Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
?% Las Vegas - May 1^, 195^ W 26 C O P Y E. Bennett - Los Angfeles cc: Mr. Wm. Reinhardt Mr. R. M. Sutton Mr. C. M. Bates Mr. L. V. Peart Please refer to your letter dated May 12, 195^> File 80-11, relative to documents referred to in Item 2 of Exhibit "Gu attached to Agreement 113^2 dated June 1, 1953* All documents referred to in Item 2 of Exhibit "G" are now available in my office. In my correspondence with Mr. peart relative to destruction of records, Mr. Peart brought out the fact that Exhibit 11GH indicates that certain records will be turned over to the District but does not state the periods which these records will cover. In my reply to Mr. Peart I indicated that the records to be turned over to the District should be only the current records for the year in which the sale takes pll.ce, since the examination of the accounts will have taken place prior to or on the Sale Date and presumably the status of all accounts on that date will have been found to be acceptable to the Water District. It is my thought, however, that this question as to the period for which isecords will be turned over to the District should be discussed with the District authorities and an agreement reached thereon. With regard to the question of photostating the records now in this office, which will be tunned over to the District, I am of the opinio# that none of these records will need to be photostated before being turned over. At one time I had thought that possibly the "Ledger showing status and record of refunds made Subdividers under Rule 9 Contracts" covered by Item (b), paragraph 2, of Exhibit "G" should be photostated since the ledger in this office ahows numerous adjustments which have been made from time to time during the years, but in view of the fact that a record of refund payments, in somewhat different form, is available in the Auditor's office, and is in agreement with the ledger in this office as to the total amounts of refunds paid, and since there will be an agreement between the Water District and the Water Company in the matter of refunds paid under each Rule 9 Agreement, I have decided there will be no object in photostating this ledger. LRM: ejp L. R. Maag