Information
Digital ID
upr000329-138
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.U n io n P a c if ic R a il r o a d C o m p a n y jm N. H. L O O M IS , QEK'SBAL SOLICITOR L A W D E P A R T M E N T o m a h a , n e b .. May 6, 1910. Mr* H. J. S t ir lin g , A u d i t o r . Dear S ir t - Replying to your f i le 12-370, of February 14th, 1910, re lativ e to claim of the American Smelting & Refining Company, for a refund of freight charges assessed on erroneous mine weights. I am of the opinion that a t a r i f f provision that 'mine weights w ill govern* in the collection of freight charges on coal, would he no defence to an action to recover freight charges assessed on inoorrect mine weights, i f the evidence was clear that such weights were in fact erroneous. From a careful examination of the papers enclosed with your le tt e r, as w ell as Mr* Munroe's f i l e s , x am s a tis fied that the weights at the mine were in fact erroneous, and am of the opinion therefore, that there is no legal objection to the payment of the claim. Very truly yours, I* H. LOOMIS COPY