Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000334 43

Image

File
Download upr000334-043.tif (image/tiff; 26.98 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000334-043
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    P A G I F I C S E W E R P I P E C O SSS5 EiVS'f § E V E in H s v L O S A ] ¥ G E L E S November 27, 1917 Mr. S. J. Cofflnan, Jr. , Pacific Sewer Pipe Comp; 825 East 7th Street, Los Angeles, California C ompany, Sales Manager Pear Sir / Regarding the 16" pipe &6ld to the Salt Late Railroad for water line at Las Vegas, Nevada, I inspected the whole line with Mr. McGuire, Chief Engineer of the Salt Lake Route on November 24th, 191?. This is in conformity with Mr. Poster's letter of November 17, 1917. from an engineering standpoint?, in the way that their en­gineer, C. S. Miller ? t i k ul that the plans called for, in a. conversation that both\ce us had with him shortly before the time that the sal® was made to the railroad. In the first place, according to this conversation, the pipe was to end and the water was to be delivered into a high tank near the railroad and the stream of water would run continuously with no stoppage from the time that it left the springs until delivered in this tank. the different engineers, that they inserted a 16" gate valve at the end of the pipe line, also an 8" valve. According to the story told me, the 16" valve was closed and the 8* valve left open to relieve the pipe line of air when the column of water was turned down the pipe line two miles away. On the first test, the pipe burst at J one place which they estimated had about 19$ pressure. This pipe was replaced and the second test was made. The pipe ruptured in three different places, in one case the pipe burst at 6# pressure. Both Mr. McGuire and my­self feel confident that this was a cracked piece of pipe that was put into the line by oversight by the contractor, and had nothing to do with the strength of the pipe in general, as the other pipe in the line with three times a-.§ much pressure, held without any rupture. I find that the pi/e has not been installed I find in making the tests and talking with