upr000280 51

(COPT) (Letterhead of) PXLLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO STANDARD OIL BUILDING SAN FRANCISCO 4 May 12, 1952. Your File 4787-11-104 - Bell Telephone Company of Nevada v". Public Service Commission Edward C, Renwick, Esq., Assistant General Solicitor, Union Pacific Railroad Company, 422 West Sixth Street, Los Angeles 14, California. Dear Eds I have just received your letter of May 8th asking about Judge Guild’s decision in our case. In order that you may under­stand the peculiar course taken by the case after the hearing which you attended, I am enclosing numerous documents as mentioned below. At the conclusion of our evidence on October 17, 1951, the Attorney General asked a continuance to prepare witnesses to answer our new testimony, and the Court granted it. Hearings were resumed and con­cluded on November 26th and 27th. Then, pursuant to the Public Service Commission Law, the Court remanded the record to the Com­mission for its consideration and report on the new evidence. The Commission made its report in the fora of a new opinion and order dated December 14, 1951 (enclosure No. 1 herewith). The case was then, by a stipulation approved by the Court, submitted on briefs. We filed our opening brief, dated January 8, 1952 (enclosure No, 2). After getting one extension of time to reply, the Attorney General served a notice of motion to remand the case to the Commission a second time, with directions to make findings of an Intrastate rate pll if | Mjj