upr000188 136

e x e c u t iv e a s s is t a n t JAN 28 1942 O F F IC E OF LOS;AN(ailLfiS, CALIF. Lae Vegas - January 2?, 1942 Kr. C. 1. Sexton, Chairman Public service Commission, Carson City, Nevada. ©ear S ir As per oar phone conversation. We have re­drafted the rale covering "Defense Housing Projects* and have re-numbered same as Bale 9-e, so as not to oesfltot with the proposed Sale 9-b that was submitted in Case No. 1126, as it is ©ur thought that a defense housing project should be distinguished from extensions to ordinary real estate subdivisions. in the proposal that Sr. Bracken handed you, we have substituted *a distance from the Company1s nearest existing water main, equal to not more than 20 feet multiplied by the number of houses* constructed within the project. This wording will cover all contemplated projects of this character that we Anew of. As we do not know where this rule, if approved, will come in on the PSCN sheets, we have left out the reference thereto and also Rules 1© and 11, which were at the end of your suggested Isle 9-b. Would appreciate quick action on this proposal as pending projects are awaiting approval of contracts. In lieu of the word "adjacent*, as submitted Very truly yours LEO A NCNAhSE ee-Mr. Bennett Mr. B r a c k M Mr. Strom Mr. Guild