Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000274 21

Image

File
Download upr000274-021.tif (image/tiff; 23.68 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000274-021
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Wm. Reinhardt - Los (CC-Mr. W. H. Hulsizer) April 25, 1950 704-35 W M . R. APR 28 i^O This refers to your letter of March 20, 1950, file 1-7334, to Mr. Hulsizer, and his letter of March 27, 1950, file 3703.1 to me, with copy to you. Information with respeet to the items referred to in your letter is as follows; 1. Instances where Subdividers did not receive com­plete refund of costs incurred by them in the construction of water pipe lines, pursuant to Rule 9-c . Work Order Subdivider Subdividers Cost Amount Refunded and charged to Investment_____ 440 459 445564 464 470 ) Biltmore Somes, Inc. Tiffendale Homes, Inc. Ernest Allen Huntridge Development Co. Huntridge Development Co. $ 9,458.86 15.903.94 10,511.71 14.241.95 5,656.23 # 9,000.00 14,550.00 9,150.00 13,174.70 4,644.64 2. There were no instances as of December 31, 1949, where contracts with Subdividers, covering the construction of water pipe lines, pursuant to Rule 9-A, had expired before com­plete refund of costs were made. 3. There were no pipe lines acquired by the LYL&W Co. for nominal consideration, or for delinquent water bills, in which the appraised value of the pipe lines were capitalized at amounts in excess of the contract consideration. Sfei A 1 f In this connection, as a matter of information, we acquired under Work Order 233, cast iron water pipe lines in­stalled by South Nevada Land and Development Company, who pur­chased water supply from LVL&W Co. These facilities were valued at $7,735.00 and represented original cost less 2% depredation for four and 1/2 years. Acquisition also included 79 lots and some wooden waiter mains, the latter being deemed worthless, and were replaced under Work Order 241. This property was conveyed to LVL&W Co. in consideration of the aggregate of the outstanding ?unpaid water bills due LVL&W Go., plus the aggregate of the ac­counts receivable due the Land and Development Company. 27 1950