Information
Digital ID
upr000267-292
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Under ( l ) , | doubt It there le much that w* could do toward blocking the ultim ate a cqu isition o f our water properties i f they can handle the deal, X therefore think that ear best in terest weald he to negotiate with them. tinder (2) , i t weald he ay thought that we should retain eith er the B ig Spring o r ana of the better w ells la that immediate v ic in ity , together with the fe e o f a strip extending down to the shop area on which we oould pat a water lin e to provide water fo r our own requirements. Under ( 3) , as X see I t nothing bat disadvantage to ae could resu lt from allow ing the D is trict people to have access to oar accounts. X think that any values which are set on these properties should be based on a ph ysical in** veniory and priced in accordance with today's p rice s. Otherwise we weald be subjected to actual lo sses in value which oould hardly bo avoided. In. Reinhardt,