Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000288 51

Image

File
Download upr000288-051.tif (image/tiff; 26.64 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000288-051
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    REVIEW - JOURNAL LAS VEGAS 7-21-50 lawns while residents of the o-ther side'would refrain, and vice versa. right. He thought that this would Commissioner Wendell Bunk­er, who told commissioners yes-in an informal meeting give users an adequate pressure and at the same; tifne, be equi­table' to all. ed to lead the fight for some sort .3 of program to alleviate the mat- ; ter. - | -Bunker, incidentally, reported I that he still received plenty of , calls last night from water us­ers, but their, theme h a d changed from irritation to praise for his stand in demanding that the city take drastic action in settling the water problem. Bunker told • ther Review-Jour-nal that he intends to present the following facts before Mayor I Ernest Cragin and the city com­mission and an expected record delegation of irate water users: ; “It’s th e city commission that’s being held responsible. We’re the ones the public blames ! because we were stupid enough I to undertake enforcement of the ordinance which is designed I solely to cover up the mistakes j and shortcomings of the water i company. “The water company h a s known this situation was com­ing for more than 10 years. . . . Year after year the summer j shortages have been becoming I more acute. Year after year _we j \ have been fed with -promises !' while the city covered up for 1 the utility. . . _ . ? “I’m getting sick and tired of I this stalling and lack of results,” [ Bunker exclaimed, “and I be­lieve that the people of Las Ve- | .gas are sick and tired too. The water company hasn’t developed 1 ,a single gallon of a new supply I since the terrible shortage of II 1949.” T h e commissioner Said that he 'If proposed to offer a motion that ;• a committee consisting of two r members of the commission and ? i the city engineer review the sit- , uation and devise a more work­able program. During yesterday’s informal ; meeting, both Bunker and Com-j missioner Bob Moore indicated that they were in favor of con- ' demning the water company and ( then have the city take it over, j f “ At least the city can’t do any - | worse than the water company p has done and I have an idea that 4 we might do a lot better, 1 Bunker said. T ii A1 Folger, manager of the Las f Vegas Land-and Water company, jU who was present at yesterday’s I