Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
I I the same p erio d , the Water Company received 907,437,300 g a llo n s, costin g | .0403 per M g a llo n s. Of th is c o s t, f .01953 was paid to the R ailroad Company, th is payment to ta lin g #17,723,92 includes the items o f 6 per cent in te r e s t and 4 per cent d ep recia tion on the R a ilro a d Company's investment, or t o t a l fix e d charges o f 10 per cent plus insurance, taxes, maintenance and operation . She Water Company rec eived in revenue #51,664.02, equal to # .0569 per M g a llo n s. She to ta l expenses incurred hy the Water Company, in clu din g in te r e s t and d ep reciation (paid to the R ailroa d ) Which i s trea ted as a ren t item , were #36,585.85, equal to # .0403 per M g a llo n s, lea vin g a net revenue accru gin t to the Water Company o f #15,078.17, equal to # .0166 per H g a llo n s . In substance, the R ailroad Company received from the Water Company 6 per cent in te r e s t 4 per cent d ep recia tio n , insurance, taxes and maintenance, le a v in g the Water Company the net revenue above mentioned, which was equiv-a le n t to 16.8 per cent on the book value o f the Water Company's in vestment, v i z : #89,851.29. I t occurs to me th a t, taking in to account the low cost o f water to the R ailroad Company, the s o c ia l theory which seems to e x is t in Las Vegas, perhaps accentuated by the c i t y 's p roxim ity to the new dam, etc. , the Water Company should make the investment recommended as insurance again st a water shortage. I t is not probable th at much could be accomplished in the way o f reducing consumption when the t o t a l cost per M gallon s i s as low as that e x is tin g in Las Vegas. For example, i f the $ater Company employed men to p o lic e waste on the part of commercial users, such p o lic in g would cost not le s s than #1,500 per year, without any increase in revenue to substantiate - 2 -