UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
(2) furnish such a letter under our tariff or under our rule 9 contracts and suggested to him that he endeavor to have the rule abrogated. However, assuming the Rule would not be abrogated, and assuming we would be met with similar requests from other subdividers, I think we should adopt some policy on this matter. You will note in Mr. Cochran’s letter to the Water Company, attached to Mr, Maag's letter, he merely files an application for water main service without mentioning any commitment to furnish water. It is my suggestion that when such applications are filed and the subdivider insists on such a commitment to furnish water, either in his letter filing the formal application or in a subsequent letter, that Mr. Maag be permitted to reply to the request for furnishing of water, by stating that upon the completion of construction of the pipe lines, and compliance with all of the terms and conditions of Rule 9 contracts (and I have in mind particularly the chlorination provision)and the furnishing of policies of title insurance provision) that the Water Company will furnish to the subdivision such water as it may have available in connection with the furnishing of water to the entire city. E. E. BENNETT
