Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000189 355

Image

File
Download upr000189-355.tif (image/tiff; 27.03 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000189-355
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. E, E. Bennett - Loe Angeles 00s Mr. Calvin Cory - Las Vegas Mr. Wei, Reinhardt « Los Angeles Mr. 3. L. Adamson « Los Angeles Please r e fe r to your le t t e r dated May 1, 1953, F ile 36- 1 5 , r e la tiv e to proposed agreement 8ttftL.tL 2669 between the Las Vegas Land and wate r Company and Valley Enterprises, In c ,, which was submitted to you by Mr, Calvin Cory with Ms le t t e r o f A pril 25, 1953# In which I note you suggest that I furnish Mr, Cory with description o f easement area, which would not be encumbered by buildings recently constructed by Mr, MaePeek o f Valley © iterprlses, In c,, over pipe lin e easement located on northerly lo f t , o f Lot M, Park Place Addition, Las Vegas, Nevada, In order to furnish the easement description men­tioned, I t w ill be necessary to make a f ie ld survey to locate the existing buildings, pipe lin e s , e tc ., as they exist today, as w ell as, property corners and existing easement. Due to the fa c t that the northerly lin e o f Lot N Is now the subject o f dispute between Valley Enterprises, In c., as represented by Mr. MacPeok, and the property owner adjoining. I t is my opinion that such a survey, i f undertaken, should be made by & lo ca l registered surveyor. I suggest that you discuss this with Mr. Reinhardt and I f he approves the expenditure, I w ill contact a loca l surveyor and secure an estimate o f cost. I do not believe that such a survey should be made by the Railroad Company * s survey party. Las Vegas - May k t 1953 \ U 2 y - U ~ k