Information
Digital ID
upr000175-163
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Mr. Reinhardt; % May 9# 19*9 - > ea tiie basis of Z$% of the revenue® for 5 year®. We doubled the rate and the ter® of refund, iji order to be sure that any bona fide developer would get back his Investment In the water mains. One of these refund oontracts has already paid out £ but the subdivider did not have to wait the full ten years; he received M s investment back In five years six months# Fro® a public relations standpoint f I feel that it would create a very unfavorable reaction if we voluntarily acceded to SomelliniU request, after denying suoh favorable consideration to previous subdividers. 1 sincerely believe we should stand by the policy expressed in your letters of March 30th and April 12th to oppose any modification of the present Rule; then If we are ordered to do so by the Public Service Commission, we can submit the proposed Rule as a compromise. A, M. Folger >