Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Mr. E, E. Bennett - Loe Angeles 00s Mr. Calvin Cory - Las Vegas Mr. Wei, Reinhardt « Los Angeles Mr. 3. L. Adamson « Los Angeles Please r e fe r to your le t t e r dated May 1, 1953, F ile 36- 1 5 , r e la tiv e to proposed agreement 8ttftL.tL 2669 between the Las Vegas Land and wate r Company and Valley Enterprises, In c ,, which was submitted to you by Mr, Calvin Cory with Ms le t t e r o f A pril 25, 1953# In which I note you suggest that I furnish Mr, Cory with description o f easement area, which would not be encumbered by buildings recently constructed by Mr, MaePeek o f Valley © iterprlses, In c,, over pipe lin e easement located on northerly lo f t , o f Lot M, Park Place Addition, Las Vegas, Nevada, In order to furnish the easement description mentioned, I t w ill be necessary to make a f ie ld survey to locate the existing buildings, pipe lin e s , e tc ., as they exist today, as w ell as, property corners and existing easement. Due to the fa c t that the northerly lin e o f Lot N Is now the subject o f dispute between Valley Enterprises, In c., as represented by Mr. MacPeok, and the property owner adjoining. I t is my opinion that such a survey, i f undertaken, should be made by & lo ca l registered surveyor. I suggest that you discuss this with Mr. Reinhardt and I f he approves the expenditure, I w ill contact a loca l surveyor and secure an estimate o f cost. I do not believe that such a survey should be made by the Railroad Company * s survey party. Las Vegas - May k t 1953 \ U 2 y - U ~ k