,000

15,000

150,000

50,000

100,000

60,000

22.000

300

70

41

30

20

25

180

88

128

100

80

570,889

0

0

1,507,139

0

188,378

0

0

198,300

0

407,500

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11,733,040

1,504,870

642,658

0

40,000

138,378

5,200,000

2.104,136

3,863,544

2,329,000

407,500

130,000

1,800,000

0

0

n/a

0

0

0

0

850,000

0

Simon, Martin-Ve|ue...

Mosher Drew Watson...

Roger Gniike

Eugene Kinn Choy

diary Terasawa

Gary Milter

Wurster, Bernard!.,.

Alan Oshima

Bruce Eraser

CIrftord Moles Assocs.

James Brummett

COLOUM - .

6 M 769,265 392,104 3,750 104.56 87,281 240,441 49,439 20,000 34 75,000 0 18,376 675,889 George King

hajtoo* -• 5 M 691,337 569,411 5200 109.50 72,426 Owned 49,500 n/a 30 100,000 220,000 371337 0 King & Tuthill

G^atwwii-.

1 ' 3 B 95,707 78,375 2,000 39.19 16,356 Leased 976 10,000 8 0 25,300 59,995 10,412 none

ilittsA

OeLind Jit •

f«t Reret

KeyUfu-.'-

Uam bimji

Timpa

monoteUBf.

50

10

10

10

20

30

B

B

B

B

B

B

2,631,597

993,900

906273

750,657

54,000

860,000

2,059,500

576,000

27,592

503,584

24,000

564,000

25,600

10,000

12000

5,500

800

8,000

80.45

57.60

230

91.56

30.W

70.50

168,000

159,000

97,984

58,789

11,000

69,000

246,097

Leased

777,457

150,000

12,000

owned

158,000

258,900

3,240

38,284

7,000

227,000

80,000

30,000

60,000

38,000

15,000

30,000

162

66

62

66

14

32

200,000

200,000

0

0

0

860,000

170,000

0

0

0

0

0

2,100,000

760,900

777,457

580,657

54,000

0

161,597

33,000

128,816

170,000

0

0

Gee & Jenson

John M. Faster

Bentley Engineers

Educated Design

Hillsborough County

Fletcher, Valenti, Chillura

CUKIA > rj.

AlSan, T-'

Ashbimi >> HMtt '•}£-

Wlanti ' r'i-

Colouia Ji-

Dohith

ESijon Xv;

Fl. Saine -^'"'

Nofcroa 1'^

Richtand •»*.

Rosweil Ji"-

Sylvaiiia -jwfe'.

Trentoa

WoodDBdil.-'

--Sw

12

10

30

25

7

49

- 6

4

49

2

26

16

14

27

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

M

B

B

668,088

554,000

1,280,185

2,135,628

497,828

1,416,815

. 264,176

335,156

1,849,631

357,857

3,080,224

1,297,190

521,706

976,139

507,753

356,661

842,364

930,182

337,883

890,290

189,117

258,648

1,230,346

270,249

1,695,999

1,023,481

378,514

628,656

6,045

7,000

10,000

10,000

5296

10,499

3,460

3,828

14,852

4,000

20,000

12,376

7,896

10,000

84.00

50.95

84.24

93.02

63.80

8420

54.66

67.57

82.84

67.56

84.80

82.70

47.94

62.87

94,416

119,054

180,502

170,593

51,487

190,934

40,804

43,466

300,066

46,867

357,778

224,351

101,000

141,714

Owned

34,000

171,638

929,960

35,000

276,957

10,000

10,000

218,853

15,000

785,208

Owned

Owned

75,000

65,919

44,285

85,681

104,893

73,458

58,634

24,255

23,042

100,366

25.741

241,239

49,358

42192

130 769

25,550

43,500

56,000

50,000

25218

47,500

14,000

15,000

50,000

9,500

100,000

67,600

30,000

46,000

44

58

n/a

n/a

34

80

25

25

110

27

n/a

177

44

92

125,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

470,953

463,333

0

0

401,739

0

225,000

292,500

1,019,523

308,571

0

812.080

465,331

707,142

72,135

0

1380,185

2,135,628

61,089

1,416,815

7,500

0

830,108

49,286

3,080,224

485,110

56,375

180,997

0

90,667

0

0

35,000

0

31,676

42,656

0

0

0

0

1,427

88,000

David Maschke A Assocs.

Thomson A Assocs.

Harris A Partners

Na Mann Viehman

Thomson A Assocs.

Buck Lindsey A Assocs.

Tombertin Assocs.

Jinright A Ryan

Cbeny, Roberts

Ward A Wetherington

Suemore Floyd

Ed Maddrn

Associated Architectural

Steve Ashworth

ICM:

Jo.

ISUK

Ct!

Hf

Iff

NISI

_U

W*.

B;

C.

Df

kk

Uit

KET fc

E!

fr

H(

JLt

LOU

_R

lU!

_*

tUll M

v i

MIC

L

L

Lc

mi: \

u.

T,

Commimtty

Pt>p.

iliH lode

Prolect

Cost

Canal

Cott

Emsa

Sd- a

Sd.FL

Coat

Equip.

Coat

Slta

Coat

Other

Coats Volumes

Reader

Seats

Federal

Funds

Stati

Funds

Local

Funds

cm

Funds Architect

IDUO

Boisc^ M me,896 $670,393 14,200 $70.84 $80,783 $35,000 $60,720 70,000 54 0 0 $846,896 0 Dennis Fitzgerald

tlUltOiS

Oka JO

Heywoftt;

Towanda

3900

3

1

B

M

M

3,810,000

336,042

252,796

2,800,000

261.292

1«,958

18,000

4,800

3,362

155,56

54.44

43.12

250,000

24,263

26,053

360,000

19,700

16,698

400,000

30,787

65,087

80,000

20,000

40,000

121

46

26

0

0

78,240

250,000

134,442

1,609

3,560,OO0

144,810

155,206

0

56,790

17,741

Bureau o( Architecture

Paul Young

Young i Nice

INDUUU

100 M 6 248 397 4,518,366 48,000 94.13 658,336 482.000 589,695 220,000 250 0 0 5,938,397 310,000 Pecsra Jdlifie.,.

im

Baywj

Dartuvillt

DeWitt

kmi!

I

1

5

"1

M

M

M

M

133,200

158,062

948,697

108,771

89,700

130,066

699,677

85,276

3,400

2,400

7,500

2,170

'2638

54.13

93.29

3930

33,500

9,645

79,153

11,889

10,000

6,000

97,730

6,052

0

12,351

72,137

5,554

13,353

10,598

14,224

5,381

n/a

n/a

60

14

0

0

185,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

10,157

97,730

47,024

133,200

147,905

665,967

62.347

not reported

ieff Hempen

Brown Healey Bock

Weber Pollard $ Assocs.

uxus

tteCrjcken ! M 60,000 53,000 2,000 26.50 0 Owned 7,000 6,000 25 24,618 0 0 33,000 Steckldn & Bitingardt

itamicrr

/kshland

Eltton

Frankfurt

Hebron

e

12

<2

10

?04

BS

M

M

B

MS

461,502

164,343

102,645

742,466

9 816 043

363,670

63,192

73,991

546,025

6.902.02!

4,460

3,250

2,000

6,300

110,400

81.54

19.44

37.00

86.67

62.52

71,042

23,744

20,358

70,349

1370.500

4,483

70,000

Owned

77,400

644,900

22,307

7,407

8,296

48,692

998,622

25,000

20,000

20,000

30,000

500,000

15

50

16

52

293

159,769

0

50,353

0

0

0

80,125

0

170,000

0

162,231

84,218

52,292

49,014

9,816.043

150,000

0

0

523,452

0

John Meyers

Keith Sharp

Gobiin Porter 4 Assocs.

Robert Hayes 4 Assocs.

Sherman Carter Bamhart

LWISIAM Ifi B 837 110 597,238 7,000 85.32 145.000 26.164 68,708 39,000 55 0 0 837,110 0 N-Y Assocs.

KJUK

Wesfo.-ook 20 M 1,748,991 1,555,135 16,000 9730 87356 Owned 106,000 85,000 170 100,000 0 1,534,600 114,391 JSAInc.

lUSSAtBUStm

Mansfield

Whitman

16

13

M

M

2,500,000

973,478

1,855,022

835,978

23,000

11,700

80.65

71.45

184,100

45,000

Owned

Owned

460,878

92,500

100,000

39,661

84

84

0

110,960

0

6,767

2,500,000

812,918

0

42,833

Design Partnership

Wilson Rains

WCHtU)

Lake Orion'

Lansinf"

Livonia''

Saginaw

24

250

105

12

M

M

MS

M

3,670,750

43,000,000

8,667,869

493,000

2,684,502

39,500,000

7,046,042

389,000

29,042

312,000

64,000

7,356

92.44

126.60

110.09

52.88

590,000

1,700,000

647,416

69,000

45,750

Owned

Owned

Owned

350,498

1,800,000

974,411

35,000

100,000

5,000,000

150,000

26,850

168

0

220

52

0

0

0

95,000

0

41,500,000

200,000

0

3,670,750

0

8,458,869

250,000

0

1,500,000

9,000

148,000

Minoni Yamasaki Assocs.

Wm. Kessler 4 Assocs.

Kamp-DiComo Assocs.

Austin 4 Assocs.

HIMUOTIt

tafte Bend

McGrcfor

Minnetonka

F^ican Rapids"

3

3

44

3

B

B

6 M

57,714

125,000

679,033

257,414

57,714

104,000

505,712

192,744

3,108

2,350

4,500

3,100

18.57

44.25

112.38

62.18

0

8,000

54,472

17,029

Owned

5,000

11,504

32,568

0

8,000

107,345

15,073

12,000

6,000

30,000

10,000

12

24

30

26

0

0

191,231

84,810

0

0

0

0

5,000

15,000

487,802

60,000

52,714

110,000

0

112,604

not reported

Wold Assn.

Boatman 4 Assocs.

Dan W. Elton

MlSStSSIPfl

Grenada 21 M 883,531 751,925 12,800 58.74 85301 Owned 46,405 75,000 70 70,000 0 583,531 300,000 Dardaman, Jones

»SSOV?J

Kansas City 51 B 1,500,000 1,050,000 15,000 70.00 126,000 284,000 40,000 50,000 106 0 0 1,500,000 0 Devine Architects

KOinUA

Poison 12 M 516,000 460,000 10,500 43.81 16,000 Ownet 40,000 50,000 70 46,800 0 0 469,200 Fos, Ballas, Barrtrw

•IfVUi

Moapa Town

Seardilijtrt

1

1

8

B

60,000

65,000

55,000

60,000'

550

1,200

100.00

50.00

5,000

5,000

Owner

• Owned

0

0

3,000

7,500

11

19

0

0

D

0

60,000

65,000

0

0

Mark Schrader

Leo Boms

unrjBtsCT

Bogota

Gloocester

8

50

M

B

930,035

1,256,550

820,000

913,650

6,530

10,000

125.57

91.36

30,039

"~^6,000

Owner

179,OOC

80,000

87,90C

45,000

35,000

28

60

0

100,000

184,890

0

745,149

966,500

0

200,000

Remick Architect

John Kaiser

The largest addition

and renovation

project is the

Waukesha Public

Library, Wise.:

$14,385,000; the

smallest is the

Harrington PL in

Delware: $10,113

New Buildings (cont.)

Bucks County Library Center at Doylestoum, Pa.

1

Comffluottr Code Project

Cost

Const

Cost

Cross

S(|, Ft

SR.a

Cast

Euui|i,

Cost

Site

Cast

Otber

Costs Volumes Reader

Seats

Federal

Funds

State

Funds

lecal

Funds

Clft

Funds Architect

KEWTOn

BjbyRxi

Grand Island

Middle Island

Syracuse

Vooftieesville

26

17

45

25

7

M

M

M

B

M

82.632,100

2,077,366

4,433,796

1,114,534

921,759

81,891,000

1,528,868

3,361,040

858,503

740,800

24,000

12,504

31,212

8,000

8,490

J78.79

12227

107.68

107,31

8726

J227,100

429,000

285,707

87,753

64263

S260,1X)0

Owned

225,000

76,717

30,000

$254,000

119,498

562,049

91,561

86,696

125,500

50,000

200,000

28,000

43,000

124

90

50

45

70

$15,013

39,0%

0

180,582

172341

0

0

31,000

0

0

$2,617,087

2,038,270

4,402,7%

933,952

749,418

0

0

0

0

0

Gibbons, Heidtmann,,,

ScafTidi 8 Moore

Gibbons, Heidtmann,,,

Ouinlivan, Piert,,.

Bender Assocs,

Mimi CAROUM

Gamer

Wendell

n/a

n/a

B

B

1,800,000

351,000

1,562,000

293,870

2,310

1,724

676.19

170,46

238,000

57,130

Owned

Owned

0

0

250,000

30,000

150

50

0

0

0

0

1,800,000

351,000

• 0

' 0

Hager, Smith i Huffman

Haskins, Savage,,,

WIO

Chesterland

Qndnnab'

Columbus ~

Dalton

Mansfield

Matysvtlle

Sprinffield"

17

42

66

2

15

8

150

B

B

B

B

B

M

M

1,700,000

1,246,643

2,831,242

216,025

280,800

1,613,061

6,761,000

1,345,600

740,636

2,117,243

138,951

220,000

1,260,567

4,816,000

22,000

5,000

20,372 yjao

3,500

15,000

51,000

61,14

J48,13

103,93

55.14

62.86

84,04

94,43

170,115

80,371

251,442

29,408

40,000

182,460

543,000

Owned

258,454

294,701

38,000

Leased

60,000

897,000

184285

167,182

167,856

9,666

20,800

110,034

505,000

130,000

30,000

100,000

15,000

24,000

65,000

250,000

106

54

146

26

40

60

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,670,000

1,246,643

2,831,242

216,025

280,800

1,613,061

6,411,000

30,000

0

0

0

0

0

350,000

David Holzheiroer

John W. Spencer

Moody/Nolan

Aleiander-Sediel

Alexander-Seckel

Freytag 8 Assocs,

Loreru 8 Williams

oKumm

• Shawnee" 91 M 1,557,000 1,100,000 22,000 50,00 323,500 127,000 6,500 75,000 100 0 40,000 215,000 1,302,000 Price Group

OREEH

Hermiston

"Wilsonville

15

8

M

M

729,459

923,120

609,209

788,003

14,000

7,500

43,51

105,07

53,000

94,620

27,250

Owned

40,000

40,497

40,000

25,000

80

44

95,543

95,543

0

D

504,131

824,230

129,785

3,347

Robert J, Smith

Itagao 8 Otoyan Assocs,

poKmvwu

Doylestown"

Lewtsburj

PtrlBsie

Sayri

72

32

36

7

MS

M

B

M

4,848,519

811,800

867,741

664,534

4,282,199

575,800

711,477

556,744

50,000

14,000

8,000

5,320

85.64

41,13

88.93

104.65

566,320

108,000

111,264

59,890

Owned

100,000

Owned

Owned

0

28,000

45,000

47,900

125,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

140

95

60

a

0

0

0

258,125

D

0

0

0

4,848,519

0

400,000

0

0

811,800

467,741

406,409

Bohlin Powell,,,

Robert A Lack

Diseroad 8 Wolff

Ritchie Organization

SOUTH uxoum

RccR Hill 12 B 499,965 289,362 5,100 56.74 88,798 40,428 81,377 20,000 27 52,500 0 360,428 87,037 Craig, Gauldin, 8 Davis

romtssEE

Slinal Mountain 20 M 295,000 235,000 6,700 35,07 44,000 Owned 16,000 100,000 40 0 12,000 250,000 33,000 Carroll Henley

rous

Allen

Houston"

Ptano

WelllngtDn

22

1600

47

4

M

B

8

M

2,555,000

3,940,000

2,879,424

675,864

1,878,409

1,400,000

2,218,134

441,222

20,000

23,000

40,000

8.500

93,92

6087

55,45

51.91

245,000

760,000

305223

137,270

Owned

1,620,000

130,680

45,000

431,591

160,000

225,387

52,372

100,000

65,000

100,000

30,000

170

184

147

89

200,000

0

0

147,455

0

0

0

0

2,355,000

1,560,000

2,814,084

280,541

0

2,380,000

65,340

247,868

Wm, H, Hidell

Mark A Stewart

Hidell Architects

B.G.R, Architects

mEmul

tebanon

Richmond

32

25

MS

B

289,890

2,010,471

219,273

1,489,371

9,998

12,672

21,93

11783

51,852

160,000

Owned

Owned

18,765

361,100

27,750

60,200

59

140

51,852

0

0

0

1%,009

2,010,471

42,029

0

Joel Harrison

Bailey 8 Gardner

NJISMIIETOI

Blaine

Tacoma

Tacoma

Tacoma

6

10

19

25

B

B

B

B

430,000

749,100

949,938

2,350,594

280,000

536,506

591,218

1,552,798

5,400

4,397

4,397

15,487

51.85

122,02

134,46

10026

30,000

99,550

95,670

224,110

90,000

11,474

158,418

249,514

30,000

101,570

104,632

324,172

18,000

20,000

20,000

100,000

47

35

35

124

150,000

0

77,000

0

0

0

0

0

150,000

674,100

872,938

2,350,594

130,000

75,000

0

0

J, Scott Piper

Elaine Day LaTourelle

Elaine Day LaTourelle

Reed Reinvald

WESTYUSmiA

Harman 1 M 44,126 42,926 640 67.07 856 Leased 344 6,000 10 16,000 0 26,126 2,000 none

wiscoiisn

Grafton

Mitwaukee"

Oostburt

13

50

3

M

B

M

1,578,974

1,882,000

477,000

1,413,474

1,546,000

376,714

24,000

15,000

7,700

58,89

103.07

48.92

39,000

161,000

40,000

50,000

50,000

15,000

76,500

125,000

45286

50,000

60,000

17,000

70

102

52

0

125,000

125,000

0

0

0

607,974

1,707,000

350,000

971,000

100,000

2,000

Ross Potter

Kahler Slater Tptphy

Bray Assocs. •

WTDtURE

Buffalo 7 M 871,136 617,350 9,616 6420 107,755 75,000 71,031 35,000 a 224,000 250,000 377,136 20,000 DehnertyRichardson

56 LIBRARY JOURNAITDECEMBER 1 9 8 9

Additions and Renovations

Comiminitjr

Pop.

In K Code Project

Cirst

Const

Cost

tross

Sd-FL

SqK

Cost

Epulp.

Cost

Site

Cost

Other

Costs Volumes Reader

Seats

Federal

Funds

Stats

Funds

Local

Funds

cm

Funds Architect

UAEUU

Wetumpka <7 M SS4,4«7 S66,051 1,200 555.04 58,303 (^ned 510,133 8,500 18 533,026 0 543,159 58,303 Wheat 8 Assocs.

tusu

Haines

Juneau

3

30

M

M

150,040

3,820,350

132,551

2,960,000

3,526

18,110

37.59

163.45

6,353

268,150

Omied

Owned

11,136

592,200

15,900

77,000

40

99

0

403,413

140,000

1,400,000

10,040

1,981,837

0

35,100

Graham Associates

Paul Voelckers

UllZOlU

Lake Havasu Dty

Hogales

21

20

6

14

194,265

425,000

175,368

413,000

2,639

2,900

66.45

142.41

38,760

0

Owned

Owned

18,897

12,000

45,000

0

52

0

100,000

165.000

0

0

133,025

260,000

0

0

Joseph Gabriel

The Architecture

UOMUS

Danlanelle

Pocahontas

69

17

B

B

116,896

119,102

99,709

70,357

8,210

11,958

12.14

5.88

7,853

5,447

Owned

35,000

9,334

8,298

10,000

40,000

38

40

58,000

38,274

0

0

0

62,259

58,896

18,569

Saxton Smith Assoc.

Arnold 8 Stacks

CALIFOIillU

CarmeJ-by-the-Sea

fort Brajj

Greenville

Pasadena

hancho Cucamonei

Santa Paula

Whittier

5

15

<

132

100

2<

4

B

B

B

M

B

M

B

2,739,272

759,660

51,000

314,064

80,313

220,099

964,470

640,337

574,860

47,000

258,392

74,441

41,478

398.582

8,892

6,000

560

2,086

810

14,560

5,463

72.01

95.81

83.93

123.87

9.19

2.85

72.96

121,960

184,800

4,000

6,372

5,872

177,421

25,031

1,750,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

450,000

226,975

0

0

49,300

0

70O

90,857

21,000

17,000

500

3,500

3,500

75,000

30,000

50

68

40

34

18

100

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

338,280

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,304,334

709,660

37,000

0

80,313

167,115

626,190

1,434,938

50,000

14,000

314,064

0

52,983

0.

Flesher 8 foster

not reported

Plumas Cty. Engineerinj

William Henry Taylor

Wolf, Lane, Chnstopher

William Crouch

Los Angeles Intl. Sva.

DOtWUtE

Hamnjtx

Seitjyville

16

4

M

M

10,113

n/a

8,598

n/a

1,400

3,842

6.14

n/a

1,515

n/a

Owned

Owned

0

n/a

10.000

30,000

22

30

0

0

0

6,000

7,731

0

2,382

64,500

not reported

Jennifer Thompson

FLORIU

Jensen Beach

Lake Placid

Larp

22

6

71

B

B

M

164,949

50,000

994,993

80,514

40,000

870,013

4,700

1,200

12,500

17.13

33.33

69,60

79,494

10,000

0

Owned

Owned

Owned

4,486

0

124,980

12,000

12,000

137,000

55

20

158

0

0

200,000

0

0

0

85,000

0

746,993

79,494

50,000

4i,000

John M. foster

Richard JAorey

Educated Design

CEOttU

Bowdon

Bremen

Cairo

Cartersville

Hadison

Stone Mountain

3

4

21

60

14

50

6

B

M

M

B

6

385,135

416,704

1,290,626

553,735

882,884

682,421

322,354

331,151

998,656

404,650

598,047

423,046

6,500

7,500

18,000

7,000

14,000

9,300

49.59

44.15

55.48

57.81

42,72

45.49

29,236

51.148

176,577

101,400

166,161

164,574

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

33,545

34,405

115,393

47,685

98,676

94,801

21,400

29,400

110,000

10,000

45,000

38,500

75

89

160

15

58

83

0

0

0

0

300,000

0

329,656

386,957

903,664

500,OM

485,605

469,480

7,000

0

75,900

51,920

69,490

203,201

56.143

42,995

311,062

1,815

7,790

9,740

Southern Engineering

Southen Engineering

W. Frank McCall Jr.

Bracket Associates

W. Lane Greene

Lowell lOrkman Assocs.

Funding in 1989,

for eight fewer

projects, totaled

$100 million more

than in 1988

Walker Memorial Library, Westbrook, Me.

Ionia Community Library, la. Clark County Public Library, Springfield, Ohio

t ?DP A PV V A 1 IPRQ 57

The total project

cost in 1988 was

$248,416,654

for 242 projects;

the total project

cost in 1989 is

$346,731,172 for

235 projects

Paris-Bourbon County Public Library, Ky.

Additions and Renovations (cont.)

Community

hip.

ioM Code Protect

Cost

ConsL

Cost

truss

$(), FL

S<l,Fl

Cast

EDulp.

Cost

Slta

Cost

Other

Costs Yolumos

Reader

Seats

Federal

Funds

State

Funds

Local

Funds

cm

Funds ArchltKt

IDAHO

Coeur d'Alene 23 M $67,059 $62,959 800 $78.70 n/a

\

n/a $4,100 n/a n/a $31,500 0 0 $35,559 Monte J. Wller

OUMtS

Beileville

Psks Heijtits

St Chartes

South Bdiot

A2

n

32

A

B

M

M

M

375,525

750,000

A,257,992

60,047

340,264

672,726

3,019,513

54,712

7,093

11,140

54,234

5,067

47.97

60 J9

55,68

10.80

0

0

413,987

0

Owned

Owned

441,000

Owned

35,261

77,274

383,492

5,335

27,000

40,000

246,000

50,000

40

75

315

38

150,000

250,000

250,000

48,037

0

0

0

0

225,525

500,000

3,947,992

12,010

0

0

60,000

0

W.H.6J(. Inc.

Carow Architects

INendt Cedartwira,,.

Richard L Johnson

HRUAM

Anderson

Anderson

Hammond"

Union City

SO

SO

87

5

B

M

M,B

M

596,669

7,A6A,361

5A,780

92,865

338,669

5,344,593

50,A6A

86,831

16,400

125,000

n/a

4,100

42.76

59,71

n/a

21.18

10,000

517,544

0

5,014

250,000

1,119,303

Owned

Owned

n/a

482,921

4,316

1,020

150,000

500,000

254,433

24,000

30

530

436

50

158,000

250,000

32.500

0

0

0

0

0

190,669

6,533,304

20,431

59,971

250,000

681,057

1,849

32,894

Montgomery I Assocs.

Montiomery 8 Assocs.

Nutton i Hutton

General BIdg. Contractors

IOWA

Mair

Columbus Jnctn.

Jefferson

Uvermoft

togan

Tipton

Wapello

S83

1

5

1

3

3

2

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

21,A08

12,250

67,371

13,850

188,180

367,252

52,A17

13,939

10,750

48,303

13,850

181,239

319,345

43,847

540

600

7,620

672

2,400

3^00

3,720

25,81

17.92

6.34

20.61

75,52

99.80

11.79

7,076

1,500

10,671

0

0

22,053

'-4,048

0

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

393

0

8,397

0

6,941

25,854

4,522

9,000

10,500

31,868

8,066

n/a

24,101

35,000

n/a

33

70

n/a

n/a

40

n/a

0

0

0

\

30,180

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

18':623

0

41,731

0

74,000

0

25,838

2,500

12.250

26,000

13,850

84,000

367,252

26,579

Fanner's Lumber

not reported

liRIF

John K. Berte & Sons

Anderztion Amhitects

Neumann Monson

Ron Meyers

UlSAS

Americus

Independence

- Ubeal

Overland. Parti

Roseland Part

Ster1in(

2

15

ts

71

lA

3

M

M

M

B

B

M

• 72,166

208,891

920,687

78,A07

90,A85

3A,000

65,901

193,811

838,058

62,315

73,658

34,000

1,200

n/a

16,809

17,569

16,183

n/a

54.92

n/a

49.86

3.55

4.55

n/a

825

0

9,616

0

0

0

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

5,440

15,080

73,014

16,092

16,827

0

7,200

55,000

100,000

n/a

n/a

n/a

18

60

106

n/a

n/a

n/a

24,500

66,844

141,772

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

11,841

142,047

435,067

78,407

90,485

34,000

35,825

0

343,844

0

0

0

J. Trevor Lewis

Leonhard Cafllsch

Thompson 8 Associates

Kurt von Achen

Kurt von Achen

none

AEnucn

Eminence

Nevrport

Parts

13

32

13

M

B

M

276,000

308,000

A40,79A

206,029

248,000

370,074

8,000

9,300

11,341

25.75

26.67

32,63

55,478

32,000

50,320

Owned

Owned

Owned

14,493

28,000

20,400

38,000

26,000

45,000

40

28

88

0

113,000

170,000

138,000

0

0

138,000

195,000

270,794

0

0

0

J. Ouintin BiagI

J. Michael Kinseila

Pearson, Bender, Jolly

lOOtSIAJU

Coushatta

Galliano"

Slideil

10

5

AS

M

B

M

195,679

0

2,167,822

147,577

0

1,217,822

4,815

3,600

21,750

30,64

0

55.99

29,089

0

300,000

Owned

0

500,000

19,013

0

110,000

26,000

15,000

150,000

26

16

253

95,203

0

0

0

0

0

90,476

0

2,167,822

10,000

0

0

Alliance Inc.

not reported

Sam Fauntleroy

MAIK

CasUne 1 M 136,000 111,000 1,400 79^9 0

J

0 25,000 10,000 15 23,000 0 25,000 88,000 Civil Engineering Services

KASSACHUSnTS

Andover

Holden

Lanesborough"

Lexington

Lincolo

Sturbddge

West Newbury

2S

15

3

29

5

7

A

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

6,800,000

2,218,000

5A0,0O0

168,750

3,100,000

1,A75,000

1,243,552

5,200,000

1,809,074

nia

143,000

2,680,683

1,248,765

845,197

55,000

20,000

n/a

38,000

18,341

7,460

7,785

94.55

90.45

n/a

3.76

146.16

167,39

108,57

300,000

147,273

n/a

7,000

22.659

90,000

26,478

235,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

1,065,000

261,653

0

18,750

396,658

136,235

371,877

250,000

60,000

10,000

208,546

76,000

75,000

40,000

160

• 82

14

220

76

78

56

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

22,281

0

0

0

6,800,000

2,218,000

540,000

146,469

2,500,000

1,275,000

1,203,552

90,000

0

0

0

600,000

200,000

40,000

Shepley Bulfinch ,..

Jacpues Fauteux

Barry Architects, kic,

Davi« 8 Bibbins

Graham Gund Architects

Douglas Godman

Architects Design Group II

Mississippi

Forest 5 B 196,027 170,257 8,000 21i8 13,365 Owned 12,405 35,000 65 0 0 188,027 8,000 James C. Lee

HISStXfld

Ladue S16 MS 8,250,000 7,250,000 107,100 67.69 500,000 Owned 500,000 708,780 290 0 0 8250,000 0 not reported

TTt>r».«pvTr>»*r»v'»» 'T^r''^T~*/r>rT> »rvon

Lanier Lib: ary 'Association, Tryon, N.C. Memorial Hall Lib., Andover, Mass.

Communit; POIL

in M Code Protect

Cos;

Canst

Cast

Srnss

SR, Ft

S4.A

Cast

ERUIR.

Cast

Siti

Cast

Other

Casts tfolumas Reader

SaiU

Federal

Funds

State

Funds

Local

Funds

cm

Funds Hvchttect

HOKTAIU

B M 861,400 858,200 325 ! 179.00 0 Owned 13,200 35,000 40 S29,100 0 S32,300 0 Page Werner

KEW (UmPSKIK

Ctr. Strafioni

Goflstown

Uctxtia

Mereditti'

North Cwsay

Orfonl

Sanbom'crr"

2

U

16

6

B

1

2

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

27,723

16,871

64,635

885,400

122,548

118,670

38,740

27,723

15,951

33,495

723.403

107,15?

113,625

36.220

768

910

' 1,069

9,000

1,540

1,736

400

36.10

17.53

31.34

80.38

69.58

65.45

91.00

0

0

26,140

77,000

12,459

0

0

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

0

920

5,000

85,000

2,932

5,045

2,520

6000

0

0

30,000

4,263

25,000

3000

14

0

0

93

23

16

12

0

7,600

26.500

750,000

45,044

36,500

14,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

c

7,862

9,271

38,135

0

77,504

0

24,740

19,861

0

0

135,400

0

82,170

0

not repotted

Alan Shulmar

Steven Stokes

Christopher Williams

Howard Miller

Don Met!

George Hickey

NEW JUtSC

hscataway NS M 3,006,363 2,468,819 28,500 87,00 273,374 Owned 264,170 130,000 170 255,808 154,692 2,537,347 58,516 Jamil E. Faridy

NEW TOM

Borfen

Churchville

Cutchofue

E. Syracuse

Hampton Bays

Loudonville

Melville

New Berlin

New City

New Yorii

Rego Part

Schenectarty

Staten Island

Warsaw

5

4

10

12

9

75

*3

1

40

3C

31

21

360

5

M

M

M

M

14

M

e

M

M

8

BS

B

B

M

%,S92

118,015

150,000

294,959

389,990

600,000

1,147,000

185,000

2,493,200

890,000

218,640

47,997

3,404,000

535,686

74,992

112,555

110,000

238,813

349,990

472,000

902,000

185,000

2,003,000

635,000

150,573

38,990

2,754.174

433,293

1,330

1,300

2,300

7,000

3,200

2,800

3,900

3,050

14,200

10,000

7,500

2,146

20,800

3,000

56.38

86.58

47.82

34.11

109.37

168.58

231.28

60.65

141.06

63.50

20.07

18.17

132.41

144.43

15,050

0

40,000

20,061

10,000

38,000

100,000

0

163,900

200,000

68,067

9,007

352,000

29,638

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Leased

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

6,950

5,460

0

36,085

30,000

90.000

145,000

0

326,300

55,000

0

0

297,826

72,755

20,000

24,000

25,000

23,000

50,000

150,000

50,000

15,000

160,000

35,000

100,000

23,000

57,000

35,000

10

20

25

68

60

173

40

15

156

59

50

25

135

42

25,466

0

10,310

43,851

84,565

143,841

121,541

0

8,000

0

49,700

0

0

83,072

0

15,300

0

0

270,425

0

0

25,625

40,000

0

0

25,793

212,000

- 0

71,526

102,715

114,690

203,000

0

456,159

1,025,459

0

2,441,200

740,000

168,940

22,204

3,192,000

402,614

0

-•0

25,000

48,108

35,000

0

0

159,375

4,000

150,000

0

0

0

50,000

URB Group, Inc.

Richard Randall

Ward Associates

Sargent Webster...

Donald A. Denis

Gibbons, Heidtmann...

Gibbons, Heidtmann ...

Thomas Natoli

Alan Ballou

David W. Prendergast

Engineering Facilities StafI

Engineenng 8 Public Works

David P. Helpern

Sear-Brown Assocs.

NORDI TAXOUM

Charlotte

Raleigh

Salisbury

Spruce Pine

Tryon"

480

23

106

8

1

US

B

M

MS

M

11,736,440

300,000

3,792,504

175,485

184,405

8,865,565

240,000

2,956,816

164,485

151,300

160,000

9,360

47,500

2,000

1,587

55.41

25.64

62^4

82.24

95.34

998,567

60,000

577,574

0

14,661

987,635

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

884,670

0

258,114

11,000

18,444

800,000

35,000

150,000

15,000

3,280

342

50

200

n/a

6

0

0

182,069

0

0

125,000

0

110,568

81,000

0

1,153,187

300,000

3,073,533

64,500

0

458,250

0

426,334

29,985

184,405

Middleton, McMillan ...

Kurt Eichenberger

Ramsay Assocs.

William Moore

Holland Brady

NORDI DtROTl

Bismarck 60 M 4,270,451 3,808,810 73,000 52.18 146,000 Owned 315,641 450,000 190 113,000 0 3,931,451 226,000 Arnold L Hanson

OHIO

Bellevue

Blancbester

Coshocton

Fremont

Georgetown

Mansfield"

Iitrin

50

15

36

63

32

120

40

M

M

M

M

U

M

M

945,327

643,121

378,602

3,027,000

366,290

5,873,650

595,085

714,154

550,000

302,306

2,619,000

306,800

4,400,000

542,437

9,054

10,800

5,900

28,132

2,800

62,933

8,000

78.88

50.93

51.23

93.10

109.57

69.91

67.80

69,301

50,000

47,934

250.000

9,990

1,000,000

5,200

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

20.000

Owned

Owned

161,872

43,121

28,362

158,000

29,500

473,650

47,448

80,000

40,000

29,700

100,000

45,000

150,000

120,000

78

44

28

125

50

247

103

0

270,784

170,603

0

40,000

0

0

0

0

0

0

310,490

0

0

945,327

359,337

179,671

3.027,000

0

5,873,650

405,066

0

13,000

28,328

0

15,800

0

190,019

not reported

Gerald Hartey

Charles W. Gallagher, Inc.

Munder Munder 8 Assocs.

HcGill, Smith, Panshen

Aleiander Seckel Architects

Monger, Munger 8 Assocs.

OKUHOIU

Grove

Ponca City**

Woodward

Tale

15

30

15

2

M

M

M

M

290,322

1,660,881

268,588

53,811

88,400

1,313,216

246,685

51,138

5,000

10,000

9,886

900

17.68

13h32

24.95

56.82

15,000

204,385

0

0

175,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

11,922

143,280

21,903

2,673

16,500

90,000

35,000

n/a

20

111

32

n/a

100,000

0

146,000

50,000

0

23,246

0

0

190,322

1,212,635

33,000

1,482

0

425,000

89,58?

2,325

Grafton, Tull, Span 8 Toe

Howard 8 Porch Inc.

Beck Assocs. .

Dean Irby

PENNSTlYUtU

Penn Wynne 8 M 376,250 269,889 4,500 59.97 48,732 11,747 45,882 33,000 40 121,524 0 0 254,726 C.W. Fo Assocs.

RHODE tSLUB

Cranston"

No. Smithfjetd*

13

10

B

M

1,800,000

911,139

1,439,406

664,826

15,000

6,985

95.%

95.18

101,547

80,593

Owned

86,592

259,047

79,128

50,000

40,000

66,

55

200,000

430,000

782,000

0

0

95,000

818,000

386,139

Frederick Love

Herman E. Bouwman

<0

There are 949 library

projects in progress

in 1989 over 796 in

1988

Pone a City Library, Okla.

Nu-

Nu'

So

So

»E>

AR'

KD

Rli

Gale Free Library, Holden, Mass.

Additions and Renovations (cont.) b

fwnmmilty Mil Code

Project

Cost

toosL

Cost

Cross

SILFL

Sq.a

Cost

Ecuip.

Cast

Stta

Cast

Other

Costs Volumes

Reader

Seats

Federal

Funds

State

Funds

Local

Funds

cm

Funds Architect

TQKna

tbndtcstef

UL Juliet

Shell^le

Talehoma

41

25

29

41

M

B

M

M

{284,649

104,559

188,815

330,577

{225,246

93,478

142,931

265,386

5,330

2,700

3,258

5,613

{42.26

34.62

43.87

47,28

{39,934

3,700

31,832

43,567

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

{19,469

7,381

14,051

21,624

63,500

25,000

50,000

67,500

58

18

55

66

{100,000

48,475

70,420

100,000

0

0

0

0

{120,000

20,000

0

150,000

{64,649

36,084

118,395

80,577

"Gingles i Hums

Conley i Co.

Davis, Stokes Collaborative

Hickerson Fowlkes

ra«

Oitha

Gartand

Vkte

960

183

14

M

MS

M

563,709

1,243,923

55,000

371,372

852,476

55,000

15,000

61,000

1,850

24.76

13.98

29.73

111,058

308,964

0

Owned

Owned

Owned

81,279

82,483

0

100,000

400,000

35,000

119

230

62

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,243,923

'45,000

563,709

0

10,000

F i S Partners, Inc.

Tom Barrett...

Ken Nagal

TOMn

Esse" 8 M 537,423 480.253 6,677 71.93 0 Owned 57,170 12,000 31 75,133 0 462,290 0 Horton-PtasrynskI

TIKIKU

.Chesapeake 26 B 565,830 465,000 6,946 66.95 55,430 Owned 45,400 40,000 50 510,400 0 55,430 0 Design Collaborative

WKSLUUTM

Tacsma

Tacoma

17

26

B

B

1,059,035

2,242,477

707,996

1,616,868

7,475

16,932

94.72

95.49

142,785

281,900

111,241

Owned

97,013

343,709

25,000

100,000

55

113

0

0

0

0

1,059.035

2,242,477

0

0

Seifert 8 Forbes

McGranahan Messenger...

Wm VIKMU

Gtenville

. Huiricane

ML Stom

8

4

3

M

M

B

82,332

136,333

38,000

71,336

103,914

38,000

1,250

2,000

768

57.07

51.96

49.48

2,896

27,410

0

6,000

Leased

Leased

2,100

5,009

0

10,000

24,000

12,000

20

24

20

25,000

56,000

0

0

20,000

20,000

57.332

60.333

18,000

0

0

0

Wilson 8 Golf

Wilson 8 Goff

none

wtscmM

Osceola

Plynxxrtti

Vefora

Waukesha

4

11

11

52

M

M

M

US

236,000

1,169,308

414,030

14,385,000

143,000

830,536

365,628

2,900,000

3,700

16,790

6,000

60,000

38.65

49.47

60.94

48.33

24,000

190,164

0

11,100,000

57,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

12,000

148,608

48,402

385,000

30,000

43,500

25,000

196,900

20

109

51

346

0

125,000

124,209

0

0

0

0

0

0

919,308

289,821

14,385,000

236,000

125,000

0

0

Bray Assocs.

Noble Rose

William King

HSR Assocs.

Buildings Not Previously Reported

CeaaHnit; Pop.

M i l Code Project

Cost

Coast

Cost

Cross

Sd.FL

Sd.FL

Cost

Muip.

Cast

Slta

Cost

Other

Costs Volumes Ruder

Seats

Federal

Funds

State

Funds

Lncal

Funds

cm

Funds Architect

Irvine, CA (1988)

LoveUnd, CO (1988)

Bnjston, GA (1988)

Betvk^ I (1987)

Hatch*, M4 (1988)

West Chester, OH

(1988)

110

48

3

15

7

28

B

M

B

M

M

B

{2,240,000

2,631,895

196,143

1,326,294

248,700

360,493

{1,600,000

1,750,041

149,793

997,239

228,700

272,172

18,000

28,800

2,000

14,985

3,390

5,646

{88.89

60.76

74.90

66.55

67.46

4821

{540,000

240,173

29,000

154,894

0

. 81,421

Leased

Owned

10,000

Owned

Owned

Owned

{100,000

641,681

7,350

174,161

20,000

6,900

120,000

120,000

15,000

60,000

10,000

23,000

95

187

40

116

n/a

25

0

0

0

0

60,000

0

0

0

141,429

250,000

100,000

0

{2,240,000

2,631,895

44,714

1,076294

29,000

360,493

0

0

10,000

0

59,700

0

Anthony 8 Langford

Barker, Rinker, Seacat

O'Steen 8 Sutties

Noble L Rose

Alley 8 Assocs.

Voohris. Slone, INelsh

Six-Year Cost Summary

Number of new bidgs.

Number of ARRs'

S<). ft new bIdgs.

So. ft. ARRs

new BLDGl

Construction cost

Equipment cost

Site cost

Other costs

Total—Project cost

ARRs—Project cost

NEW t AJIIt PlitUECT COST

FUND SOURCES

federal, new bldgs.

Federal, ARRs

Federal, total

State, new bldgs.

State, ARRs

State, total

tj>cal, new bldgs.

Local, ARRs

Local, total

Gift new bldgs.

Gift ARRs

GifL total

TOTAL FUNDS DSEl

FltcallSM FIauI 1985 Flual 1886 Flical 1387 Flical 1881 FUcal 1888

«

63

000,252

523,963

99

125

852,831

1,227,063

71

120

1,141,957

1,189,319

101

150

1,370,479

1,582,106

101

142

1,449,397

1,280,321

111

124

1,760,743

1,612,495

{64,370,118

6,451,298

1,622,534

6,397.740

{52,799,143

6,585,913

4,085,764

5,728,714

{73,092,317

9,799,996

4,211,461

10,869,097

{101,016,870

17,958,318

5,047,659

12,096,087

{10C'.'JS4,847

20,489,527

10,403,705

12,349,755

{160,937,343

19,450,410

14,191,713

16,693,362

78,841,690

30,762.934

70,583,649

69,256,835

97,972,871

59,634,921

136,952,501

80,534,403

144,237,174

104,179,480

211,716,128

135,015,044

{109,604,624 {139,840,484 {157,607,792 {217,486,904 {248,416,654 {346,731,172

{2,274,957

2,227,355

{9,803,398

8,086,819

{6,367,559

4,753,052

{5,757,098

4,677,400

{7,352,110

7,321,967

{8,140,109

8,264,044

{4,502.312 {17,890,217 {11,120,611 {10,434,498 {14,674,077 {16,404,153

{4,340,803

2,784,153

{4,139,433

1,607,519

{1,863,277

7,054,676

{7,710,681

5,310,877

{13,849,248

6,922,165

{48,714,905

6,997,782

{7,124,956 {5,746,952 {8,917,953 {13,021,558 {20,771,413 - {55,712,687

{71,043,181

22,921,592

{47,914,637

49,096,264

{73,997,971

42,971,936-

{117,135,870

64,050,359

{112,230,599

79,197,138

{137,650,121

108,753,024

{93,964,773 {97,010,901 {116,969,907 {181,186,229 {191,427,737 {246,403,145

{1,169,101

2.838,892

{8,766,333

10,490,099

{15,771,620

4,982,621

{7,182,656

6,734,422

{11,084,832

10,805,194

{17,428,326

11,219,980

{4,007,993 .. {19,256,432 > {20,754,241 {13,917,078 {21,890,026 {28,648,306

{109,600,034 {139,904,502 {157,762,712 {218,559,363 {248,763,253 {347,168,291

' Additions, Rerruxielings, and Renovations

References

1. Five-year free lease donated by United

Centenary Methodist Church.

2. Community raised additional $300,000 toward

opening day book collection.

3. Ninety-nine year lease at $1 f«r year.

4. The library had been housed in two rooms in

the town hall for 92 years.

5. Change from building with no

. running water.

6. See article on modular building boom in

Florida, p. 74-76.

7. Project only two-thirds completed; one-third

remains to be finished sometime in the future.

8. See article on this project, p. 79-80.

9. Library situated to take advantage of view of

nine acres of wcx)ded wetlands.

10. New State of Michigan Library.

11. Three-story atrium separates conference wing

from library; includes gift shop and art gallery.,

12. First librap' in town.

13. Doubles size of original 1890 building;

designed to blend with other 1890 structures

and new construction.

14. Library constructed privately, then donated

to the city.

15. Constructed on site of former prison;

the warden's house and intake center now

house the James A. Michener Arts Center.

16. Completes a two-block complex of four

buildings dedicated to genealogical research.

17. Successfully incorporates library into^area of

two-story, tum-of-the-century buildings.

18. Branch relocated at no cost to library.

19. The town paid for the complete overhaul and

relocation of the library in the town hall.

20. Garaventa stairlift for use by handicapped;

population rises as seasons change.

21. Original building listed in National Register of

Historic Places.

22. Only remaining membership library in the

state, and one of very few in the nation;

established in 1890 and now

celebrating 100 years of service to members.

23. Successful renovation and expansion of 1908

Carnegie building.

24. Original building is Depression-era ^blic

Works Administration project built in 1935.

25. Renovated limestone-clad building modeled

after Pazzi Chapel in Florence by Brunelleschi

and completed in 1927.

26. Original building is 100 years old and served

as warehouse/storeroom for a mill that is

located across the street from the library.

27. Restoration of a 150-year-old former church.

28. Part of 100-year-old railroad depot. Historical

society grant stipulated original door,

hardware, weight, and scale must remain.

Architects

Alexander-Scckel Architects, 106

Sturgis Ave., Mansfield, OH 44903

Alf, Keith, Cannon Design, Whitehaven

Rd., Grand Island, NY

14672

Alley & Associates, Las Cruces, NM

8S001

Alliance Inc., 1324 Heame, Suite

390, Shreveport, LA 71107

Anderzohn Architects, Shenandoah,

lA

Anthony i Langford, 16152 Beach

Blvd., Suite 20, Huntington

Beach, CA 92647

Architects Design Group II, 593

Washington St., Wellesley, MA

02181

The Architecture, 2625 N, Silverbell

Rd,, Tucson, AZ 85745

Arnold & Stacks, 527 W, Washington,

PC Box 69, Jonesboro, AR

72403

Ashworth, Steve, VP of Walden,

Ashworth & Associates, 1640

Powers Ferry Rd,, Bldg. 30, Suite

100, Marietta, GA 30067

Associated Architectural Services,

Suhe 215, Village Office Bldg,,

Cleveland, TN 3731 1

Austin & Associates, 4901 Towne

Centre Rd,, Suite 225, Saginaw,

MI 48604

Bailey & Gardner, Architects, 278

Caroline St., Orange, VA 22960

Ballou, Alan, AIA, Architects, 190

Haverstraw Rd,, Suffern, NY

10901

Barker, Riner, Sea cat & Partners,

2546 15th St., Denver, CO 80211

Barnes, Edward Larrabee of John

M,Y, Lee 4 Partners, 320 W, 13th

St., New York, NY 10014

Barren, Tom, Frank L, Meier, Architects,

3400 Cariisle, #300, Dallas,

TX 75204

Barry Architects, 29 Wendell Ave.,

Pinsfield, MA 01201

Beck Associates, 2200 Classen

Blvd., Suite 1450, Citizen's Tower,

Oklahoma City, OK 73106

Bender Associates, 1 Bender Terrace,

Delmar, NY 12054

Bentley Engineers & Architects,

Inc., no address reported,

Berte, John N, & Sons, Box 48, Livermore,

LA

B.G.R, Architects, 2118 34th St.,

• Lubbock, TX 79411

Biagi, J, Quintin, Shelbyvflle, KY

Bi^erts, Gunnar &. Associates, 292

Harmon St., Birmingham, Ml

48009

Boannan i Associates, 222 N. 2d

St., Minneapolis, MN 55401

Bohlin PoweD Larkin Cywinski, 12

S, I2th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107

"-w. I«S S, Casino Center

Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89101

Bouwman, Herman E„ 61 Harvard

St., Worcester, MX 01609

Bracken Associates, 28 East Church

St., Cartersville, GA 30120

117 S, Trade

St„Tryon, NC 28782

Architects, Inc.,

2M3 S, Memorial Pl„ PQ Box 955,

Sheboygan, WI53082

Brown Healey Bock, Cedar Rapids,

Brummen, James, 290 7th St., San

Francisco, CA 94103

C^isch, Uonhard, B., 201 N, Penn,

Suite M3, Professional Bldg., Independence,

KS 67301

Caroe Architects Planners, 114 W.

Illinois, Chicago. IL

Cherry, Roberts & Associates, no

address reported.

Childers Anderson, Inc., 423 Roger

Ave., Ft. Smith, AR 72901

Choy, Eugene Kinn/Barton Choy

Associates. 2410 Beverly Blvd.,

. Los Angeles, CA 93357

City of Chicago—Bureau of Architecture,

320 N. Clark St., Rm. 600,

Chicago, IL 60610

Clcavc-Lundgren & Associates,

Inc., 131 E. 5th, Benson, AZ

Coblin Porter & Associates, Frankfort.

KY

Conlcy & Co. Architects, 8307 Collins

Rd., Nashville, TN 37221

CraAon, Tull, Span & Voc, Inc., Box

1750, Grove. OK 74344

Craig, Gauldin, & Davis, Inc., PC

Box 2527, Greenville, SC 2S>602

Crouch, William, 806 Railroad Ave.,

Santa Paula, CA 93060

Crowe Architects, AIA, PC Box 569,

Frisco. CO 80443

Sherman St., Cambridge, MA

Dcvinc Architecls, 23UW. 47th St.,

Kansas City, MO 64112

Diseroad & Wolff. Inc.. 8 Broad St.,

Hatfield, PA 19440

Dunwody, Beeland. & Henderson,

484 Mulberry St., Macon, GA

31201

Educated Design. 5001 W. Cypress

St., Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33607

Eichcnbcrgcr, Kurt, 413 Glcnwood

Ave., Raleigh, NC 27603

Ellon, Dan W., Box 23, Pelican Rapids,

MN 56572

Engineering Facilities Staff. Queens

Borough Public Library, 89-11

Merrick Blvd., Jamaica, NY 11432

Esherick, Homsey, Dodge & Davis,

2789 25th St., San Francisco. CA

94110

F & S Partners, Inc., 3535 Travis,

#201, Dallas, TX 75204

Faridy, Jamil E., Faridy, Thome,

Maddish, PA, I5I5 Lower Ferry

Rd.. Trenton, NJ 08628

Orion Toumship Public Library, Lake Orion, Mich.

Crump Firm, Inc., 81 Monroe Bldg.,

Memphis, TN 38103

Dardman. Jones Ltd., 1500 Gateway,

Grenada, MS 38901

Davies & Bibbins, II Hurley St.,

Cambridge, MA 02141

Davis, Stokes Collaborative, PC, 530

26th Ave. S., NashvUle, TN 37209

Dehnert/Richardson/Associates, PC,

350 Garfield, Lander, WY 82520

Denis, Donald A., AIA, PC, Rte.

25A, PO Box 565, Aquebogue, NY

11931

Denney, Roy, Southern Engineering,

807 S. Psirk St., CarroUton, GA

30117

Dept. of Engineering i Public

Works, Schenectady County, 80

Keller Ave., Schenectady, NY

12306

Design Collaborative, 2940 N. Lynnhaven

Rd., Virginia Beach, VA

23452

Design Partnership of Cambridge, 86

Farrell 4 Associates Architects,

Inc., 4710 Bellaire Bldg., Suite

370, Houston, TX 77401

Fauntleroy, Sam, 316 N. Lee 1-ane,

SUdeU, LA 70458

Fitzgerald, Dennis of Architectural

Alliance, 117 Balsom, Boise, ID

83706

Flesher 4 Foster Architects, 663

Lighthouse Ave., Suite F, Pacific

Grove, CA,93950

Fletcher, Valenti 4 Chillura, Tampa,

FL

Foster, John M,,'927 NE Jensen

Beach Blvd., Jensen Beach, FL

34457

Fox, Ballas, Barrow Associates, PO

Box 7547, Missoula, MT 59807

Fox, C.W., Associates, 8430 Ardleigh

St., Philadelphia, PA 19118

Eraser, Bruce, ALA, 890 Osos St.,

San Luis Obispo, CA

Freytag 4 Associates, Inc., Suite

502, Ohio Bldg., Sidney, OH 45365

Gabriel, Joseph, 3055 McCulloch

Blvd., Lake Havasu City, AZ

86403

Gallagher, Charles W., Inc., 234 S.

Third St., Coshocton, OH

Geddes Brecher Quails Cunningham,

103 University Sq., Princeton, NJ

08540

Gee 4 Jenson, 315 E. Robinson St.,

Orlando, FL 32801

General Building Contractors, Inc.,

2457 C.R. 68, Auburn, IN 46706

Gibbons, Heidtmann 4 Salvador,

707 Westchester Ave., Suite 110,

White Plains, NY 10604

Gingles 4 Hurms, Architects 4 Engineers,

2111 20th Ave. S., Nashville,

TN

Glaser Associates Inc., 2753 Erie

Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45208

Goodman, Douglas, Reinhart Associates,

Agawam, MA

Graham Associates Architects Planners,

Box 5560 Ketchikan, AK

99901

Graham Gund Architects, 47 Thorndike

St., Cambridge, MA

Greene, W. Lane, Atlanta, GA 30305

Grulke, Roger, 515 New Jersey,

Suite A, Redlands, CA 92373

Hager, Smith 4 Huffman, PO Box

1308, Raleigh, NC 27602

Hanson, Arnold L,, PO Box 2755,

Bismarck, ND 58502

Harley, Gerald, C.G. Hartman 4 Associates,

514A Ohio Pike, Cincinnati,

OH 45255

Harris 4 Partners, 1580 Connally'

Dr., Suite C, East Point, GA 30344

Harrison, Joel, L-ebanon, VA 24266

Haskins, Savage, Rice, Pearce, 2515

Fairview Rd., Raleigh, NC 27606

Hayes, Robert 4 Associates, Ft.

MitcheU, KY

Helpern, David P., AIA, 23 E. 4th

St., New York, NY 10003

Hempen, Jeff, Clarksville, lA

Henley, Carroll, Chattanooga, TN

Hickerson Fowlkes Architects, 2300

West End Ave., Nashville, TN

37203

Hickey, George, Frank P. Marinace

Architect, Box 429, New Hampton,

NH 03256

Hidden, William H., Hidell Architects,

2811 McKinney Ave., Suite

207, Dallas, TX 75204

Hillsborough County, PO Box 1110,

Tam[», FL 33601

Holzheimer, David, Associates, Architects,

8223 E. Washington St.,

Chagrin Falls, OH 44022

Horton-Ptaszynski Architects, Tracy

House, Shelbume, VT

Howard 4 Porch, Inc., First National

Center, Suite 1300 E., Oklahoma

City, OK 73102

HSR Associates, Inc., Madison, Wl

Button 4 Hutton, 6832 Calumet

Ave., Hammond, IN 46324

Irby, Dean, 2003 W. 6th St., Stillwater,

OK 74074

Jinright, Robert of Jinright 4 Ryan,

PO Box 533, Thomasville, GA

31799

Johnson, Richard L„ Associates,

Inc., 4703 Charles St., Rockford,

IL61108

Jones, Gerald W. 4 Co., 11701 Winner

Rd., Independence, MO 64052

JSA Inc. Architects Planners, 361

Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH

03801

Kahler Slater Torphy Architects,

Inc., 733 N. Van Buren, Milwaukee,

WI 53202

Kahri. Albert, Associates, Inc., New

Center BIdg., Detroit, MI 48202

Kaiser, John, 97 Downing Place, Somerdale,

NJ

Kamp-DiComo Associates, 15875

Middlebelt Rd., Livonia, Ml 48154

Kant Charuhas Chapman & Twohey,

1150 I7th St. NW, Suite 103,

Washington, DC 20036

Kessler, William & Associates, 733

St. Antoine St., Detroit, Ml 48226

King <t Tuthill, PO Box 736, Avon

Park, North Avon, CT 06001

King, George, Box 663, Durango,

CO 81301

King, WiUiam, 1602 W. Beltline

Hwy., Madison, Wl

Kinsella, J. Michael, Erlanger, KY

41018

Kirkman, Lowell Associates, PO

Box 1033, Dalton, OA 30720

Lack, Robert A., 29 S. 2d St., Lewisburg,

PA 17837

LaTourelle, Elaine Day & Associates,

Terminal Sales Bldg., First

SL Virginia, Seattle, WA 98101

Lee, James C., 4744 1-55 N, Jackson,

MS 39311

Lewis, J. Trevor, AIA, PO Box 337,

Emporia, KS 66801

Lindsey, Buck & Associates, no address

reported.

Lorenz & Williams, Inc., 120 W.

Third St., Dayton, OH 45402

Love, Frederick, Project Consultant,

Robinson Green Beretta Corp., 2

John St., Providence, RI 02903

McCall, William Frank, Jr., 110 3d

Ave. SE, Moultrie, OA 31768 -

McCurry, Carieton G., PO Box 351,

Gulf Shores, AL 36542

McGee, Keimeth, PA, AIA, 23 Lazy

Eight Dr., Daytona Beach, FL

32114

McGin, Smith, Panshon, 2734 Chancellor

Dr., Suite 105, Crestview

HUls, KY 41017

McGranahan Messenger & Associates,

950 Fawcett, Suite 300, Tacoma,

WA 98402

McNair, Johnson & Associates, PO

Box 84, Columbia, SC 29202

Macon & Chaintreuil Associates, 266

Alexander St., Rochester. NY

14607

Maddox, Ed of Maddox & Associates,

414 E. 39th St., Savatmah,

GA 31412

Marcellus Wri^t Cox & Smith, 100

Shockoe Slip, Richmond, VA

23219

Maschke, David & Associates, PO

Box %3, Albany, GA 31701

Metz, Don, Lyme, NH 03768

Meyers, John, 323 15th St., Ashland,

KY 41101

MHF, Jefferson, lA

Middleton, McMillan, Architects,

Inc., 6230 Fairview Rd., Charlotte,

NC 28210

Miller, Gary, Architect & Associates,

350 W. 5th St., Suite 210B,

San Bernardino, CA 92401

Miller, Howard, PO Box 143, Center

Conway, NH 03813

Miller, Monte J., 2d & Sherman

Ave., Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814

Moles, Clifford, Associates, 405 Sansome

St., San Francisco, CA

94111

Monson, Neuman, Iowa City, lA

Montgomery, K.R. & Associates,

Inc., 33 W. 10th St., Andersen, IN

46016

Moody/Nolan, Ltd., 1780 E. Broad

St., Columbus, OH 43203

Moore, William, 805 BBT Bldg.,

Asheville, NC 28801

Morey, Richard, Imageering, Lake

Placid, FL 33852

Morris-Aubry Architects, 3355 W.

Alabama, Houston, TX 77098

Mosher Drew Watson Fugerson Architects,

4206 W. Point Loma

Blvd., San Diego, CA

MRB Group Inc., 2480 Browncroft

Blvd., Rochester, NY 14625

Munger, Monger 4 Associates, 225

N. Michigan, Toledo, OH 43624

Myers, George, 405 Banning Creek

Rd., Prescott, AZ 86301

Myers, Ron, City Engineer, Washington,

lA

N-Y Associates, 2700 Lake Villa

Dr., Metairie, LA 70002

Nagal, Ken, Vidor, TX 77662

Nagao & Oroyan Associates, 1680

Pearl St., Eugene, OR 97401

NatoU, Thomas, Norwich, NY

Newman, Herbert S., Associates,

300 York St., New Haven, CT

06511

Nix Mann Viehman, 1328 Peachtree

St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30303

O'LearyTerasawa Partners, 1313 W.

8th St., Suite 200, Los Angeles,

CA 90012

Oshima, Alan, 1731 J St., Suite 200,

Sacramento, CA

O'Steen & Suttles, AIA, PO Box

Soui/i Branch Library,

Kansas City, Mo.

328, Douglas, GA 31533

Pacific Urban Design, San Jose, CA

Page-Werner, PO Box 3005, Great

Falls, MT 59403

Parsons, Wible, Brummal, Alkire,

500 1st Alabama Bank Bldg.,

Montgomery, AL 36104

Pearson + Bender -t- Jolly, 201 Kentucky

Ave., Lexington, KY 40502

Peck, Cal 4 Steve Clark, AIA, Vickery/

Ovresat/Awsumb Associates,

Inc., 400 E. South St., Suite 300,

Orlando, FL 32801-2892

Pecsox, Jelliffe, Randall 4 Nice/

Schuette Mohler, 1015 Main St.,

Lafayette, IN

Phillips Associates, 275 Broadhollow

Rd., Melville, NY 11747

PHJ Architects, Inc., PO Box 215,

Montgomery, AL 36101

Piper, J. Scott, 203 W. Holly, Bellingham,

WA

Plumas County Engineering Dept.,

Box 10179, ^incy, CA 95971

Potter, Ross, 735 Jenifer St., Madison,

WI 53703

Prendergast, David W., 5 Beekman

St., New York, NY 10038

Price Group Architects, 301 Broadway

Bldg., Shawnee, OK 74801

QuinUvan, Pierk 4 Krause, 101 E.

Water St., Syracuse, NY 13201

Ramsay Associates, 625 W. Innes

St., Salisbury, NC 28144

Randall, Richard, Naples, NY 14512

Rea Design Associates, 86 Main St.,

Auburn, ME 04210

Remick Architect 4 Planners. 2 Executive

Dr., New Windsor, NY

12550

Ritchie Organization, 80 Bridge St.,

Newton, MA 02158

Rose, Noble E., 4610 University

Ave., Suite 430, PO Box 53705,

Madison, WI 53511

Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw 4 Folley,

2112 Erie Blvd. E., Syracuse,

NY 13224

Saxton Smith Associates, 814 W. B,

V Russellville, AR 72801

Scaffidi 4 Moore Architects, 4535

Bailey Ave., Buffalo, NY 14226

Scalf, J. 4 Associates, Nashville,

TN

Schaefer, Johnson, Cox 4 Frey, 220

S. Hillside, Wichita, KS 67211

Schrader, Mark, 1105 Terminal Way,

Suite 209, Reno, NV 89502

Sear-Brown Associates, 83 Metra

Park, Rochester, NY 14623

Seckel, Alexander, Architects, 106

Sturges Ave., Mansfield, OH

44903

Seifert 4 Forbes, 925 Tacoma Ave.

S., Tacoma, WA 98402

Sharp, Keith, 116 E. 4th St., HopkinsviUe,

KY 42240

Shepley Bulfinch Richardson 4 Abbot,

40 Broad St., Boston, MA

02109

Shere, Ralph, Architecture Unlimited,

PO Box 1555, Tryon, NC 28782

Sherman Carter Bamhart, 140 E.

Main St., Lexington, KY 40507

Shulman, Alan, 8 Elm St,, Goffstown,

NH 03045

Simmons, Harry, Jr., 127 Sixth

Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11217

Simon, Martin of Vegue, Winkelstein,

Moris, San Francisco, CA

Sizemore Floyd Architects, 1 Georgia

Center, Suite 10000,600 Peachtree

St., Atlanta, GA 30308

Smith, Robert J., Rte. 3, Box 100,

Ontario, OR 97914

Spencer, John W., of Spencer 4

Spencer, Carew Tower, Cincinnati,

OH 45202

Stecklein 4 Brungardt, 1st National

Bank Tower, Hays, KS

Stewart, Mark A., Brooks Association,

220 W. Loop S., #895, Houston,

TX 77027

Stokes, Steven, 47 Court St., Laconia,

NH 03246

Swenson, Earl 4 Associates, Nashville,

TN

Taylor, William H., AIA, 776 E.

Green St., Suite 204, Pasadena,

CA9I101

Thompson 4 Associates, 304 N. Lincoln,

Liberal, KS 67901

Thomson 4 Associates, 2906-B N.

Patterson St., Valdosta, GA 31602

Tomberlin Associates Architects,

Inc., 2241 Perimeter Park Dr., Atlanta,

GA 30341

Vkkery, Moje, Drinkard 4 Oakland

(VMDO), 116 2d St. NE, Charlottesville,

VA 22901

Voelckers, Paul of Minch Ritter Forrest

Architects, 800 Glacier Ave.,

Juneau, AK 99801

von Achen, Kurt, Eudora, KS

Voohris, Slone, Welsh, Crossland—

Architects, Inc., 414 Reading Rd.,

Mason, OH 45040

Walden 3 Associates, Hubbardston,

MA 01452-0187

Ward Associates, Bohemia, NY

11716

Ward 4 Wetherington, PO Box 1005,

LaGrange, GA 30241

Warner, Garett of Warner, Nease,

Bost Architects, Inc., 2701 Rockcreek

Pkwy., Suite 108, North

Kansas City, MO 64116

We Group Architects 4 Planners,

122 SW Third Ave., Portland, OR

97204

Weber Pollard 4 Associates, Marshalllown,

lA

Weese, Ben, Weese Langley Weese,

9 W. Hubbard St., Chicago, IL

60610

Wendt Cedarholm Tippens, Inc., 560

Green Bay Rd., Winnetka, IL

60093

Wheat, Raymond 4 Associates, 2034

Xlubview Ave., Montgomery, AL

36106

W.H.G.K., Inc., 3201 W. Main

Belleville, IL 62223

Williams, Christopher, Meredith

NH 03253

Wilson 4 Goff, Associated Architects,

81 Main St., St. Albans, WV

25177

Wilson Rains/Design Partnership, 71

High St., Newton Upper Falls,

MA

Wofford, Theodore J., AIA, of Murphy,

Downey, Wofford 4 Richman,

8135 Forsyth, Suite 222, St.

Louis, MO 63105

Wold Association, Architects, 386

N. Webasha, St. Paul, MN 55102

Wolf, Lang, Christopher Architects,

Inc., 10470 Foothill Blvd, Rancho

Cucamonga, CA 92730

Wurster, Bemardi, Emmons, San

Francisco, CA

Yamasaki, Minoru, Associates, 350

W. Big Beaver, Troy, MI 480O7-

4100

Young, Paul 4 Richard Nice, Young

Architects, 211 Prospect, Box

1484, Bloomington, IL 61702

NAME OF UBRARY

STAGES

NAME OF UBRARY

STAGES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B

1 2 3 4 s 8 7 8

Pittsylvania County PL, Chatham [1989]

Chesapeake PL [1991]

Greenbrier Library, Chesapeake [1991]

Russell Memorial Lib., Chesapeake [1991]

Cumberland County PL [?]

Municipal Library, Fairfax [1992]

Great Falls Library [1991]

Herrxion Community Library [1992]

Eastern Loudoun PL. Leesburg [1991]

Leesburg PL [1991]

Lorton Community Library [1989]

Lovettsville PL [1990]

Blue Ridge Regional Lib., Martir^vilie [1990]

Middleburg PL [1990]

r4or1olk PL [1989]

Orange County Library [1994]

Purcellville PL [1991]

Innsbrook Library, Richmond [1990]

Satem PL [1990]

Middlesex County PL, Urt>anna [?]

Patrick Henry Community Lib., Vienna [1992]

Spririgfield Metro Library, Vienna [1992]

Vienna Metro Utxary [1992]

Great Neck Area Lib., Virginia Beach [1989]

Kempsville Area Lib., Virginia Beach [1989]

Pungo-Blackwater Lib., Virginia Beach [1990]

Rappahannock County Lib., Washington [1991]

y^ y^ y y WASHINGTON

y^

y^ y^

Everett PL [1991)

Port Townsend PL [1990]

y y

>>

>> y^ Pullman (Neill) PL [1991]

Sedro-Wodley PL [1989]

North Spokane Ulxary, Spokane [1989]

Fern Hill Branch Lib., Tacoma [1989]

Mottet Branch Utxary, Tacoma [1989]

y

y^

y^

>>

y^

y^

y^

y y

y

y

y

y

Swasey Branch Ulxary, Tacoma [1989]

Tacoma PL [1990]

WEST VIRGINIA

Hannan PL, Ashton [1989]

Branchland PL [1989]

West Huntington PL, Huntington [1990]

Grant County PL, Peterstxirg [1990]

WISCONSIN

y^ y^ Brillion PL [1990]

BrookfieW PL[1990]

Cambridge Community Ubrary [1989]

Aram PL, Delavan [1990]

lola Village Library [1990]

y y y y

y^ y^ v'

y y y y y y y y

y y y

y'

y y y

Woman's Club Free Ubrary, Lodi [1989]

- Mkjdleton PL [1990]

New Berlin PL [1989]

Onalaska PL [1989]

Prescott PL [1990]

Shawano City-County Ubrary [1989]

y^ p' y y y

Mead PL, Shetxiygan [1995] y y y

Academic Projects

NAME OF UBRARY

STAGES

NAME OF UBRARY

STAGES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

ALABAMA Caiitomia State Univ., Northridge [1991]

Mills College. Oakland [1989]

California State Polytechnic, Pomona [1989]

California State Univ., Sacramento [1990]

Bethel Seminary W., San Diego [1989]

San Frarxasco State University [?]

Univ. of California, San Frandsco [1990]

Science Lib., UC-Santa Cruz [1990]

Cat. State-Stanislaus, Turiock [1989]

>>

Troy State University, Dothan [1989]

Science/Engineering, UA-Tuscaloosa [1990]

ALASKA

>>

Univ. of Alaska-Southeast Juneau [1989]

ARIZONA

Northern Arizona University, FlagstafI [1990]

ARKANSAS

Univ. of Central Arkansas, Conway [1990]

Harding University, Searcy [1990]

CALIFORNIA

Calilomia State Univ., Bakersfiekj [1992]

Main Lib., UC-Berkeley [1993]

Biosciences Ub., UC-Berkeley [1989]

Biosciences Ub., UC-Berkeley [1994]

Haas Business Sch., UC-Berkeley [1992]

Ctiemistry Ub., UC-Berkeley [1990]

Doe Ub., UC-Berketey [1993]

East Asiatic Ub., UC-Berkeley [1997]

Environmental Design, Wurster Hall,

University ot California, Berkeley [1989]

Calilomia State-Hayward, Concord [1992]

Univ. of Caflfomia, Davis [1992]

Science Ub., UC-lrvine [1992]

Univ. of Calilomia-San Diego, l.a Jolta [1992]

International Relabons/Padfic Studies,

Univ. of Caiifomia-San Diego, LB Jolla [1989]

Teaching Ub., USC, Los Angeles [1992]

Info Sciences Inst., USC, Marina del Rey [1989]

Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey [1991]

y y K' CONNECTICUT

y y

DELAWARE

y

>>

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

American University l.aw Lib. [1992]

y

y

y National Defense University [1991]

FLORIDA

Valencia Community Coll., Orlando [1992]

GEORGIA

HAWAII

Chamir«de University of Honolulu [1990]

Hawaii Pacific College, Honolulu [1989]

>>

IDAHO

North kJaho College, Coeur d'Alene [1991]

Lewis Oark State Coll., Lewiston [1990]

lUUNOIS

y y University of Illinois, Chicago [1990]

I iRpiPv iniipsjii mprpMBFR IBS')

J

I ,

NAUP np LIBRARY

STAGES NAME OF UBRARY

STAGES

Knox College, Galesburg [1990] '

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2

NEW YORK

3 4 5 6 7 8

Bradley University, Peoria [1990]

Augustana Coll.. Rock IstarxJ [1990]

INDIANA

yy

SUNY College at Fredonia ^1994]

Touro Law Center, Huntington [1990] t-*

^ yy yy y

y

y

Wabash College, Crawlordsvilte [1990] Parsons School of Design, New York [1990]

SL Joseph's College, Patchogue [1989]

-y y y

^ y y y 0

IOWA Ftochester Institute of Technology [1991] v' ^ y y y y 0

SI. Ambfose University, Davenport [1995] Union College, Schenectady [1994] 0

Grand View College, Des Moines (1991) y^ College of Staten Island [1991] v-" y y y y

KANSAS Health Science Ctr., SUNY at Syracuse [1993]

University of Kansas, l-awrence [1989] NORTH CAROUNA

KENTUCKY Univ. of North Carolina, Astieville [1990] y y y y y y

Berea College [1991]

Belknap Campus, Univ. of Louisville [1989]

y^ y^ North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh [1989] y y y y 0

yy OHIO

MAINE Geology/Physics Lib., Univ. of Cincinnati [1989] y y y y y

LRC, Univ. of Maine, Augusta [1990]

Sdetvce Ub., Bowdoin Coll., Brunswick [1991]

Scfx>ol of Law, Univ. of Maine, Portland [1991]

yy University of Rk) Grande [1991] k' y y y y

y^ y^ Youngstown State University [1989] y

MARYUND OKLAHOMA

Univ. of Maryland, College Park [1990]

Hood College, Frederick [1991]

Western Maryland Coll., Westminster [1991]

y^ y^ y^ yy y' yy Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater [7]

y^ y^ y^ K f OREGON

yy Oregon State University, Corvallis [1992] y y

MASSACHUSETTS University of Oregon, Eugene [1992] y' y^ y y y

Resource Ctr., Northeastern Univ., Boston [1990]

Ftotch Lib., MIT, Cambridge [1990]

Boston College, Chestnut HiH [1989]

Morse Institute, Natick [1992]

Smith College, Northampton [1990]

Mount Holyoke College, So. Hadley [1992]

Williams College, Williamstown [1992]

yy

yy Hatfield Marine Scienc» Ctr., Newport [1990] y

y y y

' y

' y

y

y^ ^ Portarrd State University [1990] y

y^ y^ V* yy y" yy

>> y^ yy 'y yy PENNSYLVANIA

y^ yy y 0

MICHIGAN

Universrty of Michigan, Ann Artxx [1989]

Engineering Lib., Univ. of Michigan [?]

Social Work Ub., Univ. of Michigan [1992]

Ferris State. University, Big Rapid [1995]

Aquinas College, Grand Rapids [1992]

Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo [1990]

Olivet College [7]

Oakland University, Rochester [1989]

Walsh College, Troy [1990]

yy Franklin & Marshall Coll., Lancaster [1990] f y

y^ y^ y0 Philadelphia Coll. of Textiles i Saence [1992] y y^ y y y^ y^ y 0 Pennsylvania State, Schuylkill Haven [1991] y^ y

y^ University of Scranton [1992]

Susquetianna Univers'rty, Selinsgrove [1989] y

y

J-' y^ y^ y^ y y yy y y yy RHODE ISLAND -

y^ >> y^ y y yy Fioger Williams College, Bristol [1990] ^ y^

y^ y^ y^ y y yy y y yy Salve Regina College, Newport [1989] y ^ 0

>> SOUTH DAKOTA

MINNESOTA Sisseton-Wahpeton Community College [1990] y y V 0

Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis [1998]

Science & Engineering, UM-Minneapdis (1996)

St. Olaf College, Northfiekf [1992]

College of SL Thomas, St. Paul [1991]

TEXAS

y^

y^

y^

y^ y^ y > Sam Houston State Univ., Huntsville [1990] y y V 0

y^ y^ y

yy y y yy

S.F. Austin State Univ., Nacogdoches [1991]

SW Texas State Univ., San Marcos [1990] c* y^

y y y V ^ y

MISSISSIPPI VIRGINIA

Millsaps College, Jackson [1990] >> yy y > Marymount University, Arlington [1989] y* y^ y y y V ^ y y

MISSOURI University of Virginia, Charlottesville [7] y^ y' y y

Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City [1991]

Northeast Missouri State, Kirksville [1990]

Mo. Western State Ck)ll., SL Joseph [1990]

Missouri Baptist College, SL (.ouis [1992]

University of Missouri, SL Louis [1989]

Sch. of Medidne/Biomedical Comm. Ctr.,

Washington University, St. Louis [1989]

Music Ub., Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville [1989]

Newport Coll., Newport News [1991] y' y^

>0

y^ y^

Roanoke College, Salem [1990] y"

Shenandoah CollJConservatory, Winchester [7] y'

WASHINGTON

y y y \

y y

^ y y

yy

Washington State Univ., Pullman [1993-95] y^ y^ y y y

University of Washington, Seattle [1990] y y y

NEW JERSEY Gonzaga University, Spokane [1992] y

Caldwell College [1991]

Rutgers University, New Brunswick [1992]

Art Lib., Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick [1991]

y^ y^ y^ y^ Ctr. lor Info & Technology, Gonzaga Univ [1991] y

y^ y^ y^ Whitworth College, Spokane [1992] y^ y^ y y

y^ y^ y^ y^ WEST VIRGINIA

NEW MEXICO Davis & Elkins College, Elkins [1991]

WISCONSIN

y y y

Altxjquerque Academy [1991]

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque [?)

New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces [1991]

SL John's College, Sante Fe [1990]

NM Inst, of Mining & Technology, Socorro [1991

y^ Gateway Techntca! College. Elkborn [1990J y y^ y^ y^ y^ Univ. of Wiscoosln-LaCrosse (1992) y^

y^ >> y* ty yy Edgewood College, Madison [1990] y

] y^ yy Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison [1990] y ^

7?

Coiisolidlaied StmileintEs

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS

4505 MARYLAND PARKWAY 89109

TEL. 739-3477

....just a short reminder that the Legislative Feasibility

Hearing on starting a law school in Nevada has been rescheduled

for Friday, March l6 at 2:30 p.m. in the West Lounge of the

Student Union Building. Your attendance and support is

welcome (if not vital).

BOX #3

Law School Proposal 1980-

Law School Proposal 1972-

Proposed New Degrees Programs 1982 -

New Programs

Proposed New Degrees Programs October - December 1981

Proposed New Degrees Programs January - September 1981

Proposed New Degrees, Programs 1979-80

Proposed New Degrees, Programs 1977-78

University College Study November 1980

Administrative Study at University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Admissions Study

' Archeological Survey #1

School of Architecture

Al-Azhar University Proposal (Mohamed Yousef) #2

Al-Azhar University Proposal (Mohamed Yousef) #1

. Archeological Survey #jL.

Architecture Program Proposal #2

BOX #4

Dean of Student Services Search Committee/Information

Student Service 1985

Interviewing and Recruiting 1985-86, 87 6-2-330-4000-755

Campus Police 1984-86

Counseling and Evaluation Center

Financial Aid 1983-86

Athletics 1985 .

Showband of the Stars

Athletic Development 1984-85

Womens Athletics - Miscellaneous

NCCA - National Collegiate Athletic Association

Intercollegiate Athletic Council 1985

PCAA - Pacific Coast Athletic Association

Assistant General Counsel 1985

Assistant General Counsel 1985

Las Vegas Valley Water District - Reservoir

Affirmative Action 1985

V

•

Law School Proposal 1969-72

Clippings re; Law School proposal

Law School Paper - Dr. Goodall

Cresap, McCormick & Paget, Inc. Law School Consultants

Law School Feasibility Study

Space for Proposed Law School

Dr. Zorn's folder

Board of Regents University of Nevada System Law School

Feasibility Study

BOX #4 CONTINUED

Law School Study for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (5)

Leisure Studies Center

Survey Research Center Proposal 1976

Veterinary Programs - General Information

Zoological Society 1976-1977

Zoological Society 1972-1975

Personnel 1985