Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000184 128

Image

File
Download upr000184-128.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000184-128
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Lob Angeles, llov ember A, 1952 1-733^ Mr, A. £« Stoddard act MMrr., Vw,, H0,# PHeurlksiinaser Mr. V, H. Johnson bcc Mr. V. VJ. Smith Recommendation for authority to cancel following A*P* £» authorlzatlonal Investment A.F.S. XI, (wo-6?6) approved June 11, 1952, authorising construction of water line® to serve second unit of Columbia Heights Addition at estimated cost of $6,320 A.F.I2. 20 (WO 686) approved November 29* 1951, authorizing construction of water lHieniegsh tst oA dsderivtei ont haitr d eusntiitm aotfe d Coclousmtb ioaf. 1-6,ObO X. H. VI tt, doing business as Model Home# of Las Vegas developed Unit No. 1 of Columbia Heights Addition with single family residence and proposed to develop Unit# Ho. 2 and 3 with multiple family buildings but was unable to secure approval of the City Planning Commission, Subsequent, Mr. VItt Bold his Interest In the property and moved hi# operation to Idaho* As water lines to serve Units Ho. 2 and 3 cannot be constructed within present authorisations, due to Increased labor and material coats, I recommend the authorizations be cancelled. Vis, Reinhardt