Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000348 78

Image

File
Download upr000348-078.tif (image/tiff; 23.55 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000348-078
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Omaha August 2, 704-36 1954 ^SCEJVED fi TAX Dfil’T. AU6 3 1954 O . r . K rs C O . LOS ANGELES CALSF. Mr# E* Eo Bennett •*. Los Angeles (00-ite*A.l.Stod4axdoCtoalia MT.O.MoCory ^Las Vegas A llr.Wto.Reinhardt-Loa Angeles Mr*0 oMoBates~Loa Angel BSr.W.RoRouse ~Qmaha M r * Lc RoMaag ®Las Vegas MroW.HoKulsizer'Mfeaaha M r . L eLoBurri<*Q»aha} In accordance with request contained In your letter of June 22* 1954* file 80-11# representatives of*fche Acoouating Department were in Las Vegas# Nevada from June 28# 1954 to July sor 19S4a when the final accounting for the purchase of the water property was completed b y Conway and Company acting for the Las Vegas Valley Water District. Tke amount due Las Vegas Land and Water Company for the property sold is #2*317#£74.93. as shown on statement dated July 86a 1954 which was sent you with m y letter same date. We understand that Conway and Company will certify this figure to the Water District as representing the final cost of the y®ter property. Initially# the auditors questioned the collectibility of some #200.00 of our Accounts leoeivableg however# in confer­ence with Mr* Conway the exception was withdrawn# *Ehe Water Company was paid the preliminary purchase price of #2*299*029.64 on July 1* 1954s thus# a n additional amount of #18*845.29 is now due it. When this amount Is paid from the purchase fund in escrow# there w i U remain in escrow #157*771.85 which it will be necessary to refund to the water District. $he large refund to be made to the Water District is due to not incurring expenditures on authorized worh order projects during May and June 1954 that were estimated to be ex­pended during those months® W i U you kindly progress this subject further with respect to the ultimate payment of the balance due the Water Company. ?Mi R. Ms SUTTON