Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000204 291

Image

File
Download upr000204-291.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000204-291
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. 'Witt. Reinhardt 2* December 4, 1951 Such a transfer would also have the advantage of be­ing very acceptable to the present Commission because the present Commission looks with suspicion upon the fact that the Railroad Company is the producer of water at Las Vegas. Although we know that the Water Company has not been unfair­ly treated in charges made by the Railroad Company for wa­ter produced, it is difficult to make the present Chairman of the Commission accept this fact. If the transfer took place, all of the capital expenditures and all revenues and expenses would be reported to the Commission in one annual report and the Commission would not be able to assert that some secret profit was being hidden in the transactions be­tween the Railroad and the Water Company. There is another important reason why the Railroad Com­pany should disassociate itself entirely from water produc­tion at Las Vegas. We all know that the water shortage is becoming more and more acute as the result of declining wa­ter tables and increased population. It is problematical whether the District or the City will be able to finance the bringing of Lake Mead water to Las Vegas. If the present efforts of the District fail, it is entirely possible that the people of that area will look to the Railroad Company to furnish the capital to bring in a supplementary supply of water. There are many defenses which the Railroad Com­pany eould assert if an attempt were made to compel it to furnish a supplementary water supply from such source, but I think it is highly desirable that the Railroad put itself in such position that no one could possibly assert that it had an obligation to supplement the present water supply. If it were not the producer of the domestic water supply at Las Vegas, no one would -have any justification for asking the Railroad to furnish an additional supply. If the water distribution company were also the producer of water, it would be unable to finance the bringing in of an alterna­tive supply from Lake Mead unless the Railroad Company were willing to loan the money, which the Railroad Company would undoubtedly refuse to do. If anyone were to attempt to compel the Railroad Com­pany to furnish an alternate supply of water, they would un­doubtedly proceed by asking the Commission or courts to find