Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000330 75

Image

File
Download upr000330-075.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000330-075
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    H r PARTIES INCLUDED 1* At© 'transfer companies engaged in transferring passengers and baggage between depots in same place, and between depots and residences, such as Pamelas Transfer Co*, hioago, Union Transfer Company, San Francisco# New Orleans Transfer Company, New Orleans, subject to the Act? Must our contracts with any such Companies for privileges of solicitation iiW J B B iH B n p H m our trains, prescribing charges, etc* be filed? L \. RECORDS 1* When any arrangements between carriers are filed with connlsslai are they to be open to the inspection of any person? INTERCHANGES 1# Will the law compel or give the Commission power to order and interohasge which a company objects to, account short haul against long haul? For instance. Northern Pacific refuse to interchange at Portland on business fro® or to points #ast of the 9?th meridian. Does the law obligate th m to make such exchange, or, does it vest in the Oaomisslan power to direct them to do so* 3* Similarly, interchange at Butte, Mont* with Great Northern and Northern Pacific is for restricted territory only# is there any legal obligation to extend it or power with the commission to extend it? 3* Paragraph two of section fifteen states the Commission may establish through routes and rates “provided no reasonable or satisfac* iory through route exists** Question whether the existence of a through rout® and joint rate such as Northern Pacific via St*Paul from Chicago to Puget sound would preclude the commission from ordering the establishment of another through route via Missouri River and Portland between same points?