Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Las Vegas - Dee ember 12, 19U$ V 23-1-51 Mr* 33, £* Bennetts Will appreciate year opinion of the proper method of refunding under C/A — X0#f0g the o on tract be- tween the LYL&V Co,, and Shipley and ing v&ter mains Installed la Creatwoo Ads sHoocnieast eTsr,a ctc,overWe have been refunding under the first portion of the contract covering Hooks 1, 2, and the Snaolret hw ahsa lfdu olfy rHeoccekiv e%d , cOooevte rSitnagt etmheisn tp aonrtdi oBinl lo fo ft he cons traction referred to as Unit # 1 where nine house s have been completed in Hook 1 and eighteen houses in Hook 2# cons true tiAardtdlitcil en aIlI Iw partoevri dmea#i nst hatto esuerbdvel vtihdee rr seamya inSitnag teHmoeonkts enadn d Bailflt erof thSiasl eh assu bmbietetne dd,o nwee a wnidl lt hree Cfousntd 50% of the revenues received fro® the South half of Hook 3* and Hooks b,5,6,7, and 8, He has now completed btuhte whaast enro mta iynest bseutbwmeietnt eHd oCookst 6 Satnatde 7m#e nta nadn dH o3c1k11 7 oaf nSda 8le, beoaus^ the line in Houston Drive has not be installed. 7 and 8, fTrhoimr wthyi hcohu wsees ahraev er ecbeeievni cnogn rsetvreuncuteesd ainnd Htohoeka question is whether we can refund 50% of these revenue s from Hocks 7 and # before the final oompletlonoCftthe contract. vlthhild tFhreosem are lfeugndasl usnttainld posiuncth, t1i maes assu mhee w eco mcpolueltde s the pipe line in Houston Drive and submits Cost Statem ent and Bill of Sale to ooverj however the intent of the conrtervaecntu weass frtoo ma falflo rwda tSehri plseeyrv aicne so ppionr ttuhnei ttyr actot irenc aeniv ee ffort to reimburse him as far as possible for the *approaoh pipe which he Installed to the tract, tinder your interpretation of this contract ctoruacltd, weo rr meufsutn dw e$0 %b e ofc oanlfli nreedv etnou eH#o crkec 1ei, v2ed, farnodm t htehe naotr tthhi hs altfim oef i s3 7 to Hayv ooibdj eacnt airgnu bmreinntg isnugc ht ahse wseub hjaecdt w uipt h the Huntridge pip^le on the difference between a lege! obligation and a moral obligation to refund pipe line costs. A. M. Folger