Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000274 166

Image

File
Download upr000274-166.tif (image/tiff; 27.13 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000274-166
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    u i 1 General and administrative expenses used in the summary reflect the followingj Item 1949 1950 Recorded Adjusted Istimeted Incurred at L.V. #25,270 #25,600 #26,600 Allocated ; p ? 9,046 9,100 #23,270 #34,646 #35,700 Further analysis of these figures will be available with additional reclassification for purpose of the exhibit* Depreciation expense Is predicated on the lives and rates currently in use. In my opinion such rates could be increased. Taxes, other than Income, for 1950 reflect - Income taxes have been com puted as if the LVL&WCo. as well as the LA&SLRRCo. filed separate tax returns. However, the two have been considered as one, Insofar as the amount of the taxable net income is involved, I. e. the classification for corporations in excess of #50,000 annual net Income has been used. By so doing, , it makes no difference which of the two corporations are treated separately, as on page 2, or if the operations are merged. This would appear proper, as a difference in net earnings should not be permitted for rate purposes, merely by the device of the as­sumption as to corporate identity where the physical properties are as one and under common control.' The LVL&SfCo. and the £A&SLRRCo. are entitled to be treated as a separate corporation for income tax purposes. The customers of the LVL&WCo, should not be burdened, nor should they profit through any consolidated tax return of the holding company, i. e.