UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
> Los Angeles - October 25, 1954 20-334 Mr. R. L. Adamson: Referring to your letter of October 15» 1954> file 1-7334, concerning procedure to be followed during construction of Las Vegas Valley Water District’s 30 inch water pipe line and 51 inch R.C. Pipe casing to be jacked under our tracks at Las Vegas, Nevada. Have reviewed your drawing F-51& showing proposed construction, which is approved, with the exception that jacking pit should be moved approximately 22 feet west to clear Track No. 227. Advised you in my letter of September 8th that Track No. 227 could be taken out of service with the thought in mind that it would be for only a day or two; however in your letter you state that track would be out of service for at least two weeks, and probably longer, and as this track is used daily in yard operation, do not feel that track should be taken out of service for that length of time.
