Information
Digital ID
upr000318-144
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.I October 26, 1909 •) c ssup, Engineer Maintenance of Way l)e ar S ir : I have your favor of October 20, asking opinion as to our right to condemn right of way for pipe line to connect I doubt very much whether we would have the righ t under our railroad company has power to exercise the right of eminent d, oma.i n f_o r t,h, e purpose of„ acqui. ri,ng any necessary to tihsj e operation and maintenance of i; ts railroad, I have been It might be d iffic u lt further for uo$> to show that we absolutely require this water in the operation of our railroad, inasmuch as we have other means of acquiring water near at hand. However, i f you d esire, we can bring an action to determine the question. Referring to Hr, N ichols' le tte r , however, I would advise that it would be ille g a l for us to issue anypassea to Mr, P h illip s or Ms family for the use o f this water. Have you tried to obtain a right of way for a pipe line by negotiation? unable to find any decision which goes to the ex$ri|p^;s point I return herewith f i l e . Very .respectfully,