Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000175 163

Image

File
Download upr000175-163.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000175-163
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Reinhardt; % May 9# 19*9 - > ea tiie basis of Z$% of the revenue® for 5 year®. We doubled the rate and the ter® of refund, iji order to be sure that any bona fide developer would get back his Investment In the water mains. One of these refund oontracts has already paid out £ but the subdivider did not have to wait the full ten years; he received M s investment back In five years six months# Fro® a public relations standpoint f I feel that it would create a very unfavorable reaction if we voluntarily acceded to SomelliniU request, after denying suoh favorable consideration to previous subdividers. 1 sincerely believe we should stand by the policy expressed in your letters of March 30th and April 12th to oppose any modification of the present Rule; then If we are ordered to do so by the Public Service Commission, we can submit the proposed Rule as a compromise. A, M. Folger >