Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000274 68

Image

File
Download upr000274-068.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000274-068
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

V II - Present Cost of Reproduction MTo Wehe said that he simply wished the cost of re­production statement previously furnished by Mr. Hulsizer brought up to December 31, 1949, and to be furnished with a general description of the method used in preparing the reproduction cost estimate, along with some detail as to the cost elements that become a part of the estimates. Mr. Hulsizer said that he could furnish this. Ill - Charges Reflected in Capitalized Plant Additions Mr. Wehe advised that all he desired was a general statement as to whether our accounting included any in­direct costs, overhead or other arbitrary percentages. Mr. Hulsizer said this could be furnished. B. OPERATING EXPENSE - Las Vegas Land and Water Co. I - General Expenses II III -- TRaexteisrement Expense ^Account 782) There was no particular discussion concerning these items. Mr. Hulsizer stated that the Information called for would be furnished. C. RETIREMENT RESERVES (Account 251) I I - Accrued Depreciation There was no particular discussion of this item. II ~ Amortization (Account 251) There was considerable discussion concerning this item. It was apparently the -understanding of Messrs. Hulsizer and Barnes that the Los Angeles representatives proposed to omit the amortized facilities from the rate base. They were opposed to this and pointed out that there had been substantial deficits In the years in which the facilities were amortized, and that they had not, therefore, been amortized at the expense of the rate payer. We agreed with this view and stated that it had been our intention to include them in the proposed rate base, even though the Commission might not allow this item. Mr. Wehe pointed out that he desired the income tax information for the purpose of making a com­putation to justify the inclusion of the amortized 2