Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000318 57

Image

File
Download upr000318-057.tif (image/tiff; 30.22 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000318-057
Details

Member of

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

10 CALIFORNIA’S STAKE IN THE COLORADO RIVER irrigation of lands from thodoAver river might have been faced with abandonment within a few years. Although the junior appropriators upstream might have been enjoined, such litigation would have been long and costly and it was decided that efforts should be directed to a more constructive solution to obtain adequate water supplies as well as other important benefits. It was recognized that storage would be needed to regulate and conserve the flood waters in order to obtain an adequate supply not only for irrigation but also for importation into the metropolitan areas of Southern Cali­fornia, and to provide for control of floods and silt. In order to meet these combined needs the Boulder Canyon Project was conceived and promoted by the several Southern California agen­cies concerned, actively supported by most of the citizens and organiza­tions of Southern California and throughout the State. Numerous investi­gations and reports were made by various federal agencies, particularly the Bureau of Reclamation. These culminated in a comprehensive report by F. B. Weymouth, issued in 1924, in which the plans for the storage dam (now Hoover Dam) and the All-American Canal were crystallized substantially as subsequently carried out. However, efforts to secure the authorization and construction of Boulder Canyon Project as a federal undertaking resulted in a long drawn out battle extending over a period of eight to ten years. The Colorado River Compact When the project was first proposed and the plans of California to develop and use Colorado River water became generally known, it became apparent that unless some prior understanding could be reached with respect to the division of the waters of the Colorado River and its tribu­taries among the seven states of the Colorado River Basiii, it would be difficult if not impossible to secure the authorization of the project as a federal undertaking. The negotiation and signing of the Colorado River Compact in 1922, therefore, apportioning the waters of the Colorado River System, was an essential initial step in the consummation of the project. As a result of several meetings of representatives of the Colorado River Basin States, starting as early as 1918 and culminating in a meet­ing held at Denver, Colorado, in August, 1920, it was agreed that a compact should be entered into between the states based upon the general idea of equitable apportionment. In 1921, each of the seven basin states adopted appropriate legislation authorizing the appointment of com­pact commissioners. On August 19, 1921, Congress consented to the negotiation of such a compact and provided for the appointment of a commissioner to represent the Unitejl States, to which position Herbert Hoover, then Secretary of Commerce, was appointed. Ca l i f o r n i a ’s s t a k e i n t h e Co l o r a d o r iv e r 11