Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Letter from A. M. Folger (Las Vegas) to Frank Strong, June 7, 1948

File

File
Download hln000799.tif (image/tiff; 22.17 MB)

Information

Creator

Creator: Folger, Al M.

Date

1948-06-07

Description

The charges for water for the hospital seemed to be too high and Folger was asking for permission to lower them.

Digital ID

hln000799

Physical Identifier

Box 47 Correspondence File 1948
    Details

    Citation

    hln000799. Union Pacific Railroad Collection, 1828-1995. MS-00397. Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas, Nevada. http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1js9m76n

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at?special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Standardized Rights Statement

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Digital Processing Note

    Manual transcription

    Language

    English

    Format

    application/pdf

    W 23-7 Mr. Frank Strong: ( cc - Mr. E. E. Bennett) I enclose copy of letter from Public Service Commission, June 3, and complaint from Las Vegas Hos-pital, dated May 6, both of which are self explanatory. This is one of the very rare complaints made to the Public Service Commission on winter rates in Las Vegas, one of the reasons for the scarcity of complaints being our policy of fairness in the application of rates and endeavoring in all cases to base the rates on actual usage in the absence of meters. However, in-equalities are bound to appear occasionally under flat rate schedule because each classification is definitely stated without any leeway between the large users and the small users in the same classification of service. You will note that the Commission has sustained our position in responding to the complainant, but suggests the rate prescribed may be too high in this particular case. I do not agree that any of our water rates in Las Vegas are too high; in fact utility rates here are about the only cost of living items that have not increased tremendously in the last 15 years. However, it does appear that the total rate of $57.45 for the Hospital is out of line when compared with rate paid by commercial laundries of $30.00 plus toilets. We have no desire to be arbitrary in the matter of the application of water rates and have always exhibited a tendency to meet the Public Service Commission more than half way, which is recognized by their spirit of cooperation and friendliness toward us. Will be glad to have you dis-cuss this with Mr. Bennett and if you concur we will submit a request to the Commission for permission to charge, say, $15.00 per month for laundries operated in conjunction with hospitals, of which there are only 2 in town. Nothing will be done with the restaurant rate; a charge of 8c a day for water used in connection with cooking for patients in 48 rooms is not excessive. A. M. Folger