UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Mr • Sf* Rous® 3 July 7, 1952 been submitted to the Commission, the Court, and it is expected tha t tThhei s rewpaosr tteher *so rtdrearn sof cript will be available-to the Commission*within a short period of tine, to recUonndseird tehre thlea wc tashee aCnodm micshsanigoen nitosw hoapsi naionn .o ppIofr ttuhneity Commission changes its opinion, the Court is then entitled to render judgment upon the revised opinion and decision of the Commission, Otherwise the Court renders judgment upon the original opinion and decision, I think our chances of obtaining some additional relief from the Commission are favorable, but 1 think the Comission will grant us the very minimum relief which it feels will be sustained by the Court, 3. 1, Bennett
