Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Omaha, U ebr., October 23, 1922 Mr. 1. E. Calvin: Referring to your ILetter of October 18th and previous correspondence with reference to the revision of the by-laws o f the Las Vegas Land and Water Company; I have drafted a complete revision of these by-laws, conforming to the Union P a c ific Railroad Company by-laws as closely as in my judgment I appropriately could, considering the essential differences in the characters and natures o f the two companies. The form of the by-laws varies considerably from the o rigin a l by-laws of the Land and Water Company, but there are not many changes in the substance. Four copies of the revised draft are attached. I desire to c a ll your especial attention to the follow ing points: 1. Section 4 of A rtic le I o f the revised by-laws provides fo r ten days’ notice to the stockholders o f a l l meetings. The present by-laws c a ll fo r ten days* notice o f annual meetings and fiv e days’ notice of special meetings. In the Union P a c ific bylaws the length o f notice is the same, namely, twenty-one days* I t seemed to me that the notice fo r special meetings should, i f anything, be longer than the notice fo r annual meetings as the time fo r annual meetings is set forth in the by-laws and this o f i t s e l f is notice. Ten days do not seem to be too long a time fo r the giving o f notice fo r either annual or special meetings. 2. Section 2 of A rtic le I I o f the revised by-laws provides that notice of special meetings of the directors sh all be given at le a st fiv e days p rio r thereto. This i s the same length o f time prescribed by the o rig in a l by-laws, but I question whether, as a matter o f fact, i t is su ffic ie n t time to enable a l l the directors to assemble. The question should be considered. 3. Section 4 of A rtic le I I o f the revised by-laws provides that the Chairman of the Executive Committee sh a ll preside at a l l meetings of the Board of Directors at which he sh all be present. The o rig in a l by-laws provide that the President should preside. The revised d raft conforms to the Union P a c ific by-law regulation.. A corresponding change was necessary in Section 2 o f A rtic le I I to provide that special meetings of the Board o f Directors sh all be held whenever called upon order o f the Chairman o f the Executive Committee instead o f the President as was provided in the o rigin al by-laws. 4. I desire to c a ll your especial attention to A rtic le I I I o f the revised by-laws which deals with the Executive Committee. Kiis a r tic le of the revised draft d iffe r s p a rticu larly on two points from the o rigin a l d raft. In the o rigin al d raft an Executive